↑ Up

PyRes---1.5.SAT-Sat.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : PyRes---1.5
% Problem  : KRS021+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu May  9 17:28:29 EDT 2024

% Result   : Satisfiable 0.20s 0.52s
% Output   : Saturation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.13  % Problem  : KRS021+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.08/0.14  % Command  : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Thu May  9 00:14:23 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.52  % Version:  1.5
% 0.20/0.52  % SZS status Satisfiable
% 0.20/0.52  % SZS output start Saturation
% 0.20/0.52  fof(axiom_1,axiom,(![X]:(xsd_string(X)<=>(~xsd_integer(X)))),file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', axiom_1)).
% 0.20/0.52  fof(c3,plain,(![X]:(xsd_string(X)<=>~xsd_integer(X))),inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[axiom_1])).
% 0.20/0.52  fof(c4,plain,(![X]:((~xsd_string(X)|~xsd_integer(X))&(xsd_integer(X)|xsd_string(X)))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c3])).
% 0.20/0.52  fof(c5,plain,((![X]:(~xsd_string(X)|~xsd_integer(X)))&(![X]:(xsd_integer(X)|xsd_string(X)))),inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[c4])).
% 0.20/0.52  fof(c7,plain,(![X2]:(![X3]:((~xsd_string(X2)|~xsd_integer(X2))&(xsd_integer(X3)|xsd_string(X3))))),inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[fof(c6,plain,((![X2]:(~xsd_string(X2)|~xsd_integer(X2)))&(![X3]:(xsd_integer(X3)|xsd_string(X3)))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c5])).])).
% 0.20/0.52  cnf(c9,plain,xsd_integer(X9)|xsd_string(X9),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c7])).
% 0.20/0.52  cnf(c8,plain,~xsd_string(X8)|~xsd_integer(X8),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c7])).
% 0.20/0.52  fof(axiom_3,axiom,rrdf_1(i2003_11_14_17_14_36685,i2003_11_14_17_14_36852),file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', axiom_3)).
% 0.20/0.52  cnf(c1,plain,rrdf_1(i2003_11_14_17_14_36685,i2003_11_14_17_14_36852),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[axiom_3])).
% 0.20/0.52  fof(axiom_2,axiom,crdfBag(i2003_11_14_17_14_36685),file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', axiom_2)).
% 0.20/0.52  cnf(c2,plain,crdfBag(i2003_11_14_17_14_36685),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[axiom_2])).
% 0.20/0.52  fof(axiom_0,axiom,(![X]:(cowlThing(X)&(~cowlNothing(X)))),file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', axiom_0)).
% 0.20/0.52  fof(c10,plain,(![X]:(cowlThing(X)&~cowlNothing(X))),inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[axiom_0])).
% 0.20/0.52  fof(c11,plain,((![X]:cowlThing(X))&(![X]:~cowlNothing(X))),inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[c10])).
% 0.20/0.52  fof(c13,plain,(![X4]:(![X5]:(cowlThing(X4)&~cowlNothing(X5)))),inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[fof(c12,plain,((![X4]:cowlThing(X4))&(![X5]:~cowlNothing(X5))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c11])).])).
% 0.20/0.52  cnf(c15,plain,~cowlNothing(X7),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c13])).
% 0.20/0.52  cnf(c14,plain,cowlThing(X6),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c13])).
% 0.20/0.52  % SZS output end Saturation
% 0.20/0.52  
% 0.20/0.52  % Initial clauses    : 7
% 0.20/0.52  % Processed clauses  : 6
% 0.20/0.52  % Factors computed   : 0
% 0.20/0.52  % Resolvents computed: 1
% 0.20/0.52  % Tautologies deleted: 1
% 0.20/0.52  % Forward subsumed   : 1
% 0.20/0.52  % Backward subsumed  : 0
% 0.20/0.52  % -------- CPU Time ---------
% 0.20/0.52  % User time          : 0.148 s
% 0.20/0.52  % System time        : 0.014 s
% 0.20/0.52  % Total time         : 0.162 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------