%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : KRS040+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:00:37 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Satisfiable 10.87s 2.80s
% Output : Saturation 10.87s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named c_0_163ERROR: Could not build tree for root c_0_174ERROR: MakeTreeStats fails)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_0_33,plain,
( ~ cTorF(X1)
| X1 = iminus4
| X1 = iplus4 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_30]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_77,plain,
cTorF(iT),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_64]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_140,plain,
iplus8 = iT,
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_134]),c_0_125]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_149,plain,
cTorF(iminus4),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_142]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_166,plain,
iminus8 = iplus3,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_136,c_0_155]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_174,plain,
cTorF(iplus4),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_163]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_176,plain,
iminus7 = iplus3,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_165,c_0_155]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_177,plain,
iplus3 != iT,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_155,c_0_166]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_180,plain,
iminus1 = iT,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_109,c_0_155]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_188,plain,
iplus5 = iplus3,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_175,c_0_176]),c_0_176]),c_0_177]),c_0_178]),c_0_166]),c_0_177]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_190,plain,
iplus6 = iT,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_179,c_0_176]),c_0_176]),c_0_177]),c_0_180]),c_0_177]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_192,plain,
iminus9 = iT,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_87,c_0_155]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_197,plain,
cTorF(iplus3),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_182]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_198,plain,
( iplus4 = iT
| iminus4 = iT ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_77]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_205,plain,
( ~ cTorF(X1)
| X1 = iT
| X1 = iplus3 ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_60,c_0_140]),c_0_166]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_206,plain,
( iplus4 = iplus3
| iminus5 = iplus4 ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_187,c_0_188]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_207,plain,
( iminus6 = iplus4
| iplus4 = iT ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_189,c_0_190]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_208,plain,
( iplus4 = iT
| iplus9 = iplus4 ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_191,c_0_192]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_209,plain,
( iF = iminus4
| iplus4 = iplus3 ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_146]),c_0_166]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_210,plain,
( iminus4 = iplus3
| iminus4 = iT ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_193,c_0_140]),c_0_166]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_211,plain,
( iplus4 != iT
| iminus4 = iplus3 ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_194,c_0_168]),c_0_155]),c_0_166]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_212,plain,
( iplus4 = iT
| iplus4 = iplus3 ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_195,c_0_140]),c_0_140])]),c_0_146]),c_0_166]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_213,plain,
( iminus4 != iplus4
| iplus4 = iplus3 ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_196,c_0_146]),c_0_166]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_214,plain,
( iminus4 != iT
| iplus4 = iplus3 ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_146]),c_0_166]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_215,plain,
( iF = iminus4
| iminus4 = iT ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_152,c_0_149]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_216,plain,
( iplus4 = iplus3
| iminus4 = iplus3 ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_197]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_217,plain,
( iF = iplus4
| iplus4 = iT ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_198]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_218,plain,
( xsd_string(X1)
| xsd_integer(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_199]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_219,plain,
( ~ xsd_integer(X1)
| ~ xsd_string(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_199]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_220,plain,
~ cowlNothing(X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_200]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_221,plain,
iminus5 = iT,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_201,c_0_188]),c_0_177]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_222,plain,
iminus6 = iplus3,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_202,c_0_190])]),c_0_177]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_223,plain,
iF = iplus3,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_146,c_0_166]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_224,plain,
iplus9 = iplus3,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_203,c_0_166]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_225,plain,
iminus2 = iplus3,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_168,c_0_166]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_226,plain,
iplus1 = iplus3,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_178,c_0_166]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_227,plain,
iminus3 = iT,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_130,c_0_155]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_228,plain,
iplus2 = iT,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_132,c_0_155]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_229,plain,
iplus7 = iT,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_204,c_0_140]),
[final] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05 % Problem : KRS040+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.00/0.09 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.21/0.48 % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.21/0.48 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.21/0.48 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.21/0.48 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.21/0.48 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.21/0.48 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.21/0.48 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.21/0.48 % DateTime : Sun Sep 20 22:51:19 UTC 2026
% 0.21/0.48 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.48 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.26/0.55 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.26/0.55 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 10.87/2.80 % Version: 3.5.1
% 10.87/2.80 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 10.87/2.80 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 10.87/2.80 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 10.87/2.80 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 10.87/2.80 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 10.87/2.80 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 10.87/2.80 % new_bool_1 with pid 1664052 completed with status 9
% 10.87/2.80 % new_bool_3 with pid 1664051 completed with status 9
% 10.87/2.80 % sh5l with pid 1664053 completed with status 9
% 10.87/2.80 % C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 1664050 completed with status 1
% 10.87/2.80 % Result found by C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 10.87/2.80 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 10.87/2.80 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 10.87/2.80 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 10.87/2.80 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 10.87/2.80 % No SInE strategy applied
% 10.87/2.80 % Search class: FGHSF-FFMM00-SFFFFFNN
% 10.87/2.80 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 10.87/2.80 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 10.87/2.80 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 10.87/2.80 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 10.87/2.80 % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 10.87/2.80 % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 10.87/2.80 % new_bool_1 with pid 1664068 completed with status 1
% 10.87/2.80 % Result found by new_bool_1
% 10.87/2.80 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 10.87/2.80 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 10.87/2.80 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 10.87/2.80 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 10.87/2.80 % No SInE strategy applied
% 10.87/2.80 % Search class: FGHSF-FFMM00-SFFFFFNN
% 10.87/2.80 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 10.87/2.80 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 10.87/2.80 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 10.87/2.80 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 10.87/2.80 % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 10.87/2.80 % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 10.87/2.80 % Preprocessing time : 0.003 s
% 10.87/2.80 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 10.87/2.80
% 10.87/2.80 % No proof found!
