↑ Up

Etableau---0.67.SAT-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Etableau---0.67
% Problem  : KRS011-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 03:00:19 EDT 2022

% Result   : Satisfiable 0.11s 0.38s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.11s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem  : KRS011-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.11/0.12  % Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.11/0.34  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.11/0.34  % DateTime : Tue Jun  7 07:51:06 EDT 2022
% 0.11/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.37  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.11/0.37  # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2SI
% 0.11/0.37  # and selection function SelectNewComplexAHP.
% 0.11/0.37  #
% 0.11/0.37  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.11/0.37  # Number of axioms: 54 Number of unprocessed: 51
% 0.11/0.37  # Tableaux proof search.
% 0.11/0.37  # APR header successfully linked.
% 0.11/0.37  # Hello from C++
% 0.11/0.38  # The folding up rule is enabled...
% 0.11/0.38  # Local unification is enabled...
% 0.11/0.38  # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels...
% 0.11/0.38  # 51 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification
% 0.11/0.38  # Creating start rules for all 2 conjectures.
% 0.11/0.38  # There are 2 start rule candidates:
% 0.11/0.38  # Found 2 unit axioms.
% 0.11/0.38  # Unsuccessfully attempted saturation on 1 start tableaux, moving on.
% 0.11/0.38  # 2 start rule tableaux created.
% 0.11/0.38  # 49 extension rule candidate clauses
% 0.11/0.38  # 2 unit axiom clauses
% 0.11/0.38  
% 0.11/0.38  # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process.
% 0.11/0.38  # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 2
% 0.11/0.38  # 8458 Satisfiable branch
% 0.11/0.38  # Satisfiable branch found.
% 0.11/0.38  # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.11/0.38  # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.11/0.38  # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.11/0.38  # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.11/0.38  # There were 0 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.11/0.38  # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.11/0.38  # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.11/0.38  # There were 0 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.11/0.38  # SZS status Satisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.11/0.38  # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.11/0.38  # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.11/0.38  
% 0.11/0.38  # End clausification derivation
% 0.11/0.38  # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.11/0.38  cnf(i_0_55, negated_conjecture, (f(exists))).
% 0.11/0.38  cnf(i_0_56, negated_conjecture, (~g(exists))).
% 0.11/0.38  cnf(i_0_104, plain, (g(X1)|~r2least(X1))).
% 0.11/0.38  cnf(i_0_101, plain, (f1(X1)|~f(X1))).
% 0.11/0.38  cnf(i_0_100, plain, (f2(X1)|~f(X1))).
% 0.11/0.38  cnf(i_0_99, plain, (f3(X1)|~f(X1))).
% 0.11/0.38  cnf(i_0_103, plain, (r2least(X1)|~g(X1))).
% 0.11/0.38  cnf(i_0_63, plain, (~e(X1)|~c(X1))).
% 0.11/0.38  cnf(i_0_64, plain, (~d(X1)|~c(X1))).
% 0.11/0.38  cnf(i_0_65, plain, (~d(X1)|~e(X1))).
% 0.11/0.38  cnf(i_0_105, plain, (~r2least(X1)|~equalish(u14r2(X1),u14r1(X1)))).
% 0.11/0.38  cnf(i_0_102, plain, (f(X1)|~f3(X1)|~f2(X1)|~f1(X1))).
% 0.11/0.38  cnf(i_0_69, plain, (c(u9r5(X1))|~f1(X1))).
% 0.11/0.38  cnf(i_0_89, plain, (e(u11r5(X1))|~f3(X1))).
% 0.11/0.38  cnf(i_0_79, plain, (d(u10r5(X1))|~f2(X1))).
% 0.11/0.38  cnf(i_0_60, plain, (t(X1,X2)|~t1(X1,X2))).
% 0.11/0.38  cnf(i_0_61, plain, (t(X1,X2)|~t2(X1,X2))).
% 0.11/0.38  cnf(i_0_62, plain, (t(X1,X2)|~t3(X1,X2))).
% 0.11/0.38  cnf(i_0_107, plain, (r(X1,u14r2(X1))|~r2least(X1))).
% 0.11/0.38  cnf(i_0_106, plain, (r(X1,u14r1(X1))|~r2least(X1))).
% 0.11/0.38  cnf(i_0_57, plain, (r(X1,X2)|~r1(X1,X2))).
% 0.11/0.38  cnf(i_0_58, plain, (r(X1,X2)|~r2(X1,X2))).
% 0.11/0.38  cnf(i_0_59, plain, (r(X1,X2)|~r3(X1,X2))).
% 0.11/0.38  cnf(i_0_72, plain, (r1(X1,u9r4(X1))|~f1(X1))).
% 0.11/0.38  cnf(i_0_82, plain, (r2(X1,u10r4(X1))|~f2(X1))).
% 0.11/0.38  cnf(i_0_92, plain, (r3(X1,u11r4(X1))|~f3(X1))).
% 0.11/0.38  cnf(i_0_70, plain, (t1(u9r4(X1),u9r5(X1))|~f1(X1))).
% 0.11/0.38  cnf(i_0_80, plain, (t2(u10r4(X1),u10r5(X1))|~f2(X1))).
% 0.11/0.38  cnf(i_0_90, plain, (t3(u11r4(X1),u11r5(X1))|~f3(X1))).
% 0.11/0.38  cnf(i_0_108, plain, (r2least(X1)|equalish(X2,X3)|~r(X1,X3)|~r(X1,X2))).
