%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : CSE---1.7 % Problem : KRS012-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.0.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s % Computer : n012.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 300s % DateTime : Mon Jun 24 10:08:14 EDT 2024 % Result : Unsatisfiable 0.54s 0.62s % Output : CNFRefutation 0.57s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.07/0.12 % Problem : KRS012-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.0.0. % 0.07/0.12 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s % 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n012.cluster.edu % 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.13/0.33 % WCLimit : 300 % 0.13/0.33 % DateTime : Wed Jun 19 12:28:39 EDT 2024 % 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime : % 0.20/0.56 start to proof:theBenchmark % 0.54/0.61 %------------------------------------------- % 0.54/0.61 % File :CSE---1.7 % 0.54/0.61 % Problem :theBenchmark % 0.54/0.61 % Transform :cnf % 0.54/0.61 % Format :tptp:raw % 0.54/0.61 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s % 0.54/0.61 % 0.54/0.61 % Result :Theorem 0.010000s % 0.54/0.61 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.010000s % 0.54/0.61 %------------------------------------------- % 0.54/0.62 %-------------------------------------------------------------------------- % 0.54/0.62 % File : KRS012-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.0.0. % 0.54/0.62 % Domain : Knowledge Representation % 0.54/0.62 % Problem : Paramasivam problem T-Box 4a % 0.54/0.62 % Version : Especial. % 0.54/0.62 % English : f subsumes c. % 0.54/0.62 % 0.54/0.62 % Refs : [PP95] Paramasivam & Plaisted (1995), Automated Deduction Tec % 0.54/0.62 % Source : [PP95] % 0.54/0.62 % Names : Problem 4(a) [PP95] % 0.54/0.62 % 0.54/0.62 % Status : Unsatisfiable % 0.54/0.62 % Rating : 0.00 v7.1.0, 0.17 v7.0.0, 0.12 v6.3.0, 0.14 v6.2.0, 0.00 v2.1.0 % 0.54/0.62 % Syntax : Number of clauses : 13 ( 2 unt; 6 nHn; 10 RR) % 0.54/0.62 % Number of literals : 34 ( 0 equ; 14 neg) % 0.54/0.62 % Maximal clause size : 4 ( 2 avg) % 0.54/0.62 % Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg) % 0.54/0.62 % Number of predicates : 5 ( 5 usr; 0 prp; 1-2 aty) % 0.54/0.62 % Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 1 con; 0-1 aty) % 0.54/0.62 % Number of variables : 14 ( 0 sgn) % 0.54/0.62 % SPC : CNF_UNS_RFO_NEQ_NHN % 0.54/0.62 % 0.54/0.62 % Comments : % 0.54/0.62 %-------------------------------------------------------------------------- % 0.54/0.62 cnf(clause_1,negated_conjecture, % 0.54/0.62 c(exists) ). % 0.54/0.62 % 0.54/0.62 cnf(clause_2,negated_conjecture, % 0.54/0.62 ~ f(exists) ). % 0.54/0.62 % 0.54/0.62 cnf(clause_3,axiom, % 0.54/0.62 ( e(X3) % 0.54/0.62 | ~ c(X1) % 0.54/0.62 | ~ r(X1,X3) % 0.54/0.62 | ~ d(X3) ) ). % 0.54/0.62 % 0.54/0.62 cnf(clause_4,axiom, % 0.54/0.62 ( d(X2) % 0.54/0.62 | ~ c(X1) % 0.54/0.62 | ~ r(X1,X2) ) ). % 0.54/0.62 % 0.54/0.62 cnf(clause_5,axiom, % 0.54/0.62 ( c(X1) % 0.54/0.62 | ~ d(u0r1(X1)) % 