% 10.87/2.80 % SZS status Satisfiable
% 10.87/2.80 % SZS output start Saturation
% See solution above
% 10.87/2.80 % Parsed axioms : 83
% 10.87/2.80 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 10.87/2.80 % Initial clauses : 105
% 10.87/2.80 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 26
% 10.87/2.80 % Initial clauses in saturation : 79
% 10.87/2.80 % Processed clauses : 5737
% 10.87/2.80 % ...of these trivial : 1219
% 10.87/2.80 % ...subsumed : 2265
% 10.87/2.80 % ...remaining for further processing : 2253
% 10.87/2.80 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 20
% 10.87/2.80 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 10.87/2.80 % Backward-subsumed : 216
% 10.87/2.80 % Backward-rewritten : 1757
% 10.87/2.80 % Generated clauses : 98912
% 10.87/2.80 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 92907
% 10.87/2.80 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 10.87/2.80 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 31
% 10.87/2.80 % Paramodulations : 98144
% 10.87/2.80 % Factorizations : 606
% 10.87/2.80 % NegExts : 0
% 10.87/2.80 % Equation resolutions : 20
% 10.87/2.80 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 10.87/2.80 % Total rewrite steps : 8888
% 10.87/2.80 % ...of those cached : 8853
% 10.87/2.80 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 10.87/2.80 % Propositional check models : 0
% 10.87/2.80 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 10.87/2.80 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 10.87/2.80 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 10.87/2.80 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 10.87/2.80 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 10.87/2.80 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 10.87/2.80 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 10.87/2.80 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 10.87/2.80 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 10.87/2.80 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 10.87/2.80 % Current number of processed clauses : 39
% 10.87/2.80 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 20
% 10.87/2.80 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 10.87/2.80 % Negative unit clauses : 2
% 10.87/2.80 % Non-unit-clauses : 17
% 10.87/2.80 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 10.87/2.80 % ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 10.87/2.80 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 10.87/2.80 % Current number of archived clauses : 2195
% 10.87/2.80 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 199533
% 10.87/2.80 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 108359
% 10.87/2.80 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 2454
% 10.87/2.80 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 885
% 10.87/2.80 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 10.87/2.80 % BW rewrite match attempts : 17
% 10.87/2.80 % BW rewrite match successes : 17
% 10.87/2.80 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 10.87/2.80 % Condensation successes : 0
% 10.87/2.80 % Termbank termtop insertions : 570615
% 10.87/2.80 % Search garbage collected termcells : 398
% 10.87/2.80
% 10.87/2.80 % -------------------------------------------------
% 10.87/2.80 % User time : 2.034 s
% 10.87/2.80 % System time : 0.103 s
% 10.87/2.80 % Total time : 2.138 s
% 10.87/2.80 % Maximum resident set size: 3680 pages
% 10.87/2.80
% 10.87/2.80 % -------------------------------------------------
% 10.87/2.80 % User time : 10.326 s
% 10.87/2.80 % System time : 0.599 s
% 10.87/2.80 % Total time : 10.924 s
% 10.87/2.80 % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 10.87/2.80 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------