%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : KRS005-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:00:33 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Satisfiable 0.15s 0.43s
% Output : Saturation 0.15s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named c_0_8ERROR: Could not build tree for root c_0_17ERROR: MakeTreeStats fails)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( ~ equalish(u0r1(X4,X1),X4)
| ~ r(X1,X4)
| ~ r(X1,X3)
| ~ r(X1,X2)
| equalish(X2,X3)
| e(X1) ),
c_0_8,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( ~ r(X2,X1)
| ~ e(X2)
| equalish(X1,u0r4(X2)) ),
c_0_9,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( ~ e(X4)
| ~ r(X3,X1)
| ~ r(X3,X2)
| ~ r(X3,u0r4(X4))
| ~ r(X4,u0r1(u0r4(X4),X3))
| e(X3)
| equalish(X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( ~ r(X1,X4)
| ~ r(X1,X3)
| ~ r(X1,X2)
| r(X1,u0r1(X4,X1))
| equalish(X2,X3)
| e(X1) ),
c_0_12,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( ~ equalish(u0r3(X1),u0r2(X1))
| ~ e(X1) ),
c_0_13,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
( ~ e(X1)
| r(X1,u0r2(X1)) ),
c_0_14,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
( ~ e(X1)
| r(X1,u0r3(X1)) ),
c_0_15,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
( ~ e(X1)
| r(X1,u0r4(X1)) ),
c_0_16,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
e(exist),
clause_1,
[final] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : KRS005-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.36 % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.36 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.36 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.36 % DateTime : Sun Sep 20 22:50:39 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/0.36 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.15/0.41 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/0.41 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.43 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.15/0.43 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.43 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.43 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.43 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43 % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 3679798 completed with status 1
% 0.15/0.43 % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.15/0.43 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.43 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.43 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.43 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.15/0.43 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.15/0.43 % Search class: FGHNF-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.43 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.15/0.43 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S032N with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43 % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43 % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43 % SubtermCWHack with pid 3679803 completed with status 1
% 0.15/0.43 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.15/0.43 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.43 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.43 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.43 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.15/0.43 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.15/0.43 % Search class: FGHNF-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.43 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.15/0.43 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.15/0.43
% 0.15/0.43 % No proof found!
% 0.15/0.43 % SZS status Satisfiable
% 0.15/0.43 % SZS output start Saturation
% See solution above
% 0.15/0.43 % Parsed axioms : 8
% 0.15/0.43 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.15/0.43 % Initial clauses : 8
% 0.15/0.43 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.15/0.43 % Initial clauses in saturation : 8
% 0.15/0.43 % Processed clauses : 9
% 0.15/0.43 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.15/0.43 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.43 % ...remaining for further processing : 9
% 0.15/0.43 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.15/0.43 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.15/0.43 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.43 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.15/0.43 % Generated clauses : 4
% 0.15/0.43 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1
% 0.15/0.43 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.43 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.15/0.43 % Paramodulations : 4
% 0.15/0.43 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.15/0.43 % NegExts : 0
% 0.15/0.43 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.15/0.43 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.15/0.43 % Total rewrite steps : 0
% 0.15/0.43 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.15/0.43 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.15/0.43 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.15/0.43 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.15/0.43 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.15/0.43 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.15/0.43 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.15/0.43 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.43 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.43 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.43 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.43 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.43 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.43 % Current number of processed clauses : 9
% 0.15/0.43 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 1
% 0.15/0.43 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.15/0.43 % Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.15/0.43 % Non-unit-clauses : 8
% 0.15/0.43 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.15/0.43 % ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.15/0.43 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.15/0.43 % Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.15/0.43 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 6
% 0.15/0.43 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.15/0.43 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.15/0.43 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.15/0.43 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.15/0.43 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.15/0.43 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.15/0.43 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.15/0.43 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.15/0.43 % Termbank termtop insertions : 430
% 0.15/0.43 % Search garbage collected termcells : 28
% 0.15/0.43
% 0.15/0.43 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.43 % User time : 0.003 s
% 0.15/0.43 % System time : 0.003 s
% 0.15/0.43 % Total time : 0.006 s
% 0.15/0.43 % Maximum resident set size: 3584 pages
% 0.15/0.43
% 0.15/0.43 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.43 % User time : 0.008 s
% 0.15/0.43 % System time : 0.010 s
% 0.15/0.43 % Total time : 0.018 s
% 0.15/0.43 % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.15/0.43 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------