↑ Up

Etableau---0.67.SAT-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Etableau---0.67
% Problem  : KRS006-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s

% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 03:00:19 EDT 2022

% Result   : Satisfiable 0.19s 0.37s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : KRS006-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.19/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.19/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.19/0.34  % DateTime : Tue Jun  7 09:39:51 EDT 2022
% 0.19/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.37  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.19/0.37  # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.19/0.37  # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 0.19/0.37  #
% 0.19/0.37  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.19/0.37  # Number of axioms: 27 Number of unprocessed: 27
% 0.19/0.37  # Tableaux proof search.
% 0.19/0.37  # APR header successfully linked.
% 0.19/0.37  # Hello from C++
% 0.19/0.37  # The folding up rule is enabled...
% 0.19/0.37  # Local unification is enabled...
% 0.19/0.37  # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels...
% 0.19/0.37  # 27 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification
% 0.19/0.37  # Creating start rules for all 5 conjectures.
% 0.19/0.37  # There are 5 start rule candidates:
% 0.19/0.37  # Found 5 unit axioms.
% 0.19/0.37  # Unsuccessfully attempted saturation on 1 start tableaux, moving on.
% 0.19/0.37  # 5 start rule tableaux created.
% 0.19/0.37  # 22 extension rule candidate clauses
% 0.19/0.37  # 5 unit axiom clauses
% 0.19/0.37  
% 0.19/0.37  # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process.
% 0.19/0.37  # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 5
% 0.19/0.37  # Returning from population with 10 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux.
% 0.19/0.37  # We now have 10 tableaux to operate on
% 0.19/0.37  # 5290 Satisfiable branch
% 0.19/0.37  # 5292 Satisfiable branch
% 0.19/0.37  # 5294 Satisfiable branch
% 0.19/0.37  # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses
% 0.19/0.37  # Satisfiable branch found.
% 0.19/0.37  # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.19/0.37  # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.19/0.37  # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.19/0.37  # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.19/0.37  # There were 0 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.19/0.37  # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.19/0.37  # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.19/0.37  # There were 0 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.19/0.37  # SZS status Satisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.37  # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.37  # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.19/0.37  
% 0.19/0.37  # End clausification derivation
% 0.19/0.37  # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.19/0.37  cnf(i_0_28, negated_conjecture, (e(exist))).
% 0.19/0.37  cnf(i_0_29, negated_conjecture, (r1most(exist))).
% 0.19/0.37  cnf(i_0_31, negated_conjecture, (d(u4r2(exist)))).
% 0.19/0.37  cnf(i_0_32, negated_conjecture, (c(u4r1(exist)))).
% 0.19/0.37  cnf(i_0_30, negated_conjecture, (r(exist,u4r1(exist)))).
% 0.19/0.37  cnf(i_0_49, plain, (r1most(X1)|~e(X1))).
% 0.19/0.37  cnf(i_0_40, plain, (d(X1)|~s1most(X1))).
% 0.19/0.37  cnf(i_0_33, plain, (s2least(X1)|~c(X1))).
% 0.19/0.37  cnf(i_0_39, plain, (s1most(X1)|~d(X1))).
% 0.19/0.37  cnf(i_0_34, plain, (c(X1)|~s2least(X1))).
% 0.19/0.37  cnf(i_0_35, plain, (~equalish(u1r2(X1),u1r1(X1))|~s2least(X1))).
% 0.19/0.37  cnf(i_0_45, plain, (d(u4r2(X1))|~e(X1))).
% 0.19/0.37  cnf(i_0_47, plain, (c(u4r1(X1))|~e(X1))).
% 0.19/0.37  cnf(i_0_48, plain, (r(X1,u4r1(X1))|~e(X1))).
% 0.19/0.37  cnf(i_0_46, plain, (r(X1,u4r2(X1))|~e(X1))).
% 0.19/0.37  cnf(i_0_54, plain, (r(X1,u5r2(X1))|r1most(X1))).
% 0.19/0.37  cnf(i_0_53, plain, (r(X1,u5r1(X1))|r1most(X1))).
