↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : KLE143+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:58:56 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 3.88s 0.98s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.88s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   12
%            Number of leaves      :   12
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   58 (  49 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   69 (  51 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   22 (  11   ~;   8   |;   1   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  100 (   0 sgn  48   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(infty_unfold1,axiom,
    ! [X1] : strong_iteration(X1) = addition(multiplication(X1,strong_iteration(X1)),one),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE004+0.ax',infty_unfold1) ).

fof(additive_commutativity,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : addition(X1,X2) = addition(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE004+0.ax',additive_commutativity) ).

fof(additive_associativity,axiom,
    ! [X3,X2,X1] : addition(X1,addition(X2,X3)) = addition(addition(X1,X2),X3),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE004+0.ax',additive_associativity) ).

fof(idempotence,axiom,
    ! [X1] : addition(X1,X1) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE004+0.ax',idempotence) ).

fof(distributivity2,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] : multiplication(addition(X1,X2),X3) = addition(multiplication(X1,X3),multiplication(X2,X3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE004+0.ax',distributivity2) ).

fof(multiplicative_left_identity,axiom,
    ! [X1] : multiplication(one,X1) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE004+0.ax',multiplicative_left_identity) ).

fof(infty_coinduction,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( leq(X3,addition(multiplication(X1,X3),X2))
     => leq(X3,multiplication(strong_iteration(X1),X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE004+0.ax',infty_coinduction) ).

fof(multiplicative_associativity,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] : multiplication(X1,multiplication(X2,X3)) = multiplication(multiplication(X1,X2),X3),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE004+0.ax',multiplicative_associativity) ).

fof(distributivity1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] : multiplication(X1,addition(X2,X3)) = addition(multiplication(X1,X2),multiplication(X1,X3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE004+0.ax',distributivity1) ).

fof(multiplicative_right_identity,axiom,
    ! [X1] : multiplication(X1,one) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE004+0.ax',multiplicative_right_identity) ).

fof(order,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( leq(X1,X2)
    <=> addition(X1,X2) = X2 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE004+0.ax',order) ).

fof(goals,conjecture,
    ! [X4] : multiplication(strong_iteration(X4),strong_iteration(X4)) = strong_iteration(X4),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goals) ).

fof(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X32] : strong_iteration(X32) = addition(multiplication(X32,strong_iteration(X32)),one),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[infty_unfold1]) ).

fof(c_0_13,plain,
    ! [X5,X6] : addition(X5,X6) = addition(X6,X5),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[additive_commutativity]) ).

fof(c_0_14,plain,
    ! [X7,X8,X9] : addition(X9,addition(X8,X7)) = addition(addition(X9,X8),X7),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[additive_associativity]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    strong_iteration(X1) = addition(multiplication(X1,strong_iteration(X1)),one),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    addition(X1,X2) = addition(X2,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    addition(X1,addition(X2,X3)) = addition(addition(X1,X2),X3),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    addition(one,multiplication(X1,strong_iteration(X1))) = strong_iteration(X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).

fof(c_0_19,plain,
    ! [X11] : addition(X11,X11) = X11,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[idempotence]) ).

fof(c_0_20,plain,
    ! [X20,X21,X22] : multiplication(addition(X20,X21),X22) = addition(multiplication(X20,X22),multiplication(X21,X22)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[distributivity2]) ).

fof(c_0_21,plain,
    ! [X16] : multiplication(one,X16) = X16,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[multiplicative_left_identity]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    addition(one,addition(multiplication(X1,strong_iteration(X1)),X2)) = addition(strong_iteration(X1),X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    addition(X1,X1) = X1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    multiplication(addition(X1,X2),X3) = addition(multiplication(X1,X3),multiplication(X2,X3)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    multiplication(one,X1) = X1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).

fof(c_0_26,plain,
    ! [X33,X34,X35] :
      ( leq(X35,multiplication(strong_iteration(X33),X34))
      | ~ leq(X35,addition(multiplication(X33,X35),X34)) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[infty_coinduction])])]) ).

fof(c_0_27,plain,
    ! [X12,X13,X14] : multiplication(X12,multiplication(X13,X14)) = multiplication(multiplication(X12,X13),X14),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[multiplicative_associativity]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    addition(strong_iteration(X1),multiplication(X1,strong_iteration(X1))) = strong_iteration(X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]),c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    addition(X1,multiplication(X2,X1)) = multiplication(addition(X2,one),X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]),c_0_16]) ).

