%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem : KRS036+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:01:22 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Satisfiable 0.16s 10.54s
% Output : Saturation 0.16s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named c_0_11ERROR: Could not build tree for root c_0_41ERROR: MakeTreeStats fails)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( ~ rinvF(X1,X2)
| rf(X2,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( ~ cSatisfiable(X1)
| rinvF(esk1_1(X1),esk2_1(X1)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( ~ rinvR(X1,X2)
| rr(X2,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( ~ cSatisfiable(X1)
| rinvR(X1,esk1_1(X1)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( ~ rf(X1,X2)
| rr(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
( ~ cSatisfiable(X1)
| rf(esk2_1(X1),esk1_1(X1)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
( ~ rr(X2,X3)
| ~ rr(X1,X2)
| rr(X1,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
( ~ cSatisfiable(X1)
| rr(esk1_1(X1),X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
( ~ cSatisfiable(X1)
| rinvF(X1,esk3_1(X1)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
( ~ rr(X1,X2)
| rinvR(X2,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
( ~ cSatisfiable(X1)
| rr(esk2_1(X1),esk1_1(X1)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
( ~ cSatisfiable(X2)
| ~ rr(X1,esk1_1(X2))
| rr(X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
( ~ cSatisfiable(X1)
| rf(esk3_1(X1),X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_23]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_31,plain,
( ~ ca(X4)
| ~ rinvF(X1,X4)
| ~ ca(X3)
| ~ rinvF(X2,X3)
| ~ rinvR(X1,X2)
| cSatisfiable(X1)
| ca(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_32,plain,
( ~ cSatisfiable(X1)
| rinvR(esk1_1(X1),esk2_1(X1)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_33,plain,
( ~ cSatisfiable(X1)
| rr(esk2_1(X1),X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_25]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_34,plain,
( ~ cSatisfiable(X1)
| rr(esk3_1(X1),X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_27]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_35,plain,
( ~ rf(X1,X3)
| ~ rf(X1,X2)
| X2 = X3 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_28]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_36,plain,
( ~ cSatisfiable(X1)
| ~ ca(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_37,plain,
( ~ cSatisfiable(X1)
| ca(esk3_1(X1)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_38,plain,
( ~ cSatisfiable(X1)
| ca(esk2_1(X1)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_41,plain,
( ~ cSatisfiable(X1)
| ~ ca(X2)
| ~ ca(X3)
| ~ rinvF(esk1_1(X1),X3)
| ~ rinvF(esk2_1(X1),X2)
| cSatisfiable(esk1_1(X1))
| ca(esk1_1(X1)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_42,plain,
( ~ cSatisfiable(X1)
| ~ cSatisfiable(esk1_1(X1))
| rr(esk2_1(esk1_1(X1)),X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_33]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_43,plain,
( ~ cSatisfiable(X2)
| ~ rr(X1,esk2_1(X2))
| rr(X1,esk1_1(X2)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_25]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_44,plain,
( ~ cSatisfiable(X2)
| ~ rr(X1,esk2_1(X2))
| rr(X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_33]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_45,plain,
( ~ cSatisfiable(X1)
| rinvR(X1,esk2_1(X1)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_33]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_46,plain,
( ~ cSatisfiable(X1)
| ~ cSatisfiable(esk1_1(X1))
| rr(esk1_1(esk1_1(X1)),X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_22]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_47,plain,
( ~ cSatisfiable(X1)
| ~ cSatisfiable(esk1_1(X1))
| rr(esk3_1(esk1_1(X1)),X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_34]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_48,plain,
( ~ cSatisfiable(X2)
| ~ rf(esk2_1(X2),X1)
| X1 = esk1_1(X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_20]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_49,plain,
( ~ cSatisfiable(X2)
| ~ rr(X1,esk3_1(X2))
| rr(X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_34]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_50,plain,
( ~ cSatisfiable(X1)
| rinvR(X1,esk3_1(X1)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_34]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_51,plain,
( ~ cSatisfiable(X2)
| ~ rf(esk3_1(X2),X1)
| X1 = X2 ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_27]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_52,plain,
( ~ rf(X1,X2)
| rinvF(X2,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_53,plain,
( ~ cSatisfiable(X1)
| ~ cSatisfiable(esk3_1(X1)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_37]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_54,plain,
( ~ cSatisfiable(X1)
| ~ cSatisfiable(esk2_1(X1)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_38]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_55,plain,
( xsd_string(X1)
| xsd_integer(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_39]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_56,plain,
( ~ xsd_integer(X1)
| ~ xsd_string(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_39]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_57,plain,
~ cowlNothing(X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_40]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_58,plain,
cSatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_15_47436),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[axiom_7]),
[final] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : KRS036+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/10.39 % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.11/10.39 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/10.39 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/10.39 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/10.39 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/10.39 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/10.39 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/10.39 % DateTime : Sun Sep 20 22:56:33 UTC 2026