% 0.19/0.37  cnf(i_0_44, plain, (s1most(X1)|s(X1,u3r2(X1)))).
% 0.19/0.37  cnf(i_0_52, plain, (r1most(X1)|~equalish(u5r2(X1),u5r1(X1)))).
% 0.19/0.37  cnf(i_0_42, plain, (s1most(X1)|~equalish(u3r2(X1),u3r1(X1)))).
% 0.19/0.37  cnf(i_0_37, plain, (s(X1,u1r2(X1))|~s2least(X1))).
% 0.19/0.37  cnf(i_0_36, plain, (s(X1,u1r1(X1))|~s2least(X1))).
% 0.19/0.37  cnf(i_0_43, plain, (s1most(X1)|s(X1,u3r1(X1)))).
% 0.19/0.37  cnf(i_0_50, plain, (e(X1)|~c(X2)|~d(X3)|~r(X1,X3)|~r(X1,X2)|~r1most(X1))).
% 0.19/0.37  cnf(i_0_51, plain, (equalish(X1,X2)|~r(X3,X2)|~r(X3,X1)|~r1most(X3))).
% 0.19/0.37  cnf(i_0_41, plain, (equalish(X1,X2)|~s1most(X3)|~s(X3,X2)|~s(X3,X1))).
% 0.19/0.37  cnf(i_0_38, plain, (equalish(X1,X2)|s2least(X3)|~s(X3,X2)|~s(X3,X1))).
% 0.19/0.37  # End listing active clauses.  There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.19/0.37  # Begin printing tableau
% 0.19/0.37  # Found 5 steps
% 0.19/0.37  cnf(i_0_28, negated_conjecture, (e(exist)), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.19/0.37  cnf(i_0_59, plain, (e(exist)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_49])).
% 0.19/0.37  cnf(i_0_222, plain, (r1most(exist)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_51])).
% 0.19/0.37  cnf(i_0_265, plain, (~r(exist,u4r1(exist))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_30])).
% 0.19/0.37  cnf(i_0_266, plain, (~r(exist,u4r1(exist))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_30])).
% 0.19/0.37  # End printing tableau
% 0.19/0.37  # SZS output end
% 0.19/0.37  # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.19/0.37  # 5289 Satisfiable branch
% 0.19/0.37  # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses
% 0.19/0.37  # Satisfiable branch found.
% 0.19/0.37  # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.19/0.37  # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.19/0.37  # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.19/0.37  # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.19/0.37  # There were 0 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.19/0.37  # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.19/0.37  # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.19/0.37  # There were 0 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.19/0.37  # Satisfiable branch found.
% 0.19/0.37  # SZS status Satisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.37  # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.37  # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.19/0.37  
% 0.19/0.37  # End clausification derivation
% 0.19/0.37  # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.19/0.37  cnf(i_0_28, negated_conjecture, (e(exist))).
% 0.19/0.37  cnf(i_0_29, negated_conjecture, (r1most(exist))).
% 0.19/0.37  cnf(i_0_31, negated_conjecture, (d(u4r2(exist)))).
% 0.19/0.37  cnf(i_0_32, negated_conjecture, (c(u4r1(exist)))).
% 0.19/0.37  cnf(i_0_30, negated_conjecture, (r(exist,u4r1(exist)))).
% 0.19/0.37  cnf(i_0_49, plain, (r1most(X1)|~e(X1))).
% 0.19/0.37  cnf(i_0_40, plain, (d(X1)|~s1most(X1))).
% 0.19/0.37  cnf(i_0_33, plain, (s2least(X1)|~c(X1))).
% 0.19/0.37  cnf(i_0_39, plain, (s1most(X1)|~d(X1))).
% 0.19/0.37  cnf(i_0_34, plain, (c(X1)|~s2least(X1))).
% 0.19/0.37  cnf(i_0_35, plain, (~equalish(u1r2(X1),u1r1(X1))|~s2least(X1))).
