%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : Etableau---0.67 % Problem : KRS044+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s % Computer : n028.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 600s % DateTime : Sun Jul 17 03:00:24 EDT 2022 % Result : Satisfiable 0.20s 0.39s % Output : CNFRefutation 0.20s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.04/0.13 % Problem : KRS044+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0. % 0.04/0.14 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s % 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n028.cluster.edu % 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 600 % 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Tue Jun 7 06:49:14 EDT 2022 % 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime : % 0.20/0.38 # No SInE strategy applied % 0.20/0.38 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d % 0.20/0.38 # and selection function SelectCQIPrecWNTNp. % 0.20/0.38 # % 0.20/0.38 # Presaturation interreduction done % 0.20/0.38 # Number of axioms: 24 Number of unprocessed: 24 % 0.20/0.38 # Tableaux proof search. % 0.20/0.38 # APR header successfully linked. % 0.20/0.38 # Hello from C++ % 0.20/0.39 # The folding up rule is enabled... % 0.20/0.39 # Local unification is enabled... % 0.20/0.39 # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels... % 0.20/0.39 # 24 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification % 0.20/0.39 # No conjectures after preprocessing. Attempting to resurrect them from ax_archive. % 0.20/0.39 # No conjectures. % 0.20/0.39 # There are 24 start rule candidates: % 0.20/0.39 # Found 2 unit axioms. % 0.20/0.39 # Unsuccessfully attempted saturation on 1 start tableaux, moving on. % 0.20/0.39 # 24 start rule tableaux created. % 0.20/0.39 # 22 extension rule candidate clauses % 0.20/0.39 # 2 unit axiom clauses % 0.20/0.39 % 0.20/0.39 # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process. % 0.20/0.39 # 2863 Satisfiable branch % 0.20/0.39 # Satisfiable branch found. % 0.20/0.39 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts. % 0.20/0.39 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked. % 0.20/0.39 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts. % 0.20/0.39 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations. % 0.20/0.39 # There were 0 total successful branch saturations. % 0.20/0.39 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction. % 0.20/0.39 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch. % 0.20/0.39 # There were 0 successful branch saturations after the branch. % 0.20/0.39 # 2864 Satisfiable branch % 0.20/0.39 # 2866 Satisfiable branch % 0.20/0.39 # SZS status Satisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.20/0.39 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.20/0.39 # Begin clausification derivation % 0.20/0.39 % 0.20/0.39 # End clausification derivation % 0.20/0.39 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion % 0.20/0.39 cnf(i_0_44, plain, (cSatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_16_1832))). % 0.20/0.39 cnf(i_0_22, plain, (~cowlNothing(X1))). % 0.20/0.39 cnf(i_0_25, plain, (~xsd_string(X1)|~xsd_integer(X1))). % 0.20/0.39 cnf(i_0_32, plain, (~ra_Px1(X1,X2)|~cp(X1))). % 0.20/0.39 cnf(i_0_33, plain, (cpxcomp(X1)|~ra_Px1(X1,X2))). % 0.20/0.39 cnf(i_0_24, plain, (xsd_string(X1)|xsd_integer(X1))). % 0.20/0.39 cnf(i_0_29, plain, (cp(esk1_1(X1))|~cSatisfiable(X1))). % 0.20/0.39 cnf(i_0_38, plain, (rf(X1,X2)|~rinvF(X2,X1))). % 0.20/0.39 cnf(i_0_45, plain, (rf(X1,X2)|~rs(X1,X2))). % 0.20/0.39 cnf(i_0_40, plain, (rf1(X1,X2)|~rinvF1(X2,X1))). % 0.20/0.39 cnf(i_0_46, plain, (rf1(X1,X2)|~rs(X1,X2))). % 0.20/0.39 cnf(i_0_27, plain, (cpxcomp(esk2_1(X1))|~cSatisfiable(X1))). % 0.20/0.39 cnf(i_0_42, plain, (rs(X1,X2)|~rinvS(X2,X1))). % 0.20/0.39 cnf(i_0_37, plain, (rinvF(X1,X2)|~rf(X2,X1))). % 0.20/0.39 cnf(i_0_39, plain, (rinvF1(X1,X2)|~rf1(X2,X1))). % 0.20/0.39 cnf(i_0_41, plain, (rinvS(X1,X2)|~rs(X2,X1))). % 0.20/0.39 cnf(i_0_31, plain, (ra_Px1(X1,esk3_1(X1))|cp(X1))). % 0.20/0.39 cnf(i_0_34, plain, (ra_Px1(X1,esk4_1(X1))|~cpxcomp(X1))). % 0.20/0.39 cnf(i_0_30, plain, (rf(X1,esk1_1(X1))|~cSatisfiable(X1))). % 0.20/0.39 cnf(i_0_28, plain, (rf1(X1,esk2_1(X1))|~cSatisfiable(X1))). % 0.20/0.39 cnf(i_0_35, plain, (X1=X2|~rf(X3,X2)|~rf(X3,X1))). % 0.20/0.39 cnf(i_0_36, plain, (X1=X2|~rf1(X3,X2)|~rf1(X3,X1))). % 0.20/0.39 cnf(i_0_43, plain, (X1=X2|~rs(X3,X2)|~rs(X3,X1))). % 0.20/0.39 cnf(i_0_26, plain, (cSatisfiable(X1)|~rf1(X1,X2)|~rf(X1,X3)|~cpxcomp(X2)|~cp(X3))). % 0.20/0.39 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification! % 0.20/0.39 # Begin printing