↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : KLE150+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 07:44:25 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.14s 0.69s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.14s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   27 (  18 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   36 (  17 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   22 (  13   ~;   6   |;   2   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   30 (   1 sgn  12   !;   1   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(additive_commutativity,axiom,
    ! [A,B] : addition(A,B) = addition(B,A),
    file('theBenchmark.p',additive_commutativity) ).

fof(idempotence,axiom,
    ! [A] : addition(A,A) = A,
    file('theBenchmark.p',idempotence) ).

fof(multiplicative_associativity,axiom,
    ! [A,B,C] : multiplication(A,multiplication(B,C)) = multiplication(multiplication(A,B),C),
    file('theBenchmark.p',multiplicative_associativity) ).

fof(left_annihilation,axiom,
    ! [A] : multiplication(zero,A) = zero,
    file('theBenchmark.p',left_annihilation) ).

fof(infty_unfold1,axiom,
    ! [A] : strong_iteration(A) = addition(multiplication(A,strong_iteration(A)),one),
    file('theBenchmark.p',infty_unfold1) ).

fof(order,axiom,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( leq(A,B)
    <=> addition(A,B) = B ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',order) ).

fof(goals,conjecture,
    ! [X0] :
      ( leq(addition(one,multiplication(X0,zero)),strong_iteration(multiplication(X0,zero)))
      & leq(strong_iteration(multiplication(X0,zero)),addition(one,multiplication(X0,zero))) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',goals) ).

fof(goals_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0] :
        ( leq(addition(one,multiplication(X0,zero)),strong_iteration(multiplication(X0,zero)))
        & leq(strong_iteration(multiplication(X0,zero)),addition(one,multiplication(X0,zero))) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[goals]) ).

cnf(c_20,plain,
    addition(A,B) = addition(B,A),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[additive_commutativity]) ).

cnf(c_23,plain,
    addition(A,A) = A,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[idempotence]) ).

cnf(c_24,plain,
    multiplication(multiplication(A,B),C) = multiplication(A,multiplication(B,C)),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[multiplicative_associativity]) ).

cnf(c_31,plain,
    multiplication(zero,A) = zero,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[left_annihilation]) ).

cnf(c_38,plain,
    strong_iteration(A) = addition(multiplication(A,strong_iteration(A)),one),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[infty_unfold1]) ).

cnf(c_897,plain,
    strong_iteration(A) = addition(one,multiplication(A,strong_iteration(A))),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_20,c_38]) ).

cnf(c_39,plain,
    addition(one,multiplication(A,strong_iteration(A))) = strong_iteration(A),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_897]) ).

cnf(c_44,plain,
    ( addition(A,B) != B
    | leq(A,B) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[order]) ).

fof(nnf_19,plain,
    ? [X0] :
      ( ~ leq(addition(one,multiplication(X0,zero)),strong_iteration(multiplication(X0,zero)))
      | ~ leq(strong_iteration(multiplication(X0,zero)),addition(one,multiplication(X0,zero))) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[goals_neg]) ).

fof(sk_goals_neg,plain,
    ( ~ leq(addition(one,multiplication(sK0,zero)),strong_iteration(multiplication(sK0,zero)))
    | ~ leq(strong_iteration(multiplication(sK0,zero)),addition(one,multiplication(sK0,zero))) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0]),skolemize(X0,sK0)],[nnf_19]) ).

cnf(c_45,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ leq(addition(one,multiplication(sK0,zero)),strong_iteration(multiplication(sK0,zero)))
    | ~ leq(strong_iteration(multiplication(sK0,zero)),addition(one,multiplication(sK0,zero))) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_goals_neg]) ).

cnf(c_87,plain,
    addition(one,multiplication(A,multiplication(B,strong_iteration(multiplication(A,B))))) = strong_iteration(multiplication(A,B)),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_24,c_39]) ).

cnf(c_102,plain,
    leq(A,A),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_44,c_23]) ).

cnf(c_898,plain,
    addition(one,multiplication(A,zero)) = strong_iteration(multiplication(A,zero)),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_31,c_87]) ).

cnf(c_870,plain,
    strong_iteration(multiplication(A,zero)) = addition(one,multiplication(A,zero)),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_898]) ).

cnf(c_899,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ leq(addition(one,multiplication(sK0,zero)),strong_iteration(multiplication(sK0,zero)))
    | ~ leq(addition(one,multiplication(sK0,zero)),addition(one,multiplication(sK0,zero))) ),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_870,c_45]) ).

cnf(c_900,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ leq(addition(one,multiplication(sK0,zero)),addition(one,multiplication(sK0,zero)))
    | ~ leq(addition(one,multiplication(sK0,zero)),addition(one,multiplication(sK0,zero))) ),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_870,c_899]) ).

cnf(c_901,negated_conjecture,
    ~ leq(addition(one,multiplication(sK0,zero)),addition(one,multiplication(sK0,zero))),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_900]) ).

cnf(c_896,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_102,c_901]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05  % Problem  : KLE150+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.07  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.43  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.18/0.43  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.18/0.43  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.18/0.43  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.18/0.43  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.18/0.43  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.18/0.43  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.18/0.43  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 19:27:48 UTC 2026
% 0.18/0.44  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.44  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.18/0.44  % Process 3471449 was started by sandbox on n019,
% 0.18/0.44  % Fri Sep 25 19:27:48 2026
% 0.18/0.44  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.18/0.45  
% 0.18/0.45  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 1.14/0.69  
% 1.14/0.69  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 1.14/0.69  
% 1.14/0.69  % Proof 1 at 0.15 (+ 0.08) seconds.
% 1.14/0.69  % Length of proof is 19.
% 1.14/0.69  % Level of proof is 5.
% 1.14/0.69  % Maximum clause weight is 50.000.
% 1.14/0.69  % Given clauses 111.
% 1.14/0.69  
% 1.14/0.69  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------