↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : KLE142+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 04:35:48 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.26s 1.73s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.26s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   13
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   40 (  30 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   52 (  30 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   24 (  12   ~;   9   |;   1   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   52 (  10 sgn  24   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(infty_coinduction,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( leq(X3,addition(multiplication(X1,X3),X2))
     => leq(X3,multiplication(strong_iteration(X1),X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE004+0.ax',infty_coinduction) ).

fof(multiplicative_left_identity,axiom,
    ! [X1] : multiplication(one,X1) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE004+0.ax',multiplicative_left_identity) ).

fof(additive_identity,axiom,
    ! [X1] : addition(X1,zero) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE004+0.ax',additive_identity) ).

fof(order,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( leq(X1,X2)
    <=> addition(X1,X2) = X2 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE004+0.ax',order) ).

fof(idempotence,axiom,
    ! [X1] : addition(X1,X1) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE004+0.ax',idempotence) ).

fof(isolation,axiom,
    ! [X1] : strong_iteration(X1) = addition(star(X1),multiplication(strong_iteration(X1),zero)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE004+0.ax',isolation) ).

fof(additive_commutativity,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : addition(X1,X2) = addition(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE004+0.ax',additive_commutativity) ).

fof(goals,conjecture,
    ! [X4] : strong_iteration(strong_iteration(X4)) = strong_iteration(one),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goals) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X68,X69,X70] :
      ( ~ leq(X70,addition(multiplication(X68,X70),X69))
      | leq(X70,multiplication(strong_iteration(X68),X69)) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[infty_coinduction])]) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X51] : multiplication(one,X51) = X51,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[multiplicative_left_identity]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( leq(X1,multiplication(strong_iteration(X2),X3))
    | ~ leq(X1,addition(multiplication(X2,X1),X3)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    multiplication(one,X1) = X1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

fof(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X45] : addition(X45,zero) = X45,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[additive_identity]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( leq(X1,multiplication(strong_iteration(one),X2))
    | ~ leq(X1,addition(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    addition(X1,zero) = X1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

fof(c_0_15,plain,
    ! [X72,X73] :
      ( ( ~ leq(X72,X73)
        | addition(X72,X73) = X73 )
      & ( addition(X72,X73) != X73
        | leq(X72,X73) ) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[order])]) ).

fof(c_0_16,plain,
    ! [X46] : addition(X46,X46) = X46,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[idempotence]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( leq(X1,multiplication(strong_iteration(one),zero))
    | ~ leq(X1,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( leq(X1,X2)
    | addition(X1,X2) != X2 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    addition(X1,X1) = X1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).

fof(c_0_20,plain,
    ! [X71] : strong_iteration(X71) = addition(star(X71),multiplication(strong_iteration(X71),zero)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[isolation]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( addition(X1,X2) = X2
    | ~ leq(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    leq(X1,multiplication(strong_iteration(one),zero)),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),c_0_19])]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    strong_iteration(X1) = addition(star(X1),multiplication(strong_iteration(X1),zero)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    addition(X1,multiplication(strong_iteration(one),zero)) = multiplication(strong_iteration(one),zero),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    multiplication(strong_iteration(one),zero) = strong_iteration(one),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    addition(X1,strong_iteration(one)) = strong_iteration(one),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]),c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    leq(X1,strong_iteration(one)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_25]) ).

fof(c_0_28,plain,
    ! [X40,X41] : addition(X40,X41) = addition(X41,X40),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[additive_commutativity]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    ( leq(X1,multiplication(strong_iteration(X2),zero))
    | ~ leq(X1,multiplication(X2,X1)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    leq(X1,multiplication(strong_iteration(X2),strong_iteration(one))),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_26]),c_0_27])]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    addition(X1,X2) = addition(X2,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_28]) ).

fof(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X4] : strong_iteration(strong_iteration(X4)) = strong_iteration(one),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[goals]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    leq(strong_iteration(one),multiplication(strong_iteration(strong_iteration(X1)),zero)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    addition(strong_iteration(one),X1) = strong_iteration(one),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_26]) ).

fof(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
    strong_iteration(strong_iteration(esk1_0)) != strong_iteration(one),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_32])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    multiplication(strong_iteration(strong_iteration(X1)),zero) = strong_iteration(one),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_33]),c_0_34]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
    strong_iteration(strong_iteration(esk1_0)) != strong_iteration(one),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_35]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,plain,
    strong_iteration(strong_iteration(X1)) = strong_iteration(one),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_36]),c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_38])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem    : KLE142+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.14/0.32  % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.32  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.14/0.32  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.32  % DateTime   : Mon May  4 20:31:05 EDT 2026
% 0.14/0.32  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.14/0.34  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 1.26/1.73  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 1.26/1.73  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 1.26/1.73  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.26/1.73  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.26/1.73  % Total time : 1.372s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------