↑ Up

Twee---2.7.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Twee---2.7
% Problem  : KLE113+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep 29 11:39:50 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.12s 0.45s
% Output   : Proof 0.12s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : KLE113+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.08/0.36  % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/0.36  % DateTime : Sun Sep 27 13:09:09 UTC 2026
% 0.12/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.36  Running run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.45  Command-line arguments: --flatten --complete-subsets
% 0.12/0.45  
% 0.12/0.45  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.12/0.45  
% 0.12/0.45  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.12/0.45  Axiom 1 (domain4): domain(X) = antidomain(antidomain(X)).
% 0.12/0.45  Axiom 2 (additive_commutativity): addition(X, Y) = addition(Y, X).
% 0.12/0.45  Axiom 3 (additive_identity): addition(X, zero) = X.
% 0.12/0.45  Axiom 4 (domain3): addition(antidomain(antidomain(X)), antidomain(X)) = one.
% 0.12/0.45  Axiom 5 (multiplicative_right_identity): multiplication(X, one) = X.
% 0.12/0.45  Axiom 6 (right_annihilation): multiplication(X, zero) = zero.
% 0.12/0.45  Axiom 7 (domain1): multiplication(antidomain(X), X) = zero.
% 0.12/0.45  Axiom 8 (forward_diamond): forward_diamond(X, Y) = domain(multiplication(X, domain(Y))).
% 0.12/0.45  
% 0.12/0.45  Lemma 9: antidomain(one) = zero.
% 0.12/0.45  Proof:
% 0.12/0.45    antidomain(one)
% 0.12/0.45  = { by axiom 5 (multiplicative_right_identity) R->L }
% 0.12/0.45    multiplication(antidomain(one), one)
% 0.12/0.45  = { by axiom 7 (domain1) }
% 0.12/0.45    zero
% 0.12/0.45  
% 0.12/0.45  Lemma 10: antidomain(zero) = one.
% 0.12/0.45  Proof:
% 0.12/0.45    antidomain(zero)
% 0.12/0.45  = { by lemma 9 R->L }
% 0.12/0.45    antidomain(antidomain(one))
% 0.12/0.45  = { by axiom 3 (additive_identity) R->L }
% 0.12/0.45    addition(antidomain(antidomain(one)), zero)
% 0.12/0.45  = { by axiom 2 (additive_commutativity) }
% 0.12/0.45    addition(zero, antidomain(antidomain(one)))
% 0.12/0.45  = { by lemma 9 R->L }
% 0.12/0.45    addition(antidomain(one), antidomain(antidomain(one)))
% 0.12/0.45  = { by axiom 2 (additive_commutativity) R->L }
% 0.12/0.45    addition(antidomain(antidomain(one)), antidomain(one))
% 0.12/0.45  = { by axiom 4 (domain3) }
% 0.12/0.45    one
% 0.12/0.45  
% 0.12/0.45  Goal 1 (goals): forward_diamond(x0, zero) = zero.
% 0.12/0.45  Proof:
% 0.12/0.45    forward_diamond(x0, zero)
% 0.12/0.45  = { by axiom 8 (forward_diamond) }
% 0.12/0.45    domain(multiplication(x0, domain(zero)))
% 0.12/0.45  = { by axiom 1 (domain4) }
% 0.12/0.45    antidomain(antidomain(multiplication(x0, domain(zero))))
% 0.12/0.45  = { by axiom 1 (domain4) }
% 0.12/0.45    antidomain(antidomain(multiplication(x0, antidomain(antidomain(zero)))))
% 0.12/0.45  = { by lemma 10 }
% 0.12/0.45    antidomain(antidomain(multiplication(x0, antidomain(one))))
% 0.12/0.45  = { by lemma 9 }
% 0.12/0.45    antidomain(antidomain(multiplication(x0, zero)))
% 0.12/0.45  = { by axiom 6 (right_annihilation) }
% 0.12/0.45    antidomain(antidomain(zero))
% 0.12/0.45  = { by lemma 10 }
% 0.12/0.45    antidomain(one)
% 0.12/0.45  = { by lemma 9 }
% 0.12/0.45    zero
% 0.12/0.45  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.12/0.45  
% 0.12/0.45  RESULT: Theorem (the conjecture is true).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------