% 0.11/0.38  cnf(i_0_77, plain, (f1(X1)|t(X2,u9r2(X2,X1))|~c(X3)|~t1(X2,X3)|~r1(X1,X2))).
% 0.11/0.38  cnf(i_0_73, plain, (f1(X1)|~equalish(u9r2(X2,X1),u9r1(X2,X1))|~c(X3)|~t1(X2,X3)|~r1(X1,X2))).
% 0.11/0.38  cnf(i_0_75, plain, (f1(X1)|~equalish(u9r3(X2,X1),u9r2(X2,X1))|~c(X3)|~t1(X2,X3)|~r1(X1,X2))).
% 0.11/0.38  cnf(i_0_74, plain, (f1(X1)|~equalish(u9r3(X2,X1),u9r1(X2,X1))|~c(X3)|~t1(X2,X3)|~r1(X1,X2))).
% 0.11/0.38  cnf(i_0_83, plain, (f2(X1)|~equalish(u10r2(X2,X1),u10r1(X2,X1))|~d(X3)|~t2(X2,X3)|~r2(X1,X2))).
% 0.11/0.38  cnf(i_0_76, plain, (f1(X1)|t(X2,u9r1(X2,X1))|~c(X3)|~t1(X2,X3)|~r1(X1,X2))).
% 0.11/0.38  cnf(i_0_78, plain, (f1(X1)|t(X2,u9r3(X2,X1))|~c(X3)|~t1(X2,X3)|~r1(X1,X2))).
% 0.11/0.38  cnf(i_0_85, plain, (f2(X1)|~equalish(u10r3(X2,X1),u10r2(X2,X1))|~d(X3)|~t2(X2,X3)|~r2(X1,X2))).
% 0.11/0.38  cnf(i_0_84, plain, (f2(X1)|~equalish(u10r3(X2,X1),u10r1(X2,X1))|~d(X3)|~t2(X2,X3)|~r2(X1,X2))).
% 0.11/0.38  cnf(i_0_93, plain, (f3(X1)|~equalish(u11r2(X2,X1),u11r1(X2,X1))|~e(X3)|~t3(X2,X3)|~r3(X1,X2))).
% 0.11/0.38  cnf(i_0_95, plain, (f3(X1)|~equalish(u11r3(X2,X1),u11r2(X2,X1))|~e(X3)|~t3(X2,X3)|~r3(X1,X2))).
% 0.11/0.38  cnf(i_0_87, plain, (f2(X1)|t(X2,u10r2(X2,X1))|~d(X3)|~t2(X2,X3)|~r2(X1,X2))).
% 0.11/0.38  cnf(i_0_94, plain, (f3(X1)|~equalish(u11r3(X2,X1),u11r1(X2,X1))|~e(X3)|~t3(X2,X3)|~r3(X1,X2))).
% 0.11/0.38  cnf(i_0_86, plain, (f2(X1)|t(X2,u10r1(X2,X1))|~d(X3)|~t2(X2,X3)|~r2(X1,X2))).
% 0.11/0.38  cnf(i_0_88, plain, (f2(X1)|t(X2,u10r3(X2,X1))|~d(X3)|~t2(X2,X3)|~r2(X1,X2))).
% 0.11/0.38  cnf(i_0_97, plain, (f3(X1)|t(X2,u11r2(X2,X1))|~e(X3)|~t3(X2,X3)|~r3(X1,X2))).
% 0.11/0.38  cnf(i_0_96, plain, (f3(X1)|t(X2,u11r1(X2,X1))|~e(X3)|~t3(X2,X3)|~r3(X1,X2))).
% 0.11/0.38  cnf(i_0_98, plain, (f3(X1)|t(X2,u11r3(X2,X1))|~e(X3)|~t3(X2,X3)|~r3(X1,X2))).
% 0.11/0.38  cnf(i_0_71, plain, (equalish(X1,X2)|equalish(X1,X3)|equalish(X2,X3)|~f1(X4)|~t(u9r4(X4),X3)|~t(u9r4(X4),X2)|~t(u9r4(X4),X1))).
% 0.11/0.38  cnf(i_0_81, plain, (equalish(X1,X2)|equalish(X1,X3)|equalish(X2,X3)|~f2(X4)|~t(u10r4(X4),X3)|~t(u10r4(X4),X2)|~t(u10r4(X4),X1))).
% 0.11/0.38  cnf(i_0_91, plain, (equalish(X1,X2)|equalish(X1,X3)|equalish(X2,X3)|~f3(X4)|~t(u11r4(X4),X3)|~t(u11r4(X4),X2)|~t(u11r4(X4),X1))).
% 0.11/0.38  # End listing active clauses.  There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.11/0.38  # Begin printing tableau
% 0.11/0.38  # Found 3 steps
% 0.11/0.38  cnf(i_0_55, negated_conjecture, (f(exists)), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.11/0.38  cnf(i_0_110, plain, (f(exists)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_99])).
% 0.11/0.38  cnf(i_0_288, plain, (f3(exists)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_89])).
% 0.11/0.38  # End printing tableau
% 0.11/0.38  # SZS output end
% 0.11/0.38  # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.11/0.38  # Returning from population with 4 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux.
% 0.11/0.38  # We now have 4 tableaux to operate on
% 0.11/0.38  # Found closed tableau during pool population.
% 0.11/0.38  # Proof search is over...
% 0.11/0.38  # Freeing feature tree
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------