% 0.19/0.37  cnf(i_0_45, plain, (d(u4r2(X1))|~e(X1))).
% 0.19/0.37  cnf(i_0_47, plain, (c(u4r1(X1))|~e(X1))).
% 0.19/0.37  cnf(i_0_48, plain, (r(X1,u4r1(X1))|~e(X1))).
% 0.19/0.37  cnf(i_0_46, plain, (r(X1,u4r2(X1))|~e(X1))).
% 0.19/0.37  cnf(i_0_54, plain, (r(X1,u5r2(X1))|r1most(X1))).
% 0.19/0.37  cnf(i_0_53, plain, (r(X1,u5r1(X1))|r1most(X1))).
% 0.19/0.37  cnf(i_0_44, plain, (s1most(X1)|s(X1,u3r2(X1)))).
% 0.19/0.37  cnf(i_0_52, plain, (r1most(X1)|~equalish(u5r2(X1),u5r1(X1)))).
% 0.19/0.37  cnf(i_0_42, plain, (s1most(X1)|~equalish(u3r2(X1),u3r1(X1)))).
% 0.19/0.37  cnf(i_0_37, plain, (s(X1,u1r2(X1))|~s2least(X1))).
% 0.19/0.37  cnf(i_0_36, plain, (s(X1,u1r1(X1))|~s2least(X1))).
% 0.19/0.37  cnf(i_0_43, plain, (s1most(X1)|s(X1,u3r1(X1)))).
% 0.19/0.37  cnf(i_0_50, plain, (e(X1)|~c(X2)|~d(X3)|~r(X1,X3)|~r(X1,X2)|~r1most(X1))).
% 0.19/0.37  cnf(i_0_51, plain, (equalish(X1,X2)|~r(X3,X2)|~r(X3,X1)|~r1most(X3))).
% 0.19/0.37  cnf(i_0_41, plain, (equalish(X1,X2)|~s1most(X3)|~s(X3,X2)|~s(X3,X1))).
% 0.19/0.37  cnf(i_0_38, plain, (equalish(X1,X2)|s2least(X3)|~s(X3,X2)|~s(X3,X1))).
% 0.19/0.37  # End listing active clauses.  There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.19/0.37  # Begin printing tableau
% 0.19/0.37  # Found 5 steps
% 0.19/0.37  cnf(i_0_31, negated_conjecture, (d(u4r2(exist))), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.19/0.37  cnf(i_0_57, plain, (d(u4r2(exist))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_39])).
% 0.19/0.37  cnf(i_0_174, plain, (s1most(u4r2(exist))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_41])).
% 0.19/0.37  cnf(i_0_268, plain, (equalish(u1r2(u4r2(exist)),u1r1(u4r2(exist)))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_35])).
% 0.19/0.37  cnf(i_0_270, plain, (~s(u4r2(exist),u1r1(u4r2(exist)))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_36])).
% 0.19/0.37  # End printing tableau
% 0.19/0.37  # SZS output end
% 0.19/0.37  # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.19/0.37  # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses
% 0.19/0.37  # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.19/0.37  # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.19/0.37  # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.19/0.37  # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.19/0.37  # There were 0 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.19/0.37  # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.19/0.37  # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.19/0.37  # There were 0 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.19/0.37  # Satisfiable branch found.
% 0.19/0.37  # There were 2 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.19/0.37  # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.19/0.37  # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.19/0.37  # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.19/0.37  # There were 1 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.19/0.37  # There were 1 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.19/0.37  # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.19/0.37  # There were 0 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.19/0.37  # SZS status Satisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.37  # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.37  # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.19/0.37  
% 0.19/0.37  # End clausification derivation
% 0.19/0.37  # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.19/0.37  cnf(i_0_28, negated_conjecture, (e(exist))).
% 0.19/0.37  cnf(i_0_29, negated_conjecture, (r1most(exist))).
% 0.19/0.37  cnf(i_0_31, negated_conjecture, (d(u4r2(exist)))).
% 0.19/0.37  cnf(i_0_32, negated_conjecture, (c(u4r1(exist)))).
