↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : KLE119+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 01:52:27 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.13s 1.29s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.13s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   12
%            Number of leaves      :   11
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   48 (  48 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   48 (  47 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   11 (  11   ~;   0   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    9 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   11 (  11 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   49 (   0 sgn  47   !;   2   ?;  13   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : addition(X0,X1) = addition(X1,X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',additive_commutativity) ).

fof(f2,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] : addition(X2,addition(X1,X0)) = addition(addition(X2,X1),X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',additive_associativity) ).

fof(f3,axiom,
    ! [X0] : addition(X0,zero) = X0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',additive_identity) ).

fof(f7,axiom,
    ! [X0] : multiplication(one,X0) = X0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',multiplicative_left_identity) ).

fof(f10,axiom,
    ! [X0] : multiplication(X0,zero) = zero,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',right_annihilation) ).

fof(f16,axiom,
    ! [X0] : domain(X0) = antidomain(antidomain(X0)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+4.ax',domain4) ).

fof(f17,axiom,
    ! [X0] : multiplication(X0,coantidomain(X0)) = zero,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+4.ax',codomain1) ).

fof(f19,axiom,
    ! [X0] : addition(coantidomain(coantidomain(X0)),coantidomain(X0)) = one,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+4.ax',codomain3) ).

fof(f20,axiom,
    ! [X0] : codomain(X0) = coantidomain(coantidomain(X0)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+4.ax',codomain4) ).

fof(f24,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : backward_diamond(X0,X1) = codomain(multiplication(codomain(X1),X0)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+6.ax',backward_diamond) ).

fof(f27,conjecture,
    ! [X0,X1] : addition(backward_diamond(zero,domain(X0)),domain(X1)) = domain(X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goals) ).

fof(f28,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0,X1] : addition(backward_diamond(zero,domain(X0)),domain(X1)) = domain(X1),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f27]) ).

fof(f29,plain,
    ? [X0,X1] : domain(X1) != addition(backward_diamond(zero,domain(X0)),domain(X1)),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f28]) ).

fof(f30,plain,
    domain(sK1) != addition(backward_diamond(zero,domain(sK0)),domain(sK1)),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1]),skolemize(X0,sK0),skolemize(X1,sK1)],[f29]) ).

fof(f31,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : addition(X0,X1) = addition(X1,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).

fof(f32,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : addition(X2,addition(X1,X0)) = addition(addition(X2,X1),X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).

fof(f33,plain,
    ! [X0] : addition(X0,zero) = X0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).

fof(f37,plain,
    ! [X0] : multiplication(one,X0) = X0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).

fof(f40,plain,
    ! [X0] : zero = multiplication(X0,zero),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f10]) ).

fof(f45,plain,
    ! [X0] : antidomain(antidomain(X0)) = domain(X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f16]) ).

fof(f46,plain,
    ! [X0] : zero = multiplication(X0,coantidomain(X0)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f17]) ).

fof(f48,plain,
    ! [X0] : one = addition(coantidomain(coantidomain(X0)),coantidomain(X0)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f19]) ).

fof(f49,plain,
    ! [X0] : coantidomain(coantidomain(X0)) = codomain(X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f20]) ).

fof(f53,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : backward_diamond(X0,X1) = codomain(multiplication(codomain(X1),X0)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f24]) ).

fof(f56,plain,
    domain(sK1) != addition(backward_diamond(zero,domain(sK0)),domain(sK1)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f30]) ).

fof(f58,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : backward_diamond(X0,X1) = coantidomain(coantidomain(multiplication(coantidomain(coantidomain(X1)),X0))),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f53,f49,f49]) ).

fof(f63,plain,
    antidomain(antidomain(sK1)) != addition(coantidomain(coantidomain(multiplication(coantidomain(coantidomain(antidomain(antidomain(sK0)))),zero))),antidomain(antidomain(sK1))),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f56,f45,f58,f45,f45]) ).

tcf(c_49,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : addition(X0,X1) = addition(X1,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f31]) ).

tcf(c_50,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : addition(addition(X0,X1),X2) = addition(X0,addition(X1,X2)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f32]) ).

tcf(c_51,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : addition(X0,zero) = X0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f33]) ).

tcf(c_55,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : multiplication(one,X0) = X0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f37]) ).

tcf(c_58,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : multiplication(X0,zero) = zero,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f40]) ).

tcf(c_63,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : multiplication(X0,coantidomain(X0)) = zero,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f46]) ).

