%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : KRS016-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:00:34 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Satisfiable 0.11s 0.45s
% Output : Saturation 0.11s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named c_0_19ERROR: Could not build tree for root c_0_42ERROR: MakeTreeStats fails)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
( ~ s(X1,X2)
| ~ c(X1)
| r(X1,X2) ),
c_0_19,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_24,axiom,
( s(X1,u3r1(X1))
| s1most(X1) ),
clause_18,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_30,axiom,
( s(X1,u3r2(X1))
| s1most(X1) ),
clause_19,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_32,plain,
( ~ s(X1,X2)
| ~ r(X1,X2)
| ~ d(X1) ),
c_0_20,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_33,axiom,
( r(X1,u1r1(X1))
| r1most(X1) ),
clause_10,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_34,axiom,
( r(X1,u1r2(X1))
| r1most(X1) ),
clause_11,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_38,plain,
( ~ d(X1)
| s1most(X1) ),
c_0_21,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_39,negated_conjecture,
d(exist),
clause_2,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_40,plain,
( ~ c(X1)
| r1most(X1) ),
c_0_22,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_41,negated_conjecture,
c(exist),
clause_1,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_42,plain,
( ~ c(X1)
| r(X1,u3r1(X1))
| s1most(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_43,plain,
( ~ r1most(X1)
| r(X1,u0r1(X1))
| s(X1,u0r1(X1))
| c(X1) ),
c_0_25,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_44,plain,
( ~ s(X3,X2)
| ~ s(X3,X1)
| ~ s1most(X3)
| equalish(X1,X2) ),
c_0_26,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_45,plain,
( ~ r(X3,X2)
| ~ r(X3,X1)
| ~ r1most(X3)
| equalish(X1,X2) ),
c_0_27,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_46,plain,
( ~ s1most(X1)
| r(X1,u2r1(X1))
| d(X1) ),
c_0_28,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_47,plain,
( ~ s(X1,u0r1(X1))
| ~ r(X1,u0r1(X1))
| ~ r1most(X1)
| c(X1) ),
c_0_29,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_48,plain,
( ~ c(X1)
| r(X1,u3r2(X1))
| s1most(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_30]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_49,plain,
( ~ s1most(X1)
| s(X1,u2r1(X1))
| d(X1) ),
c_0_31,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_50,plain,
( ~ d(X1)
| ~ s(X1,u1r1(X1))
| r1most(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_51,plain,
( ~ d(X1)
| ~ s(X1,u1r2(X1))
| r1most(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_34]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_52,plain,
( ~ r(X1,X2)
| ~ c(X1)
| s(X1,X2) ),
c_0_35,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_53,plain,
( ~ equalish(u3r2(X1),u3r1(X1))
| s1most(X1) ),
c_0_36,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_54,plain,
( ~ equalish(u1r2(X1),u1r1(X1))
| r1most(X1) ),
c_0_37,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_55,negated_conjecture,
s1most(exist),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_39]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_56,negated_conjecture,
r1most(exist),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_41]),
[final] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : KRS016-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.37 % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.37 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.37 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.37 % DateTime : Sun Sep 20 22:52:15 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.38 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.38 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.42 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.11/0.42 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.11/0.45 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.11/0.45 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.11/0.45 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.11/0.45 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.11/0.45 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.45 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.45 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.45 % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 2789539 completed with status 1
% 0.11/0.45 % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.11/0.45 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.11/0.45 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.11/0.45 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.11/0.45 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.11/0.45 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.11/0.45 % Search class: FGHNF-FFSF11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.11/0.45 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.11/0.45 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.45 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.45 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.45 % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.45 % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.45 % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 2789544 completed with status 1
% 0.11/0.45 % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.11/0.45 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.11/0.45 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.11/0.45 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.11/0.45 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.11/0.45 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.11/0.45 % Search class: FGHNF-FFSF11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.11/0.45 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.11/0.45 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.45 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.45 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.11/0.45 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.11/0.45
% 0.11/0.45 % No proof found!
% 0.11/0.45 % SZS status Satisfiable
% 0.11/0.45 % SZS output start Saturation
% See solution above
% 0.11/0.45 % Parsed axioms : 19
% 0.11/0.45 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Initial clauses : 19
% 0.11/0.45 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Initial clauses in saturation : 19
% 0.11/0.45 % Processed clauses : 46
% 0.11/0.45 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % ...subsumed : 2
% 0.11/0.45 % ...remaining for further processing : 44
% 0.11/0.45 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Generated clauses : 17
% 0.11/0.45 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 8
% 0.11/0.45 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Paramodulations : 17
% 0.11/0.45 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % NegExts : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Total rewrite steps : 5
% 0.11/0.45 % ...of those cached : 2
% 0.11/0.45 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.45 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.45 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.45 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.45 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.45 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.45 % Current number of processed clauses : 25
% 0.11/0.45 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 4
% 0.11/0.45 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Non-unit-clauses : 21
% 0.11/0.45 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.11/0.45 % ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Current number of archived clauses : 19
% 0.11/0.45 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 63
% 0.11/0.45 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 41
% 0.11/0.45 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 2
% 0.11/0.45 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 0.11/0.45 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Termbank termtop insertions : 1017
% 0.11/0.45 % Search garbage collected termcells : 46
% 0.11/0.45
% 0.11/0.45 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.11/0.45 % User time : 0.004 s
% 0.11/0.45 % System time : 0.003 s
% 0.11/0.45 % Total time : 0.007 s
% 0.11/0.45 % Maximum resident set size: 3644 pages
% 0.11/0.45
% 0.11/0.45 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.11/0.45 % User time : 0.008 s
% 0.11/0.45 % System time : 0.012 s
% 0.11/0.45 % Total time : 0.019 s
% 0.11/0.45 % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.11/0.45 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------