%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem : KRS031+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:01:21 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Satisfiable 0.25s 0.61s
% Output : Saturation 0.25s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named c_0_16ERROR: Could not build tree for root c_0_29ERROR: MakeTreeStats fails)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
( ~ rf2(X1,X2)
| ~ rf2(X1,X3)
| X2 = X3 ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15])]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
( ~ cSatisfiable(X1)
| rf2(X1,esk2_1(X1)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
( ~ rf1(X1,X2)
| ~ rf1(X1,X3)
| X2 = X3 ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_15])]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
( ~ cSatisfiable(X1)
| rf1(X1,esk1_1(X1)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
( ~ cp2(X1)
| ~ cp1(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
( ~ cSatisfiable(X1)
| cp2(esk2_1(X1)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
( ~ cp2(X3)
| ~ rf2(X1,X3)
| ~ cp1(X2)
| ~ rf1(X1,X2)
| cSatisfiable(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
( ~ cSatisfiable(X2)
| ~ rf2(X2,X1)
| X1 = esk2_1(X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_31,plain,
( ~ cSatisfiable(X2)
| ~ rf1(X2,X1)
| X1 = esk1_1(X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_32,plain,
( ~ rr(X1,X2)
| rf2(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_24]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_33,plain,
( ~ rr(X1,X2)
| rf1(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_25]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_34,plain,
( ~ cSatisfiable(X1)
| ~ cp1(esk2_1(X1)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_35,plain,
( ~ cSatisfiable(X1)
| cp1(esk1_1(X1)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_36,plain,
( ~ xsd_integer(X1)
| ~ xsd_string(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_28]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_37,plain,
( xsd_string(X1)
| xsd_integer(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_28]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_38,plain,
~ cowlNothing(X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_39,plain,
cSatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_15_2938),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[axiom_6]),
[final] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05 % Problem : KRS031+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.00/0.07 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.16/0.45 % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.45 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.45 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.45 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.16/0.45 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.16/0.45 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.45 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.16/0.45 % DateTime : Sun Sep 20 22:54:01 UTC 2026
% 0.16/0.45 % CPUTime :
% 0.16/0.45 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.25/0.53 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.25/0.53 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/0.61 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.25/0.61 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.25/0.61 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.25/0.61 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.25/0.61 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.25/0.61 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.25/0.61 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.25/0.61 % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 1879225 completed with status 1
% 0.25/0.61 % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.25/0.61 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.25/0.61 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.25/0.61 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.25/0.61 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.25/0.61 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.25/0.61 % Search class: FGHSF-FFSF11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.25/0.61 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.25/0.61 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.25/0.61 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.25/0.61 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S4d with 136s (1) cores
% 0.25/0.61 % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.25/0.61 % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.25/0.61 % SubtermCWHack with pid 1879238 completed with status 1
% 0.25/0.61 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.25/0.61 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.25/0.61 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.25/0.61 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.25/0.61 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.25/0.61 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.25/0.61 % Search class: FGHSF-FFSF11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.25/0.61 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.25/0.61 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.25/0.61 % Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.25/0.61
% 0.25/0.61 % No proof found!
% 0.25/0.61 % SZS status Satisfiable
% 0.25/0.61 % SZS output start Saturation
% See solution above
% 0.25/0.61 % Parsed axioms : 22
% 0.25/0.61 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.25/0.61 % Initial clauses : 28
% 0.25/0.61 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 14
% 0.25/0.61 % Initial clauses in saturation : 14
% 0.25/0.61 % Processed clauses : 17
% 0.25/0.61 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.25/0.61 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.25/0.61 % ...remaining for further processing : 17
% 0.25/0.61 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.25/0.61 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.25/0.61 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.25/0.61 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.25/0.61 % Generated clauses : 5
% 0.25/0.61 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 3
% 0.25/0.61 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.25/0.61 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.25/0.61 % Paramodulations : 5
% 0.25/0.61 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.25/0.61 % NegExts : 0
% 0.25/0.61 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.25/0.61 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.25/0.61 % Total rewrite steps : 0
% 0.25/0.61 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.25/0.61 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.25/0.61 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.25/0.61 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.25/0.61 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.25/0.61 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.25/0.61 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.25/0.61 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.25/0.61 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.25/0.61 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.25/0.61 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.25/0.61 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.25/0.61 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.25/0.61 % Current number of processed clauses : 17
% 0.25/0.61 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 1
% 0.25/0.61 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.25/0.61 % Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.25/0.61 % Non-unit-clauses : 15
% 0.25/0.61 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.25/0.61 % ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.25/0.61 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.25/0.61 % Current number of archived clauses : 1
% 0.25/0.61 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 29
% 0.25/0.61 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 18
% 0.25/0.61 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.25/0.61 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.25/0.61 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.25/0.61 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.25/0.61 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.25/0.61 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.25/0.61 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.25/0.61 % Termbank termtop insertions : 1958
% 0.25/0.61 % Search garbage collected termcells : 445
% 0.25/0.61
% 0.25/0.61 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.25/0.61 % User time : 0.010 s
% 0.25/0.61 % System time : 0.005 s
% 0.25/0.61 % Total time : 0.014 s
% 0.25/0.61 % Maximum resident set size: 3652 pages
% 0.25/0.61
% 0.25/0.61 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.25/0.61 % User time : 0.021 s
% 0.25/0.61 % System time : 0.019 s
% 0.25/0.61 % Total time : 0.039 s
% 0.25/0.61 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.25/0.61 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------