tableau % 0.20/0.39 # Found 3 steps % 0.20/0.39 cnf(i_0_44, plain, (cSatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_16_1832)), inference(start_rule)). % 0.20/0.39 cnf(i_0_47, plain, (cSatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_16_1832)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_29])). % 0.20/0.39 cnf(i_0_107, plain, (cp(esk1_1(i2003_11_14_17_16_1832))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_32])). % 0.20/0.39 # End printing tableau % 0.20/0.39 # SZS output end % 0.20/0.39 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s" % 0.20/0.39 # Creating equality axioms % 0.20/0.39 # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses % 0.20/0.39 # 2868 Satisfiable branch % 0.20/0.39 # Satisfiable branch found. % 0.20/0.39 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts. % 0.20/0.39 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked. % 0.20/0.39 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts. % 0.20/0.39 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations. % 0.20/0.39 # There were 0 total successful branch saturations. % 0.20/0.39 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction. % 0.20/0.39 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch. % 0.20/0.39 # There were 0 successful branch saturations after the branch. % 0.20/0.39 # Child (2863) has found a proof. % 0.20/0.39 % 0.20/0.39 # SZS status Satisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.20/0.39 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.20/0.39 # Begin clausification derivation % 0.20/0.39 % 0.20/0.39 # End clausification derivation % 0.20/0.39 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion % 0.20/0.39 cnf(i_0_44, plain, (cSatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_16_1832))). % 0.20/0.39 cnf(i_0_22, plain, (~cowlNothing(X1))). % 0.20/0.39 cnf(i_0_25, plain, (~xsd_string(X1)|~xsd_integer(X1))). % 0.20/0.39 cnf(i_0_32, plain, (~ra_Px1(X1,X2)|~cp(X1))). % 0.20/0.39 cnf(i_0_33, plain, (cpxcomp(X1)|~ra_Px1(X1,X2))). % 0.20/0.39 cnf(i_0_24, plain, (xsd_string(X1)|xsd_integer(X1))). % 0.20/0.39 cnf(i_0_29, plain, (cp(esk1_1(X1))|~cSatisfiable(X1))). % 0.20/0.39 cnf(i_0_38, plain, (rf(X1,X2)|~rinvF(X2,X1))). % 0.20/0.39 cnf(i_0_45, plain, (rf(X1,X2)|~rs(X1,X2))). % 0.20/0.39 cnf(i_0_40, plain, (rf1(X1,X2)|~rinvF1(X2,X1))). % 0.20/0.39 cnf(i_0_46, plain, (rf1(X1,X2)|~rs(X1,X2))). % 0.20/0.39 cnf(i_0_27, plain, (cpxcomp(esk2_1(X1))|~cSatisfiable(X1))). % 0.20/0.39 cnf(i_0_42, plain, (rs(X1,X2)|~rinvS(X2,X1))). % 0.20/0.39 cnf(i_0_37, plain, (rinvF(X1,X2)|~rf(X2,X1))). % 0.20/0.39 cnf(i_0_39, plain, (rinvF1(X1,X2)|~rf1(X2,X1))). % 0.20/0.39 cnf(i_0_41, plain, (rinvS(X1,X2)|~rs(X2,X1))). % 0.20/0.39 cnf(i_0_31, plain, (ra_Px1(X1,esk3_1(X1))|cp(X1))). % 0.20/0.39 cnf(i_0_34, plain, (ra_Px1(X1,esk4_1(X1))|~cpxcomp(X1))). % 0.20/0.39 cnf(i_0_30, plain, (rf(X1,esk1_1(X1))|~cSatisfiable(X1))). % 0.20/0.39 cnf(i_0_28, plain, (rf1(X1,esk2_1(X1))|~cSatisfiable(X1))). % 0.20/0.39 cnf(i_0_35, plain, (X1=X2|~rf(X3,X2)|~rf(X3,X1))). % 0.20/0.39 cnf(i_0_36, plain, (X1=X2|~rf1(X3,X2)|~rf1(X3,X1))). % 0.20/0.39 cnf(i_0_43, plain, (X1=X2|~rs(X3,X2)|~rs(X3,X1))). % 0.20/0.39 cnf(i_0_26, plain, (cSatisfiable(X1)|~rf1(X1,X2)|~rf(X1,X3)|~cpxcomp(X2)|~cp(X3))). % 0.20/0.39 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification! % 0.20/0.39 # Begin printing tableau % 0.20/0.39 # Found 6 steps % 0.20/0.39 cnf(i_0_32, plain, (~ra_Px1(esk1_1(i2003_11_14_17_16_1832),esk4_1(esk1_1(i2003_11_14_17_16_1832)))|~cp(esk1_1(i2003_11_14_17_16_1832))), inference(start_rule)). % 0.20/0.39 cnf(i_0_51, plain, (~ra_Px1(esk1_1(i2003_11_14_17_16_1832),esk4_1(esk1_1(i2003_11_14_17_16_1832)))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_34])). % 0.20/0.39 cnf(i_0_130, plain, (~cpxcomp(esk1_1(i2003_11_14_17_16_1832))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_33])). % 0.20/0.39 cnf(i_0_136, plain, (~ra_Px1(esk1_1(i2003_11_14_17_16_1832),esk3_1(esk1_1(i2003_11_14_17_16_1832)))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_31])). % 0.20/0.39 cnf(i_0_52, plain, (~cp(esk1_1(i2003_11_14_17_16_1832))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_29])). % 0.20/0.39 cnf(i_0_172, plain, (~cSatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_16_1832)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_44])). % 0.20/0.39 # End printing tableau % 0.20/0.39 # SZS output end % 0.20/0.39 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s" % 0.20/0.39 # Satisfiable branch found. % 0.20/0.39 # Proof search is over... % 0.20/0.39 # Freeing feature tree %------------------------------------------------------------------------------