↑ Up

ePrincess---1.0.UNS-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ePrincess---1.0
% Problem  : KRS081+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : ePrincess-casc -timeout=%d %s

% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 02:56:30 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 61.32s 25.37s
% Output   : Proof 68.57s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.13  % Problem  : KRS081+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.04/0.13  % Command  : ePrincess-casc -timeout=%d %s
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Tue Jun  7 11:53:20 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.62/0.66          ____       _                          
% 0.62/0.66    ___  / __ \_____(_)___  ________  __________
% 0.62/0.66   / _ \/ /_/ / ___/ / __ \/ ___/ _ \/ ___/ ___/
% 0.62/0.66  /  __/ ____/ /  / / / / / /__/  __(__  |__  ) 
% 0.62/0.66  \___/_/   /_/  /_/_/ /_/\___/\___/____/____/  
% 0.62/0.66  
% 0.62/0.66  A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic
% 0.62/0.66  (ePrincess v.1.0)
% 0.62/0.66  
% 0.62/0.66  (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2015
% 0.62/0.66  (c) Peter Backeman, 2014-2015
% 0.62/0.66  (contributions by Angelo Brillout, Peter Baumgartner)
% 0.62/0.66  Free software under GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL).
% 0.62/0.66  Bug reports to peter@backeman.se
% 0.62/0.66  
% 0.62/0.66  For more information, visit http://user.uu.se/~petba168/breu/
% 0.62/0.66  
% 0.62/0.66  Loading /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.74/0.71  Prover 0: Options:  -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 1.63/1.03  Prover 0: Preprocessing ...
% 2.11/1.20  Prover 0: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 2.11/1.22  Prover 0: Constructing countermodel ...
% 14.34/6.00  Prover 1: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -resolutionMethod=normal +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 14.45/6.06  Prover 1: Preprocessing ...
% 15.58/6.27  Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ...
% 23.66/8.60  Prover 2: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 23.66/8.64  Prover 2: Preprocessing ...
% 36.51/13.18  Prover 2: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 37.83/13.49  Prover 2: Constructing countermodel ...
% 56.54/22.39  Prover 0: stopped
% 56.74/22.59  Prover 3: Options:  -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 56.79/22.62  Prover 3: Preprocessing ...
% 56.79/22.64  Prover 3: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 56.79/22.65  Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ...
% 61.32/25.36  Prover 3: proved (2775ms)
% 61.32/25.37  Prover 1: stopped
% 61.32/25.37  Prover 2: stopped
% 61.32/25.37  
% 61.32/25.37  No countermodel exists, formula is valid
% 61.32/25.37  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 61.32/25.37  
% 61.32/25.37  Generating proof ... Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 68.08/29.19  found it (size 280)
% 68.08/29.19  
% 68.08/29.19  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 68.08/29.19  Assumed formulas after preprocessing and simplification: 
% 68.08/29.19  | (0) cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_19_24236) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] : ( ~ rr(v0, v9) |  ~ rr(v0, v8) |  ~ rr(v0, v7) |  ~ rr(v0, v6) |  ~ rr(v0, v5) |  ~ rr(v0, v4) |  ~ rr(v0, v3) |  ~ rr(v0, v2) |  ~ rr(v0, v1) |  ~ cp5(v5) |  ~ cp4(v8) |  ~ cp4(v7) |  ~ cp3(v9) |  ~ cp3(v4) |  ~ cp2(v6) |  ~ cp2(v1) |  ~ cp1(v3) |  ~ cp1(v2) |  ~ cp(v8) |  ~ cp(v6) |  ~ cp(v4) |  ~ cp(v2) | cUnsatisfiable(v0) |  ? [v10] :  ? [v11] :  ? [v12] :  ? [v13] :  ? [v14] : ( ~ (v14 = v13) &  ~ (v14 = v12) &  ~ (v14 = v11) &  ~ (v14 = v10) &  ~ (v13 = v12) &  ~ (v13 = v11) &  ~ (v13 = v10) &  ~ (v12 = v11) &  ~ (v12 = v10) &  ~ (v11 = v10) & rr(v0, v14) & rr(v0, v13) & rr(v0, v12) & rr(v0, v11) & rr(v0, v10))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = v4 | v5 = v3 | v5 = v2 | v5 = v1 | v4 = v3 | v4 = v2 | v4 = v1 | v3 = v2 | v3 = v1 | v2 = v1 |  ~ rr(v0, v5) |  ~ rr(v0, v4) |  ~ rr(v0, v3) |  ~ rr(v0, v2) |  ~ rr(v0, v1) |  ~ cUnsatisfiable(v0)) &  ! [v0] : ( ~ xsd_string(v0) |  ~ xsd_integer(v0)) &  ! [v0] : ( ~ cp5(v0) |  ~ cp4(v0)) &  ! [v0] : ( ~ cp5(v0) |  ~ cp3(v0)) &  ! [v0] : ( ~ cp5(v0) |  ~ cp2(v0)) &  ! [v0] : ( ~ cp5(v0) |  ~ cp1(v0)) &  ! [v0] : ( ~ cp4(v0) |  ~ cp3(v0)) &  ! [v0] : ( ~ cp4(v0) |  ~ cp2(v0)) &  ! [v0] : ( ~ cp4(v0) |  ~ cp1(v0)) &  ! [v0] : ( ~ cp3(v0) |  ~ cp2(v0)) &  ! [v0] : ( ~ cp3(v0) |  ~ cp1(v0)) &  ! [v0] : ( ~ cp2(v0) |  ~ cp1(v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ~ cowlNothing(v0) &  ! [v0] : ( ~ cUnsatisfiable(v0) |  ? [v1] : (rr(v0, v1) & cp5(v1))) &  ! [v0] : ( ~ cUnsatisfiable(v0) |  ? [v1] : (rr(v0, v1) & cp4(v1) & cp(v1))) &  ! [v0] : ( ~ cUnsatisfiable(v0) |  ? [v1] : (rr(v0, v1) & cp4(v1))) &  ! [v0] : ( ~ cUnsatisfiable(v0) |  ? [v1] : (rr(v0, v1) & cp3(v1) & cp(v1))) &  ! [v0] : ( ~ cUnsatisfiable(v0) |  ? [v1] : (rr(v0, v1) & cp3(v1))) &  ! [v0] : ( ~ cUnsatisfiable(v0) |  ? [v1] : (rr(v0, v1) & cp2(v1) & cp(v1))) &  ! [v0] : ( ~ cUnsatisfiable(v0) |  ? [v1] : (rr(v0, v1) & cp2(v1))) &  ! [v0] : ( ~ cUnsatisfiable(v0) |  ? [v1] : (rr(v0, v1) & cp1(v1) & cp(v1))) &  ! [v0] : ( ~ cUnsatisfiable(v0) |  ? [v1] : (rr(v0, v1) & cp1(v1))) &  ? [v0] : (xsd_string(v0) | xsd_integer(v0)) &  ? [v0] : cowlThing(v0)
% 68.08/29.20  | Applying alpha-rule on (0) yields:
% 68.08/29.20  | (1)  ! [v0] : ( ~ cUnsatisfiable(v0) |  ? [v1] : (rr(v0, v1) & cp1(v1) & cp(v1)))
% 68.08/29.20  | (2)  ! [v0] : ( ~ cUnsatisfiable(v0) |  ? [v1] : (rr(v0, v1) & cp5(v1)))
% 68.08/29.20  | (3)  ! [v0] : ( ~ cUnsatisfiable(v0) |  ? [v1] : (rr(v0, v1) & cp3(v1)))
% 68.08/29.20  | (4)  ! [v0] : ( ~ cp4(v0) |  ~ cp3(v0))
% 68.08/29.20  | (5)  ! [v0] : ( ~ cp3(v0) |  ~ cp1(v0))
% 68.08/29.20  | (6)  ! [v0] : ( ~ cUnsatisfiable(v0) |  ? [v1] : (rr(v0, v1) & cp4(v1) & cp(v1)))
% 68.08/29.20  | (7)  ! [v0] : ( ~ cp5(v0) |  ~ cp3(v0))
% 68.08/29.20  | (8)  ! [v0] : ( ~ cUnsatisfiable(v0) |  ? [v1] : (rr(v0, v1) & cp2(v1)))
% 68.08/29.20  | (9)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] : ( ~ rr(v0, v9) |  ~ rr(v0, v8) |  ~ rr(v0, v7) |  ~ rr(v0, v6) |  ~ rr(v0, v5) |  ~ rr(v0, v4) |  ~ rr(v0, v3) |  ~ rr(v0, v2) |  ~ rr(v0, v1) |  ~ cp5(v5) |  ~ cp4(v8) |  ~ cp4(v7) |  ~ cp3(v9) |  ~ cp3(v4) |  ~ cp2(v6) |  ~ cp2(v1) |  ~ cp1(v3) |  ~ cp1(v2) |  ~ cp(v8) |  ~ cp(v6) |  ~ cp(v4) |  ~ cp(v2) | cUnsatisfiable(v0) |  ? [v10] :  ? [v11] :  ? [v12] :  ? [v13] :  ? [v14] : ( ~ (v14 = v13) &  ~ (v14 = v12) &  ~ (v14 = v11) &  ~ (v14 = v10) &  ~ (v13 = v12) &  ~ (v13 = v11) &  ~ (v13 = v10) &  ~ (v12 = v11) &  ~ (v12 = v10) &  ~ (v11 = v10) & rr(v0, v14) & rr(v0, v13) & rr(v0, v12) & rr(v0, v11) & rr(v0, v10)))
% 68.08/29.21  | (10)  ! [v0] : ( ~ cp2(v0) |  ~ cp1(v0))
% 68.08/29.21  | (11)  ? [v0] : cowlThing(v0)
% 68.08/29.21  | (12)  ! [v0] : ( ~ cp5(v0) |  ~ cp1(v0))
% 68.08/29.21  | (13)  ! [v0] : ( ~ cp3(v0) |  ~ cp2(v0))
% 68.08/29.21  | (14)  ! [v0] : ( ~ cUnsatisfiable(v0) |  ? [v1] : (rr(v0, v1) & cp2(v1) & cp(v1)))
% 68.08/29.21  | (15)  ! [v0] : ( ~ cUnsatisfiable(v0) |  ? [v1] : (rr(v0, v1) & cp4(v1)))
% 68.08/29.21  | (16)  ! [v0] : ( ~ cp5(v0) |  ~ cp4(v0))
% 68.08/29.21  | (17)  ! [v0] :  ~ cowlNothing(v0)
% 68.08/29.21  | (18)  ! [v0] : ( ~ cp5(v0) |  ~ cp2(v0))
% 68.08/29.21  | (19) cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_19_24236)
% 68.08/29.21  | (20)  ! [v0] : ( ~ xsd_string(v0) |  ~ xsd_integer(v0))
% 68.08/29.21  | (21)  ! [v0] : ( ~ cp4(v0) |  ~ cp2(v0))
% 68.08/29.21  | (22)  ! [v0] : ( ~ cp4(v0) |  ~ cp1(v0))
% 68.08/29.21  | (23)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = v4 | v5 = v3 | v5 = v2 | v5 = v1 | v4 = v3 | v4 = v2 | v4 = v1 | v3 = v2 | v3 = v1 | v2 = v1 |  ~ rr(v0, v5) |  ~ rr(v0, v4) |  ~ rr(v0, v3) |  ~ rr(v0, v2) |  ~ rr(v0, v1) |  ~ cUnsatisfiable(v0))
% 68.08/29.21  | (24)  ? [v0] : (xsd_string(v0) | xsd_integer(v0))
% 68.08/29.21  | (25)  ! [v0] : ( ~ cUnsatisfiable(v0) |  ? [v1] : (rr(v0, v1) & cp1(v1)))
% 68.08/29.21  | (26)  ! [v0] : ( ~ cUnsatisfiable(v0) |  ? [v1] : (rr(v0, v1) & cp3(v1) & cp(v1)))
% 68.08/29.21  |
% 68.08/29.21  | Instantiating formula (2) with i2003_11_14_17_19_24236 and discharging atoms cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_19_24236), yields:
% 68.08/29.21  | (27)  ? [v0] : (rr(i2003_11_14_17_19_24236, v0) & cp5(v0))
% 68.08/29.21  |
% 68.08/29.21  | Instantiating formula (6) with i2003_11_14_17_19_24236 and discharging atoms cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_19_24236), yields:
% 68.08/29.21  | (28)  ? [v0] : (rr(i2003_11_14_17_19_24236, v0) & cp4(v0) & cp(v0))
% 68.08/29.21  |
% 68.08/29.21  | Instantiating formula (15) with i2003_11_14_17_19_24236 and discharging atoms cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_19_24236), yields:
% 68.08/29.21  | (29)  ? [v0] : (rr(i2003_11_14_17_19_24236, v0) & cp4(v0))
% 68.08/29.21  |
% 68.08/29.21  | Instantiating formula (26) with i2003_11_14_17_19_24236 and discharging atoms cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_19_24236), yields:
