↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : KLE150+2 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 04:35:50 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.29s 1.72s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.29s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   39 (  30 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   50 (  36 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   23 (  12   ~;   7   |;   3   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   62 (   1 sgn  36   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(goals,conjecture,
    ! [X4] :
      ( leq(strong_iteration(multiplication(X4,zero)),addition(one,multiplication(X4,zero)))
      & leq(addition(one,multiplication(X4,zero)),strong_iteration(multiplication(X4,zero))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goals) ).

fof(infty_unfold1,axiom,
    ! [X1] : strong_iteration(X1) = addition(multiplication(X1,strong_iteration(X1)),one),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE004+0.ax',infty_unfold1) ).

fof(additive_commutativity,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : addition(X1,X2) = addition(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE004+0.ax',additive_commutativity) ).

fof(order,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( leq(X1,X2)
    <=> addition(X1,X2) = X2 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE004+0.ax',order) ).

fof(additive_associativity,axiom,
    ! [X3,X2,X1] : addition(X1,addition(X2,X3)) = addition(addition(X1,X2),X3),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE004+0.ax',additive_associativity) ).

fof(multiplicative_associativity,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] : multiplication(X1,multiplication(X2,X3)) = multiplication(multiplication(X1,X2),X3),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE004+0.ax',multiplicative_associativity) ).

fof(left_annihilation,axiom,
    ! [X1] : multiplication(zero,X1) = zero,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE004+0.ax',left_annihilation) ).

fof(idempotence,axiom,
    ! [X1] : addition(X1,X1) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE004+0.ax',idempotence) ).

fof(distributivity1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] : multiplication(X1,addition(X2,X3)) = addition(multiplication(X1,X2),multiplication(X1,X3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE004+0.ax',distributivity1) ).

fof(additive_identity,axiom,
    ! [X1] : addition(X1,zero) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE004+0.ax',additive_identity) ).

fof(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X4] :
        ( leq(strong_iteration(multiplication(X4,zero)),addition(one,multiplication(X4,zero)))
        & leq(addition(one,multiplication(X4,zero)),strong_iteration(multiplication(X4,zero))) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[goals]) ).

fof(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X67] : strong_iteration(X67) = addition(multiplication(X67,strong_iteration(X67)),one),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[infty_unfold1]) ).

fof(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X40,X41] : addition(X40,X41) = addition(X41,X40),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[additive_commutativity]) ).

fof(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ leq(strong_iteration(multiplication(esk1_0,zero)),addition(one,multiplication(esk1_0,zero)))
    | ~ leq(addition(one,multiplication(esk1_0,zero)),strong_iteration(multiplication(esk1_0,zero))) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_10])])]) ).

fof(c_0_14,plain,
    ! [X72,X73] :
      ( ( ~ leq(X72,X73)
        | addition(X72,X73) = X73 )
      & ( addition(X72,X73) != X73
        | leq(X72,X73) ) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[order])]) ).

fof(c_0_15,plain,
    ! [X42,X43,X44] : addition(X44,addition(X43,X42)) = addition(addition(X44,X43),X42),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[additive_associativity]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    strong_iteration(X1) = addition(multiplication(X1,strong_iteration(X1)),one),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    addition(X1,X2) = addition(X2,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

fof(c_0_18,plain,
    ! [X47,X48,X49] : multiplication(X47,multiplication(X48,X49)) = multiplication(multiplication(X47,X48),X49),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[multiplicative_associativity]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ leq(strong_iteration(multiplication(esk1_0,zero)),addition(one,multiplication(esk1_0,zero)))
    | ~ leq(addition(one,multiplication(esk1_0,zero)),strong_iteration(multiplication(esk1_0,zero))) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( leq(X1,X2)
    | addition(X1,X2) != X2 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    addition(X1,addition(X2,X3)) = addition(addition(X1,X2),X3),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    addition(one,multiplication(X1,strong_iteration(X1))) = strong_iteration(X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    multiplication(X1,multiplication(X2,X3)) = multiplication(multiplication(X1,X2),X3),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).

fof(c_0_24,plain,
    ! [X58] : multiplication(zero,X58) = zero,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[left_annihilation]) ).

fof(c_0_25,plain,
    ! [X46] : addition(X46,X46) = X46,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[idempotence]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    ( addition(one,addition(multiplication(esk1_0,zero),strong_iteration(multiplication(esk1_0,zero)))) != addition(one,multiplication(esk1_0,zero))
    | ~ leq(addition(one,multiplication(esk1_0,zero)),strong_iteration(multiplication(esk1_0,zero))) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]),c_0_17]),c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    addition(one,multiplication(X1,multiplication(X2,strong_iteration(multiplication(X1,X2))))) = strong_iteration(multiplication(X1,X2)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    multiplication(zero,X1) = zero,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_24]) ).

fof(c_0_29,plain,
    ! [X52,X53,X54] : multiplication(X52,addition(X53,X54)) = addition(multiplication(X52,X53),multiplication(X52,X54)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[distributivity1]) ).

fof(c_0_30,plain,
    ! [X45] : addition(X45,zero) = X45,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[additive_identity]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    addition(X1,X1) = X1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    ( addition(one,addition(multiplication(esk1_0,zero),strong_iteration(multiplication(esk1_0,zero)))) != addition(one,multiplication(esk1_0,zero))
    | addition(one,addition(multiplication(esk1_0,zero),strong_iteration(multiplication(esk1_0,zero)))) != strong_iteration(multiplication(esk1_0,zero)) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_20]),c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    strong_iteration(multiplication(X1,zero)) = addition(one,multiplication(X1,zero)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    addition(X1,addition(X2,X3)) = addition(X2,addition(X3,X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    multiplication(X1,addition(X2,X3)) = addition(multiplication(X1,X2),multiplication(X1,X3)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_29]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    addition(X1,zero) = X1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,plain,
    addition(X1,addition(X1,X2)) = addition(X1,X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]),c_0_34]),c_0_35]),c_0_36]),c_0_37]),c_0_33]),c_0_34]),c_0_35]),c_0_36]),c_0_37]),c_0_33])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11  % Problem    : KLE150+2 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.11  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.13/0.31  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.31  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.31  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.31  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.31  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.31  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.31  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.31  % DateTime   : Mon May  4 20:33:06 EDT 2026
% 0.13/0.31  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.13/0.32  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 1.29/1.72  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 1.29/1.72  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 1.29/1.72  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.29/1.72  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.29/1.72  % Total time : 1.371s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------