↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : KLE142+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 01:52:30 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 2.13s 1.10s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 2.13s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   23
%            Number of leaves      :   15
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   86 (  64 unt;   3 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  185 (  55 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   50 (  26   ~;  19   |;   3   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   4 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  103 (   0 sgn 102   !;   1   ?;  55   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : addition(X0,X1) = addition(X1,X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE004+0.ax',additive_commutativity) ).

fof(f2,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] : addition(X2,addition(X1,X0)) = addition(addition(X2,X1),X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE004+0.ax',additive_associativity) ).

fof(f4,axiom,
    ! [X0] : addition(X0,X0) = X0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE004+0.ax',idempotence) ).

fof(f5,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] : multiplication(X0,multiplication(X1,X2)) = multiplication(multiplication(X0,X1),X2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE004+0.ax',multiplicative_associativity) ).

fof(f6,axiom,
    ! [X0] : multiplication(X0,one) = X0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE004+0.ax',multiplicative_right_identity) ).

fof(f7,axiom,
    ! [X0] : multiplication(one,X0) = X0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE004+0.ax',multiplicative_left_identity) ).

fof(f10,axiom,
    ! [X0] : multiplication(zero,X0) = zero,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE004+0.ax',left_annihilation) ).

fof(f15,axiom,
    ! [X0] : strong_iteration(X0) = addition(multiplication(X0,strong_iteration(X0)),one),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE004+0.ax',infty_unfold1) ).

fof(f16,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( leq(X2,addition(multiplication(X0,X2),X1))
     => leq(X2,multiplication(strong_iteration(X0),X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE004+0.ax',infty_coinduction) ).

fof(f17,axiom,
    ! [X0] : strong_iteration(X0) = addition(star(X0),multiplication(strong_iteration(X0),zero)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE004+0.ax',isolation) ).

fof(f18,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( leq(X0,X1)
    <=> addition(X0,X1) = X1 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE004+0.ax',order) ).

fof(f19,conjecture,
    ! [X0] :
      ( leq(strong_iteration(one),strong_iteration(strong_iteration(X0)))
      & leq(strong_iteration(strong_iteration(X0)),strong_iteration(one)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goals) ).

fof(f20,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0] :
        ( leq(strong_iteration(one),strong_iteration(strong_iteration(X0)))
        & leq(strong_iteration(strong_iteration(X0)),strong_iteration(one)) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f19]) ).

fof(f23,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ~ leq(X2,addition(multiplication(X0,X2),X1))
      | leq(X2,multiplication(strong_iteration(X0),X1)) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f16]) ).

fof(f24,plain,
    ? [X0] :
      ( ~ leq(strong_iteration(one),strong_iteration(strong_iteration(X0)))
      | ~ leq(strong_iteration(strong_iteration(X0)),strong_iteration(one)) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f20]) ).

fof(f25,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( ~ leq(X0,X1)
        | addition(X0,X1) = X1 )
      & ( addition(X0,X1) != X1
        | leq(X0,X1) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f18]) ).

fof(f26,plain,
    ( ~ leq(strong_iteration(one),strong_iteration(strong_iteration(sK0)))
    | ~ leq(strong_iteration(strong_iteration(sK0)),strong_iteration(one)) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0]),skolemize(X0,sK0)],[f24]) ).

fof(f27,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : addition(X0,X1) = addition(X1,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).

fof(f28,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : addition(X2,addition(X1,X0)) = addition(addition(X2,X1),X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).

fof(f30,plain,
    ! [X0] : addition(X0,X0) = X0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).

fof(f31,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : multiplication(X0,multiplication(X1,X2)) = multiplication(multiplication(X0,X1),X2),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).

fof(f32,plain,
    ! [X0] : multiplication(X0,one) = X0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).

fof(f33,plain,
    ! [X0] : multiplication(one,X0) = X0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).

fof(f36,plain,
    ! [X0] : zero = multiplication(zero,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f10]) ).

fof(f41,plain,
    ! [X0] : strong_iteration(X0) = addition(multiplication(X0,strong_iteration(X0)),one),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f15]) ).

fof(f42,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ leq(X2,addition(multiplication(X0,X2),X1))
      | leq(X2,multiplication(strong_iteration(X0),X1)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f23]) ).

fof(f43,plain,
    ! [X0] : strong_iteration(X0) = addition(star(X0),multiplication(strong_iteration(X0),zero)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f17]) ).

fof(f44,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ leq(X0,X1)
      | addition(X0,X1) = X1 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f25]) ).

fof(f45,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( addition(X0,X1) != X1
      | leq(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f25]) ).

fof(f46,plain,
    ( ~ leq(strong_iteration(one),strong_iteration(strong_iteration(sK0)))
    | ~ leq(strong_iteration(strong_iteration(sK0)),strong_iteration(one)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f26]) ).