% 68.08/29.21  | (30)  ? [v0] : (rr(i2003_11_14_17_19_24236, v0) & cp3(v0) & cp(v0))
% 68.08/29.21  |
% 68.08/29.21  | Instantiating formula (3) with i2003_11_14_17_19_24236 and discharging atoms cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_19_24236), yields:
% 68.08/29.21  | (31)  ? [v0] : (rr(i2003_11_14_17_19_24236, v0) & cp3(v0))
% 68.08/29.21  |
% 68.08/29.21  | Instantiating formula (14) with i2003_11_14_17_19_24236 and discharging atoms cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_19_24236), yields:
% 68.08/29.21  | (32)  ? [v0] : (rr(i2003_11_14_17_19_24236, v0) & cp2(v0) & cp(v0))
% 68.08/29.21  |
% 68.08/29.21  | Instantiating formula (8) with i2003_11_14_17_19_24236 and discharging atoms cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_19_24236), yields:
% 68.08/29.21  | (33)  ? [v0] : (rr(i2003_11_14_17_19_24236, v0) & cp2(v0))
% 68.08/29.21  |
% 68.08/29.21  | Instantiating formula (1) with i2003_11_14_17_19_24236 and discharging atoms cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_19_24236), yields:
% 68.08/29.21  | (34)  ? [v0] : (rr(i2003_11_14_17_19_24236, v0) & cp1(v0) & cp(v0))
% 68.08/29.21  |
% 68.08/29.21  | Instantiating formula (25) with i2003_11_14_17_19_24236 and discharging atoms cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_19_24236), yields:
% 68.08/29.21  | (35)  ? [v0] : (rr(i2003_11_14_17_19_24236, v0) & cp1(v0))
% 68.08/29.21  |
% 68.08/29.21  | Instantiating (35) with all_10_0_2 yields:
% 68.08/29.21  | (36) rr(i2003_11_14_17_19_24236, all_10_0_2) & cp1(all_10_0_2)
% 68.08/29.21  |
% 68.08/29.21  | Applying alpha-rule on (36) yields:
% 68.08/29.21  | (37) rr(i2003_11_14_17_19_24236, all_10_0_2)
% 68.08/29.21  | (38) cp1(all_10_0_2)
% 68.08/29.21  |
% 68.08/29.21  | Instantiating (33) with all_12_0_3 yields:
% 68.08/29.21  | (39) rr(i2003_11_14_17_19_24236, all_12_0_3) & cp2(all_12_0_3)
% 68.08/29.21  |
% 68.08/29.21  | Applying alpha-rule on (39) yields:
% 68.08/29.21  | (40) rr(i2003_11_14_17_19_24236, all_12_0_3)
% 68.08/29.21  | (41) cp2(all_12_0_3)
% 68.08/29.21  |
% 68.08/29.21  | Instantiating (32) with all_14_0_4 yields:
% 68.08/29.21  | (42) rr(i2003_11_14_17_19_24236, all_14_0_4) & cp2(all_14_0_4) & cp(all_14_0_4)
% 68.08/29.21  |
% 68.08/29.21  | Applying alpha-rule on (42) yields:
% 68.08/29.21  | (43) rr(i2003_11_14_17_19_24236, all_14_0_4)
% 68.08/29.22  | (44) cp2(all_14_0_4)
% 68.08/29.22  | (45) cp(all_14_0_4)
% 68.08/29.22  |
% 68.08/29.22  | Instantiating (31) with all_16_0_5 yields:
% 68.08/29.22  | (46) rr(i2003_11_14_17_19_24236, all_16_0_5) & cp3(all_16_0_5)
% 68.08/29.22  |
% 68.08/29.22  | Applying alpha-rule on (46) yields:
% 68.08/29.22  | (47) rr(i2003_11_14_17_19_24236, all_16_0_5)
% 68.08/29.22  | (48) cp3(all_16_0_5)
% 68.08/29.22  |
% 68.08/29.22  | Instantiating (34) with all_18_0_6 yields:
% 68.08/29.22  | (49) rr(i2003_11_14_17_19_24236, all_18_0_6) & cp1(all_18_0_6) & cp(all_18_0_6)
% 68.08/29.22  |
% 68.08/29.22  | Applying alpha-rule on (49) yields:
% 68.08/29.22  | (50) rr(i2003_11_14_17_19_24236, all_18_0_6)
% 68.08/29.22  | (51) cp1(all_18_0_6)
% 68.08/29.22  | (52) cp(all_18_0_6)
% 68.08/29.22  |
% 68.08/29.22  | Instantiating (29) with all_20_0_7 yields:
% 68.08/29.22  | (53) rr(i2003_11_14_17_19_24236, all_20_0_7) & cp4(all_20_0_7)
% 68.08/29.22  |
% 68.08/29.22  | Applying alpha-rule on (53) yields:
% 68.08/29.22  | (54) rr(i2003_11_14_17_19_24236, all_20_0_7)
% 68.08/29.22  | (55) cp4(all_20_0_7)
% 68.08/29.22  |
% 68.08/29.22  | Instantiating (28) with all_22_0_8 yields:
% 68.08/29.22  | (56) rr(i2003_11_14_17_19_24236, all_22_0_8) & cp4(all_22_0_8) & cp(all_22_0_8)
% 68.08/29.22  |
% 68.08/29.22  | Applying alpha-rule on (56) yields:
% 68.08/29.22  | (57) rr(i2003_11_14_17_19_24236, all_22_0_8)
% 68.08/29.22  | (58) cp4(all_22_0_8)
% 68.08/29.22  | (59) cp(all_22_0_8)
% 68.08/29.22  |
% 68.08/29.22  | Instantiating (27) with all_24_0_9 yields:
% 68.08/29.22  | (60) rr(i2003_11_14_17_19_24236, all_24_0_9) & cp5(all_24_0_9)
% 68.08/29.22  |
% 68.08/29.22  | Applying alpha-rule on (60) yields:
% 68.08/29.22  | (61) rr(i2003_11_14_17_19_24236, all_24_0_9)
% 68.08/29.22  | (62) cp5(all_24_0_9)
% 68.08/29.22  |
% 68.08/29.22  | Instantiating (30) with all_26_0_10 yields:
% 68.08/29.22  | (63) rr(i2003_11_14_17_19_24236, all_26_0_10) & cp3(all_26_0_10) & cp(all_26_0_10)
% 68.08/29.22  |
% 68.08/29.22  | Applying alpha-rule on (63) yields:
% 68.08/29.22  | (64) rr(i2003_11_14_17_19_24236, all_26_0_10)
% 68.08/29.22  | (65) cp3(all_26_0_10)
% 68.08/29.22  | (66) cp(all_26_0_10)
% 68.08/29.22  |
