↑ Up

E---3.5.1.SAT-Sat.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : KRS006-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:00:33 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Satisfiable 0.05s 0.44s
% Output   : Saturation 0.05s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named c_0_27ERROR: Could not build tree for root c_0_30ERROR: MakeTreeStats fails)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    ( ~ s(X3,X2)
    | ~ s(X3,X1)
    | ~ s1most(X3)
    | equalish(X1,X2) ),
    c_0_27,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    ( ~ s2least(X1)
    | s(X1,u1r1(X1)) ),
    c_0_28,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    ( ~ equalish(u1r2(X1),u1r1(X1))
    | ~ s2least(X1) ),
    c_0_29,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_38,plain,
    ( ~ s2least(X1)
    | s(X1,u1r2(X1)) ),
    c_0_32,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_39,plain,
    ( ~ c(X1)
    | s2least(X1) ),
    c_0_33,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_40,plain,
    ( ~ e(X1)
    | c(u4r1(X1)) ),
    c_0_34,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_46,plain,
    ( ~ s(X1,X3)
    | ~ s(X1,X2)
    | equalish(X2,X3)
    | s2least(X1) ),
    c_0_35,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_47,axiom,
    ( s(X1,u3r1(X1))
    | s1most(X1) ),
    clause_16,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_50,negated_conjecture,
    c(u4r1(exist)),
    clause_5,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_51,plain,
    ( ~ s2least(X1)
    | ~ s1most(X1) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_37]),c_0_38]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_52,plain,
    ( ~ e(X1)
    | s2least(u4r1(X1)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_39,c_0_40]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_53,plain,
    ( ~ r(X3,X2)
    | ~ r(X3,X1)
    | ~ r1most(X3)
    | equalish(X1,X2) ),
    c_0_41,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_54,plain,
    ( ~ e(X1)
    | r(X1,u4r1(X1)) ),
    c_0_42,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_55,plain,
    ( ~ e(X1)
    | r1most(X1) ),
    c_0_43,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_56,plain,
    ( ~ e(X1)
    | r(X1,u4r2(X1)) ),
    c_0_44,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_57,plain,
    ( ~ equalish(u3r2(X1),u3r1(X1))
    | s1most(X1) ),
    c_0_45,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_59,axiom,
    ( s(X1,u3r2(X1))
    | s1most(X1) ),
    clause_17,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_61,negated_conjecture,
    r(exist,u4r1(exist)),
    clause_3,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_62,negated_conjecture,
    r1most(exist),
    clause_2,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_64,plain,
    ( ~ d(X1)
    | s1most(X1) ),
    c_0_48,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_65,plain,
    ( ~ e(X1)
    | d(u4r2(X1)) ),
    c_0_49,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_68,negated_conjecture,
    s2least(u4r1(exist)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_39,c_0_50]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_69,negated_conjecture,
    d(u4r2(exist)),
    clause_4,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_70,plain,
    ( ~ e(X1)
    | ~ s1most(u4r1(X1)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_51,c_0_52]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_71,plain,
    ( ~ e(X2)
    | ~ r(X2,X1)
    | equalish(X1,u4r1(X2)) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_53,c_0_54]),c_0_55]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_72,plain,
    ( ~ e(X2)
    | ~ r(X2,X1)
    | equalish(X1,u4r2(X2)) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_53,c_0_56]),c_0_55]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_73,plain,
    ( s2least(X1)
    | s1most(X1) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_57,c_0_58]),c_0_59]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_74,plain,
    ( ~ d(X3)
    | ~ r(X1,X3)
    | ~ c(X2)
    | ~ r(X1,X2)
    | ~ r1most(X1)
    | e(X1) ),
    c_0_60,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_75,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ r(exist,X1)
    | equalish(X1,u4r1(exist)) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_53,c_0_61]),c_0_62])]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_76,plain,
    ( ~ equalish(u5r2(X1),u5r1(X1))
    | r1most(X1) ),
    c_0_63,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_77,axiom,
    ( r(X1,u5r1(X1))
    | r1most(X1) ),
    clause_26,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_78,axiom,
    ( r(X1,u5r2(X1))
    | r1most(X1) ),
    clause_27,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_79,plain,
    ( ~ e(X1)
    | s1most(u4r2(X1)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_64,c_0_65]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_80,plain,
    ( ~ s2least(X1)
    | c(X1) ),
    c_0_66,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_81,plain,
    ( ~ s1most(X1)
    | d(X1) ),
    c_0_67,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_82,negated_conjecture,
    ~ s1most(u4r1(exist)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_51,c_0_68]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_83,negated_conjecture,
    s1most(u4r2(exist)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_64,c_0_69]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_84,negated_conjecture,
    e(exist),
    clause_1,
    [final] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : KRS006-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/0.36  % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.12/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.12/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.36  % DateTime : Sun Sep 20 22:55:07 UTC 2026
% 0.05/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.05/0.36  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.05/0.41  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.05/0.41  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.05/0.44  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.05/0.44  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.05/0.44  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.05/0.44  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.05/0.44  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.05/0.44  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.05/0.44  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.05/0.44  % sh5l with pid 970388 completed with status 1
