%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : KRS042+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:00:38 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Satisfiable 0.14s 0.44s
% Output : Saturation 0.14s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named c_0_25ERROR: Could not build tree for root c_0_58ERROR: MakeTreeStats fails)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
( ~ ra_Px1(X1,X2)
| ~ ca_Cx1xcomp(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
( ~ ca_Cx1(X1)
| ra_Px1(X1,esk3_1(X1)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
( ~ ca_Cx1(X1)
| ~ ca_Cx1xcomp(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_31,plain,
( ~ cSatisfiable(X1)
| ca_Cx1(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_25]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_34,plain,
( ~ rrx4a(X1,X3)
| ~ rrx4a(X1,X2)
| X2 = X3 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_26]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_35,plain,
( ~ cSatisfiable(X1)
| rrx4a(X1,esk2_1(X1)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_25]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_36,plain,
( ~ rrx3a(X1,X3)
| ~ rrx3a(X1,X2)
| X2 = X3 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_27]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_37,plain,
( ~ cSatisfiable(X1)
| rrx3a(X1,esk1_1(X1)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_25]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_38,plain,
( ~ ca_Cx1xcomp(X1)
| rrx3a(X1,esk4_1(X1)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_28]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_42,plain,
( ~ cc1(X1)
| ~ cc2(X1)
| ca_Ax2(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_29]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_43,plain,
( ~ cSatisfiable(X1)
| cc2(esk2_1(X1)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_25]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_44,plain,
( ~ ca_Ax2(X2)
| ~ rrx3a(X1,X2)
| ca_Cx1xcomp(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_28]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_45,plain,
( ~ cSatisfiable(X1)
| ~ ca_Cx1xcomp(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_54,plain,
( ~ ra_Px1(X1,X2)
| ca_Cx1(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_55,plain,
( ca_Cx1xcomp(X1)
| ra_Px1(X1,esk5_1(X1)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_58,plain,
( ~ cc2(X3)
| ~ rrx4a(X1,X3)
| ~ ca_Cx1(X1)
| ~ cc1(X2)
| ~ rrx3a(X1,X2)
| cSatisfiable(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_25]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_59,plain,
( ~ cSatisfiable(X2)
| ~ rrx4a(X2,X1)
| X1 = esk2_1(X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_60,plain,
( ~ cSatisfiable(X2)
| ~ rrx3a(X2,X1)
| X1 = esk1_1(X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_37]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_61,plain,
( ~ ca_Cx1xcomp(X2)
| ~ rrx3a(X2,X1)
| X1 = esk4_1(X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_38]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_62,plain,
( ~ rrx4(X1,X3)
| ~ rrx4(X1,X2)
| X2 = X3 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_39]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_63,plain,
( ~ rrx3(X1,X3)
| ~ rrx3(X1,X2)
| X2 = X3 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_40]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_64,plain,
( ~ rrx(X1,X3)
| ~ rrx(X1,X2)
| X2 = X3 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_41]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_65,plain,
( ~ cSatisfiable(X1)
| ~ cc1(esk2_1(X1))
| ca_Ax2(esk2_1(X1)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_42,c_0_43]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_66,plain,
( ~ cSatisfiable(X1)
| ~ ca_Ax2(esk1_1(X1)) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_44,c_0_37]),c_0_45]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_67,plain,
( ~ rrx4a(X1,X2)
| rrxa(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_46]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_68,plain,
( ~ rrx3a(X1,X2)
| rrxa(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_47]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_69,plain,
( ~ rrx4a(X1,X2)
| rrx2a(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_48]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_70,plain,
( ~ rrx4(X1,X2)
| rrx2(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_49]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_71,plain,
( ~ rrx3a(X1,X2)
| rrx1a(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_50]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_72,plain,
( ~ rrx3(X1,X2)
| rrx1(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_51]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_73,plain,
( ~ rrx4(X1,X2)
| rrx(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_52]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_74,plain,
( ~ rrx3(X1,X2)
| rrx(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_53]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_75,plain,
( ca_Cx1(X1)
| ca_Cx1xcomp(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_54,c_0_55]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_76,plain,
( ~ cSatisfiable(X1)
| cc1(esk1_1(X1)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_25]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_77,plain,
( ~ ca_Cx1xcomp(X1)
| ca_Ax2(esk4_1(X1)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_28]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_78,plain,
( ~ xsd_integer(X1)
| ~ xsd_string(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_56]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_79,plain,
( ~ ca_Ax2(X1)
| cc2(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_29]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_80,plain,
( ~ ca_Ax2(X1)
| cc1(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_29]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_81,plain,
( xsd_string(X1)
| xsd_integer(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_56]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_82,plain,
~ cowlNothing(X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_57]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_83,plain,
cSatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_16_10980),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[axiom_12]),