% 68.08/29.22  | Instantiating formula (23) with all_12_0_3, all_26_0_10, all_22_0_8, all_20_0_7, all_18_0_6, i2003_11_14_17_19_24236 and discharging atoms rr(i2003_11_14_17_19_24236, all_26_0_10), rr(i2003_11_14_17_19_24236, all_22_0_8), rr(i2003_11_14_17_19_24236, all_20_0_7), rr(i2003_11_14_17_19_24236, all_18_0_6), rr(i2003_11_14_17_19_24236, all_12_0_3), cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_19_24236), yields:
% 68.08/29.22  | (67) all_26_0_10 = all_22_0_8 | all_26_0_10 = all_20_0_7 | all_26_0_10 = all_18_0_6 | all_26_0_10 = all_12_0_3 | all_22_0_8 = all_20_0_7 | all_22_0_8 = all_18_0_6 | all_22_0_8 = all_12_0_3 | all_20_0_7 = all_18_0_6 | all_20_0_7 = all_12_0_3 | all_18_0_6 = all_12_0_3
% 68.08/29.22  |
% 68.08/29.22  | Instantiating formula (23) with all_12_0_3, all_26_0_10, all_22_0_8, all_18_0_6, all_16_0_5, i2003_11_14_17_19_24236 and discharging atoms rr(i2003_11_14_17_19_24236, all_26_0_10), rr(i2003_11_14_17_19_24236, all_22_0_8), rr(i2003_11_14_17_19_24236, all_18_0_6), rr(i2003_11_14_17_19_24236, all_16_0_5), rr(i2003_11_14_17_19_24236, all_12_0_3), cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_19_24236), yields:
% 68.08/29.22  | (68) all_26_0_10 = all_22_0_8 | all_26_0_10 = all_18_0_6 | all_26_0_10 = all_16_0_5 | all_26_0_10 = all_12_0_3 | all_22_0_8 = all_18_0_6 | all_22_0_8 = all_16_0_5 | all_22_0_8 = all_12_0_3 | all_18_0_6 = all_16_0_5 | all_18_0_6 = all_12_0_3 | all_16_0_5 = all_12_0_3
% 68.08/29.22  |
% 68.08/29.22  | Instantiating formula (23) with all_12_0_3, all_26_0_10, all_20_0_7, all_18_0_6, all_16_0_5, i2003_11_14_17_19_24236 and discharging atoms rr(i2003_11_14_17_19_24236, all_26_0_10), rr(i2003_11_14_17_19_24236, all_20_0_7), rr(i2003_11_14_17_19_24236, all_18_0_6), rr(i2003_11_14_17_19_24236, all_16_0_5), rr(i2003_11_14_17_19_24236, all_12_0_3), cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_19_24236), yields:
% 68.08/29.22  | (69) all_26_0_10 = all_20_0_7 | all_26_0_10 = all_18_0_6 | all_26_0_10 = all_16_0_5 | all_26_0_10 = all_12_0_3 | all_20_0_7 = all_18_0_6 | all_20_0_7 = all_16_0_5 | all_20_0_7 = all_12_0_3 | all_18_0_6 = all_16_0_5 | all_18_0_6 = all_12_0_3 | all_16_0_5 = all_12_0_3
% 68.08/29.22  |
% 68.08/29.22  | Instantiating formula (23) with all_12_0_3, all_20_0_7, all_18_0_6, all_16_0_5, all_14_0_4, i2003_11_14_17_19_24236 and discharging atoms rr(i2003_11_14_17_19_24236, all_20_0_7), rr(i2003_11_14_17_19_24236, all_18_0_6), rr(i2003_11_14_17_19_24236, all_16_0_5), rr(i2003_11_14_17_19_24236, all_14_0_4), rr(i2003_11_14_17_19_24236, all_12_0_3), cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_19_24236), yields:
% 68.08/29.22  | (70) all_20_0_7 = all_18_0_6 | all_20_0_7 = all_16_0_5 | all_20_0_7 = all_14_0_4 | all_20_0_7 = all_12_0_3 | all_18_0_6 = all_16_0_5 | all_18_0_6 = all_14_0_4 | all_18_0_6 = all_12_0_3 | all_16_0_5 = all_14_0_4 | all_16_0_5 = all_12_0_3 | all_14_0_4 = all_12_0_3
% 68.08/29.22  |
% 68.08/29.22  | Instantiating formula (23) with all_10_0_2, all_26_0_10, all_24_0_9, all_20_0_7, all_16_0_5, i2003_11_14_17_19_24236 and discharging atoms rr(i2003_11_14_17_19_24236, all_26_0_10), rr(i2003_11_14_17_19_24236, all_24_0_9), rr(i2003_11_14_17_19_24236, all_20_0_7), rr(i2003_11_14_17_19_24236, all_16_0_5), rr(i2003_11_14_17_19_24236, all_10_0_2), cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_19_24236), yields:
% 68.08/29.22  | (71) all_26_0_10 = all_24_0_9 | all_26_0_10 = all_20_0_7 | all_26_0_10 = all_16_0_5 | all_26_0_10 = all_10_0_2 | all_24_0_9 = all_20_0_7 | all_24_0_9 = all_16_0_5 | all_24_0_9 = all_10_0_2 | all_20_0_7 = all_16_0_5 | all_20_0_7 = all_10_0_2 | all_16_0_5 = all_10_0_2
% 68.08/29.22  |
% 68.08/29.22  | Instantiating formula (23) with all_10_0_2, all_26_0_10, all_24_0_9, all_20_0_7, all_14_0_4, i2003_11_14_17_19_24236 and discharging atoms rr(i2003_11_14_17_19_24236, all_26_0_10), rr(i2003_11_14_17_19_24236, all_24_0_9), rr(i2003_11_14_17_19_24236, all_20_0_7), rr(i2003_11_14_17_19_24236, all_14_0_4), rr(i2003_11_14_17_19_24236, all_10_0_2), cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_19_24236), yields:
% 68.08/29.22  | (72) all_26_0_10 = all_24_0_9 | all_26_0_10 = all_20_0_7 | all_26_0_10 = all_14_0_4 | all_26_0_10 = all_10_0_2 | all_24_0_9 = all_20_0_7 | all_24_0_9 = all_14_0_4 | all_24_0_9 = all_10_0_2 | all_20_0_7 = all_14_0_4 | all_20_0_7 = all_10_0_2 | all_14_0_4 = all_10_0_2
% 68.08/29.22  |
% 68.08/29.22  | Instantiating formula (23) with all_10_0_2, all_26_0_10, all_24_0_9, all_20_0_7, all_12_0_3, i2003_11_14_17_19_24236 and discharging atoms rr(i2003_11_14_17_19_24236, all_26_0_10), rr(i2003_11_14_17_19_24236, all_24_0_9), rr(i2003_11_14_17_19_24236, all_20_0_7), rr(i2003_11_14_17_19_24236, all_12_0_3), rr(i2003_11_14_17_19_24236, all_10_0_2), cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_19_24236), yields:
% 68.08/29.22  | (73) all_26_0_10 = all_24_0_9 | all_26_0_10 = all_20_0_7 | all_26_0_10 = all_12_0_3 | all_26_0_10 = all_10_0_2 | all_24_0_9 = all_20_0_7 | all_24_0_9 = all_12_0_3 | all_24_0_9 = all_10_0_2 | all_20_0_7 = all_12_0_3 | all_20_0_7 = all_10_0_2 | all_12_0_3 = all_10_0_2
% 68.08/29.22  |
% 68.08/29.22  | Instantiating formula (23) with all_10_0_2, all_26_0_10, all_22_0_8, all_20_0_7, all_16_0_5, i2003_11_14_17_19_24236 and discharging atoms rr(i2003_11_14_17_19_24236, all_26_0_10), rr(i2003_11_14_17_19_24236, all_22_0_8), rr(i2003_11_14_17_19_24236, all_20_0_7), rr(i2003_11_14_17_19_24236, all_16_0_5), rr(i2003_11_14_17_19_24236, all_10_0_2), cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_19_24236), yields:
% 68.08/29.22  | (74) all_26_0_10 = all_22_0_8 | all_26_0_10 = all_20_0_7 | all_26_0_10 = all_16_0_5 | all_26_0_10 = all_10_0_2 | all_22_0_8 = all_20_0_7 | all_22_0_8 = all_16_0_5 | all_22_0_8 = all_10_0_2 | all_20_0_7 = all_16_0_5 | all_20_0_7 = all_10_0_2 | all_16_0_5 = all_10_0_2
% 68.08/29.22  |
% 68.08/29.22  | Instantiating formula (23) with all_10_0_2, all_26_0_10, all_22_0_8, all_20_0_7, all_12_0_3, i2003_11_14_17_19_24236 and discharging atoms rr(i2003_11_14_17_19_24236, all_26_0_10), rr(i2003_11_14_17_19_24236, all_22_0_8), rr(i2003_11_14_17_19_24236, all_20_0_7), rr(i2003_11_14_17_19_24236, all_12_0_3), rr(i2003_11_14_17_19_24236, all_10_0_2), cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_19_24236), yields:
% 68.08/29.22  | (75) all_26_0_10 = all_22_0_8 | all_26_0_10 = all_20_0_7 | all_26_0_10 = all_12_0_3 | all_26_0_10 = all_10_0_2 | all_22_0_8 = all_20_0_7 | all_22_0_8 = all_12_0_3 | all_22_0_8 = all_10_0_2 | all_20_0_7 = all_12_0_3 | all_20_0_7 = all_10_0_2 | all_12_0_3 = all_10_0_2
% 68.08/29.22  |
% 68.08/29.22  | Instantiating formula (23) with all_10_0_2, all_26_0_10, all_22_0_8, all_18_0_6, all_16_0_5, i2003_11_14_17_19_24236 and discharging atoms rr(i2003_11_14_17_19_24236, all_26_0_10), rr(i2003_11_14_17_19_24236, all_22_0_8), rr(i2003_11_14_17_19_24236, all_18_0_6), rr(i2003_11_14_17_19_24236, all_16_0_5), rr(i2003_11_14_17_19_24236, all_10_0_2), cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_19_24236), yields:
% 68.08/29.22  | (76) all_26_0_10 = all_22_0_8 | all_26_0_10 = all_18_0_6 | all_26_0_10 = all_16_0_5 | all_26_0_10 = all_10_0_2 | all_22_0_8 = all_18_0_6 | all_22_0_8 = all_16_0_5 | all_22_0_8 = all_10_0_2 | all_18_0_6 = all_16_0_5 | all_18_0_6 = all_10_0_2 | all_16_0_5 = all_10_0_2
% 68.08/29.22  |
% 68.08/29.22  | Instantiating formula (23) with all_10_0_2, all_26_0_10, all_22_0_8, all_16_0_5, all_14_0_4, i2003_11_14_17_19_24236 and discharging atoms rr(i2003_11_14_17_19_24236, all_26_0_10), rr(i2003_11_14_17_19_24236, all_22_0_8), rr(i2003_11_14_17_19_24236, all_16_0_5), rr(i2003_11_14_17_19_24236, all_14_0_4), rr(i2003_11_14_17_19_24236, all_10_0_2), cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_19_24236), yields:
% 68.08/29.22  | (77) all_26_0_10 = all_22_0_8 | all_26_0_10 = all_16_0_5 | all_26_0_10 = all_14_0_4 | all_26_0_10 = all_10_0_2 | all_22_0_8 = all_16_0_5 | all_22_0_8 = all_14_0_4 | all_22_0_8 = all_10_0_2 | all_16_0_5 = all_14_0_4 | all_16_0_5 = all_10_0_2 | all_14_0_4 = all_10_0_2
% 68.08/29.22  |
% 68.08/29.22  | Instantiating formula (16) with all_20_0_7 and discharging atoms cp4(all_20_0_7), yields:
% 68.08/29.22  | (78)  ~ cp5(all_20_0_7)
% 68.08/29.22  |
% 68.08/29.22  | Instantiating formula (7) with all_24_0_9 and discharging atoms cp5(all_24_0_9), yields:
% 68.08/29.22  | (79)  ~ cp3(all_24_0_9)
% 68.08/29.22  |
% 68.08/29.23  | Instantiating formula (4) with all_22_0_8 and discharging atoms cp4(all_22_0_8), yields:
% 68.08/29.23  | (80)  ~ cp3(all_22_0_8)
% 68.08/29.23  |
% 68.08/29.23  | Instantiating formula (4) with all_20_0_7 and discharging atoms cp4(all_20_0_7), yields:
% 68.08/29.23  | (81)  ~ cp3(all_20_0_7)
% 68.08/29.23  |
% 68.08/29.23  | Instantiating formula (4) with all_16_0_5 and discharging atoms cp3(all_16_0_5), yields:
% 68.08/29.23  | (82)  ~ cp4(all_16_0_5)
% 68.08/29.23  |
% 68.08/29.23  | Instantiating formula (18) with all_14_0_4 and discharging atoms cp2(all_14_0_4), yields:
% 68.08/29.23  | (83)  ~ cp5(all_14_0_4)
% 68.08/29.23  |
% 68.08/29.23  | Instantiating formula (21) with all_14_0_4 and discharging atoms cp2(all_14_0_4), yields:
% 68.08/29.23  | (84)  ~ cp4(all_14_0_4)
% 68.08/29.23  |
% 68.08/29.23  | Instantiating formula (13) with all_14_0_4 and discharging atoms cp2(all_14_0_4), yields:
% 68.08/29.23  | (85)  ~ cp3(all_14_0_4)
% 68.08/29.23  |
% 68.08/29.23  | Instantiating formula (21) with all_12_0_3 and discharging atoms cp2(all_12_0_3), yields:
% 68.08/29.23  | (86)  ~ cp4(all_12_0_3)
% 68.08/29.23  |
% 68.08/29.23  | Instantiating formula (13) with all_12_0_3 and discharging atoms cp2(all_12_0_3), yields:
% 68.08/29.23  | (87)  ~ cp3(all_12_0_3)
% 68.08/29.23  |
% 68.08/29.23  | Instantiating formula (22) with all_18_0_6 and discharging atoms cp1(all_18_0_6), yields:
% 68.08/29.23  | (88)  ~ cp4(all_18_0_6)
% 68.08/29.23  |
% 68.08/29.23  | Instantiating formula (5) with all_18_0_6 and discharging atoms cp1(all_18_0_6), yields:
% 68.08/29.23  | (89)  ~ cp3(all_18_0_6)
% 68.08/29.23  |
% 68.08/29.23  | Instantiating formula (10) with all_14_0_4 and discharging atoms cp2(all_14_0_4), yields:
% 68.08/29.23  | (90)  ~ cp1(all_14_0_4)
% 68.08/29.23  |
% 68.08/29.23  | Instantiating formula (10) with all_12_0_3 and discharging atoms cp2(all_12_0_3), yields:
% 68.08/29.23  | (91)  ~ cp1(all_12_0_3)
% 68.08/29.23  |
% 68.08/29.23  | Instantiating formula (12) with all_10_0_2 and discharging atoms cp1(all_10_0_2), yields:
% 68.08/29.23  | (92)  ~ cp5(all_10_0_2)
% 68.08/29.23  |
% 68.08/29.23  | Instantiating formula (22) with all_10_0_2 and discharging atoms cp1(all_10_0_2), yields:
% 68.08/29.23  | (93)  ~ cp4(all_10_0_2)
% 68.08/29.23  |
% 68.08/29.23  | Instantiating formula (5) with all_10_0_2 and discharging atoms cp1(all_10_0_2), yields:
% 68.08/29.23  | (94)  ~ cp3(all_10_0_2)
% 68.08/29.23  |
% 68.08/29.23  | Instantiating formula (10) with all_10_0_2 and discharging atoms cp1(all_10_0_2), yields:
% 68.08/29.23  | (95)  ~ cp2(all_10_0_2)
% 68.08/29.23  |
% 68.08/29.23  | Using (62) and (78) yields:
% 68.08/29.23  | (96)  ~ (all_24_0_9 = all_20_0_7)
% 68.08/29.23  |
% 68.08/29.23  | Using (62) and (83) yields:
% 68.08/29.23  | (97)  ~ (all_24_0_9 = all_14_0_4)
% 68.08/29.23  |
% 68.08/29.23  | Using (62) and (92) yields:
% 68.08/29.23  | (98)  ~ (all_24_0_9 = all_10_0_2)
% 68.08/29.23  |
% 68.08/29.23  | Using (58) and (88) yields:
% 68.08/29.23  | (99)  ~ (all_22_0_8 = all_18_0_6)
% 68.08/29.23  |
% 68.08/29.23  | Using (55) and (88) yields:
% 68.08/29.23  | (100)  ~ (all_20_0_7 = all_18_0_6)
% 68.08/29.23  |
% 68.08/29.23  | Using (58) and (82) yields:
% 68.08/29.23  | (101)  ~ (all_22_0_8 = all_16_0_5)
% 68.08/29.23  |
% 68.08/29.23  | Using (55) and (82) yields:
% 68.08/29.23  | (102)  ~ (all_20_0_7 = all_16_0_5)
% 68.08/29.23  |
% 68.08/29.23  | Using (58) and (84) yields:
% 68.08/29.23  | (103)  ~ (all_22_0_8 = all_14_0_4)
% 68.08/29.23  |
% 68.08/29.23  | Using (55) and (84) yields:
% 68.08/29.23  | (104)  ~ (all_20_0_7 = all_14_0_4)
% 68.08/29.23  |
% 68.08/29.23  | Using (55) and (86) yields:
% 68.08/29.23  | (105)  ~ (all_20_0_7 = all_12_0_3)
% 68.08/29.23  |
% 68.08/29.23  | Using (58) and (93) yields:
% 68.08/29.23  | (106)  ~ (all_22_0_8 = all_10_0_2)
% 68.08/29.23  |
% 68.08/29.23  | Using (55) and (93) yields:
% 68.08/29.23  | (107)  ~ (all_20_0_7 = all_10_0_2)
% 68.08/29.23  |
% 68.08/29.23  | Using (65) and (79) yields:
% 68.08/29.23  | (108)  ~ (all_26_0_10 = all_24_0_9)
% 68.08/29.23  |
% 68.08/29.23  | Using (65) and (80) yields:
% 68.08/29.23  | (109)  ~ (all_26_0_10 = all_22_0_8)
% 68.08/29.23  |
% 68.08/29.23  | Using (65) and (81) yields:
% 68.08/29.23  | (110)  ~ (all_26_0_10 = all_20_0_7)
% 68.08/29.23  |
% 68.08/29.23  | Using (65) and (89) yields:
% 68.08/29.23  | (111)  ~ (all_26_0_10 = all_18_0_6)
% 68.08/29.23  |
% 68.08/29.23  | Using (48) and (89) yields:
% 68.08/29.23  | (112)  ~ (all_18_0_6 = all_16_0_5)
% 68.08/29.23  |
% 68.08/29.23  | Using (65) and (85) yields:
% 68.08/29.23  | (113)  ~ (all_26_0_10 = all_14_0_4)
% 68.08/29.23  |
% 68.08/29.23  | Using (48) and (85) yields:
% 68.08/29.23  | (114)  ~ (all_16_0_5 = all_14_0_4)
% 68.08/29.23  |
% 68.08/29.23  | Using (48) and (87) yields:
% 68.08/29.23  | (115)  ~ (all_16_0_5 = all_12_0_3)
% 68.08/29.23  |
% 68.08/29.23  | Using (65) and (94) yields:
% 68.08/29.23  | (116)  ~ (all_26_0_10 = all_10_0_2)
% 68.08/29.23  |
% 68.08/29.23  | Using (48) and (94) yields:
% 68.08/29.23  | (117)  ~ (all_16_0_5 = all_10_0_2)
% 68.08/29.23  |
% 68.08/29.23  | Using (44) and (95) yields:
% 68.08/29.23  | (118)  ~ (all_14_0_4 = all_10_0_2)
% 68.08/29.23  |
% 68.08/29.23  | Using (51) and (90) yields:
% 68.08/29.23  | (119)  ~ (all_18_0_6 = all_14_0_4)
% 68.08/29.23  |
% 68.08/29.23  | Using (51) and (91) yields:
% 68.08/29.23  | (120)  ~ (all_18_0_6 = all_12_0_3)
% 68.08/29.23  |
% 68.08/29.23  +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (71), into two cases.
