↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : KLE151+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 07:44:25 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.11s 0.45s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.11s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   34 (  30 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   38 (  20 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   15 (  11   ~;   2   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   50 (   0 sgn  20   !;   2   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(additive_commutativity,axiom,
    ! [A,B] : addition(A,B) = addition(B,A),
    file('theBenchmark.p',additive_commutativity) ).

fof(idempotence,axiom,
    ! [A] : addition(A,A) = A,
    file('theBenchmark.p',idempotence) ).

fof(multiplicative_associativity,axiom,
    ! [A,B,C] : multiplication(A,multiplication(B,C)) = multiplication(multiplication(A,B),C),
    file('theBenchmark.p',multiplicative_associativity) ).

fof(multiplicative_right_identity,axiom,
    ! [A] : multiplication(A,one) = A,
    file('theBenchmark.p',multiplicative_right_identity) ).

fof(distributivity1,axiom,
    ! [A,B,C] : multiplication(A,addition(B,C)) = addition(multiplication(A,B),multiplication(A,C)),
    file('theBenchmark.p',distributivity1) ).

fof(infty_unfold1,axiom,
    ! [A] : strong_iteration(A) = addition(multiplication(A,strong_iteration(A)),one),
    file('theBenchmark.p',infty_unfold1) ).

fof(infty_coinduction,axiom,
    ! [A,B,C] :
      ( leq(C,addition(multiplication(A,C),B))
     => leq(C,multiplication(strong_iteration(A),B)) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',infty_coinduction) ).

fof(order,axiom,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( leq(A,B)
    <=> addition(A,B) = B ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',order) ).

fof(goals,conjecture,
    ! [X0,X1] : leq(multiplication(X0,strong_iteration(multiplication(X1,X0))),multiplication(strong_iteration(multiplication(X0,X1)),X0)),
    file('theBenchmark.p',goals) ).

fof(goals_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0,X1] : leq(multiplication(X0,strong_iteration(multiplication(X1,X0))),multiplication(strong_iteration(multiplication(X0,X1)),X0)),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[goals]) ).

cnf(c_20,plain,
    addition(A,B) = addition(B,A),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[additive_commutativity]) ).

cnf(c_23,plain,
    addition(A,A) = A,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[idempotence]) ).

cnf(c_24,plain,
    multiplication(multiplication(A,B),C) = multiplication(A,multiplication(B,C)),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[multiplicative_associativity]) ).

cnf(c_25,plain,
    multiplication(A,one) = A,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[multiplicative_right_identity]) ).

cnf(c_27,plain,
    multiplication(A,addition(B,C)) = addition(multiplication(A,B),multiplication(A,C)),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[distributivity1]) ).

cnf(c_28,plain,
    addition(multiplication(A,B),multiplication(A,C)) = multiplication(A,addition(B,C)),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_27]) ).

cnf(c_38,plain,
    strong_iteration(A) = addition(multiplication(A,strong_iteration(A)),one),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[infty_unfold1]) ).

cnf(c_115,plain,
    strong_iteration(A) = addition(one,multiplication(A,strong_iteration(A))),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_20,c_38]) ).

cnf(c_39,plain,
    addition(one,multiplication(A,strong_iteration(A))) = strong_iteration(A),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_115]) ).

cnf(c_40,plain,
    ( leq(A,multiplication(strong_iteration(B),C))
    | ~ leq(A,addition(multiplication(B,A),C)) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[infty_coinduction]) ).

cnf(c_44,plain,
    ( addition(A,B) != B
    | leq(A,B) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[order]) ).

fof(nnf_19,plain,
    ? [X0,X1] : ~ leq(multiplication(X0,strong_iteration(multiplication(X1,X0))),multiplication(strong_iteration(multiplication(X0,X1)),X0)),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[goals_neg]) ).

fof(sk_goals_neg,plain,
    ~ leq(multiplication(sK0,strong_iteration(multiplication(sK1,sK0))),multiplication(strong_iteration(multiplication(sK0,sK1)),sK0)),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1]),skolemize(X0,sK0),skolemize(X1,sK1)],[nnf_19]) ).

cnf(c_45,negated_conjecture,
    ~ leq(multiplication(sK0,strong_iteration(multiplication(sK1,sK0))),multiplication(strong_iteration(multiplication(sK0,sK1)),sK0)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_goals_neg]) ).

cnf(c_116,plain,
    addition(A,multiplication(A,B)) = multiplication(A,addition(one,B)),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_25,c_28]) ).

cnf(c_53,plain,
    multiplication(A,addition(one,B)) = addition(A,multiplication(A,B)),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_116]) ).

cnf(c_87,plain,
    addition(one,multiplication(A,multiplication(B,strong_iteration(multiplication(A,B))))) = strong_iteration(multiplication(A,B)),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_24,c_39]) ).

cnf(c_102,plain,
    leq(A,A),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_44,c_23]) ).

cnf(c_117,negated_conjecture,
    ~ leq(multiplication(sK0,strong_iteration(multiplication(sK1,sK0))),addition(multiplication(multiplication(sK0,sK1),multiplication(sK0,strong_iteration(multiplication(sK1,sK0)))),sK0)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_40,c_45]) ).

cnf(c_118,negated_conjecture,
    ~ leq(multiplication(sK0,strong_iteration(multiplication(sK1,sK0))),addition(multiplication(sK0,multiplication(sK1,multiplication(sK0,strong_iteration(multiplication(sK1,sK0))))),sK0)),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_24,c_117]) ).

cnf(c_119,negated_conjecture,
    ~ leq(multiplication(sK0,strong_iteration(multiplication(sK1,sK0))),addition(sK0,multiplication(sK0,multiplication(sK1,multiplication(sK0,strong_iteration(multiplication(sK1,sK0))))))),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_20,c_118]) ).

cnf(c_120,negated_conjecture,
    ~ leq(multiplication(sK0,strong_iteration(multiplication(sK1,sK0))),multiplication(sK0,addition(one,multiplication(sK1,multiplication(sK0,strong_iteration(multiplication(sK1,sK0))))))),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_53,c_119]) ).

cnf(c_113,negated_conjecture,
    ~ leq(multiplication(sK0,strong_iteration(multiplication(sK1,sK0))),multiplication(sK0,strong_iteration(multiplication(sK1,sK0)))),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_87,c_120]) ).

cnf(c_114,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_113,c_102]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : KLE151+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.06/0.37  % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.06/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.06/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.06/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.06/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.06/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.06/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.06/0.37  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 19:27:25 UTC 2026
% 0.06/0.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.38  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.11/0.38  % Process 3550272 was started by sandbox on n006,
% 0.11/0.38  % Fri Sep 25 19:27:25 2026
% 0.11/0.38  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.11/0.39  
% 0.11/0.39  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.11/0.45  
% 0.11/0.45  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.11/0.45  
% 0.11/0.45  % Proof 1 at 0.01 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.11/0.45  % Length of proof is 25.
% 0.11/0.45  % Level of proof is 5.
% 0.11/0.45  % Maximum clause weight is 15.000.
% 0.11/0.45  % Given clauses 20.
% 0.11/0.45  
% 0.11/0.45  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------