%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : KRS028+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:00:36 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Satisfiable 0.29s 0.64s
% Output : Saturation 0.29s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named c_0_17ERROR: Could not build tree for root c_0_45ERROR: MakeTreeStats fails)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
( ~ rrx4a(X1,X3)
| ~ rrx4a(X1,X2)
| X2 = X3 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
( ~ cSatisfiable(X1)
| rrx4a(X1,esk1_1(X1)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
( ~ rrx3a(X1,X3)
| ~ rrx3a(X1,X2)
| X2 = X3 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
( ~ cSatisfiable(X1)
| rrx3a(X1,esk2_1(X1)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_31,plain,
( ~ rrx4a(X1,X2)
| rrxa(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_32,plain,
( ~ rrx4a(X1,X2)
| rrx2a(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_33,plain,
( ~ rrx3a(X1,X2)
| rrxa(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_34,plain,
( ~ rrx3a(X1,X2)
| rrx1a(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_23]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_37,plain,
( ~ cSatisfiable(X1)
| ~ cc2(X2)
| ~ cc1(X2)
| ~ rrx3a(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_38,plain,
( ~ cSatisfiable(X1)
| cc1(esk2_1(X1)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_45,plain,
( ~ cSatisfiable(X2)
| ~ rrx4a(X2,X1)
| X1 = esk1_1(X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_46,plain,
( ~ cc1(X3)
| ~ rrx3a(X1,X3)
| ~ cc2(X2)
| ~ rrx4a(X1,X2)
| cSatisfiable(X1)
| rrx3a(X1,esk3_1(X1)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_47,plain,
( ~ cc1(X3)
| ~ rrx3a(X1,X3)
| ~ cc2(X2)
| ~ rrx4a(X1,X2)
| cSatisfiable(X1)
| cc2(esk3_1(X1)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_48,plain,
( ~ cc1(X3)
| ~ rrx3a(X1,X3)
| ~ cc2(X2)
| ~ rrx4a(X1,X2)
| cSatisfiable(X1)
| cc1(esk3_1(X1)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_49,plain,
( ~ rrx4(X1,X3)
| ~ rrx4(X1,X2)
| X2 = X3 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_28]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_50,plain,
( ~ cSatisfiable(X2)
| ~ rrx3a(X2,X1)
| X1 = esk2_1(X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_51,plain,
( ~ cSatisfiable(X1)
| rrxa(X1,esk1_1(X1)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_27]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_52,plain,
( ~ cSatisfiable(X1)
| rrx2a(X1,esk1_1(X1)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_27]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_53,plain,
( ~ cSatisfiable(X1)
| rrxa(X1,esk2_1(X1)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_30]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_54,plain,
( ~ cSatisfiable(X1)
| rrx1a(X1,esk2_1(X1)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_30]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_55,plain,
( ~ rrx3(X1,X3)
| ~ rrx3(X1,X2)
| X2 = X3 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_35]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_56,plain,
( ~ rrx(X1,X3)
| ~ rrx(X1,X2)
| X2 = X3 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_36]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_57,plain,
( ~ cSatisfiable(X1)
| ~ cc2(esk2_1(X1)) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_30]),c_0_38]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_58,plain,
( ~ rrx4(X1,X2)
| rrx2(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_39]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_59,plain,
( ~ cSatisfiable(X1)
| cc2(esk1_1(X1)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_60,plain,
( ~ rrx3(X1,X2)
| rrx1(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_40]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_61,plain,
( ~ rrx4(X1,X2)
| rrx(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_41]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_62,plain,
( ~ rrx3(X1,X2)
| rrx(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_42]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_63,plain,
( xsd_string(X1)
| xsd_integer(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_43]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_64,plain,
( ~ xsd_integer(X1)
| ~ xsd_string(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_43]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_65,plain,
~ cowlNothing(X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_44]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_66,plain,
cSatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_15_19316),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[axiom_8]),
[final] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05 % Problem : KRS028+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.00/0.08 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.20/0.47 % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.20/0.47 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.20/0.47 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.20/0.47 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.20/0.47 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.20/0.47 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.20/0.47 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.20/0.47 % DateTime : Sun Sep 20 22:51:05 UTC 2026
% 0.20/0.47 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.47 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.23/0.55 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.23/0.55 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.29/0.64 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.29/0.64 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.29/0.64 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.29/0.64 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.29/0.64 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.29/0.64 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.29/0.64 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.29/0.64 % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 1663610 completed with status 1