fof(c_0_30,plain,
    ! [X17,X18,X19] : multiplication(X17,addition(X18,X19)) = addition(multiplication(X17,X18),multiplication(X17,X19)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[distributivity1]) ).

fof(c_0_31,plain,
    ! [X15] : multiplication(X15,one) = X15,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[multiplicative_right_identity]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    ( ~ leq(X1,addition(multiplication(X2,X1),X3))
    | leq(X1,multiplication(strong_iteration(X2),X3)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    multiplication(X1,multiplication(X2,X3)) = multiplication(multiplication(X1,X2),X3),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    multiplication(addition(X1,one),strong_iteration(X1)) = strong_iteration(X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]) ).

fof(c_0_35,plain,
    ! [X37,X38] :
      ( ( leq(X37,X38)
        | addition(X37,X38) != X38 )
      & ( addition(X37,X38) = X38
        | ~ leq(X37,X38) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[order])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    multiplication(X1,addition(X2,X3)) = addition(multiplication(X1,X2),multiplication(X1,X3)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,plain,
    multiplication(X1,one) = X1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,plain,
    addition(X1,addition(X1,X2)) = addition(X1,X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,plain,
    ( ~ leq(X1,addition(X3,multiplication(X2,X1)))
    | leq(X1,multiplication(strong_iteration(X2),X3)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,plain,
    addition(one,multiplication(X1,multiplication(X2,strong_iteration(multiplication(X1,X2))))) = strong_iteration(multiplication(X1,X2)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_33]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,plain,
    multiplication(addition(one,X1),strong_iteration(X1)) = strong_iteration(X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_42,plain,
    ( addition(X1,X2) != X2
    | leq(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_35]) ).

cnf(c_0_43,plain,
    addition(X1,multiplication(X1,X2)) = multiplication(X1,addition(X2,one)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_37]),c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_44,plain,
    addition(one,strong_iteration(X1)) = strong_iteration(X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_45,plain,
    ( ~ leq(multiplication(X1,strong_iteration(multiplication(X2,X1))),strong_iteration(multiplication(X2,X1)))
    | leq(multiplication(X1,strong_iteration(multiplication(X2,X1))),strong_iteration(X2)) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_39,c_0_40]),c_0_37]) ).

cnf(c_0_46,plain,
    multiplication(strong_iteration(X1),strong_iteration(multiplication(X1,strong_iteration(X1)))) = strong_iteration(multiplication(X1,strong_iteration(X1))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_47,plain,
    leq(X1,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_42,c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_48,plain,
    addition(X1,strong_iteration(X1)) = strong_iteration(X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_43,c_0_34]),c_0_17]),c_0_44]),c_0_16]),c_0_44]),c_0_34]) ).

fof(c_0_49,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X4] : multiplication(strong_iteration(X4),strong_iteration(X4)) = strong_iteration(X4),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[goals]) ).

cnf(c_0_50,plain,
    ( ~ leq(X1,X2)
    | addition(X1,X2) = X2 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_35]) ).

cnf(c_0_51,plain,
    leq(strong_iteration(multiplication(X1,strong_iteration(X1))),strong_iteration(X1)),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_45,c_0_46]),c_0_47])]) ).

cnf(c_0_52,plain,
    addition(strong_iteration(X1),strong_iteration(multiplication(X1,strong_iteration(X1)))) = strong_iteration(multiplication(X1,strong_iteration(X1))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_48]),c_0_44]) ).

fof(c_0_53,negated_conjecture,
    multiplication(strong_iteration(esk1_0),strong_iteration(esk1_0)) != strong_iteration(esk1_0),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_49])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_54,plain,
    strong_iteration(multiplication(X1,strong_iteration(X1))) = strong_iteration(X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_50,c_0_51]),c_0_16]),c_0_52]) ).

cnf(c_0_55,negated_conjecture,
    multiplication(strong_iteration(esk1_0),strong_iteration(esk1_0)) != strong_iteration(esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_53]) ).

cnf(c_0_56,plain,
    multiplication(strong_iteration(X1),strong_iteration(X1)) = strong_iteration(X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_46,c_0_54]),c_0_54]) ).

