%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : CSE---1.7 % Problem : KRS064+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.1.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s % Computer : n022.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 300s % DateTime : Mon Jun 24 10:08:22 EDT 2024 % Result : Unsatisfiable 0.55s 0.61s % Output : CNFRefutation 0.55s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.11/0.12 % Problem : KRS064+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.1.0. % 0.11/0.12 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s % 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n022.cluster.edu % 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.13/0.33 % WCLimit : 300 % 0.13/0.33 % DateTime : Wed Jun 19 14:01:24 EDT 2024 % 0.13/0.33 % CPUTime : % 0.20/0.57 start to proof:theBenchmark % 0.55/0.61 %------------------------------------------- % 0.55/0.61 % File :CSE---1.7 % 0.55/0.61 % Problem :theBenchmark % 0.55/0.61 % Transform :cnf % 0.55/0.61 % Format :tptp:raw % 0.55/0.61 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s % 0.55/0.61 % 0.55/0.61 % Result :Theorem 0.000000s % 0.55/0.61 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.000000s % 0.55/0.61 %------------------------------------------- % 0.55/0.61 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % 0.55/0.61 % File : KRS064+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.1.0. % 0.55/0.61 % Domain : Knowledge Representation (Semantic Web) % 0.55/0.61 % Problem : Something of type owl:Nothing % 0.55/0.61 % Version : Especial. % 0.55/0.61 % English : The triple asserts something of type owl:Nothing, however that is % 0.55/0.61 % the empty class. % 0.55/0.61 % 0.55/0.61 % Refs : [Bec03] Bechhofer (2003), Email to G. Sutcliffe % 0.55/0.61 % : [TR+04] Tsarkov et al. (2004), Using Vampire to Reason with OW % 0.55/0.61 % Source : [Bec03] % 0.55/0.61 % Names : inconsistent_Nothing-Manifest001 [Bec03] % 0.55/0.61 % 0.55/0.61 % Status : Unsatisfiable % 0.55/0.61 % Rating : 0.00 v3.1.0 % 0.55/0.61 % Syntax : Number of formulae : 3 ( 1 unt; 0 def) % 0.55/0.61 % Number of atoms : 5 ( 0 equ) % 0.55/0.61 % Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg) % 0.55/0.61 % Number of connectives : 4 ( 2 ~; 0 |; 1 &) % 0.55/0.61 % ( 1 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>) % 0.55/0.61 % Maximal formula depth : 4 ( 3 avg) % 0.55/0.61 % Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg) % 0.55/0.61 % Number of predicates : 4 ( 4 usr; 0 prp; 1-1 aty) % 0.55/0.61 % Number of functors : 1 ( 1 usr; 1 con; 0-0 aty) % 0.55/0.61 % Number of variables : 2 ( 2 !; 0 ?) % 0.55/0.61 % SPC : FOF_UNS_EPR_NEQ % 0.55/0.61 % 0.55/0.61 % Comments : Sean Bechhofer says there are some errors in the encoding of % 0.55/0.61 % datatypes, so this problem may not be perfect. At least it's % 0.55/0.61 % still representative of the type of reasoning required for OWL. % 0.55/0.61 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % 0.55/0.61 %----Thing and Nothing % 0.55/0.61 fof(axiom_0,axiom, % 0.55/0.61 ! [X] : % 0.55/0.61 ( cowlThing(X) % 0.55/0.61 & ~ cowlNothing(X) ) ). % 0.55/0.61 % 0.55/0.61 %----String and Integer disjoint % 0.55/0.61 fof(axiom_1,axiom, % 0.55/0.61 ! [X] : % 0.55/0.61 ( xsd_string(X) % 0.55/0.61 <=> ~ xsd_integer(X) ) ). % 0.55/0.61 % 0.55/0.61 %----i2003_11_14_17_18_08754 % 0.55/0.61 fof(axiom_2,axiom, % 0.55/0.61 cowlNothing(i2003_11_14_17_18_08754) ). % 0.55/0.61 % 0.55/0.61 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % 0.55/0.61 %------------------------------------------- % 0.55/0.61 % Proof found % 0.55/0.61 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark % 0.55/0.61 % SZS output start Proof % 0.55/0.61 %ClaNum:4(EqnAxiom:0) % 0.55/0.61 %VarNum:5(SingletonVarNum:3) % 0.55/0.61 %MaxLitNum:2 % 0.55/0.61 %MaxfuncDepth:0 % 0.55/0.61 %SharedTerms:2 % 0.55/0.61 [1]P1(a1) % 0.55/0.61 [2]~P1(x21) % 0.55/0.61 [3]P3(x31)+P2(x31) % 0.55/0.61 [4]~P3(x41)+~P2(x41) % 0.55/0.61 %EqnAxiom % 0.55/0.61 % 0.55/0.61 %------------------------------------------- % 0.55/0.62 cnf(5,plain, % 0.55/0.62 ($false), % 0.55/0.62 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,2]), % 0.55/0.62 ['proof']). % 0.55/0.62 % SZS output end Proof % 0.55/0.62 % Total time :0.000000s %------------------------------------------------------------------------------