% 0.19/0.37  cnf(i_0_30, negated_conjecture, (r(exist,u4r1(exist)))).
% 0.19/0.37  cnf(i_0_49, plain, (r1most(X1)|~e(X1))).
% 0.19/0.37  cnf(i_0_40, plain, (d(X1)|~s1most(X1))).
% 0.19/0.37  cnf(i_0_33, plain, (s2least(X1)|~c(X1))).
% 0.19/0.37  cnf(i_0_39, plain, (s1most(X1)|~d(X1))).
% 0.19/0.37  cnf(i_0_34, plain, (c(X1)|~s2least(X1))).
% 0.19/0.37  cnf(i_0_35, plain, (~equalish(u1r2(X1),u1r1(X1))|~s2least(X1))).
% 0.19/0.37  cnf(i_0_45, plain, (d(u4r2(X1))|~e(X1))).
% 0.19/0.37  cnf(i_0_47, plain, (c(u4r1(X1))|~e(X1))).
% 0.19/0.37  cnf(i_0_48, plain, (r(X1,u4r1(X1))|~e(X1))).
% 0.19/0.37  cnf(i_0_46, plain, (r(X1,u4r2(X1))|~e(X1))).
% 0.19/0.37  cnf(i_0_54, plain, (r(X1,u5r2(X1))|r1most(X1))).
% 0.19/0.37  cnf(i_0_53, plain, (r(X1,u5r1(X1))|r1most(X1))).
% 0.19/0.37  cnf(i_0_44, plain, (s1most(X1)|s(X1,u3r2(X1)))).
% 0.19/0.37  cnf(i_0_52, plain, (r1most(X1)|~equalish(u5r2(X1),u5r1(X1)))).
% 0.19/0.37  cnf(i_0_42, plain, (s1most(X1)|~equalish(u3r2(X1),u3r1(X1)))).
% 0.19/0.37  cnf(i_0_37, plain, (s(X1,u1r2(X1))|~s2least(X1))).
% 0.19/0.37  cnf(i_0_36, plain, (s(X1,u1r1(X1))|~s2least(X1))).
% 0.19/0.37  cnf(i_0_43, plain, (s1most(X1)|s(X1,u3r1(X1)))).
% 0.19/0.37  cnf(i_0_50, plain, (e(X1)|~c(X2)|~d(X3)|~r(X1,X3)|~r(X1,X2)|~r1most(X1))).
% 0.19/0.37  cnf(i_0_51, plain, (equalish(X1,X2)|~r(X3,X2)|~r(X3,X1)|~r1most(X3))).
% 0.19/0.37  cnf(i_0_41, plain, (equalish(X1,X2)|~s1most(X3)|~s(X3,X2)|~s(X3,X1))).
% 0.19/0.37  cnf(i_0_38, plain, (equalish(X1,X2)|s2least(X3)|~s(X3,X2)|~s(X3,X1))).
% 0.19/0.37  # End listing active clauses.  There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.19/0.37  # Begin printing tableau
% 0.19/0.37  # Found 3 steps
% 0.19/0.37  cnf(i_0_32, negated_conjecture, (c(u4r1(exist))), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.19/0.37  cnf(i_0_56, plain, (c(u4r1(exist))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_33])).
% 0.19/0.37  cnf(i_0_118, plain, (s2least(u4r1(exist))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_35])).
% 0.19/0.37  # End printing tableau
% 0.19/0.37  # SZS output end
% 0.19/0.37  # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.19/0.37  # SZS status Satisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.37  # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.37  # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.19/0.37  
% 0.19/0.37  # End clausification derivation
% 0.19/0.37  # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.19/0.37  cnf(i_0_28, negated_conjecture, (e(exist))).
% 0.19/0.37  cnf(i_0_29, negated_conjecture, (r1most(exist))).
% 0.19/0.37  cnf(i_0_31, negated_conjecture, (d(u4r2(exist)))).
% 0.19/0.37  cnf(i_0_32, negated_conjecture, (c(u4r1(exist)))).
