↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : KLE150+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 01:52:32 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 3.73s 11.30s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.73s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   34 (  34 unt;   3 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   56 (  33 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    6 (   6   ~;   0   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   4 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   36 (   0 sgn  35   !;   1   ?;  13   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : addition(X0,X1) = addition(X1,X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE004+0.ax',additive_commutativity) ).

fof(f2,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] : addition(X2,addition(X1,X0)) = addition(addition(X2,X1),X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE004+0.ax',additive_associativity) ).

fof(f5,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] : multiplication(X0,multiplication(X1,X2)) = multiplication(multiplication(X0,X1),X2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE004+0.ax',multiplicative_associativity) ).

fof(f10,axiom,
    ! [X0] : multiplication(zero,X0) = zero,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE004+0.ax',left_annihilation) ).

fof(f15,axiom,
    ! [X0] : strong_iteration(X0) = addition(multiplication(X0,strong_iteration(X0)),one),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE004+0.ax',infty_unfold1) ).

fof(f19,conjecture,
    ! [X0] : strong_iteration(multiplication(X0,zero)) = addition(one,multiplication(X0,zero)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goals) ).

fof(f20,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0] : strong_iteration(multiplication(X0,zero)) = addition(one,multiplication(X0,zero)),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f19]) ).

fof(f24,plain,
    ? [X0] : strong_iteration(multiplication(X0,zero)) != addition(one,multiplication(X0,zero)),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f20]) ).

fof(f26,plain,
    strong_iteration(multiplication(sK0,zero)) != addition(one,multiplication(sK0,zero)),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0]),skolemize(X0,sK0)],[f24]) ).

fof(f27,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : addition(X0,X1) = addition(X1,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).

fof(f28,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : addition(X2,addition(X1,X0)) = addition(addition(X2,X1),X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).

fof(f31,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : multiplication(X0,multiplication(X1,X2)) = multiplication(multiplication(X0,X1),X2),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).

fof(f36,plain,
    ! [X0] : zero = multiplication(zero,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f10]) ).

fof(f41,plain,
    ! [X0] : strong_iteration(X0) = addition(multiplication(X0,strong_iteration(X0)),one),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f15]) ).

fof(f46,plain,
    strong_iteration(multiplication(sK0,zero)) != addition(one,multiplication(sK0,zero)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f26]) ).

tcf(c_49,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : addition(X0,X1) = addition(X1,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f27]) ).

tcf(c_50,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : addition(addition(X0,X1),X2) = addition(X0,addition(X1,X2)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f28]) ).

tcf(c_53,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : multiplication(multiplication(X0,X1),X2) = multiplication(X0,multiplication(X1,X2)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f31]) ).

tcf(c_58,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : multiplication(zero,X0) = zero,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f36]) ).

tcf(c_63,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : addition(multiplication(X0,strong_iteration(X0)),one) = strong_iteration(X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f41]) ).

tcf(c_68,negated_conjecture,
    addition(one,multiplication(sK0,zero)) != strong_iteration(multiplication(sK0,zero)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f46]) ).

tcf(c_86,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : addition(one,multiplication(X0,strong_iteration(X0))) = strong_iteration(X0),
    inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_63,c_50,c_49]) ).

tcf(c_206,definition,
    iPr_def_10 = multiplication(sK0,zero),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_10])],[]) ).

tcf(c_207,definition,
    iPr_def_11 = addition(one,iPr_def_10),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_11])],[]) ).

tcf(c_208,definition,
    iPr_def_12 = strong_iteration(iPr_def_10),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_12])],[]) ).

tcf(c_209,negated_conjecture,
    iPr_def_11 != iPr_def_12,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_68,c_208,c_206,c_207]) ).

tcf(c_525,plain,
    addition(one,multiplication(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_12)) = iPr_def_12,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_208,c_86]) ).

tcf(c_527,plain,
    addition(multiplication(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_12),one) = iPr_def_12,
    inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_525,c_50,c_49]) ).

tcf(c_528,plain,
    addition(iPr_def_10,one) = iPr_def_11,
    inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_207,c_50,c_49]) ).

tcf(c_705,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : multiplication(sK0,multiplication(zero,X0)) = multiplication(iPr_def_10,X0),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_206,c_53]) ).

tcf(c_709,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : multiplication(iPr_def_10,X0) = iPr_def_10,
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_705,c_58,c_206]) ).

tcf(c_710,plain,
    addition(iPr_def_10,one) = iPr_def_12,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_527,c_709]) ).

tcf(c_711,plain,
    iPr_def_11 = iPr_def_12,
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_710,c_528]) ).

tcf(c_712,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_711,c_209]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : KLE150+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.11/10.38  % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.11/10.38  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/10.38  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/10.38  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/10.38  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/10.38  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/10.38  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/10.38  % DateTime : Wed Sep 23 19:06:26 UTC 2026
% 0.11/10.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/10.38  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.16/10.42  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.16/10.42  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.16/10.43  
% 0.16/10.43  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.16/10.43  
% 0.16/10.44  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.16/10.45  % Proving...
% 3.73/11.30  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 3.73/11.30  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.73/11.30  
% 3.73/11.30  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 3.73/11.30  
% 3.73/11.30  % ------  iProver source info
% 3.73/11.30  
% 3.73/11.30  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 3.73/11.30  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 3.73/11.30  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 3.73/11.30  
% 3.73/11.30  % ------ Parsing...
% 3.73/11.30  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 3.73/11.30  
% 3.73/11.30  % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 3.73/11.30  
% 3.73/11.30  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 3.73/11.30  
% 3.73/11.30  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 3.73/11.30  % ------ Proving...
% 3.73/11.30  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 3.73/11.30  
% 3.73/11.30  % 
% 3.73/11.30  % clauses                               23
% 3.73/11.30  % conjectures                           1
% 3.73/11.30  % EPR                                   1
% 3.73/11.30  % Horn                                  23
% 3.73/11.30  % unary                                 18
% 3.73/11.30  % binary                                5
% 3.73/11.30  % lits                                  28
% 3.73/11.30  % lits eq                               20
% 3.73/11.30  % fd_pure                               0
% 3.73/11.30  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 3.73/11.30  % fd_cond                               0
% 3.73/11.30  % fd_pseudo_cond                        0
% 3.73/11.30  % AC symbols                            1
% 3.73/11.30  
% 3.73/11.30  % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 3.73/11.30  
% 3.73/11.30  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 3.73/11.30  
% 3.73/11.30  
% 3.73/11.30  % ------ 
% 3.73/11.30  % Current options:
% 3.73/11.30  % ------ 
% 3.73/11.30  
% 3.73/11.30  
% 3.73/11.30  % 
% 3.73/11.30  
% 3.73/11.30  % ------ Proving...
% 3.73/11.30  % 
% 3.73/11.30  
% 3.73/11.30  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.73/11.30  
% 3.73/11.30  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.73/11.30  
% 3.73/11.30  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------