%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : KRS057+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:00:40 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Satisfiable 0.21s 0.60s
% Output : Saturation 0.21s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named c_0_4ERROR: Could not build tree for root c_0_13ERROR: MakeTreeStats fails)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( ~ cD(X1)
| ~ cB(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
cB(iA),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( ~ cC(X1)
| X1 = iA ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( ~ cB(X1)
| X1 = iA ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( X1 = iA
| cD(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( ~ xsd_integer(X1)
| ~ xsd_string(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( ~ cD(X1)
| ~ cC(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( ~ cB(X1)
| cC(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( ~ cC(X1)
| cB(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
( xsd_string(X1)
| xsd_integer(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
( cC(X1)
| cD(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
( cB(X1)
| cD(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
~ cD(iA),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
~ cowlNothing(X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
cC(iA),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]),
[final] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : KRS057+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.00/0.06 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.18/0.47 % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.18/0.47 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.18/0.47 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.18/0.47 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.18/0.47 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.18/0.47 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.18/0.47 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.18/0.47 % DateTime : Sun Sep 20 22:55:20 UTC 2026
% 0.18/0.47 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.47 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.21/0.54 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.21/0.54 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/0.60 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.21/0.60 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.60 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.60 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.60 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.60 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.60 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.60 % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 4125165 completed with status 1
% 0.21/0.60 % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.21/0.60 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.60 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.60 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.60 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.21/0.60 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.21/0.60 % Search class: FGHSF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.60 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.21/0.60 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.60 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.60 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SA with 136s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.60 % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.60 % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.60 % SubtermCWHack with pid 4125172 completed with status 1
% 0.21/0.60 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.21/0.60 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.60 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.60 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.60 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.21/0.60 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.21/0.60 % Search class: FGHSF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.60 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.21/0.60 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.60 % Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.21/0.60
% 0.21/0.60 % No proof found!
% 0.21/0.60 % SZS status Satisfiable
% 0.21/0.60 % SZS output start Saturation
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.60 % Parsed axioms : 11
% 0.21/0.60 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.21/0.60 % Initial clauses : 24
% 0.21/0.60 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 9
% 0.21/0.60 % Initial clauses in saturation : 15
% 0.21/0.60 % Processed clauses : 25
% 0.21/0.60 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.21/0.60 % ...subsumed : 7
% 0.21/0.60 % ...remaining for further processing : 18
% 0.21/0.60 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 3
% 0.21/0.60 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.21/0.60 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.21/0.60 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.21/0.60 % Generated clauses : 15
% 0.21/0.60 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 10
% 0.21/0.60 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.21/0.60 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.21/0.60 % Paramodulations : 12
% 0.21/0.60 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.21/0.60 % NegExts : 0
% 0.21/0.60 % Equation resolutions : 3
% 0.21/0.60 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.21/0.60 % Total rewrite steps : 1
% 0.21/0.60 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.21/0.60 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.21/0.60 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.21/0.60 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.21/0.60 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.21/0.60 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.21/0.60 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.21/0.60 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.60 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.60 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.60 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.60 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.60 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.60 % Current number of processed clauses : 15
% 0.21/0.60 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 2
% 0.21/0.60 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.21/0.60 % Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.21/0.60 % Non-unit-clauses : 11
% 0.21/0.60 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.21/0.60 % ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.21/0.60 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.21/0.60 % Current number of archived clauses : 1
% 0.21/0.60 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 5
% 0.21/0.60 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 5
% 0.21/0.60 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 5
% 0.21/0.60 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.21/0.60 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.21/0.60 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.21/0.60 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.21/0.60 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.21/0.60 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.21/0.60 % Termbank termtop insertions : 1264
% 0.21/0.60 % Search garbage collected termcells : 232
% 0.21/0.60
% 0.21/0.60 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.60 % User time : 0.009 s
% 0.21/0.60 % System time : 0.003 s
% 0.21/0.60 % Total time : 0.012 s
% 0.21/0.60 % Maximum resident set size: 3640 pages
% 0.21/0.60
% 0.21/0.60 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.60 % User time : 0.025 s
% 0.21/0.60 % System time : 0.013 s
% 0.21/0.60 % Total time : 0.038 s
% 0.21/0.60 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.21/0.60 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------