%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : KRS030+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:00:36 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Satisfiable 0.12s 0.41s
% Output : Saturation 0.12s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named c_0_14ERROR: Could not build tree for root c_0_30ERROR: MakeTreeStats fails)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( ~ rf1(X1,X3)
| ~ rf1(X1,X2)
| X2 = X3 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( ~ cSatisfiable(X1)
| rf1(X1,esk1_1(X1)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
( ~ rf(X1,X3)
| ~ rf(X1,X2)
| X2 = X3 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
( ~ cSatisfiable(X1)
| rf(X1,esk2_1(X1)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
( ~ cp(X3)
| ~ rf(X1,X3)
| ~ rf1(X1,X2)
| cSatisfiable(X1)
| cp(X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_31,plain,
( ~ cSatisfiable(X2)
| ~ rf1(X2,X1)
| X1 = esk1_1(X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_32,plain,
( ~ cSatisfiable(X2)
| ~ rf(X2,X1)
| X1 = esk2_1(X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_33,plain,
( ~ rs(X1,X3)
| ~ rs(X1,X2)
| X2 = X3 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_34,plain,
( ~ rinvS(X1,X2)
| rs(X2,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_23]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_35,plain,
( ~ rs(X1,X2)
| rinvS(X2,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_23]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_36,plain,
( ~ rf1(X1,X2)
| rinvF1(X2,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_24]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_37,plain,
( ~ rf(X1,X2)
| rinvF(X2,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_25]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_38,plain,
( ~ rs(X1,X2)
| rf1(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_26]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_39,plain,
( ~ rinvF1(X1,X2)
| rf1(X2,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_24]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_40,plain,
( ~ rs(X1,X2)
| rf(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_27]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_41,plain,
( ~ rinvF(X1,X2)
| rf(X2,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_25]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_42,plain,
( ~ cSatisfiable(X1)
| ~ cp(esk1_1(X1)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_43,plain,
( ~ cSatisfiable(X1)
| cp(esk2_1(X1)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_44,plain,
( ~ xsd_integer(X1)
| ~ xsd_string(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_28]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_45,plain,
( xsd_string(X1)
| xsd_integer(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_28]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_46,plain,
~ cowlNothing(X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_29]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_47,plain,
cSatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_15_26245),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[axiom_9]),
[final] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : KRS030+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.08/0.35 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.35 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.35 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.08/0.35 % DateTime : Sun Sep 20 22:51:20 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.08/0.35 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/0.39 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.12/0.39 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.41 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.12/0.41 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.12/0.41 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.12/0.41 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.12/0.41 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.41 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.41 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.41 % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 1088126 completed with status 1
% 0.12/0.41 % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.12/0.41 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.12/0.41 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.12/0.41 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.12/0.41 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.12/0.41 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.12/0.41 % Search class: FGHSF-FFSF11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.12/0.41 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.12/0.41 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.41 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.41 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S4d with 136s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.41 % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.41 % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.41 % SubtermCWHack with pid 1088139 completed with status 1
% 0.12/0.41 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.12/0.41 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.12/0.41 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.12/0.41 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.12/0.41 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.12/0.41 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.12/0.41 % Search class: FGHSF-FFSF11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.12/0.41 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.12/0.41 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.41 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.12/0.41
% 0.12/0.41 % No proof found!
% 0.12/0.41 % SZS status Satisfiable
% 0.12/0.41 % SZS output start Saturation
% See solution above
% 0.12/0.41 % Parsed axioms : 30
% 0.12/0.41 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.12/0.41 % Initial clauses : 39
% 0.12/0.41 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 19
% 0.12/0.41 % Initial clauses in saturation : 20
% 0.12/0.41 % Processed clauses : 22
% 0.12/0.41 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.12/0.41 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.12/0.41 % ...remaining for further processing : 22
% 0.12/0.41 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.12/0.41 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.12/0.41 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.12/0.41 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.12/0.41 % Generated clauses : 7
% 0.12/0.41 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 2
% 0.12/0.41 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.12/0.41 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.12/0.41 % Paramodulations : 7
% 0.12/0.41 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.12/0.41 % NegExts : 0
% 0.12/0.41 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.12/0.41 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.12/0.41 % Total rewrite steps : 0
% 0.12/0.41 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.12/0.41 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.12/0.41 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.12/0.41 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.12/0.41 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.12/0.41 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.12/0.41 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.12/0.41 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.12/0.41 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.12/0.41 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.12/0.41 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.12/0.41 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.12/0.41 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.12/0.41 % Current number of processed clauses : 22
% 0.12/0.41 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 1
% 0.12/0.41 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.12/0.41 % Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.12/0.41 % Non-unit-clauses : 20
% 0.12/0.41 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.12/0.41 % ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.12/0.41 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.12/0.41 % Current number of archived clauses : 1
% 0.12/0.41 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 81
% 0.12/0.41 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 56
% 0.12/0.41 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.12/0.41 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.12/0.41 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.12/0.41 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.12/0.41 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.12/0.41 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.12/0.41 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.12/0.41 % Termbank termtop insertions : 2676
% 0.12/0.41 % Search garbage collected termcells : 588
% 0.12/0.41
% 0.12/0.41 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.12/0.41 % User time : 0.006 s
% 0.12/0.41 % System time : 0.004 s
% 0.12/0.41 % Total time : 0.010 s
% 0.12/0.41 % Maximum resident set size: 3664 pages
% 0.12/0.41
% 0.12/0.41 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.12/0.41 % User time : 0.015 s
% 0.12/0.41 % System time : 0.012 s
% 0.12/0.41 % Total time : 0.027 s
% 0.12/0.41 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.12/0.41 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------