↑ Up

Enigma---0.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : KLE114+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 01:50:23 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 8.51s 2.61s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 8.51s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   20 (  20 unt;   0 nHn;   6 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   20 (  19 equ;   3 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :   12 (   3 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   16 (   2 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_24,plain,
    multiplication(X1,one) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-gb5w9atl/input.p',i_0_24) ).

cnf(i_0_12,plain,
    multiplication(antidomain(X1),X1) = zero,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-gb5w9atl/input.p',i_0_12) ).

cnf(i_0_14,plain,
    addition(antidomain(antidomain(X1)),antidomain(X1)) = one,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-gb5w9atl/input.p',i_0_14) ).

cnf(i_0_2,plain,
    addition(X1,X2) = addition(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-gb5w9atl/input.p',i_0_2) ).

cnf(i_0_4,plain,
    addition(X1,zero) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-gb5w9atl/input.p',i_0_4) ).

cnf(i_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    antidomain(antidomain(antidomain(antidomain(antidomain(multiplication(esk1_0,antidomain(antidomain(antidomain(antidomain(antidomain(one))))))))))) != one,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-gb5w9atl/input.p',i_0_19) ).

cnf(i_0_27,plain,
    multiplication(X1,zero) = zero,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-gb5w9atl/input.p',i_0_27) ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    multiplication(X1,one) = X1,
    i_0_24 ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    multiplication(antidomain(X1),X1) = zero,
    i_0_12 ).

cnf(c_0_37,plain,
    addition(antidomain(antidomain(X1)),antidomain(X1)) = one,
    i_0_14 ).

cnf(c_0_38,plain,
    addition(X1,X2) = addition(X2,X1),
    i_0_2 ).

cnf(c_0_39,plain,
    addition(X1,zero) = X1,
    i_0_4 ).

cnf(c_0_40,negated_conjecture,
    antidomain(antidomain(antidomain(antidomain(antidomain(multiplication(esk1_0,antidomain(antidomain(antidomain(antidomain(antidomain(one))))))))))) != one,
    i_0_19 ).

cnf(c_0_41,plain,
    antidomain(one) = zero,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_36]) ).

cnf(c_0_42,plain,
    addition(antidomain(X1),antidomain(antidomain(X1))) = one,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_38]) ).

cnf(c_0_43,plain,
    addition(zero,X1) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_39]) ).

cnf(c_0_44,negated_conjecture,
    antidomain(antidomain(antidomain(antidomain(antidomain(multiplication(esk1_0,antidomain(antidomain(antidomain(antidomain(zero)))))))))) != one,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_41]) ).

cnf(c_0_45,plain,
    antidomain(zero) = one,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_42,c_0_41]),c_0_43]) ).

cnf(c_0_46,plain,
    multiplication(X1,zero) = zero,
    i_0_27 ).

cnf(c_0_47,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_44,c_0_45]),c_0_41]),c_0_45]),c_0_41]),c_0_46]),c_0_45]),c_0_41]),c_0_45]),c_0_41]),c_0_45])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.13  % Problem  : KLE114+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Thu Jun 16 12:23:52 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.46  # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.20/0.47  # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.47  # Filter: axfilter_auto   0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   0.p
% 0.20/0.47  # Filter: axfilter_auto   1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   1.p
% 0.20/0.47  # Filter: axfilter_auto   2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   2.p
% 8.51/2.61  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y:
% 8.51/2.61  # Version: 2.1pre011
% 8.51/2.61  # Preprocessing time       : 0.010 s
% 8.51/2.61  
% 8.51/2.61  # Proof found!
% 8.51/2.61  # SZS status Theorem
% 8.51/2.61  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 8.51/2.61  # Proof object total steps             : 20
% 8.51/2.61  # Proof object clause steps            : 13
% 8.51/2.61  # Proof object formula steps           : 7
% 8.51/2.61  # Proof object conjectures             : 4
% 8.51/2.61  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 3
% 8.51/2.61  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 1
% 8.51/2.61  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 7
% 8.51/2.61  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 7
% 8.51/2.61  # Proof object generating inferences   : 3
% 8.51/2.61  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 14
% 8.51/2.61  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 8.51/2.61  # Parsed axioms                        : 20
% 8.51/2.61  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 8.51/2.61  # Initial clauses                      : 20
% 8.51/2.61  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 8.51/2.61  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 20
% 8.51/2.61  # Processed clauses                    : 25
% 8.51/2.61  # ...of these trivial                  : 1
% 8.51/2.61  # ...subsumed                          : 0
% 8.51/2.61  # ...remaining for further processing  : 24
% 8.51/2.61  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 8.51/2.61  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 8.51/2.61  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 8.51/2.61  # Backward-rewritten                   : 2
% 8.51/2.61  # Generated clauses                    : 97
% 8.51/2.61  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 60
% 8.51/2.61  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 8.51/2.61  # Paramodulations                      : 97
% 8.51/2.61  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 8.51/2.61  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 8.51/2.61  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 8.51/2.61  # Propositional unsat check successes  : 0
% 8.51/2.61  # Current number of processed clauses  : 22
% 8.51/2.61  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 19
% 8.51/2.61  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 8.51/2.61  #    Negative unit clauses             : 0
% 8.51/2.61  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 2
% 8.51/2.61  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 55
% 8.51/2.61  # ...number of literals in the above   : 55
% 8.51/2.61  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 8.51/2.61  # Current number of archived clauses   : 2
% 8.51/2.61  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 8.51/2.61  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 8.51/2.61  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 8.51/2.61  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 8.51/2.61  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 8.51/2.61  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 6
% 8.51/2.61  # BW rewrite match successes           : 2
% 8.51/2.61  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 8.51/2.61  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 8.51/2.61  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 1180
% 8.51/2.61  
% 8.51/2.61  # -------------------------------------------------
% 8.51/2.61  # User time                : 0.009 s
% 8.51/2.61  # System time              : 0.002 s
% 8.51/2.61  # Total time               : 0.012 s
% 8.51/2.61  # ...preprocessing         : 0.010 s
% 8.51/2.61  # ...main loop             : 0.001 s
% 8.51/2.61  # Maximum resident set size: 7132 pages
% 8.51/2.61  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------