%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : KRS039+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:00:37 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Satisfiable 0.24s 0.58s
% Output : Saturation 0.24s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named c_0_7ERROR: Could not build tree for root c_0_15ERROR: MakeTreeStats fails)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( ~ rr(X1,X2)
| rinvR(X2,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( ~ cSatisfiable(X1)
| rr(X1,esk2_1(X1)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( ~ cSatisfiable(X1)
| rr(X1,esk1_1(X1)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( ~ rr(X1,X3)
| ~ rr(X1,X2)
| cSatisfiable(X1)
| rr1(esk3_2(X1,X3),esk4_2(X1,X3))
| rr1(esk5_2(X1,X2),esk6_2(X1,X2)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( ~ rr(X1,X3)
| ~ rr(X1,X2)
| cSatisfiable(X1)
| rinvR(X3,esk3_2(X1,X3))
| rr1(esk5_2(X1,X2),esk6_2(X1,X2)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( ~ rr(X2,X3)
| ~ rr(X2,X1)
| cSatisfiable(X2)
| rr1(esk3_2(X2,X3),esk4_2(X2,X3))
| rinvR(X1,esk5_2(X2,X1)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( ~ rr(X1,X3)
| ~ rr(X1,X2)
| cSatisfiable(X1)
| rr1(esk3_2(X1,X3),esk4_2(X1,X3))
| cp(esk6_2(X1,X2)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( ~ rr(X1,X3)
| ~ cp(esk4_2(X1,X3))
| ~ rr(X1,X2)
| cSatisfiable(X1)
| rr1(esk5_2(X1,X2),esk6_2(X1,X2)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
( ~ cSatisfiable(X1)
| rinvR(esk2_1(X1),X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
( ~ rr(X2,X3)
| ~ rr(X2,X1)
| cSatisfiable(X2)
| rinvR(X3,esk3_2(X2,X3))
| rinvR(X1,esk5_2(X2,X1)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
( ~ rr(X1,X3)
| ~ rr(X1,X2)
| cSatisfiable(X1)
| rinvR(X3,esk3_2(X1,X3))
| cp(esk6_2(X1,X2)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
( ~ rr(X2,X3)
| ~ cp(esk4_2(X2,X3))
| ~ rr(X2,X1)
| cSatisfiable(X2)
| rinvR(X1,esk5_2(X2,X1)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
( ~ rr(X1,X3)
| ~ cp(esk4_2(X1,X3))
| ~ rr(X1,X2)
| cSatisfiable(X1)
| cp(esk6_2(X1,X2)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
( ~ cSatisfiable(X1)
| ~ rr1(X2,X3)
| ~ rinvR(esk1_1(X1),X2)
| cp(X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
( ~ cSatisfiable(X1)
| rinvR(esk1_1(X1),X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_12]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
( ~ cSatisfiable(X1)
| ~ cp(X3)
| ~ rr1(X2,X3)
| ~ rinvR(esk2_1(X1),X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
( ~ rinvR(X1,X2)
| rr(X2,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
( xsd_string(X1)
| xsd_integer(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
( ~ xsd_integer(X1)
| ~ xsd_string(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_31,plain,
~ cowlNothing(X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_32,plain,
cSatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_15_58383),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[axiom_4]),
[final] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : KRS039+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.16/0.43 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.43 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.43 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.43 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.16/0.43 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.16/0.43 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.43 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.16/0.43 % DateTime : Sun Sep 20 22:53:28 UTC 2026
% 0.16/0.44 % CPUTime :
% 0.16/0.44 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.16/0.50 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.16/0.51 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/0.58 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.24/0.58 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.24/0.58 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.24/0.58 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.24/0.58 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.58 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.58 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.58 % G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 371022 completed with status 1
% 0.24/0.58 % Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 0.24/0.58 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.24/0.58 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.24/0.58 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.24/0.58 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.24/0.58 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.24/0.58 % Search class: FGHNF-FFMF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.24/0.58 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.24/0.58 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.58 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.58 % Starting G-E--_200_B02_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S2k with 136s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.58 % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.58 % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.58 % new_bool_3 with pid 371037 completed with status 1
% 0.24/0.58 % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.24/0.58 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.24/0.58 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.24/0.58 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.24/0.58 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.24/0.58 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.24/0.58 % Search class: FGHNF-FFMF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.24/0.58 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.24/0.58 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.58 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.58 % Starting G-E--_200_B02_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S2k with 136s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.58 % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.58 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.24/0.58 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.24/0.58
% 0.24/0.58 % No proof found!
% 0.24/0.58 % SZS status Satisfiable
% 0.24/0.58 % SZS output start Saturation
% See solution above
% 0.24/0.58 % Parsed axioms : 5
% 0.24/0.58 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.24/0.58 % Initial clauses : 20
% 0.24/0.58 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 1
% 0.24/0.58 % Initial clauses in saturation : 19
% 0.24/0.58 % Processed clauses : 42
% 0.24/0.58 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.24/0.58 % ...subsumed : 2
% 0.24/0.58 % ...remaining for further processing : 40
% 0.24/0.58 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.24/0.58 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.24/0.58 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.24/0.58 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.24/0.58 % Generated clauses : 17
% 0.24/0.58 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 4
% 0.24/0.58 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.24/0.58 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.24/0.58 % Paramodulations : 17
% 0.24/0.58 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.24/0.58 % NegExts : 0
% 0.24/0.58 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.24/0.58 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.24/0.58 % Total rewrite steps : 0
% 0.24/0.58 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.24/0.58 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.24/0.58 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.24/0.58 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.24/0.58 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.24/0.58 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.24/0.58 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.24/0.58 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.24/0.58 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.24/0.58 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.24/0.58 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.24/0.58 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.24/0.58 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.24/0.58 % Current number of processed clauses : 21
% 0.24/0.58 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 1
% 0.24/0.58 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.24/0.58 % Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.24/0.58 % Non-unit-clauses : 19
% 0.24/0.58 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.24/0.58 % ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.24/0.58 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.24/0.58 % Current number of archived clauses : 20
% 0.24/0.58 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 297
% 0.24/0.58 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 94
% 0.24/0.58 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 2
% 0.24/0.58 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.24/0.58 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.24/0.58 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.24/0.58 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.24/0.58 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.24/0.58 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.24/0.58 % Termbank termtop insertions : 1832
% 0.24/0.58 % Search garbage collected termcells : 294
% 0.24/0.58
% 0.24/0.58 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.24/0.58 % User time : 0.010 s
% 0.24/0.58 % System time : 0.002 s
% 0.24/0.58 % Total time : 0.012 s
% 0.24/0.58 % Maximum resident set size: 3632 pages
% 0.24/0.58
% 0.24/0.58 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.24/0.58 % User time : 0.021 s
% 0.24/0.58 % System time : 0.017 s
% 0.24/0.58 % Total time : 0.038 s
% 0.24/0.58 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.24/0.58 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------