↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : KLE113+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 07:44:20 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.14s 0.39s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.14s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   13
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   36 (  36 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   36 (  35 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   12 (  12   ~;   0   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   25 (   1 sgn  12   !;   1   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(additive_commutativity,axiom,
    ! [A,B] : addition(A,B) = addition(B,A),
    file('theBenchmark.p',additive_commutativity) ).

fof(additive_identity,axiom,
    ! [A] : addition(A,zero) = A,
    file('theBenchmark.p',additive_identity) ).

fof(multiplicative_right_identity,axiom,
    ! [A] : multiplication(A,one) = A,
    file('theBenchmark.p',multiplicative_right_identity) ).

fof(right_annihilation,axiom,
    ! [A] : multiplication(A,zero) = zero,
    file('theBenchmark.p',right_annihilation) ).

fof(domain1,axiom,
    ! [X0] : multiplication(antidomain(X0),X0) = zero,
    file('theBenchmark.p',domain1) ).

fof(domain3,axiom,
    ! [X0] : addition(antidomain(antidomain(X0)),antidomain(X0)) = one,
    file('theBenchmark.p',domain3) ).

fof(domain4,axiom,
    ! [X0] : domain(X0) = antidomain(antidomain(X0)),
    file('theBenchmark.p',domain4) ).

fof(forward_diamond,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : forward_diamond(X0,X1) = domain(multiplication(X0,domain(X1))),
    file('theBenchmark.p',forward_diamond) ).

fof(goals,conjecture,
    ! [X0] : forward_diamond(X0,zero) = zero,
    file('theBenchmark.p',goals) ).

fof(goals_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0] : forward_diamond(X0,zero) = zero,
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[goals]) ).

fof(nnf_27,plain,
    ? [X0] : forward_diamond(X0,zero) != zero,
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[goals_neg]) ).

fof(sk_goals_neg,plain,
    forward_diamond(sK0,zero) != zero,
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0]),skolemize(X0,sK0)],[nnf_27]) ).

cnf(c_30,negated_conjecture,
    forward_diamond(sK0,zero) != zero,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_goals_neg]) ).

cnf(c_34,plain,
    forward_diamond(A,B) = domain(multiplication(A,domain(B))),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[forward_diamond]) ).

cnf(c_42,plain,
    domain(A) = antidomain(antidomain(A)),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[domain4]) ).

cnf(c_43,plain,
    addition(antidomain(antidomain(A)),antidomain(A)) = one,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[domain3]) ).

cnf(c_46,plain,
    multiplication(antidomain(A),A) = zero,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[domain1]) ).

cnf(c_48,plain,
    multiplication(A,zero) = zero,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[right_annihilation]) ).

cnf(c_54,plain,
    multiplication(A,one) = A,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[multiplicative_right_identity]) ).

cnf(c_57,plain,
    addition(A,zero) = A,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[additive_identity]) ).

cnf(c_59,plain,
    addition(A,B) = addition(B,A),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[additive_commutativity]) ).

cnf(c_149,negated_conjecture,
    domain(multiplication(sK0,domain(zero))) != zero,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_34,c_30]) ).

cnf(c_150,negated_conjecture,
    domain(multiplication(sK0,antidomain(antidomain(zero)))) != zero,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_42,c_149]) ).

cnf(c_62,negated_conjecture,
    antidomain(antidomain(multiplication(sK0,antidomain(antidomain(zero))))) != zero,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_42,c_150]) ).

cnf(c_67,plain,
    addition(antidomain(A),antidomain(antidomain(A))) = one,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_59,c_43]) ).

cnf(c_101,plain,
    antidomain(one) = zero,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_54,c_46]) ).

cnf(c_123,plain,
    addition(zero,A) = A,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_59,c_57]) ).

cnf(c_151,plain,
    addition(zero,antidomain(antidomain(one))) = one,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_101,c_67]) ).

cnf(c_152,plain,
    addition(zero,antidomain(zero)) = one,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_101,c_151]) ).

cnf(c_142,plain,
    antidomain(zero) = one,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_123,c_152]) ).

cnf(c_153,negated_conjecture,
    antidomain(antidomain(multiplication(sK0,antidomain(one)))) != zero,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_142,c_62]) ).

cnf(c_154,negated_conjecture,
    antidomain(antidomain(multiplication(sK0,zero))) != zero,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_101,c_153]) ).

cnf(c_155,negated_conjecture,
    antidomain(antidomain(zero)) != zero,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_48,c_154]) ).

cnf(c_156,negated_conjecture,
    antidomain(one) != zero,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_142,c_155]) ).

cnf(c_157,negated_conjecture,
    zero != zero,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_101,c_156]) ).

cnf(c_148,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_157]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : KLE113+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.36  % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.36  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 19:23:43 UTC 2026
% 0.14/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.14/0.36  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.14/0.36  % Process 2308153 was started by sandbox2 on n009,
% 0.14/0.36  % Fri Sep 25 19:23:43 2026
% 0.14/0.36  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.14/0.37  
% 0.14/0.37  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.14/0.39  
% 0.14/0.39  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.14/0.39  
% 0.14/0.39  % Proof 1 at 0.01 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.14/0.39  % Length of proof is 24.
% 0.14/0.39  % Level of proof is 4.
% 0.14/0.39  % Maximum clause weight is 49.000.
% 0.14/0.39  % Given clauses 31.
% 0.14/0.39  
% 0.14/0.39  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------