% 68.08/29.23  |-Branch one:
% 68.08/29.23  | (121) all_26_0_10 = all_24_0_9
% 68.08/29.23  |
% 68.08/29.23  	| Equations (121) can reduce 108 to:
% 68.08/29.23  	| (122) $false
% 68.08/29.23  	|
% 68.08/29.23  	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 68.08/29.23  |-Branch two:
% 68.08/29.23  | (108)  ~ (all_26_0_10 = all_24_0_9)
% 68.08/29.23  | (124) all_26_0_10 = all_20_0_7 | all_26_0_10 = all_16_0_5 | all_26_0_10 = all_10_0_2 | all_24_0_9 = all_20_0_7 | all_24_0_9 = all_16_0_5 | all_24_0_9 = all_10_0_2 | all_20_0_7 = all_16_0_5 | all_20_0_7 = all_10_0_2 | all_16_0_5 = all_10_0_2
% 68.08/29.23  |
% 68.08/29.23  	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (67), into two cases.
% 68.08/29.23  	|-Branch one:
% 68.08/29.23  	| (125) all_26_0_10 = all_22_0_8
% 68.08/29.23  	|
% 68.08/29.23  		| Equations (125) can reduce 109 to:
% 68.08/29.23  		| (122) $false
% 68.08/29.23  		|
% 68.08/29.23  		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 68.08/29.23  	|-Branch two:
% 68.08/29.23  	| (109)  ~ (all_26_0_10 = all_22_0_8)
% 68.08/29.23  	| (128) all_26_0_10 = all_20_0_7 | all_26_0_10 = all_18_0_6 | all_26_0_10 = all_12_0_3 | all_22_0_8 = all_20_0_7 | all_22_0_8 = all_18_0_6 | all_22_0_8 = all_12_0_3 | all_20_0_7 = all_18_0_6 | all_20_0_7 = all_12_0_3 | all_18_0_6 = all_12_0_3
% 68.08/29.23  	|
% 68.08/29.23  		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (68), into two cases.
% 68.08/29.23  		|-Branch one:
% 68.08/29.23  		| (125) all_26_0_10 = all_22_0_8
% 68.08/29.23  		|
% 68.08/29.23  			| Equations (125) can reduce 109 to:
% 68.08/29.23  			| (122) $false
% 68.08/29.23  			|
% 68.08/29.23  			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 68.08/29.23  		|-Branch two:
% 68.08/29.23  		| (109)  ~ (all_26_0_10 = all_22_0_8)
% 68.08/29.23  		| (132) all_26_0_10 = all_18_0_6 | all_26_0_10 = all_16_0_5 | all_26_0_10 = all_12_0_3 | all_22_0_8 = all_18_0_6 | all_22_0_8 = all_16_0_5 | all_22_0_8 = all_12_0_3 | all_18_0_6 = all_16_0_5 | all_18_0_6 = all_12_0_3 | all_16_0_5 = all_12_0_3
% 68.08/29.23  		|
% 68.08/29.23  			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (69), into two cases.
% 68.08/29.23  			|-Branch one:
% 68.08/29.23  			| (133) all_26_0_10 = all_20_0_7
% 68.08/29.23  			|
% 68.08/29.23  				| Equations (133) can reduce 110 to:
% 68.08/29.23  				| (122) $false
% 68.08/29.23  				|
% 68.08/29.23  				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 68.08/29.23  			|-Branch two:
% 68.08/29.23  			| (110)  ~ (all_26_0_10 = all_20_0_7)
% 68.08/29.23  			| (136) all_26_0_10 = all_18_0_6 | all_26_0_10 = all_16_0_5 | all_26_0_10 = all_12_0_3 | all_20_0_7 = all_18_0_6 | all_20_0_7 = all_16_0_5 | all_20_0_7 = all_12_0_3 | all_18_0_6 = all_16_0_5 | all_18_0_6 = all_12_0_3 | all_16_0_5 = all_12_0_3
% 68.08/29.23  			|
% 68.08/29.23  				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (132), into two cases.
% 68.08/29.23  				|-Branch one:
% 68.08/29.23  				| (137) all_26_0_10 = all_18_0_6
% 68.08/29.23  				|
% 68.08/29.23  					| Equations (137) can reduce 111 to:
% 68.08/29.23  					| (122) $false
% 68.08/29.23  					|
% 68.08/29.23  					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 68.08/29.23  				|-Branch two:
% 68.08/29.23  				| (111)  ~ (all_26_0_10 = all_18_0_6)
% 68.08/29.24  				| (140) all_26_0_10 = all_16_0_5 | all_26_0_10 = all_12_0_3 | all_22_0_8 = all_18_0_6 | all_22_0_8 = all_16_0_5 | all_22_0_8 = all_12_0_3 | all_18_0_6 = all_16_0_5 | all_18_0_6 = all_12_0_3 | all_16_0_5 = all_12_0_3
% 68.08/29.24  				|
% 68.08/29.24  					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (72), into two cases.
% 68.08/29.24  					|-Branch one:
% 68.08/29.24  					| (121) all_26_0_10 = all_24_0_9
% 68.08/29.24  					|
% 68.08/29.24  						| Equations (121) can reduce 108 to:
% 68.08/29.24  						| (122) $false
% 68.08/29.24  						|
% 68.08/29.24  						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 68.08/29.24  					|-Branch two:
% 68.08/29.24  					| (108)  ~ (all_26_0_10 = all_24_0_9)
% 68.08/29.24  					| (144) all_26_0_10 = all_20_0_7 | all_26_0_10 = all_14_0_4 | all_26_0_10 = all_10_0_2 | all_24_0_9 = all_20_0_7 | all_24_0_9 = all_14_0_4 | all_24_0_9 = all_10_0_2 | all_20_0_7 = all_14_0_4 | all_20_0_7 = all_10_0_2 | all_14_0_4 = all_10_0_2
% 68.08/29.24  					|
% 68.08/29.24  						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (70), into two cases.
% 68.08/29.24  						|-Branch one:
% 68.08/29.24  						| (145) all_20_0_7 = all_18_0_6
% 68.08/29.24  						|
% 68.08/29.24  							| Equations (145) can reduce 100 to:
% 68.08/29.24  							| (122) $false
% 68.08/29.24  							|
% 68.08/29.24  							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 68.08/29.24  						|-Branch two:
% 68.08/29.24  						| (100)  ~ (all_20_0_7 = all_18_0_6)
% 68.08/29.24  						| (148) all_20_0_7 = all_16_0_5 | all_20_0_7 = all_14_0_4 | all_20_0_7 = all_12_0_3 | all_18_0_6 = all_16_0_5 | all_18_0_6 = all_14_0_4 | all_18_0_6 = all_12_0_3 | all_16_0_5 = all_14_0_4 | all_16_0_5 = all_12_0_3 | all_14_0_4 = all_12_0_3
% 68.08/29.24  						|
% 68.08/29.24  							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (148), into two cases.
