↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : KLE148+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 07:44:24 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.23s 0.64s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.23s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   15
%            Number of leaves      :   11
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   57 (  48 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   72 (  51 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   32 (  17   ~;   7   |;   5   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   72 (   6 sgn  22   !;   2   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(additive_commutativity,axiom,
    ! [A,B] : addition(A,B) = addition(B,A),
    file('theBenchmark.p',additive_commutativity) ).

fof(additive_associativity,axiom,
    ! [C,B,A] : addition(A,addition(B,C)) = addition(addition(A,B),C),
    file('theBenchmark.p',additive_associativity) ).

fof(additive_identity,axiom,
    ! [A] : addition(A,zero) = A,
    file('theBenchmark.p',additive_identity) ).

fof(idempotence,axiom,
    ! [A] : addition(A,A) = A,
    file('theBenchmark.p',idempotence) ).

fof(multiplicative_associativity,axiom,
    ! [A,B,C] : multiplication(A,multiplication(B,C)) = multiplication(multiplication(A,B),C),
    file('theBenchmark.p',multiplicative_associativity) ).

fof(multiplicative_right_identity,axiom,
    ! [A] : multiplication(A,one) = A,
    file('theBenchmark.p',multiplicative_right_identity) ).

fof(distributivity1,axiom,
    ! [A,B,C] : multiplication(A,addition(B,C)) = addition(multiplication(A,B),multiplication(A,C)),
    file('theBenchmark.p',distributivity1) ).

fof(left_annihilation,axiom,
    ! [A] : multiplication(zero,A) = zero,
    file('theBenchmark.p',left_annihilation) ).

fof(infty_unfold1,axiom,
    ! [A] : strong_iteration(A) = addition(multiplication(A,strong_iteration(A)),one),
    file('theBenchmark.p',infty_unfold1) ).

fof(order,axiom,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( leq(A,B)
    <=> addition(A,B) = B ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',order) ).

fof(goals,conjecture,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( leq(X0,multiplication(X0,strong_iteration(X1)))
      & ( multiplication(X0,X1) = zero
       => leq(multiplication(X0,strong_iteration(X1)),X0) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',goals) ).

fof(goals_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0,X1] :
        ( leq(X0,multiplication(X0,strong_iteration(X1)))
        & ( multiplication(X0,X1) = zero
         => leq(multiplication(X0,strong_iteration(X1)),X0) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[goals]) ).

cnf(c_20,plain,
    addition(A,B) = addition(B,A),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[additive_commutativity]) ).

cnf(c_21,plain,
    addition(addition(A,B),C) = addition(A,addition(B,C)),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[additive_associativity]) ).

cnf(c_22,plain,
    addition(A,zero) = A,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[additive_identity]) ).

cnf(c_23,plain,
    addition(A,A) = A,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[idempotence]) ).

cnf(c_24,plain,
    multiplication(multiplication(A,B),C) = multiplication(A,multiplication(B,C)),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[multiplicative_associativity]) ).

cnf(c_25,plain,
    multiplication(A,one) = A,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[multiplicative_right_identity]) ).

cnf(c_27,plain,
    multiplication(A,addition(B,C)) = addition(multiplication(A,B),multiplication(A,C)),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[distributivity1]) ).

cnf(c_28,plain,
    addition(multiplication(A,B),multiplication(A,C)) = multiplication(A,addition(B,C)),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_27]) ).

cnf(c_31,plain,
    multiplication(zero,A) = zero,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[left_annihilation]) ).

cnf(c_38,plain,
    strong_iteration(A) = addition(multiplication(A,strong_iteration(A)),one),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[infty_unfold1]) ).

cnf(c_1242,plain,
    strong_iteration(A) = addition(one,multiplication(A,strong_iteration(A))),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_20,c_38]) ).

cnf(c_39,plain,
    addition(one,multiplication(A,strong_iteration(A))) = strong_iteration(A),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_1242]) ).

cnf(c_44,plain,
    ( addition(A,B) != B
    | leq(A,B) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[order]) ).

fof(nnf_19,plain,
    ? [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ leq(X0,multiplication(X0,strong_iteration(X1)))
      | ( ~ leq(multiplication(X0,strong_iteration(X1)),X0)
        & multiplication(X0,X1) = zero ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[goals_neg]) ).

fof(sk_goals_neg_sk,plain,
    ( ~ leq(sK0,multiplication(sK0,strong_iteration(sK1)))
    | ( ~ leq(multiplication(sK0,strong_iteration(sK1)),sK0)
      & multiplication(sK0,sK1) = zero ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1]),skolemize(X0,sK0),skolemize(X1,sK1)],[nnf_19]) ).

fof(sk_goals_neg,plain,
    ( ( ~ leq(sK0,multiplication(sK0,strong_iteration(sK1)))
      | ~ leq(multiplication(sK0,strong_iteration(sK1)),sK0) )
    & ( ~ leq(sK0,multiplication(sK0,strong_iteration(sK1)))
      | multiplication(sK0,sK1) = zero ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[sk_goals_neg_sk]) ).

