↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : KLE119+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 07:44:20 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.13s 0.38s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.13s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   18
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   43 (  43 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   43 (  42 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   17 (  17   ~;   0   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    8 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   11 (  11 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   30 (   1 sgn  15   !;   2   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(additive_commutativity,axiom,
    ! [A,B] : addition(A,B) = addition(B,A),
    file('theBenchmark.p',additive_commutativity) ).

fof(additive_identity,axiom,
    ! [A] : addition(A,zero) = A,
    file('theBenchmark.p',additive_identity) ).

fof(multiplicative_left_identity,axiom,
    ! [A] : multiplication(one,A) = A,
    file('theBenchmark.p',multiplicative_left_identity) ).

fof(right_annihilation,axiom,
    ! [A] : multiplication(A,zero) = zero,
    file('theBenchmark.p',right_annihilation) ).

fof(domain4,axiom,
    ! [X0] : domain(X0) = antidomain(antidomain(X0)),
    file('theBenchmark.p',domain4) ).

fof(codomain1,axiom,
    ! [X0] : multiplication(X0,coantidomain(X0)) = zero,
    file('theBenchmark.p',codomain1) ).

fof(codomain3,axiom,
    ! [X0] : addition(coantidomain(coantidomain(X0)),coantidomain(X0)) = one,
    file('theBenchmark.p',codomain3) ).

fof(codomain4,axiom,
    ! [X0] : codomain(X0) = coantidomain(coantidomain(X0)),
    file('theBenchmark.p',codomain4) ).

fof(backward_diamond,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : backward_diamond(X0,X1) = codomain(multiplication(codomain(X1),X0)),
    file('theBenchmark.p',backward_diamond) ).

fof(goals,conjecture,
    ! [X0,X1] : addition(backward_diamond(zero,domain(X0)),domain(X1)) = domain(X1),
    file('theBenchmark.p',goals) ).

fof(goals_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0,X1] : addition(backward_diamond(zero,domain(X0)),domain(X1)) = domain(X1),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[goals]) ).

fof(nnf_27,plain,
    ? [X0,X1] : domain(X1) != addition(backward_diamond(zero,domain(X0)),domain(X1)),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[goals_neg]) ).

fof(sk_goals_neg,plain,
    domain(sK0) != addition(backward_diamond(zero,domain(sK1)),domain(sK0)),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1]),skolemize(X0,sK1),skolemize(X1,sK0)],[nnf_27]) ).

cnf(c_30,negated_conjecture,
    domain(sK0) != addition(backward_diamond(zero,domain(sK1)),domain(sK0)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_goals_neg]) ).

cnf(c_31,negated_conjecture,
    addition(backward_diamond(zero,domain(sK1)),domain(sK0)) != domain(sK0),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_30]) ).

cnf(c_34,plain,
    backward_diamond(A,B) = codomain(multiplication(codomain(B),A)),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[backward_diamond]) ).

cnf(c_38,plain,
    codomain(A) = coantidomain(coantidomain(A)),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[codomain4]) ).

cnf(c_39,plain,
    addition(coantidomain(coantidomain(A)),coantidomain(A)) = one,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[codomain3]) ).

cnf(c_42,plain,
    multiplication(A,coantidomain(A)) = zero,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[codomain1]) ).

cnf(c_43,plain,
    domain(A) = antidomain(antidomain(A)),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[domain4]) ).

cnf(c_49,plain,
    multiplication(A,zero) = zero,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[right_annihilation]) ).

cnf(c_54,plain,
    multiplication(one,A) = A,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[multiplicative_left_identity]) ).

cnf(c_58,plain,
    addition(A,zero) = A,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[additive_identity]) ).

cnf(c_60,plain,
    addition(A,B) = addition(B,A),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[additive_commutativity]) ).

cnf(c_144,negated_conjecture,
    addition(backward_diamond(zero,antidomain(antidomain(sK1))),domain(sK0)) != domain(sK0),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_43,c_31]) ).

cnf(c_145,negated_conjecture,
    addition(codomain(multiplication(codomain(antidomain(antidomain(sK1))),zero)),domain(sK0)) != domain(sK0),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_34,c_144]) ).

cnf(c_146,negated_conjecture,
    addition(codomain(multiplication(coantidomain(coantidomain(antidomain(antidomain(sK1)))),zero)),domain(sK0)) != domain(sK0),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_38,c_145]) ).

cnf(c_147,negated_conjecture,
    addition(codomain(zero),domain(sK0)) != domain(sK0),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_49,c_146]) ).

cnf(c_148,negated_conjecture,
    addition(coantidomain(coantidomain(zero)),domain(sK0)) != domain(sK0),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_38,c_147]) ).

cnf(c_149,negated_conjecture,
    addition(coantidomain(coantidomain(zero)),antidomain(antidomain(sK0))) != domain(sK0),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_43,c_148]) ).

cnf(c_150,negated_conjecture,
    addition(antidomain(antidomain(sK0)),coantidomain(coantidomain(zero))) != domain(sK0),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_60,c_149]) ).

cnf(c_62,negated_conjecture,
    addition(antidomain(antidomain(sK0)),coantidomain(coantidomain(zero))) != antidomain(antidomain(sK0)),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_43,c_150]) ).

cnf(c_69,plain,
    addition(coantidomain(A),coantidomain(coantidomain(A))) = one,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_60,c_39]) ).

cnf(c_95,plain,
    coantidomain(one) = zero,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_54,c_42]) ).

cnf(c_124,plain,
    addition(zero,A) = A,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_60,c_58]) ).

cnf(c_151,plain,
    addition(zero,coantidomain(coantidomain(one))) = one,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_95,c_69]) ).

cnf(c_152,plain,
    addition(zero,coantidomain(zero)) = one,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_95,c_151]) ).

cnf(c_136,plain,
    coantidomain(zero) = one,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_124,c_152]) ).

cnf(c_153,negated_conjecture,
    addition(antidomain(antidomain(sK0)),coantidomain(one)) != antidomain(antidomain(sK0)),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_136,c_62]) ).

cnf(c_154,negated_conjecture,
    addition(antidomain(antidomain(sK0)),zero) != antidomain(antidomain(sK0)),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_95,c_153]) ).

cnf(c_155,negated_conjecture,
    addition(zero,antidomain(antidomain(sK0))) != antidomain(antidomain(sK0)),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_60,c_154]) ).

cnf(c_156,negated_conjecture,
    antidomain(antidomain(sK0)) != antidomain(antidomain(sK0)),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_124,c_155]) ).

cnf(c_143,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_156]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : KLE119+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/0.35  % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.35  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.35  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.35  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 19:26:07 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.36  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.09/0.36  % Process 878595 was started by sandbox on n003,
% 0.09/0.36  % Fri Sep 25 19:26:07 2026
% 0.09/0.36  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.13/0.37  
% 0.13/0.37  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38  % Proof 1 at 0.01 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.13/0.38  % Length of proof is 27.
% 0.13/0.38  % Level of proof is 4.
% 0.13/0.38  % Maximum clause weight is 46.000.
% 0.13/0.38  % Given clauses 30.
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------