%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem : KRS003_10 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v8.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:01:17 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Satisfiable 0.11s 0.43s
% Output : Saturation 0.11s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named c_0_14ERROR: Could not build tree for root c_0_19ERROR: MakeTreeStats fails)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tcf(c_0_19,plain,
! [X1: unreal,X2: real,X3: real] :
( ~ s(X1,X3)
| ~ s(X1,X2)
| equalish(X2,X3)
| s2least(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_20,plain,
! [X1: unreal] :
( s(X1,u3r1(X1))
| s1most(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_23,plain,
! [X1: unreal,X2: real,X3: real] :
( ~ s(X1,X3)
| ~ s(X1,X2)
| ~ s1most(X1)
| equalish(X2,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_24,plain,
! [X1: unreal] :
( ~ s2least(X1)
| s(X1,u1r1(X1)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_26,plain,
! [X1: unreal] :
( ~ equalish(u3r2(X1),u3r1(X1))
| s1most(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_28,plain,
! [X1: unreal] :
( s(X1,u3r2(X1))
| s1most(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_29,plain,
! [X1: unreal] :
( ~ equalish(u1r2(X1),u1r1(X1))
| ~ s2least(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_31,plain,
! [X1: unreal] :
( ~ s2least(X1)
| s(X1,u1r2(X1)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_25]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_38,plain,
! [X1: unreal] :
( s1most(X1)
| s2least(X1) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]),c_0_28]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_39,plain,
! [X1: unreal] :
( ~ s1most(X1)
| ~ s2least(X1) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]),c_0_31]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_40,plain,
! [X1: unreal] :
( ~ s2least(X1)
| c(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_32]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_41,plain,
! [X1: unreal] :
( ~ s1most(X1)
| d(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_33]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_42,plain,
! [X1: unreal] :
( ~ c(X1)
| s2least(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_34]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_43,plain,
! [X1: unreal] :
( ~ e(X1)
| c(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_35]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_44,plain,
! [X1: unreal] :
( ~ d(X1)
| s1most(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_36]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_45,plain,
! [X1: unreal] :
( ~ f(X1)
| d(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_37]),
[final] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : KRS003_10 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v8.2.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.36 % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.36 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.36 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.36 % DateTime : Sun Sep 20 22:50:55 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.37 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.41 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.11/0.41 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.11/0.43 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.11/0.43 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.11/0.43 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.11/0.43 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.11/0.43 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.43 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.43 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.43 % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 3768522 completed with status 1
% 0.11/0.43 % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.11/0.43 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.11/0.43 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.11/0.43 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.11/0.43 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.11/0.43 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.11/0.43 % Search class: FGHNF-FFSF11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.11/0.43 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.11/0.43 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.43 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.43 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.43 % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.43 % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.43 % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with pid 3768534 completed with status 1
% 0.11/0.43 % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y
% 0.11/0.43 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.11/0.43 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.11/0.43 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.11/0.43 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.11/0.43 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.11/0.43 % Search class: FGHNF-FFSF11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.11/0.43 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.11/0.43 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.43 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.43 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.43 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.11/0.43 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.11/0.43
% 0.11/0.43 % No proof found!
% 0.11/0.43 % SZS status Satisfiable
% 0.11/0.43 % SZS output start Saturation
% See solution above
% 0.11/0.43 % Parsed axioms : 29
% 0.11/0.43 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Initial clauses : 29
% 0.11/0.43 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 15
% 0.11/0.43 % Initial clauses in saturation : 14
% 0.11/0.43 % Processed clauses : 34
% 0.11/0.43 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % ...remaining for further processing : 34
% 0.11/0.43 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Backward-subsumed : 4
% 0.11/0.43 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Generated clauses : 13
% 0.11/0.43 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 6
% 0.11/0.43 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 2
% 0.11/0.43 % Paramodulations : 13
% 0.11/0.43 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % NegExts : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Total rewrite steps : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.43 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.43 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.43 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.43 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.43 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.43 % Current number of processed clauses : 16
% 0.11/0.43 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Non-unit-clauses : 16
% 0.11/0.43 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.11/0.43 % ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Current number of archived clauses : 18
% 0.11/0.43 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 70
% 0.11/0.43 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 56
% 0.11/0.43 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 6
% 0.11/0.43 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Termbank termtop insertions : 1464
% 0.11/0.43 % Search garbage collected termcells : 138
% 0.11/0.43
% 0.11/0.43 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.11/0.43 % User time : 0.004 s
% 0.11/0.43 % System time : 0.003 s
% 0.11/0.43 % Total time : 0.007 s
% 0.11/0.43 % Maximum resident set size: 3388 pages
% 0.11/0.43
% 0.11/0.43 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.11/0.43 % User time : 0.011 s
% 0.11/0.43 % System time : 0.014 s
% 0.11/0.43 % Total time : 0.026 s
% 0.11/0.43 % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.11/0.43 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------