% 0.05/0.44  % Result found by sh5l
% 0.05/0.44  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.05/0.44  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.05/0.44  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.05/0.44  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.05/0.44  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.05/0.44  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.05/0.44  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.05/0.44  % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.05/0.44  % Search class: FGHNF-FFSS11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.05/0.44  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.05/0.44  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.05/0.44  % SubtermCWHack with pid 970396 completed with status 1
% 0.05/0.44  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.05/0.44  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.05/0.44  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.05/0.44  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.05/0.44  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.05/0.44  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.05/0.44  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.05/0.44  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.05/0.44  % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.05/0.44  % Search class: FGHNF-FFSS11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.05/0.44  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.05/0.44  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.05/0.44  % Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.05/0.44  
% 0.05/0.44  % No proof found!
% 0.05/0.44  % SZS status Satisfiable
% 0.05/0.44  % SZS output start Saturation
% See solution above
% 0.05/0.44  % Parsed axioms                        : 27
% 0.05/0.44  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.05/0.44  % Initial clauses                      : 27
% 0.05/0.44  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.05/0.44  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 27
% 0.05/0.44  % Processed clauses                    : 42
% 0.05/0.44  % ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.05/0.44  % ...subsumed                          : 2
% 0.05/0.44  % ...remaining for further processing  : 40
% 0.05/0.44  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.05/0.44  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.05/0.44  % Backward-subsumed                    : 2
% 0.05/0.44  % Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.05/0.44  % Generated clauses                    : 29
% 0.05/0.44  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 15
% 0.05/0.44  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.05/0.44  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 4
% 0.05/0.44  % Paramodulations                      : 29
% 0.05/0.44  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.05/0.44  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.05/0.44  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.05/0.44  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.05/0.44  % Total rewrite steps                  : 3
% 0.05/0.44  % ...of those cached                   : 1
% 0.05/0.44  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.05/0.44  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.05/0.44  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.05/0.44  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.05/0.44  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.05/0.44  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.05/0.44  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.05/0.44  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.05/0.44  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.05/0.44  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.05/0.44  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.05/0.44  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.05/0.44  % Current number of processed clauses  : 38
% 0.05/0.44  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 7
% 0.05/0.44  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.05/0.44  %    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.05/0.44  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 30
% 0.05/0.44  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.05/0.44  % ...number of literals in the above   : 0
% 0.05/0.44  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.05/0.44  % Current number of archived clauses   : 2
% 0.05/0.44  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 127
% 0.05/0.44  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 99
% 0.05/0.44  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 8
% 0.05/0.44  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 24
% 0.05/0.44  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.05/0.44  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 0.05/0.44  % BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.05/0.44  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.05/0.44  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.05/0.44  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 1142
% 0.05/0.44  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 63
% 0.05/0.44  
% 0.05/0.44  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.05/0.44  % User time                : 0.005 s
% 0.05/0.44  % System time              : 0.002 s
% 0.05/0.44  % Total time               : 0.007 s
% 0.05/0.44  % Maximum resident set size: 3652 pages
% 0.05/0.44  
% 0.05/0.44  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.05/0.44  % User time                : 0.008 s
% 0.05/0.44  % System time              : 0.006 s
% 0.05/0.44  % Total time               : 0.014 s
% 0.05/0.44  % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.05/0.44  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------