% 0.29/0.64 % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.29/0.64 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.29/0.64 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.29/0.64 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.29/0.64 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.29/0.64 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.29/0.64 % Search class: FGHSF-FFSF11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.29/0.64 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.29/0.64 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.29/0.64 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.29/0.64 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S4d with 136s (1) cores
% 0.29/0.64 % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.29/0.64 % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.29/0.64 % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S4d with pid 1663642 completed with status 1
% 0.29/0.64 % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S4d
% 0.29/0.64 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.29/0.64 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.29/0.64 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.29/0.64 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.29/0.64 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.29/0.64 % Search class: FGHSF-FFSF11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.29/0.64 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.29/0.64 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.29/0.64 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.29/0.64 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S4d with 136s (1) cores
% 0.29/0.64 % Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.29/0.64 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.29/0.64
% 0.29/0.64 % No proof found!
% 0.29/0.64 % SZS status Satisfiable
% 0.29/0.64 % SZS output start Saturation
% See solution above
% 0.29/0.64 % Parsed axioms : 44
% 0.29/0.64 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.29/0.64 % Initial clauses : 53
% 0.29/0.64 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 28
% 0.29/0.64 % Initial clauses in saturation : 25
% 0.29/0.64 % Processed clauses : 57
% 0.29/0.64 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.29/0.64 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.29/0.64 % ...remaining for further processing : 57
% 0.29/0.64 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.29/0.64 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.29/0.64 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.29/0.64 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.29/0.64 % Generated clauses : 11
% 0.29/0.64 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 7
% 0.29/0.64 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.29/0.64 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 1
% 0.29/0.64 % Paramodulations : 11
% 0.29/0.64 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.29/0.64 % NegExts : 0
% 0.29/0.64 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.29/0.64 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.29/0.64 % Total rewrite steps : 0
% 0.29/0.64 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.29/0.64 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.29/0.64 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.29/0.64 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.29/0.64 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.29/0.64 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.29/0.64 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.29/0.64 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.29/0.64 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.29/0.64 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.29/0.64 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.29/0.64 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.29/0.64 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.29/0.64 % Current number of processed clauses : 32
% 0.29/0.64 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 1
% 0.29/0.64 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.29/0.64 % Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.29/0.64 % Non-unit-clauses : 30
% 0.29/0.64 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.29/0.64 % ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.29/0.64 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.29/0.64 % Current number of archived clauses : 26
% 0.29/0.64 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 445
% 0.29/0.64 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 138
% 0.29/0.64 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 1
% 0.29/0.64 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.29/0.64 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.29/0.64 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.29/0.64 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.29/0.64 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.29/0.64 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.29/0.64 % Termbank termtop insertions : 4176
% 0.29/0.64 % Search garbage collected termcells : 850
% 0.29/0.64
% 0.29/0.64 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.29/0.64 % User time : 0.016 s
% 0.29/0.64 % System time : 0.005 s
% 0.29/0.64 % Total time : 0.021 s
% 0.29/0.64 % Maximum resident set size: 3928 pages
% 0.29/0.64
% 0.29/0.64 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.29/0.64 % User time : 0.038 s
% 0.29/0.64 % System time : 0.015 s
% 0.29/0.64 % Total time : 0.053 s
% 0.29/0.64 % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.29/0.64 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------