tcf(c_65,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : addition(coantidomain(coantidomain(X0)),coantidomain(X0)) = one,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f48]) ).

tcf(c_66,negated_conjecture,
    addition(coantidomain(coantidomain(multiplication(coantidomain(coantidomain(antidomain(antidomain(sK0)))),zero))),antidomain(antidomain(sK1))) != antidomain(antidomain(sK1)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f63]) ).

tcf(c_83,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : addition(coantidomain(X0),coantidomain(coantidomain(X0))) = one,
    inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_65,c_50,c_49]) ).

tcf(c_84,negated_conjecture,
    addition(antidomain(antidomain(sK1)),coantidomain(coantidomain(multiplication(coantidomain(coantidomain(antidomain(antidomain(sK0)))),zero)))) != antidomain(antidomain(sK1)),
    inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_66,c_50,c_49]) ).

tcf(c_350,plain,
    addition(antidomain(antidomain(sK1)),coantidomain(coantidomain(zero))) != antidomain(antidomain(sK1)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_58,c_84]) ).

tcf(c_353,plain,
    coantidomain(one) = zero,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_55,c_63]) ).

tcf(c_355,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : addition(zero,X0) = X0,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_51,c_49]) ).

tcf(c_388,plain,
    addition(zero,coantidomain(zero)) = one,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_353,c_83]) ).

tcf(c_400,plain,
    coantidomain(zero) = one,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_355,c_388]) ).

tcf(c_567,plain,
    addition(antidomain(antidomain(sK1)),coantidomain(one)) != antidomain(antidomain(sK1)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_400,c_350]) ).

tcf(c_573,plain,
    coantidomain(one) = zero,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_63,c_55]) ).

tcf(c_581,plain,
    addition(antidomain(antidomain(sK1)),zero) != antidomain(antidomain(sK1)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_573,c_567]) ).

tcf(c_582,plain,
    addition(zero,antidomain(antidomain(sK1))) != antidomain(antidomain(sK1)),
    inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_581,c_50,c_49]) ).

tcf(c_593,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : addition(zero,X0) = X0,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_49,c_51]) ).

tcf(c_606,plain,
    $false,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_593,c_582]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : KLE119+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.10/0.37  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.38  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.38  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.38  % DateTime : Wed Sep 23 18:59:21 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.38  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.10/0.41  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.10/0.41  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.43  
% 0.10/0.43  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.10/0.43  
% 0.10/0.43  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.10/0.44  % Proving...
% 1.13/1.29  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 1.13/1.29  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.13/1.29  
% 1.13/1.29  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 1.13/1.29  
% 1.13/1.29  % ------  iProver source info
% 1.13/1.29  
% 1.13/1.29  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 1.13/1.29  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 1.13/1.29  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 1.13/1.29  
% 1.13/1.29  % ------ Parsing...
% 1.13/1.29  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 1.13/1.29  
% 1.13/1.29  % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 1.13/1.29  
% 1.13/1.29  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 1.13/1.29  
% 1.13/1.29  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 1.13/1.29  % ------ Proving...
% 1.13/1.29  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 1.13/1.29  
% 1.13/1.29  % 
% 1.13/1.29  % clauses                               18
% 1.13/1.29  % conjectures                           1
% 1.13/1.29  % EPR                                   0
% 1.13/1.29  % Horn                                  18
% 1.13/1.29  % unary                                 18
% 1.13/1.29  % binary                                0
% 1.13/1.29  % lits                                  18
% 1.13/1.29  % lits eq                               18
% 1.13/1.29  % fd_pure                               0
% 1.13/1.29  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 1.13/1.29  % fd_cond                               0
% 1.13/1.29  % fd_pseudo_cond                        0
% 1.13/1.29  % AC symbols                            1
% 1.13/1.29  
% 1.13/1.29  % ------ Input Options Time Limit: Unbounded
% 1.13/1.29  
% 1.13/1.29  
% 1.13/1.29  % ------ 
% 1.13/1.29  % Current options:
% 1.13/1.29  % ------ 
% 1.13/1.29  
% 1.13/1.29  
% 1.13/1.29  % 
% 1.13/1.29  
% 1.13/1.29  % ------ Proving...
% 1.13/1.29  % 
% 1.13/1.29  
% 1.13/1.29  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.13/1.29  
% 1.13/1.29  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 1.13/1.29  
% 1.13/1.29  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------