↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : KLE167+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 07:44:27 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.24s 0.54s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.24s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   12
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   42 (  31 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   59 (  29 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   34 (  17   ~;   8   |;   5   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   60 (   4 sgn  21   !;   2   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(additive_commutativity,axiom,
    ! [A,B] : addition(A,B) = addition(B,A),
    file('theBenchmark.p',additive_commutativity) ).

fof(additive_associativity,axiom,
    ! [C,B,A] : addition(A,addition(B,C)) = addition(addition(A,B),C),
    file('theBenchmark.p',additive_associativity) ).

fof(additive_identity,axiom,
    ! [A] : addition(A,zero) = A,
    file('theBenchmark.p',additive_identity) ).

fof(idempotence,axiom,
    ! [A] : addition(A,A) = A,
    file('theBenchmark.p',idempotence) ).

fof(multiplicative_right_identity,axiom,
    ! [A] : multiplication(A,one) = A,
    file('theBenchmark.p',multiplicative_right_identity) ).

fof(distributivity1,axiom,
    ! [A,B,C] : multiplication(A,addition(B,C)) = addition(multiplication(A,B),multiplication(A,C)),
    file('theBenchmark.p',distributivity1) ).

fof(star_unfold1,axiom,
    ! [A] : addition(one,multiplication(A,star(A))) = star(A),
    file('theBenchmark.p',star_unfold1) ).

fof(star_induction2,axiom,
    ! [A,B,C] :
      ( leq(addition(multiplication(C,A),B),C)
     => leq(multiplication(B,star(A)),C) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',star_induction2) ).

fof(order,axiom,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( leq(A,B)
    <=> addition(A,B) = B ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',order) ).

fof(goals,conjecture,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( leq(X0,multiplication(X0,star(X1)))
      & ( multiplication(X0,X1) = zero
       => leq(multiplication(X0,star(X1)),X0) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',goals) ).

fof(goals_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0,X1] :
        ( leq(X0,multiplication(X0,star(X1)))
        & ( multiplication(X0,X1) = zero
         => leq(multiplication(X0,star(X1)),X0) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[goals]) ).

cnf(c_20,plain,
    addition(A,B) = addition(B,A),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[additive_commutativity]) ).

cnf(c_21,plain,
    addition(addition(A,B),C) = addition(A,addition(B,C)),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[additive_associativity]) ).

cnf(c_22,plain,
    addition(A,zero) = A,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[additive_identity]) ).

cnf(c_23,plain,
    addition(A,A) = A,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[idempotence]) ).

cnf(c_25,plain,
    multiplication(A,one) = A,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[multiplicative_right_identity]) ).

cnf(c_27,plain,
    multiplication(A,addition(B,C)) = addition(multiplication(A,B),multiplication(A,C)),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[distributivity1]) ).

cnf(c_28,plain,
    addition(multiplication(A,B),multiplication(A,C)) = multiplication(A,addition(B,C)),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_27]) ).

cnf(c_32,plain,
    star(A) = addition(one,multiplication(A,star(A))),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[star_unfold1]) ).

cnf(c_33,plain,
    addition(one,multiplication(A,star(A))) = star(A),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_32]) ).

cnf(c_37,plain,
    ( leq(multiplication(C,star(B)),A)
    | ~ leq(addition(multiplication(A,B),C),A) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[star_induction2]) ).

cnf(c_44,plain,
    ( addition(A,B) != B
    | leq(A,B) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[order]) ).

fof(nnf_19,plain,
    ? [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ leq(X0,multiplication(X0,star(X1)))
      | ( ~ leq(multiplication(X0,star(X1)),X0)
        & multiplication(X0,X1) = zero ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[goals_neg]) ).

fof(sk_goals_neg_sk,plain,
    ( ~ leq(sK0,multiplication(sK0,star(sK1)))
    | ( ~ leq(multiplication(sK0,star(sK1)),sK0)
      & multiplication(sK0,sK1) = zero ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1]),skolemize(X0,sK0),skolemize(X1,sK1)],[nnf_19]) ).

fof(sk_goals_neg,plain,
    ( ( ~ leq(sK0,multiplication(sK0,star(sK1)))
      | ~ leq(multiplication(sK0,star(sK1)),sK0) )
    & ( ~ leq(sK0,multiplication(sK0,star(sK1)))
      | multiplication(sK0,sK1) = zero ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[sk_goals_neg_sk]) ).

cnf(c_45,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ leq(sK0,multiplication(sK0,star(sK1)))
    | multiplication(sK0,sK1) = zero ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_goals_neg]) ).

cnf(c_46,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ leq(sK0,multiplication(sK0,star(sK1)))
    | ~ leq(multiplication(sK0,star(sK1)),sK0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_goals_neg]) ).

cnf(c_186,plain,
    A = addition(zero,A),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_22,c_20]) ).

cnf(c_49,plain,
    addition(zero,A) = A,
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_186]) ).

cnf(c_187,plain,
    addition(A,B) = addition(A,addition(A,B)),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_23,c_21]) ).

cnf(c_50,plain,
    addition(A,addition(A,B)) = addition(A,B),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_187]) ).

cnf(c_78,plain,
    leq(A,A),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_44,c_23]) ).

cnf(c_92,plain,
    leq(A,addition(A,B)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_44,c_50]) ).

cnf(c_100,plain,
    leq(multiplication(A,B),multiplication(A,addition(B,C))),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_28,c_92]) ).

cnf(c_188,plain,
    leq(multiplication(A,one),multiplication(A,star(B))),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_33,c_100]) ).

cnf(c_148,plain,
    leq(A,multiplication(A,star(B))),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_25,c_188]) ).

cnf(c_154,negated_conjecture,
    ~ leq(multiplication(sK0,star(sK1)),sK0),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_148,c_46]) ).

cnf(c_155,negated_conjecture,
    multiplication(sK0,sK1) = zero,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_148,c_45]) ).

cnf(c_189,negated_conjecture,
    ~ leq(addition(multiplication(sK0,sK1),sK0),sK0),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_37,c_154]) ).

cnf(c_190,negated_conjecture,
    ~ leq(addition(zero,sK0),sK0),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_155,c_189]) ).

cnf(c_191,negated_conjecture,
    ~ leq(sK0,sK0),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_49,c_190]) ).

cnf(c_185,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_78,c_191]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05  % Problem  : KLE167+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.06  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.45  % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.20/0.45  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.20/0.45  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.20/0.45  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.20/0.45  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.20/0.45  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.20/0.45  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.20/0.46  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 19:33:12 UTC 2026
% 0.20/0.46  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.46  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.20/0.46  % Process 2066007 was started by sandbox on n015,
% 0.20/0.46  % Fri Sep 25 19:33:12 2026
% 0.20/0.46  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.20/0.47  
% 0.20/0.47  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.24/0.54  
% 0.24/0.54  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.24/0.54  
% 0.24/0.54  % Proof 1 at 0.03 (+ 0.02) seconds.
% 0.24/0.54  % Length of proof is 32.
% 0.24/0.54  % Level of proof is 7.
% 0.24/0.54  % Maximum clause weight is 30.000.
% 0.24/0.54  % Given clauses 51.
% 0.24/0.54  
% 0.24/0.54  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------