cnf(c_0_57,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_55,c_0_56])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : KLE143+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.36  % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.36  % DateTime : Sun Sep 20 22:49:21 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.36  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.41  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.10/0.41  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.88/0.98  % Version: 3.5.1
% 3.88/0.98  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 3.88/0.98  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 3.88/0.98  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 3.88/0.98  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 3.88/0.98  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 3.88/0.98  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 3.88/0.98  % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 4115053 completed with status 0
% 3.88/0.98  % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 3.88/0.98  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 3.88/0.98  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 3.88/0.98  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 3.88/0.98  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 3.88/0.98  % No SInE strategy applied
% 3.88/0.98  % Search class: FHUSM-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 3.88/0.98  % Scheduled 11 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 3.88/0.98  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 3.88/0.98  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 3.88/0.98  % Starting G-E--_300_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 3.88/0.98  % Starting G-E--_092_C01_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_CO_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 3.88/0.98  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d with 136s (1) cores
% 3.88/0.98  % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d with pid 4115064 completed with status 0
% 3.88/0.98  % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d
% 3.88/0.98  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 3.88/0.98  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 3.88/0.98  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 3.88/0.98  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 3.88/0.98  % No SInE strategy applied
% 3.88/0.98  % Search class: FHUSM-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 3.88/0.98  % Scheduled 11 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 3.88/0.98  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 3.88/0.98  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 3.88/0.98  % Starting G-E--_300_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 3.88/0.98  % Starting G-E--_092_C01_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_CO_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 3.88/0.98  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d with 136s (1) cores
% 3.88/0.98  % Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 3.88/0.98  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 3.88/0.98  
% 3.88/0.98  % Proof found!
% 3.88/0.98  % SZS status Theorem
% 3.88/0.98  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 3.88/0.98  % Parsed axioms                        : 19
% 3.88/0.98  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 3.88/0.98  % Initial clauses                      : 20
% 3.88/0.98  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 3.88/0.98  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 20
% 3.88/0.98  % Processed clauses                    : 4550
% 3.88/0.98  % ...of these trivial                  : 493
% 3.88/0.98  % ...subsumed                          : 3355
% 3.88/0.98  % ...remaining for further processing  : 702
% 3.88/0.98  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 357
% 3.88/0.98  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 3.88/0.98  % Backward-subsumed                    : 13
% 3.88/0.98  % Backward-rewritten                   : 68
% 3.88/0.98  % Generated clauses                    : 52604
% 3.88/0.98  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 23263
% 3.88/0.98  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 3.88/0.98  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 3.88/0.98  % Paramodulations                      : 52246
% 3.88/0.98  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 3.88/0.98  % NegExts                              : 0
% 3.88/0.98  % Equation resolutions                 : 358
% 3.88/0.98  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 3.88/0.98  % Total rewrite steps                  : 107613
% 3.88/0.98  % ...of those cached                   : 100394
% 3.88/0.98  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 3.88/0.98  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 3.88/0.98  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 3.88/0.98  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 3.88/0.98  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 3.88/0.98  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 3.88/0.98  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 3.88/0.98  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 3.88/0.98  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 3.88/0.98  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 3.88/0.98  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 3.88/0.98  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 3.88/0.98  % Current number of processed clauses  : 601
% 3.88/0.98  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 311
% 3.88/0.98  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 4
% 3.88/0.98  %    Negative unit clauses             : 0
% 3.88/0.98  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 286
% 3.88/0.98  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 18515
% 3.88/0.98  % ...number of literals in the above   : 31091
% 3.88/0.98  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 3.88/0.98  % Current number of archived clauses   : 101
% 3.88/0.98  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 19980
% 3.88/0.98  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 19923
% 3.88/0.98  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 3257
% 3.88/0.98  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 511
% 3.88/0.98  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 3.88/0.98  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 795
% 3.88/0.98  % BW rewrite match successes           : 191
% 3.88/0.98  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 3.88/0.98  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 3.88/0.98  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 620624
% 3.88/0.98  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 70
% 3.88/0.98  
% 3.88/0.98  % -------------------------------------------------
% 3.88/0.98  % User time                : 0.512 s
% 3.88/0.98  % System time              : 0.026 s
% 3.88/0.98  % Total time               : 0.538 s
% 3.88/0.98  % Maximum resident set size: 3652 pages
% 3.88/0.98  
% 3.88/0.98  % -------------------------------------------------
% 3.88/0.98  % User time                : 2.514 s
% 3.88/0.98  % System time              : 0.127 s
% 3.88/0.98  % Total time               : 2.641 s
% 3.88/0.98  % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 3.88/0.98  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------