tcf(c_49,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : addition(X0,X1) = addition(X1,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f27]) ).

tcf(c_50,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : addition(addition(X0,X1),X2) = addition(X0,addition(X1,X2)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f28]) ).

tcf(c_52,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : addition(X0,X0) = X0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f30]) ).

tcf(c_53,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : multiplication(multiplication(X0,X1),X2) = multiplication(X0,multiplication(X1,X2)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f31]) ).

tcf(c_54,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : multiplication(X0,one) = X0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f32]) ).

tcf(c_55,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : multiplication(one,X0) = X0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f33]) ).

tcf(c_58,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : multiplication(zero,X0) = zero,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f36]) ).

tcf(c_63,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : addition(multiplication(X0,strong_iteration(X0)),one) = strong_iteration(X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f41]) ).

tcf(c_64,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( leq(X0,multiplication(strong_iteration(X1),X2))
      | ~ leq(X0,addition(multiplication(X1,X0),X2)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f42]) ).

tcf(c_65,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : addition(star(X0),multiplication(strong_iteration(X0),zero)) = strong_iteration(X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f43]) ).

tcf(c_66,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( leq(X0,X1)
      | ( addition(X0,X1) != X1 ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f45]) ).

tcf(c_67,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( addition(X0,X1) = X1 )
      | ~ leq(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f44]) ).

tcf(c_68,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ leq(strong_iteration(one),strong_iteration(strong_iteration(sK0)))
    | ~ leq(strong_iteration(strong_iteration(sK0)),strong_iteration(one)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f46]) ).

tcf(c_86,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : addition(one,multiplication(X0,strong_iteration(X0))) = strong_iteration(X0),
    inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_63,c_50,c_49]) ).

tcf(c_217,definition,
    iPr_def_10 = strong_iteration(sK0),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_10])],[]) ).

tcf(c_218,definition,
    iPr_def_11 = strong_iteration(iPr_def_10),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_11])],[]) ).

tcf(c_219,definition,
    iPr_def_12 = strong_iteration(one),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_12])],[]) ).

tcf(c_220,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ leq(iPr_def_12,iPr_def_11)
    | ~ leq(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_12) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_68,c_219,c_217,c_218]) ).

tcf(c_607,plain,
    addition(one,multiplication(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_11)) = iPr_def_11,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_218,c_86]) ).

tcf(c_610,plain,
    addition(multiplication(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_11),one) = iPr_def_11,
    inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_607,c_50,c_49]) ).

tcf(c_619,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : addition(multiplication(strong_iteration(X0),zero),star(X0)) = strong_iteration(X0),
    inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_65,c_50,c_49]) ).

tcf(c_622,plain,
    addition(multiplication(iPr_def_11,zero),star(iPr_def_10)) = iPr_def_11,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_218,c_619]) ).

tcf(c_633,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : addition(X0,addition(X0,X1)) = addition(X0,X1),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_52,c_50]) ).

tcf(c_1009,plain,
    addition(multiplication(iPr_def_11,zero),iPr_def_11) = iPr_def_11,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_622,c_633]) ).

tcf(c_1012,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : leq(X0,addition(X0,X1)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_633,c_66]) ).

tcf(c_1017,plain,
    addition(iPr_def_11,multiplication(iPr_def_11,zero)) = iPr_def_11,
    inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_1009,c_50,c_49]) ).

tcf(c_1055,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : leq(X0,addition(X1,X0)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_49,c_1012]) ).

tcf(c_1062,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : leq(one,strong_iteration(X0)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_86,c_1012]) ).

tcf(c_1323,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( leq(X0,multiplication(strong_iteration(one),X1))
      | ~ leq(X0,addition(X0,X1)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_55,c_64]) ).

tcf(c_1333,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( leq(X0,multiplication(iPr_def_12,X1))
      | ~ leq(X0,addition(X0,X1)) ),
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_1323,c_219]) ).

tcf(c_1334,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : leq(X0,multiplication(iPr_def_12,X1)),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_1333,c_1012]) ).

tcf(c_1379,plain,
    leq(one,iPr_def_11),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_218,c_1062]) ).

tcf(c_1382,plain,
    addition(one,iPr_def_11) = iPr_def_11,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1379,c_67]) ).

tcf(c_1383,plain,
    addition(iPr_def_11,one) = iPr_def_11,
    inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_1382,c_50,c_49]) ).

tcf(c_1400,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : leq(X0,addition(X1,addition(X2,X0))),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_50,c_1055]) ).

tcf(c_1551,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : leq(X0,iPr_def_12),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_54,c_1334]) ).

tcf(c_1556,plain,
    ~ leq(iPr_def_12,iPr_def_11),
    inference(backward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_220,c_1551]) ).

tcf(c_1568,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : addition(X0,iPr_def_12) = iPr_def_12,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1551,c_67]) ).

