%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : KRS074+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 02:55:32 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 4.46s 2.25s
% Output : CNFRefutation 4.46s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 10 ( 4 unt; 0 nHn; 10 RR)
% Number of literals : 18 ( 0 equ; 11 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 2 ( 2 usr; 1 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 9 ( 1 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_25,plain,
( ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1)
| ~ cp(X2)
| ~ rs(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-nsao0s18/lgb.p',i_0_25) ).
cnf(i_0_29,plain,
( rs(X1,esk1_1(X1))
| ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-nsao0s18/lgb.p',i_0_29) ).
cnf(i_0_28,plain,
( cp(esk1_1(X1))
| ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-nsao0s18/lgb.p',i_0_28) ).
cnf(i_0_39,plain,
cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_18_59896),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-nsao0s18/lgb.p',i_0_39) ).
cnf(c_0_44,plain,
( ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1)
| ~ cp(X2)
| ~ rs(X1,X2) ),
i_0_25 ).
cnf(c_0_45,plain,
( rs(X1,esk1_1(X1))
| ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1) ),
i_0_29 ).
cnf(c_0_46,plain,
( cp(esk1_1(X1))
| ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1) ),
i_0_28 ).
cnf(c_0_47,plain,
cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_18_59896),
i_0_39 ).
cnf(c_0_48,plain,
~ cUnsatisfiable(X1),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_44,c_0_45]),c_0_46]) ).
cnf(c_0_49,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_47,c_0_48]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12 % Problem : KRS074+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.06/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Tue Jun 7 18:32:12 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.44 # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 4.46/2.25 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 4.46/2.25 # No SInE strategy applied
% 4.46/2.25 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 4.46/2.25 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___008_C45_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_S4c
% 4.46/2.25 # and selection function SelectCQPrecWNTNp.
% 4.46/2.25 #
% 4.46/2.25 # Preprocessing time : 0.023 s
% 4.46/2.25
% 4.46/2.25 # Proof found!
% 4.46/2.25 # SZS status Theorem
% 4.46/2.25 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 4.46/2.25 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 4.46/2.25
% 4.46/2.25 # -------------------------------------------------
% 4.46/2.25 # User time : 0.026 s
% 4.46/2.25 # System time : 0.003 s
% 4.46/2.25 # Total time : 0.028 s
% 4.46/2.25 # Maximum resident set size: 7120 pages
% 4.46/2.25
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------