%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : KRS054+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:00:39 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Satisfiable 0.24s 0.63s
% Output : Saturation 0.24s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named c_0_6ERROR: Could not build tree for root c_0_10ERROR: MakeTreeStats fails)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( xsd_string(X1)
| xsd_integer(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( ~ cC(X1)
| ~ cB(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( ~ cA(X1)
| ~ cD(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( ~ cA(X1)
| ~ cE(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( ~ cD(X1)
| ~ cE(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( ~ xsd_integer(X1)
| ~ xsd_string(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
~ cowlNothing(X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]),
[final] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05 % Problem : KRS054+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.00/0.08 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.18/0.46 % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.18/0.46 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.18/0.46 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.18/0.46 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.18/0.46 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.18/0.46 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.18/0.46 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.18/0.46 % DateTime : Sun Sep 20 22:51:51 UTC 2026
% 0.18/0.47 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.47 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.24/0.56 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.24/0.56 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/0.63 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.24/0.63 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.24/0.63 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.24/0.63 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.24/0.63 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.63 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.63 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.63 % G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 3580927 completed with status 1
% 0.24/0.63 % Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 0.24/0.63 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.24/0.63 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.24/0.63 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.24/0.63 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.24/0.63 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.24/0.63 % Search class: FGHNF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.24/0.63 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.24/0.63 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.63 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.63 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.63 % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.63 % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.63 % new_bool_1 with pid 3580946 completed with status 1
% 0.24/0.63 % Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.24/0.63 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.24/0.63 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.24/0.63 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.24/0.63 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.24/0.63 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.24/0.63 % Search class: FGHNF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.24/0.63 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.24/0.63 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.63 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.63 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.63 % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.63 % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.63 % Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.24/0.63 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.24/0.63
% 0.24/0.63 % No proof found!
% 0.24/0.63 % SZS status Satisfiable
% 0.24/0.63 % SZS output start Saturation
% See solution above
% 0.24/0.63 % Parsed axioms : 4
% 0.24/0.63 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.24/0.63 % Initial clauses : 8
% 0.24/0.63 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 1
% 0.24/0.63 % Initial clauses in saturation : 7
% 0.24/0.63 % Processed clauses : 14
% 0.24/0.63 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.24/0.63 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.24/0.63 % ...remaining for further processing : 14
% 0.24/0.63 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.24/0.63 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.24/0.63 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.24/0.63 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.24/0.63 % Generated clauses : 1
% 0.24/0.63 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.24/0.63 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.24/0.63 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.24/0.63 % Paramodulations : 1
% 0.24/0.63 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.24/0.63 % NegExts : 0
% 0.24/0.63 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.24/0.63 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.24/0.63 % Total rewrite steps : 0
% 0.24/0.63 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.24/0.63 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.24/0.63 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.24/0.63 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.24/0.63 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.24/0.63 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.24/0.63 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.24/0.63 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.24/0.63 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.24/0.63 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.24/0.63 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.24/0.63 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.24/0.63 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.24/0.63 % Current number of processed clauses : 7
% 0.24/0.63 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 0
% 0.24/0.63 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.24/0.63 % Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.24/0.63 % Non-unit-clauses : 6
% 0.24/0.63 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.24/0.63 % ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.24/0.63 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.24/0.63 % Current number of archived clauses : 8
% 0.24/0.63 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.24/0.63 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.24/0.63 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.24/0.63 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.24/0.63 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.24/0.63 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.24/0.63 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.24/0.63 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.24/0.63 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.24/0.63 % Termbank termtop insertions : 439
% 0.24/0.63 % Search garbage collected termcells : 61
% 0.24/0.63
% 0.24/0.63 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.24/0.63 % User time : 0.005 s
% 0.24/0.63 % System time : 0.005 s
% 0.24/0.63 % Total time : 0.009 s
% 0.24/0.63 % Maximum resident set size: 3628 pages
% 0.24/0.63
% 0.24/0.63 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.24/0.63 % User time : 0.015 s
% 0.24/0.63 % System time : 0.012 s
% 0.24/0.63 % Total time : 0.027 s
% 0.24/0.63 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.24/0.63 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------