0.54/0.62 | ~ e(u0r2(X1)) ) ). % 0.54/0.62 % 0.54/0.62 cnf(clause_6,axiom, % 0.54/0.62 ( c(X1) % 0.54/0.62 | d(u0r2(X1)) % 0.54/0.62 | ~ d(u0r1(X1)) ) ). % 0.54/0.62 % 0.54/0.62 cnf(clause_7,axiom, % 0.54/0.62 ( c(X1) % 0.54/0.62 | r(X1,u0r2(X1)) % 0.54/0.62 | ~ d(u0r1(X1)) ) ). % 0.54/0.62 % 0.54/0.62 cnf(clause_8,axiom, % 0.54/0.62 ( c(X1) % 0.54/0.62 | r(X1,u0r1(X1)) % 0.54/0.62 | ~ e(u0r2(X1)) ) ). % 0.54/0.62 % 0.54/0.62 cnf(clause_9,axiom, % 0.54/0.62 ( c(X1) % 0.54/0.62 | r(X1,u0r1(X1)) % 0.54/0.62 | d(u0r2(X1)) ) ). % 0.54/0.62 % 0.54/0.62 cnf(clause_10,axiom, % 0.54/0.62 ( c(X1) % 0.54/0.62 | r(X1,u0r1(X1)) % 0.54/0.62 | r(X1,u0r2(X1)) ) ). % 0.54/0.62 % 0.54/0.62 cnf(clause_11,axiom, % 0.54/0.62 ( e(X2) % 0.54/0.62 | ~ f(X1) % 0.54/0.62 | ~ r(X1,X2) ) ). % 0.54/0.62 % 0.54/0.62 cnf(clause_12,axiom, % 0.54/0.62 ( f(X1) % 0.54/0.62 | ~ e(u1r1(X1)) ) ). % 0.54/0.62 % 0.54/0.62 cnf(clause_13,axiom, % 0.54/0.62 ( f(X1) % 0.54/0.62 | r(X1,u1r1(X1)) ) ). % 0.54/0.62 % 0.54/0.62 %-------------------------------------------------------------------------- % 0.54/0.62 %------------------------------------------- % 0.54/0.62 % Proof found % 0.54/0.62 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark % 0.54/0.62 % SZS output start Proof % 0.54/0.62 %ClaNum:13(EqnAxiom:0) % 0.54/0.62 %VarNum:41(SingletonVarNum:14) % 0.54/0.62 %MaxLitNum:4 % 0.54/0.62 %MaxfuncDepth:1 % 0.54/0.62 %SharedTerms:3 % 0.54/0.62 %goalClause: 1 2 % 0.54/0.62 %singleGoalClaCount:2 % 0.54/0.62 [1]P1(a1) % 0.54/0.62 [2]~P2(a1) % 0.54/0.62 [3]P2(x31)+~P3(f2(x31)) % 0.54/0.62 [4]P2(x41)+P5(x41,f2(x41)) % 0.54/0.62 [5]P1(x51)+P4(f3(x51))+~P4(f4(x51)) % 0.54/0.62 [8]P1(x81)+P5(x81,f4(x81))+P4(f3(x81)) % 0.54/0.62 [9]P1(x91)+~P3(f3(x91))+~P4(f4(x91)) % 0.54/0.62 [11]P1(x111)+P5(x111,f4(x111))+~P3(f3(x111)) % 0.54/0.62 [12]P1(x121)+P5(x121,f3(x121))+~P4(f4(x121)) % 0.54/0.62 [13]P1(x131)+P5(x131,f4(x131))+P5(x131,f3(x131)) % 0.54/0.62 [6]~P5(x62,x61)+P3(x61)+~P2(x62) % 0.54/0.62 [7]~P5(x72,x71)+P4(x71)+~P1(x72) % 0.54/0.62 [10]~P4(x101)+~P5(x102,x101)+P3(x101)+~P1(x102) % 0.54/0.62 %EqnAxiom % 0.54/0.62 % 0.54/0.62 %------------------------------------------- % 0.57/0.62 cnf(15,plain, % 0.57/0.62 (P3(x151)+~P5(x152,x151)+P5(x152,f2(x152))), % 0.57/0.62 inference(scs_inference,[],[4,6])). % 0.57/0.62 cnf(19,plain, % 0.57/0.62 (P4(f2(a1))+P3(x191)+~P5(a1,x191)), % 0.57/0.62 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,15,7])). % 0.57/0.62 cnf(20,plain, % 0.57/0.62 (P4(f2(a1))+~P5(a1,f2(a1))), % 0.57/0.62 inference(scs_inference,[],[2,19,3])). % 0.57/0.62 cnf(21,plain, % 0.57/0.62 (P3(f2(a1))+~P5(a1,f2(a1))), % 0.57/0.62 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,20,10])). % 0.57/0.62 cnf(22,plain, % 0.57/0.62 (P3(f2(a1))), % 0.57/0.62 inference(scs_inference,[],[2,21,4])). % 0.57/0.62 cnf(23,plain, % 0.57/0.62 ($false), % 0.57/0.62 inference(scs_inference,[],[2,22,3]), % 0.57/0.62 ['proof']). % 0.57/0.62 % SZS output end Proof % 0.57/0.62 % Total time :0.010000s %------------------------------------------------------------------------------