% 0.19/0.37  cnf(i_0_30, negated_conjecture, (r(exist,u4r1(exist)))).
% 0.19/0.37  cnf(i_0_49, plain, (r1most(X1)|~e(X1))).
% 0.19/0.37  cnf(i_0_40, plain, (d(X1)|~s1most(X1))).
% 0.19/0.37  cnf(i_0_33, plain, (s2least(X1)|~c(X1))).
% 0.19/0.37  cnf(i_0_39, plain, (s1most(X1)|~d(X1))).
% 0.19/0.37  cnf(i_0_34, plain, (c(X1)|~s2least(X1))).
% 0.19/0.37  cnf(i_0_35, plain, (~equalish(u1r2(X1),u1r1(X1))|~s2least(X1))).
% 0.19/0.37  cnf(i_0_45, plain, (d(u4r2(X1))|~e(X1))).
% 0.19/0.37  cnf(i_0_47, plain, (c(u4r1(X1))|~e(X1))).
% 0.19/0.37  cnf(i_0_48, plain, (r(X1,u4r1(X1))|~e(X1))).
% 0.19/0.37  cnf(i_0_46, plain, (r(X1,u4r2(X1))|~e(X1))).
% 0.19/0.37  cnf(i_0_54, plain, (r(X1,u5r2(X1))|r1most(X1))).
% 0.19/0.37  cnf(i_0_53, plain, (r(X1,u5r1(X1))|r1most(X1))).
% 0.19/0.37  cnf(i_0_44, plain, (s1most(X1)|s(X1,u3r2(X1)))).
% 0.19/0.37  cnf(i_0_52, plain, (r1most(X1)|~equalish(u5r2(X1),u5r1(X1)))).
% 0.19/0.37  cnf(i_0_42, plain, (s1most(X1)|~equalish(u3r2(X1),u3r1(X1)))).
% 0.19/0.37  cnf(i_0_37, plain, (s(X1,u1r2(X1))|~s2least(X1))).
% 0.19/0.37  cnf(i_0_36, plain, (s(X1,u1r1(X1))|~s2least(X1))).
% 0.19/0.37  cnf(i_0_43, plain, (s1most(X1)|s(X1,u3r1(X1)))).
% 0.19/0.37  cnf(i_0_50, plain, (e(X1)|~c(X2)|~d(X3)|~r(X1,X3)|~r(X1,X2)|~r1most(X1))).
% 0.19/0.37  cnf(i_0_51, plain, (equalish(X1,X2)|~r(X3,X2)|~r(X3,X1)|~r1most(X3))).
% 0.19/0.37  cnf(i_0_41, plain, (equalish(X1,X2)|~s1most(X3)|~s(X3,X2)|~s(X3,X1))).
% 0.19/0.37  cnf(i_0_38, plain, (equalish(X1,X2)|s2least(X3)|~s(X3,X2)|~s(X3,X1))).
% 0.19/0.37  # End listing active clauses.  There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.19/0.37  # Begin printing tableau
% 0.19/0.37  # Found 7 steps
% 0.19/0.37  cnf(i_0_29, negated_conjecture, (r1most(exist)), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.19/0.37  cnf(i_0_260, plain, (~d(u4r1(exist))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_0])).
% 0.19/0.37  cnf(i_0_58, plain, (r1most(exist)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_50])).
% 0.19/0.37  cnf(i_0_259, plain, (~c(u4r1(exist))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_32])).
% 0.19/0.37  cnf(i_0_258, plain, (e(exist)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_45])).
% 0.19/0.37  cnf(i_0_261, plain, (~r(exist,u4r1(exist))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_30])).
% 0.19/0.37  cnf(i_0_262, plain, (~r(exist,u4r1(exist))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_262, ...])).
% 0.19/0.37  # End printing tableau
% 0.19/0.37  # SZS output end
% 0.19/0.37  # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.19/0.37  # Child (5290) has found a proof.
% 0.19/0.37  
% 0.19/0.37  # Proof search is over...
% 0.19/0.37  # Freeing feature tree
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------