↑ Up

E-SAT---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem  : KRS003_1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:01:17 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.24s 0.56s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.24s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   37 (   7 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   75 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   74 (  36   ~;  27   |;   4   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   7  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    3 (   2 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    9 (   8 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   1 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   33 (   0 sgn  33   !;   0   ?;  33   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(decl_sort1,type,
    unreal: $tType ).

tff(decl_sort2,type,
    real: $tType ).

tff(decl_23,type,
    u1r1: unreal > real ).

tff(decl_24,type,
    u1r2: unreal > real ).

tff(decl_27,type,
    exist: unreal ).

tff(decl_28,type,
    f: unreal > $o ).

tff(decl_29,type,
    d: unreal > $o ).

tff(decl_30,type,
    e: unreal > $o ).

tff(decl_31,type,
    s1most: unreal > $o ).

tff(decl_32,type,
    s: ( real * unreal ) > $o ).

tff(decl_33,type,
    c: unreal > $o ).

tff(decl_34,type,
    equalish: ( real * real ) > $o ).

tff(decl_35,type,
    s2least: unreal > $o ).

tff(clause_1__clause_2,conjecture,
    ( ~ f(exist)
    | ~ e(exist) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_1__clause_2) ).

tff(clause_11,axiom,
    ! [X2: real,X3: real,X1: unreal] :
      ( ( s(X1,X2)
        & s(X1,X3)
        & s1most(X1) )
     => equalish(X3,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_11) ).

tff(clause_6,axiom,
    ! [X1: unreal] :
      ( s2least(X1)
     => s(X1,u1r1(X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_6) ).

tff(clause_15,axiom,
    ! [X1: unreal] :
      ( e(X1)
     => c(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_15) ).

tff(clause_16,axiom,
    ! [X1: unreal] :
      ( f(X1)
     => d(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_16) ).

tff(clause_5,axiom,
    ! [X1: unreal] :
      ~ ( equalish(u1r2(X1),u1r1(X1))
        & s2least(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_5) ).

tff(clause_7,axiom,
    ! [X1: unreal] :
      ( s2least(X1)
     => s(X1,u1r2(X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_7) ).

tff(clause_3,axiom,
    ! [X1: unreal] :
      ( c(X1)
     => s2least(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_3) ).

tff(clause_9,axiom,
    ! [X1: unreal] :
      ( d(X1)
     => s1most(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_9) ).

tff(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ~ f(exist)
      | ~ e(exist) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[clause_1__clause_2]) ).

tff(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ~ f(exist)
      | ~ e(exist) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

tff(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X14: real,X15: real,X16: unreal] :
      ( equalish(X15,X14)
      | ~ s(X16,X14)
      | ~ s(X16,X15)
      | ~ s1most(X16) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[clause_11])])]) ).

tff(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X7: unreal] :
      ( s(X7,u1r1(X7))
      | ~ s2least(X7) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[clause_6])])]) ).

tff(c_0_13,plain,
    ! [X20: unreal] :
      ( c(X20)
      | ~ e(X20) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[clause_15])])]) ).

tff(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    ( f(exist)
    & e(exist) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

tff(c_0_15,plain,
    ! [X21: unreal] :
      ( d(X21)
      | ~ f(X21) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[clause_16])])]) ).

tff(c_0_16,plain,
    ! [X6: unreal] :
      ( ~ equalish(u1r2(X6),u1r1(X6))
      | ~ s2least(X6) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[clause_5])])]) ).

tcf(c_0_17,plain,
    ! [X1: unreal,X2: real,X3: real] :
      ( ~ s(X1,X3)
      | ~ s(X1,X2)
      | ~ s1most(X1)
      | equalish(X2,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

tcf(c_0_18,plain,
    ! [X1: unreal] :
      ( ~ s2least(X1)
      | s(X1,u1r1(X1)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

tff(c_0_19,plain,
    ! [X8: unreal] :
      ( s(X8,u1r2(X8))
      | ~ s2least(X8) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[clause_7])])]) ).

tff(c_0_20,plain,
    ! [X4: unreal] :
      ( s2least(X4)
      | ~ c(X4) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[clause_3])])]) ).

tcf(c_0_21,plain,
    ! [X1: unreal] :
      ( ~ e(X1)
      | c(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

tcf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    e(exist),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

tff(c_0_23,plain,
    ! [X12: unreal] :
      ( s1most(X12)
      | ~ d(X12) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[clause_9])])]) ).

tcf(c_0_24,plain,
    ! [X1: unreal] :
      ( ~ f(X1)
      | d(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).

tcf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    f(exist),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

tcf(c_0_26,plain,
    ! [X1: unreal] :
      ( ~ equalish(u1r2(X1),u1r1(X1))
      | ~ s2least(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).