cnf(c_45,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ leq(sK0,multiplication(sK0,strong_iteration(sK1)))
    | multiplication(sK0,sK1) = zero ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_goals_neg]) ).

cnf(c_46,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ leq(sK0,multiplication(sK0,strong_iteration(sK1)))
    | ~ leq(multiplication(sK0,strong_iteration(sK1)),sK0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_goals_neg]) ).

cnf(c_1243,plain,
    A = addition(zero,A),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_22,c_20]) ).

cnf(c_49,plain,
    addition(zero,A) = A,
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_1243]) ).

cnf(c_1244,plain,
    addition(A,B) = addition(A,addition(A,B)),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_23,c_21]) ).

cnf(c_50,plain,
    addition(A,addition(A,B)) = addition(A,B),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_1244]) ).

cnf(c_1245,plain,
    addition(A,multiplication(A,B)) = multiplication(A,addition(one,B)),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_25,c_28]) ).

cnf(c_54,plain,
    multiplication(A,addition(one,B)) = addition(A,multiplication(A,B)),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_1245]) ).

cnf(c_1246,plain,
    addition(multiplication(A,one),multiplication(A,multiplication(B,strong_iteration(B)))) = multiplication(A,strong_iteration(B)),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_39,c_28]) ).

cnf(c_90,plain,
    addition(A,multiplication(A,multiplication(B,strong_iteration(B)))) = multiplication(A,strong_iteration(B)),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_25,c_1246]) ).

cnf(c_124,plain,
    leq(A,addition(A,B)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_44,c_50]) ).

cnf(c_1247,plain,
    addition(one,strong_iteration(A)) = addition(one,multiplication(A,strong_iteration(A))),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_39,c_50]) ).

cnf(c_130,plain,
    addition(one,strong_iteration(A)) = strong_iteration(A),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_39,c_1247]) ).

cnf(c_207,plain,
    leq(A,multiplication(A,addition(one,B))),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_54,c_124]) ).

cnf(c_322,plain,
    leq(A,multiplication(A,strong_iteration(B))),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_39,c_207]) ).

cnf(c_324,negated_conjecture,
    ~ leq(multiplication(sK0,strong_iteration(sK1)),sK0),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_322,c_46]) ).

cnf(c_325,negated_conjecture,
    multiplication(sK0,sK1) = zero,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_322,c_45]) ).

cnf(c_1248,plain,
    multiplication(zero,A) = multiplication(sK0,multiplication(sK1,A)),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_325,c_24]) ).

cnf(c_1249,plain,
    zero = multiplication(sK0,multiplication(sK1,A)),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_31,c_1248]) ).

cnf(c_326,plain,
    multiplication(sK0,multiplication(sK1,A)) = zero,
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_1249]) ).

cnf(c_1250,negated_conjecture,
    addition(multiplication(sK0,strong_iteration(sK1)),sK0) != sK0,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_44,c_324]) ).

cnf(c_1251,negated_conjecture,
    addition(sK0,multiplication(sK0,strong_iteration(sK1))) != sK0,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_20,c_1250]) ).

cnf(c_1252,negated_conjecture,
    multiplication(sK0,addition(one,strong_iteration(sK1))) != sK0,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_54,c_1251]) ).

cnf(c_353,negated_conjecture,
    multiplication(sK0,strong_iteration(sK1)) != sK0,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_130,c_1252]) ).

cnf(c_1253,plain,
    addition(sK0,zero) = multiplication(sK0,strong_iteration(sK1)),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_326,c_90]) ).

cnf(c_1254,plain,
    addition(zero,sK0) = multiplication(sK0,strong_iteration(sK1)),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_20,c_1253]) ).

cnf(c_1255,plain,
    sK0 = multiplication(sK0,strong_iteration(sK1)),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_49,c_1254]) ).

cnf(c_1256,plain,
    multiplication(sK0,strong_iteration(sK1)) = sK0,
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_1255]) ).

cnf(c_1241,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_353,c_1256]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05  % Problem  : KLE148+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.07  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.44  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.19/0.44  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.19/0.44  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.19/0.44  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.19/0.44  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.19/0.44  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.19/0.45  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.19/0.45  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 19:28:18 UTC 2026
% 0.19/0.45  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.45  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.19/0.45  % Process 3576019 was started by sandbox2 on n020,
% 0.19/0.45  % Fri Sep 25 19:28:18 2026
% 0.19/0.45  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.19/0.46  
% 0.19/0.46  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.23/0.64  
% 0.23/0.64  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.23/0.64  
% 0.23/0.64  % Proof 1 at 0.12 (+ 0.06) seconds.
% 0.23/0.64  % Length of proof is 38.
% 0.23/0.64  % Level of proof is 8.
% 0.23/0.64  % Maximum clause weight is 13.000.
% 0.23/0.64  % Given clauses 174.
% 0.23/0.64  
% 0.23/0.64  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------