↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : KLE148+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 01:52:31 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 3.82s 1.19s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.82s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   12
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   40 (  36 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   44 (  43 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    9 (   5   ~;   0   |;   2   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    5 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   58 (   0 sgn  56   !;   2   ?;  22   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : addition(X0,X1) = addition(X1,X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE004+0.ax',additive_commutativity) ).

fof(f2,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] : addition(X2,addition(X1,X0)) = addition(addition(X2,X1),X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE004+0.ax',additive_associativity) ).

fof(f3,axiom,
    ! [X0] : addition(X0,zero) = X0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE004+0.ax',additive_identity) ).

fof(f5,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] : multiplication(X0,multiplication(X1,X2)) = multiplication(multiplication(X0,X1),X2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE004+0.ax',multiplicative_associativity) ).

fof(f6,axiom,
    ! [X0] : multiplication(X0,one) = X0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE004+0.ax',multiplicative_right_identity) ).

fof(f8,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] : multiplication(X0,addition(X1,X2)) = addition(multiplication(X0,X1),multiplication(X0,X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE004+0.ax',distributivity1) ).

fof(f10,axiom,
    ! [X0] : multiplication(zero,X0) = zero,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE004+0.ax',left_annihilation) ).

fof(f15,axiom,
    ! [X0] : strong_iteration(X0) = addition(multiplication(X0,strong_iteration(X0)),one),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE004+0.ax',infty_unfold1) ).

fof(f19,conjecture,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( multiplication(X0,X1) = zero
     => multiplication(X0,strong_iteration(X1)) = X0 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goals) ).

fof(f20,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0,X1] :
        ( multiplication(X0,X1) = zero
       => multiplication(X0,strong_iteration(X1)) = X0 ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f19]) ).

fof(f24,plain,
    ? [X0,X1] :
      ( multiplication(X0,X1) = zero
      & multiplication(X0,strong_iteration(X1)) != X0 ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f20]) ).

fof(f26,plain,
    ( zero = multiplication(sK0,sK1)
    & sK0 != multiplication(sK0,strong_iteration(sK1)) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1]),skolemize(X0,sK0),skolemize(X1,sK1)],[f24]) ).

fof(f27,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : addition(X0,X1) = addition(X1,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).

fof(f28,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : addition(X2,addition(X1,X0)) = addition(addition(X2,X1),X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).

fof(f29,plain,
    ! [X0] : addition(X0,zero) = X0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).

fof(f31,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : multiplication(X0,multiplication(X1,X2)) = multiplication(multiplication(X0,X1),X2),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).

fof(f32,plain,
    ! [X0] : multiplication(X0,one) = X0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).

fof(f34,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : multiplication(X0,addition(X1,X2)) = addition(multiplication(X0,X1),multiplication(X0,X2)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).

fof(f36,plain,
    ! [X0] : zero = multiplication(zero,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f10]) ).

fof(f41,plain,
    ! [X0] : strong_iteration(X0) = addition(multiplication(X0,strong_iteration(X0)),one),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f15]) ).

fof(f46,plain,
    zero = multiplication(sK0,sK1),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f26]) ).

fof(f47,plain,
    sK0 != multiplication(sK0,strong_iteration(sK1)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f26]) ).

tcf(c_49,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : addition(X0,X1) = addition(X1,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f27]) ).

tcf(c_50,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : addition(addition(X0,X1),X2) = addition(X0,addition(X1,X2)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f28]) ).

tcf(c_51,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : addition(X0,zero) = X0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f29]) ).

tcf(c_53,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : multiplication(multiplication(X0,X1),X2) = multiplication(X0,multiplication(X1,X2)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f31]) ).

tcf(c_54,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : multiplication(X0,one) = X0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f32]) ).

tcf(c_56,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : addition(multiplication(X0,X1),multiplication(X0,X2)) = multiplication(X0,addition(X1,X2)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f34]) ).

tcf(c_58,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : multiplication(zero,X0) = zero,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f36]) ).

tcf(c_63,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : addition(multiplication(X0,strong_iteration(X0)),one) = strong_iteration(X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f41]) ).

tcf(c_68,negated_conjecture,
    multiplication(sK0,strong_iteration(sK1)) != sK0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f47]) ).

tcf(c_69,negated_conjecture,
    multiplication(sK0,sK1) = zero,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f46]) ).

tcf(c_87,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : addition(one,multiplication(X0,strong_iteration(X0))) = strong_iteration(X0),
    inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_63,c_50,c_49]) ).

tcf(c_521,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : multiplication(sK0,multiplication(sK1,X0)) = multiplication(zero,X0),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_69,c_53]) ).

tcf(c_524,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : multiplication(sK0,multiplication(sK1,X0)) = zero,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_521,c_58]) ).

tcf(c_550,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : multiplication(sK0,addition(X0,multiplication(sK1,X1))) = addition(multiplication(sK0,X0),zero),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_524,c_56]) ).

tcf(c_565,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : multiplication(sK0,addition(X0,multiplication(sK1,X1))) = multiplication(sK0,X0),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_550,c_51]) ).

tcf(c_4196,plain,
    multiplication(sK0,strong_iteration(sK1)) = multiplication(sK0,one),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_87,c_565]) ).

tcf(c_4199,plain,
    multiplication(sK0,strong_iteration(sK1)) = sK0,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_4196,c_54]) ).

tcf(c_4205,plain,
    $false,
    inference(backward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_68,c_4199]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : KLE148+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.10/0.37  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.37  % DateTime : Wed Sep 23 19:06:49 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.37  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.10/0.41  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.10/0.41  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.42  
% 0.10/0.42  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.10/0.42  
% 0.10/0.42  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.10/0.43  % Proving...
% 3.82/1.19  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 3.82/1.19  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.82/1.19  
% 3.82/1.19  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 3.82/1.19  
% 3.82/1.19  % ------  iProver source info
% 3.82/1.19  
% 3.82/1.19  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 3.82/1.19  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 3.82/1.19  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 3.82/1.19  
% 3.82/1.19  % ------ Parsing...
% 3.82/1.19  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 3.82/1.19  
% 3.82/1.19  % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 3.82/1.19  
% 3.82/1.19  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 3.82/1.19  
% 3.82/1.19  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 3.82/1.19  % ------ Proving...
% 3.82/1.19  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 3.82/1.19  
% 3.82/1.19  % 
% 3.82/1.19  % clauses                               21
% 3.82/1.19  % conjectures                           2
% 3.82/1.19  % EPR                                   0
% 3.82/1.19  % Horn                                  21
% 3.82/1.19  % unary                                 16
% 3.82/1.19  % binary                                5
% 3.82/1.19  % lits                                  26
% 3.82/1.19  % lits eq                               18
% 3.82/1.19  % fd_pure                               0
% 3.82/1.19  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 3.82/1.19  % fd_cond                               0
% 3.82/1.19  % fd_pseudo_cond                        0
% 3.82/1.19  % AC symbols                            1
% 3.82/1.19  
% 3.82/1.19  % ------ Input Options Time Limit: Unbounded
% 3.82/1.19  
% 3.82/1.19  
% 3.82/1.19  % ------ 
% 3.82/1.19  % Current options:
% 3.82/1.19  % ------ 
% 3.82/1.19  
% 3.82/1.19  
% 3.82/1.19  % 
% 3.82/1.19  
% 3.82/1.19  % ------ Proving...
% 3.82/1.19  % 
% 3.82/1.19  
% 3.82/1.19  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.82/1.19  
% 3.82/1.19  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.82/1.20  
% 3.82/1.20  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------