tcf(c_1728,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( leq(X0,multiplication(strong_iteration(X1),iPr_def_12))
      | ~ leq(X0,iPr_def_12) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1568,c_64]) ).

tcf(c_1732,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : leq(X0,multiplication(strong_iteration(X1),iPr_def_12)),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_1728,c_1551]) ).

tcf(c_1774,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : leq(X0,multiplication(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_12)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_218,c_1732]) ).

tcf(c_1827,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : leq(one,addition(X0,iPr_def_11)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1383,c_1400]) ).

tcf(c_1913,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : leq(one,multiplication(strong_iteration(X0),iPr_def_11)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1827,c_64]) ).

tcf(c_2060,plain,
    leq(one,multiplication(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_11)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_217,c_1913]) ).

tcf(c_2066,plain,
    addition(one,multiplication(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_11)) = multiplication(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_11),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_2060,c_67]) ).

tcf(c_2067,plain,
    addition(multiplication(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_11),one) = multiplication(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_11),
    inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_2066,c_50,c_49]) ).

tcf(c_2068,plain,
    multiplication(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_11) = iPr_def_11,
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_2067,c_610]) ).

tcf(c_2100,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( leq(iPr_def_11,multiplication(strong_iteration(iPr_def_10),X0))
      | ~ leq(iPr_def_11,addition(iPr_def_11,X0)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_2068,c_64]) ).

tcf(c_2102,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( leq(iPr_def_11,multiplication(iPr_def_11,X0))
      | ~ leq(iPr_def_11,addition(iPr_def_11,X0)) ),
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_2100,c_218]) ).

tcf(c_2103,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : leq(iPr_def_11,multiplication(iPr_def_11,X0)),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_2102,c_1012]) ).

tcf(c_2114,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : addition(iPr_def_11,multiplication(iPr_def_11,X0)) = multiplication(iPr_def_11,X0),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_2103,c_67]) ).

tcf(c_3313,plain,
    multiplication(iPr_def_11,zero) = iPr_def_11,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_1017,c_2114]) ).

tcf(c_3323,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : multiplication(iPr_def_11,multiplication(zero,X0)) = multiplication(iPr_def_11,X0),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_3313,c_53]) ).

tcf(c_3327,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : multiplication(iPr_def_11,X0) = iPr_def_11,
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_3323,c_58,c_3313]) ).

tcf(c_3336,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : leq(X0,iPr_def_11),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_1774,c_3327]) ).

tcf(c_3337,plain,
    $false,
    inference(backward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_1556,c_3336]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : KLE142+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.13/0.37  % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.13/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.13/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.37  % DateTime : Wed Sep 23 19:08:11 UTC 2026
% 0.13/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.37  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.13/0.41  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.13/0.41  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.42  
% 0.13/0.42  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.13/0.42  
% 0.13/0.42  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.13/0.43  % Proving...
% 2.13/1.10  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 2.13/1.10  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 2.13/1.10  
% 2.13/1.10  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 2.13/1.10  
% 2.13/1.10  % ------  iProver source info
% 2.13/1.10  
% 2.13/1.10  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 2.13/1.10  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 2.13/1.10  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 2.13/1.10  
% 2.13/1.10  % ------ Parsing...
% 2.13/1.10  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 2.13/1.10  
% 2.13/1.10  % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 2.13/1.10  
% 2.13/1.10  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 2.13/1.10  
% 2.13/1.10  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 2.13/1.10  % ------ Proving...
% 2.13/1.10  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 2.13/1.10  
% 2.13/1.10  % 
% 2.13/1.10  % clauses                               23
% 2.13/1.10  % conjectures                           1
% 2.13/1.10  % EPR                                   1
% 2.13/1.10  % Horn                                  23
% 2.13/1.10  % unary                                 17
% 2.13/1.10  % binary                                6
% 2.13/1.10  % lits                                  29
% 2.13/1.10  % lits eq                               19
% 2.13/1.10  % fd_pure                               0
% 2.13/1.10  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 2.13/1.10  % fd_cond                               0
% 2.13/1.10  % fd_pseudo_cond                        0
% 2.13/1.10  % AC symbols                            1
% 2.13/1.10  
% 2.13/1.10  % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 2.13/1.10  
% 2.13/1.10  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 2.13/1.10  
% 2.13/1.10  
% 2.13/1.10  % ------ 
% 2.13/1.10  % Current options:
% 2.13/1.10  % ------ 
% 2.13/1.10  
% 2.13/1.10  
% 2.13/1.10  % 
% 2.13/1.10  
% 2.13/1.10  % ------ Proving...
% 2.13/1.10  % 
% 2.13/1.10  
% 2.13/1.10  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 2.13/1.10  
% 2.13/1.10  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.13/1.10  
% 2.13/1.10  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------