tcf(c_0_27,plain,
    ! [X2: real,X1: unreal] :
      ( ~ s1most(X1)
      | ~ s(X1,X2)
      | ~ s2least(X1)
      | equalish(X2,u1r1(X1)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).

tcf(c_0_28,plain,
    ! [X1: unreal] :
      ( ~ s2least(X1)
      | s(X1,u1r2(X1)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).

tcf(c_0_29,plain,
    ! [X1: unreal] :
      ( ~ c(X1)
      | s2least(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).

tcf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    c(exist),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).

tcf(c_0_31,plain,
    ! [X1: unreal] :
      ( ~ d(X1)
      | s1most(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_23]) ).

tcf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    d(exist),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]) ).

tcf(c_0_33,plain,
    ! [X1: unreal] :
      ( ~ s1most(X1)
      | ~ s2least(X1) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]),c_0_28]) ).

tcf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
    s2least(exist),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]) ).

tcf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
    s1most(exist),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_34]),c_0_35])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.04  % Problem  : KRS003_1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.0.0.
% 0.00/0.07  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.19/0.46  % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.19/0.46  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.19/0.46  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.19/0.46  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.19/0.46  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.19/0.46  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.19/0.46  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.19/0.46  % DateTime : Sun Sep 20 22:53:06 UTC 2026
% 0.19/0.46  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.46  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.19/0.52  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.19/0.52  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/0.56  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.24/0.56  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.24/0.56  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.24/0.56  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.24/0.56  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.56  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.56  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.56  % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 4120680 completed with status 0
% 0.24/0.56  % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.24/0.56  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.24/0.56  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.24/0.56  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.24/0.56  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.24/0.56  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.24/0.56  % Search class: FGHNF-FFSF11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.24/0.56  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.24/0.56  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.56  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.56  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.56  % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.56  % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.56  % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 4120687 completed with status 0
% 0.24/0.56  % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.24/0.56  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.24/0.56  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.24/0.56  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.24/0.56  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.24/0.56  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.24/0.56  % Search class: FGHNF-FFSF11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.24/0.56  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.24/0.56  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.56  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.56  % Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
% 0.24/0.56  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.24/0.56  
% 0.24/0.56  % Proof found!
% 0.24/0.56  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.24/0.56  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.24/0.56  % Parsed axioms                        : 30
% 0.24/0.56  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.24/0.56  % Initial clauses                      : 31
% 0.24/0.56  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 15
% 0.24/0.56  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 16
% 0.24/0.56  % Processed clauses                    : 38
% 0.24/0.56  % ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.24/0.56  % ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.24/0.56  % ...remaining for further processing  : 38
% 0.24/0.56  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.24/0.56  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.24/0.56  % Backward-subsumed                    : 2
% 0.24/0.56  % Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.24/0.56  % Generated clauses                    : 12
% 0.24/0.56  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 7
% 0.24/0.56  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.24/0.56  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 1
% 0.24/0.56  % Paramodulations                      : 12
% 0.24/0.56  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.24/0.56  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.24/0.56  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.24/0.56  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.24/0.56  % Total rewrite steps                  : 1
% 0.24/0.56  % ...of those cached                   : 0
% 0.24/0.56  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.24/0.56  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.24/0.56  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.24/0.56  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.24/0.56  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.24/0.56  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.24/0.56  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.24/0.56  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.24/0.56  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.24/0.56  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.24/0.56  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.24/0.56  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.24/0.56  % Current number of processed clauses  : 20
% 0.24/0.56  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 6
% 0.24/0.56  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.24/0.56  %    Negative unit clauses             : 0
% 0.24/0.56  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 14
% 0.24/0.56  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1
% 0.24/0.56  % ...number of literals in the above   : 4
% 0.24/0.56  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.24/0.56  % Current number of archived clauses   : 18
% 0.24/0.56  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 45
% 0.24/0.56  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 36
% 0.24/0.56  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 3
% 0.24/0.56  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.24/0.56  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.24/0.56  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 0.24/0.56  % BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.24/0.56  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.24/0.56  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.24/0.56  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 1402
% 0.24/0.56  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 141
% 0.24/0.56  
% 0.24/0.56  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.24/0.56  % User time                : 0.009 s
% 0.24/0.56  % System time              : 0.005 s
% 0.24/0.56  % Total time               : 0.014 s
% 0.24/0.56  % Maximum resident set size: 3644 pages
% 0.24/0.56  
% 0.24/0.56  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.24/0.56  % User time                : 0.020 s
% 0.24/0.56  % System time              : 0.014 s
% 0.24/0.56  % Total time               : 0.033 s
% 0.24/0.56  % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.24/0.56  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------