% 0.11/10.39 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/10.39 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.16/10.46 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.16/10.46 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.16/10.54 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.16/10.54 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/10.54 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/10.54 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/10.54 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/10.54 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/10.54 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/10.54 % new_bool_3 with pid 972866 completed with status 9
% 0.16/10.54 % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 972865 completed with status 1
% 0.16/10.54 % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.16/10.54 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/10.54 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/10.54 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/10.54 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.16/10.54 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.16/10.54 % Search class: FGHSF-FFSF11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.16/10.54 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.16/10.54 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.16/10.54 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.16/10.54 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S4d with 136s (1) cores
% 0.16/10.54 % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.16/10.54 % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.16/10.54 % new_bool_3 with pid 972885 completed with status 1
% 0.16/10.54 % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.16/10.54 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/10.54 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/10.54 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/10.54 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.16/10.54 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.16/10.54 % Search class: FGHSF-FFSF11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.16/10.54 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.16/10.54 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.16/10.54 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.16/10.54 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S4d with 136s (1) cores
% 0.16/10.54 % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.16/10.54 % Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.16/10.54 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.16/10.54
% 0.16/10.54 % No proof found!
% 0.16/10.54 % SZS status Satisfiable
% 0.16/10.54 % SZS output start Saturation
% See solution above
% 0.16/10.54 % Parsed axioms : 23
% 0.16/10.54 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.16/10.54 % Initial clauses : 33
% 0.16/10.54 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 15
% 0.16/10.54 % Initial clauses in saturation : 18
% 0.16/10.54 % Processed clauses : 73
% 0.16/10.54 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.16/10.54 % ...subsumed : 16
% 0.16/10.54 % ...remaining for further processing : 57
% 0.16/10.54 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.16/10.54 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.16/10.54 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.16/10.54 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.16/10.54 % Generated clauses : 41
% 0.16/10.54 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 37
% 0.16/10.54 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.16/10.54 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.16/10.54 % Paramodulations : 41
% 0.16/10.54 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.16/10.54 % NegExts : 0
% 0.16/10.54 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.16/10.54 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.16/10.54 % Total rewrite steps : 0
% 0.16/10.54 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.16/10.54 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.16/10.54 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.16/10.54 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.16/10.54 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.16/10.54 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.16/10.54 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.16/10.54 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.16/10.54 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.16/10.54 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.16/10.54 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.16/10.54 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.16/10.54 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.16/10.54 % Current number of processed clauses : 39
% 0.16/10.54 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 1
% 0.16/10.54 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.16/10.54 % Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.16/10.54 % Non-unit-clauses : 37
% 0.16/10.54 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.16/10.54 % ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.16/10.54 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.16/10.54 % Current number of archived clauses : 19
% 0.16/10.54 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 310
% 0.16/10.54 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 206
% 0.16/10.54 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 16
% 0.16/10.54 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.16/10.54 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.16/10.54 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.16/10.54 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.16/10.54 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.16/10.54 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.16/10.54 % Termbank termtop insertions : 2916
% 0.16/10.54 % Search garbage collected termcells : 502
% 0.16/10.54
% 0.16/10.54 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/10.54 % User time : 0.015 s
% 0.16/10.54 % System time : 0.004 s
% 0.16/10.54 % Total time : 0.019 s
% 0.16/10.54 % Maximum resident set size: 3656 pages
% 0.16/10.54
% 0.16/10.54 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/10.54 % User time : 0.063 s
% 0.16/10.54 % System time : 0.035 s
% 0.16/10.54 % Total time : 0.099 s
% 0.16/10.54 % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.16/10.54 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------