↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : KLE148+2 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 04:35:49 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.60s 1.83s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.60s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :   11
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   47 (  36 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   64 (  48 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   33 (  16   ~;  10   |;   4   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   66 (   3 sgn  40   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(goals,conjecture,
    ! [X4,X5] :
      ( ( multiplication(X4,X5) = zero
       => leq(multiplication(X4,strong_iteration(X5)),X4) )
      & leq(X4,multiplication(X4,strong_iteration(X5))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goals) ).

fof(additive_associativity,axiom,
    ! [X3,X2,X1] : addition(X1,addition(X2,X3)) = addition(addition(X1,X2),X3),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE004+0.ax',additive_associativity) ).

fof(idempotence,axiom,
    ! [X1] : addition(X1,X1) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE004+0.ax',idempotence) ).

fof(infty_unfold1,axiom,
    ! [X1] : strong_iteration(X1) = addition(multiplication(X1,strong_iteration(X1)),one),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE004+0.ax',infty_unfold1) ).

fof(additive_commutativity,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : addition(X1,X2) = addition(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE004+0.ax',additive_commutativity) ).

fof(order,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( leq(X1,X2)
    <=> addition(X1,X2) = X2 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE004+0.ax',order) ).

fof(distributivity1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] : multiplication(X1,addition(X2,X3)) = addition(multiplication(X1,X2),multiplication(X1,X3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE004+0.ax',distributivity1) ).

fof(multiplicative_right_identity,axiom,
    ! [X1] : multiplication(X1,one) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE004+0.ax',multiplicative_right_identity) ).

fof(multiplicative_associativity,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] : multiplication(X1,multiplication(X2,X3)) = multiplication(multiplication(X1,X2),X3),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE004+0.ax',multiplicative_associativity) ).

fof(left_annihilation,axiom,
    ! [X1] : multiplication(zero,X1) = zero,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE004+0.ax',left_annihilation) ).

fof(additive_identity,axiom,
    ! [X1] : addition(X1,zero) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE004+0.ax',additive_identity) ).

fof(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X4,X5] :
        ( ( multiplication(X4,X5) = zero
         => leq(multiplication(X4,strong_iteration(X5)),X4) )
        & leq(X4,multiplication(X4,strong_iteration(X5))) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[goals]) ).

fof(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X44,X45,X46] : addition(X46,addition(X45,X44)) = addition(addition(X46,X45),X44),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[additive_associativity]) ).

fof(c_0_13,plain,
    ! [X48] : addition(X48,X48) = X48,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[idempotence]) ).

fof(c_0_14,plain,
    ! [X69] : strong_iteration(X69) = addition(multiplication(X69,strong_iteration(X69)),one),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[infty_unfold1]) ).

fof(c_0_15,plain,
    ! [X42,X43] : addition(X42,X43) = addition(X43,X42),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[additive_commutativity]) ).

fof(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( multiplication(esk1_0,esk2_0) = zero
      | ~ leq(esk1_0,multiplication(esk1_0,strong_iteration(esk2_0))) )
    & ( ~ leq(multiplication(esk1_0,strong_iteration(esk2_0)),esk1_0)
      | ~ leq(esk1_0,multiplication(esk1_0,strong_iteration(esk2_0))) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_11])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_17,plain,
    ! [X74,X75] :
      ( ( ~ leq(X74,X75)
        | addition(X74,X75) = X75 )
      & ( addition(X74,X75) != X75
        | leq(X74,X75) ) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[order])]) ).

fof(c_0_18,plain,
    ! [X54,X55,X56] : multiplication(X54,addition(X55,X56)) = addition(multiplication(X54,X55),multiplication(X54,X56)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[distributivity1]) ).

fof(c_0_19,plain,
    ! [X52] : multiplication(X52,one) = X52,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[multiplicative_right_identity]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    addition(X1,addition(X2,X3)) = addition(addition(X1,X2),X3),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    addition(X1,X1) = X1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    strong_iteration(X1) = addition(multiplication(X1,strong_iteration(X1)),one),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    addition(X1,X2) = addition(X2,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    ( multiplication(esk1_0,esk2_0) = zero
    | ~ leq(esk1_0,multiplication(esk1_0,strong_iteration(esk2_0))) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ( leq(X1,X2)
    | addition(X1,X2) != X2 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    multiplication(X1,addition(X2,X3)) = addition(multiplication(X1,X2),multiplication(X1,X3)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    multiplication(X1,one) = X1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    addition(X1,addition(X1,X2)) = addition(X1,X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    addition(one,multiplication(X1,strong_iteration(X1))) = strong_iteration(X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).

fof(c_0_30,plain,
    ! [X49,X50,X51] : multiplication(X49,multiplication(X50,X51)) = multiplication(multiplication(X49,X50),X51),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[multiplicative_associativity]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
    ( multiplication(esk1_0,esk2_0) = zero
    | addition(esk1_0,multiplication(esk1_0,strong_iteration(esk2_0))) != multiplication(esk1_0,strong_iteration(esk2_0)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    addition(X1,multiplication(X1,X2)) = multiplication(X1,addition(X2,one)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]),c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    addition(one,strong_iteration(X1)) = strong_iteration(X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]) ).

fof(c_0_34,plain,
    ! [X60] : multiplication(zero,X60) = zero,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[left_annihilation]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ leq(multiplication(esk1_0,strong_iteration(esk2_0)),esk1_0)
    | ~ leq(esk1_0,multiplication(esk1_0,strong_iteration(esk2_0))) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    multiplication(X1,multiplication(X2,X3)) = multiplication(multiplication(X1,X2),X3),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
    multiplication(esk1_0,esk2_0) = zero,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]),c_0_23]),c_0_33])]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,plain,
    multiplication(zero,X1) = zero,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_34]) ).

fof(c_0_39,plain,
    ! [X47] : addition(X47,zero) = X47,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[additive_identity]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,negated_conjecture,
    ( addition(esk1_0,multiplication(esk1_0,strong_iteration(esk2_0))) != esk1_0
    | ~ leq(esk1_0,multiplication(esk1_0,strong_iteration(esk2_0))) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_25]),c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,negated_conjecture,
    multiplication(esk1_0,multiplication(esk2_0,X1)) = zero,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_37]),c_0_38]) ).

cnf(c_0_42,plain,
    addition(X1,zero) = X1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_39]) ).

cnf(c_0_43,negated_conjecture,
    ( addition(esk1_0,multiplication(esk1_0,strong_iteration(esk2_0))) != multiplication(esk1_0,strong_iteration(esk2_0))
    | addition(esk1_0,multiplication(esk1_0,strong_iteration(esk2_0))) != esk1_0 ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_44,negated_conjecture,
    multiplication(esk1_0,addition(one,multiplication(esk2_0,X1))) = esk1_0,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_41]),c_0_42]),c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_45,negated_conjecture,
    multiplication(esk1_0,strong_iteration(esk2_0)) != esk1_0,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_43,c_0_32]),c_0_23]),c_0_33]),c_0_32]),c_0_23]),c_0_33])]) ).

cnf(c_0_46,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_44,c_0_29]),c_0_45]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11  % Problem    : KLE148+2 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.11  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.14/0.32  % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.32  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.14/0.32  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.32  % DateTime   : Mon May  4 20:32:06 EDT 2026
% 0.14/0.32  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.14/0.33  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 1.60/1.83  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 1.60/1.83  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 1.60/1.83  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.60/1.83  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.60/1.84  % Total time : 1.370s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------