[final] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : KRS042+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.37 % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.37 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.37 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.37 % DateTime : Sun Sep 20 22:51:40 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.37 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.14/0.41 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.14/0.41 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.44 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.14/0.44 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.44 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.44 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.44 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.44 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.44 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.44 % G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with pid 366139 completed with status 1
% 0.14/0.44 % Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S
% 0.14/0.44 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.44 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.44 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.44 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.14/0.44 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.14/0.44 % Search class: FGHSF-FFSF11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.44 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.14/0.44 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.44 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 151s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.44 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S4d with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.44 % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.44 % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.44 % SubtermCWHack with pid 366154 completed with status 1
% 0.14/0.44 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.14/0.44 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.44 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.44 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.44 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.14/0.44 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.14/0.44 % Search class: FGHSF-FFSF11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.44 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.14/0.44 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.44 % Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.14/0.44
% 0.14/0.44 % No proof found!
% 0.14/0.44 % SZS status Satisfiable
% 0.14/0.44 % SZS output start Saturation
% See solution above
% 0.14/0.44 % Parsed axioms : 53
% 0.14/0.44 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.14/0.44 % Initial clauses : 66
% 0.14/0.44 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 33
% 0.14/0.44 % Initial clauses in saturation : 33
% 0.14/0.44 % Processed clauses : 43
% 0.14/0.44 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.14/0.44 % ...subsumed : 2
% 0.14/0.44 % ...remaining for further processing : 41
% 0.14/0.44 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.14/0.44 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.14/0.44 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.14/0.44 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.14/0.44 % Generated clauses : 18
% 0.14/0.44 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 10
% 0.14/0.44 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.14/0.44 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 1
% 0.14/0.44 % Paramodulations : 18
% 0.14/0.44 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.14/0.44 % NegExts : 0
% 0.14/0.44 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.14/0.44 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.14/0.44 % Total rewrite steps : 0
% 0.14/0.44 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.14/0.44 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.14/0.44 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.14/0.44 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.14/0.44 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.14/0.44 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.14/0.44 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.14/0.44 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.44 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.44 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.44 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.44 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.44 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.44 % Current number of processed clauses : 41
% 0.14/0.44 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 1
% 0.14/0.44 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.14/0.44 % Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.14/0.44 % Non-unit-clauses : 39
% 0.14/0.44 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.14/0.44 % ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.14/0.44 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.14/0.44 % Current number of archived clauses : 1
% 0.14/0.44 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 143
% 0.14/0.44 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 89
% 0.14/0.44 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 3
% 0.14/0.44 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.14/0.44 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.14/0.44 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.14/0.44 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.14/0.44 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.14/0.44 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.14/0.44 % Termbank termtop insertions : 4775
% 0.14/0.44 % Search garbage collected termcells : 1069
% 0.14/0.44
% 0.14/0.44 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.44 % User time : 0.011 s
% 0.14/0.44 % System time : 0.002 s
% 0.14/0.44 % Total time : 0.013 s
% 0.14/0.44 % Maximum resident set size: 3436 pages
% 0.14/0.44
% 0.14/0.44 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.44 % User time : 0.030 s
% 0.14/0.44 % System time : 0.010 s
% 0.14/0.44 % Total time : 0.040 s
% 0.14/0.44 % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.14/0.44 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------