% 68.08/29.24  							|-Branch one:
% 68.08/29.24  							| (149) all_20_0_7 = all_16_0_5
% 68.08/29.24  							|
% 68.08/29.24  								| Equations (149) can reduce 102 to:
% 68.08/29.24  								| (122) $false
% 68.08/29.24  								|
% 68.08/29.24  								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 68.08/29.24  							|-Branch two:
% 68.08/29.24  							| (102)  ~ (all_20_0_7 = all_16_0_5)
% 68.08/29.24  							| (152) all_20_0_7 = all_14_0_4 | all_20_0_7 = all_12_0_3 | all_18_0_6 = all_16_0_5 | all_18_0_6 = all_14_0_4 | all_18_0_6 = all_12_0_3 | all_16_0_5 = all_14_0_4 | all_16_0_5 = all_12_0_3 | all_14_0_4 = all_12_0_3
% 68.08/29.24  							|
% 68.08/29.24  								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (152), into two cases.
% 68.08/29.24  								|-Branch one:
% 68.08/29.24  								| (153) all_20_0_7 = all_14_0_4
% 68.08/29.24  								|
% 68.08/29.24  									| Equations (153) can reduce 104 to:
% 68.08/29.24  									| (122) $false
% 68.08/29.24  									|
% 68.08/29.24  									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 68.08/29.24  								|-Branch two:
% 68.08/29.24  								| (104)  ~ (all_20_0_7 = all_14_0_4)
% 68.08/29.24  								| (156) all_20_0_7 = all_12_0_3 | all_18_0_6 = all_16_0_5 | all_18_0_6 = all_14_0_4 | all_18_0_6 = all_12_0_3 | all_16_0_5 = all_14_0_4 | all_16_0_5 = all_12_0_3 | all_14_0_4 = all_12_0_3
% 68.08/29.24  								|
% 68.08/29.24  									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (156), into two cases.
% 68.08/29.24  									|-Branch one:
% 68.08/29.24  									| (157) all_20_0_7 = all_12_0_3
% 68.08/29.24  									|
% 68.08/29.24  										| Equations (157) can reduce 105 to:
% 68.08/29.24  										| (122) $false
% 68.08/29.24  										|
% 68.08/29.24  										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 68.08/29.24  									|-Branch two:
% 68.08/29.24  									| (105)  ~ (all_20_0_7 = all_12_0_3)
% 68.08/29.24  									| (160) all_18_0_6 = all_16_0_5 | all_18_0_6 = all_14_0_4 | all_18_0_6 = all_12_0_3 | all_16_0_5 = all_14_0_4 | all_16_0_5 = all_12_0_3 | all_14_0_4 = all_12_0_3
% 68.08/29.24  									|
% 68.08/29.24  										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (160), into two cases.
% 68.08/29.24  										|-Branch one:
% 68.08/29.24  										| (161) all_18_0_6 = all_16_0_5
% 68.08/29.24  										|
% 68.08/29.24  											| Equations (161) can reduce 112 to:
% 68.08/29.24  											| (122) $false
% 68.08/29.24  											|
% 68.08/29.24  											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 68.08/29.24  										|-Branch two:
% 68.08/29.24  										| (112)  ~ (all_18_0_6 = all_16_0_5)
% 68.08/29.24  										| (164) all_18_0_6 = all_14_0_4 | all_18_0_6 = all_12_0_3 | all_16_0_5 = all_14_0_4 | all_16_0_5 = all_12_0_3 | all_14_0_4 = all_12_0_3
% 68.08/29.24  										|
% 68.08/29.24  											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (164), into two cases.
% 68.08/29.24  											|-Branch one:
% 68.08/29.24  											| (165) all_18_0_6 = all_14_0_4
% 68.08/29.24  											|
% 68.08/29.24  												| Equations (165) can reduce 119 to:
% 68.08/29.24  												| (122) $false
% 68.08/29.24  												|
% 68.08/29.24  												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 68.08/29.24  											|-Branch two:
% 68.08/29.24  											| (119)  ~ (all_18_0_6 = all_14_0_4)
% 68.08/29.24  											| (168) all_18_0_6 = all_12_0_3 | all_16_0_5 = all_14_0_4 | all_16_0_5 = all_12_0_3 | all_14_0_4 = all_12_0_3
% 68.08/29.24  											|
% 68.08/29.24  												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (168), into two cases.
% 68.08/29.24  												|-Branch one:
% 68.08/29.24  												| (169) all_18_0_6 = all_12_0_3
% 68.08/29.24  												|
% 68.08/29.24  													| Equations (169) can reduce 120 to:
% 68.08/29.24  													| (122) $false
% 68.08/29.24  													|
% 68.08/29.24  													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 68.08/29.24  												|-Branch two:
% 68.08/29.24  												| (120)  ~ (all_18_0_6 = all_12_0_3)
% 68.08/29.24  												| (172) all_16_0_5 = all_14_0_4 | all_16_0_5 = all_12_0_3 | all_14_0_4 = all_12_0_3
% 68.08/29.24  												|
% 68.08/29.24  													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (172), into two cases.
% 68.08/29.24  													|-Branch one:
% 68.08/29.24  													| (173) all_16_0_5 = all_14_0_4
% 68.08/29.24  													|
% 68.08/29.24  														| Equations (173) can reduce 114 to:
% 68.08/29.24  														| (122) $false
% 68.08/29.24  														|
% 68.08/29.24  														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 68.08/29.24  													|-Branch two:
% 68.08/29.24  													| (114)  ~ (all_16_0_5 = all_14_0_4)
% 68.08/29.24  													| (176) all_16_0_5 = all_12_0_3 | all_14_0_4 = all_12_0_3
% 68.08/29.24  													|
% 68.08/29.24  														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (176), into two cases.
% 68.08/29.24  														|-Branch one:
% 68.08/29.24  														| (177) all_16_0_5 = all_12_0_3
% 68.08/29.24  														|
% 68.08/29.24  															| Equations (177) can reduce 115 to:
% 68.08/29.24  															| (122) $false
% 68.08/29.24  															|
% 68.08/29.24  															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 68.08/29.24  														|-Branch two:
% 68.08/29.24  														| (115)  ~ (all_16_0_5 = all_12_0_3)
% 68.08/29.24  														| (180) all_14_0_4 = all_12_0_3
% 68.08/29.24  														|
% 68.08/29.24  															| Equations (180) can reduce 113 to:
% 68.08/29.24  															| (181)  ~ (all_26_0_10 = all_12_0_3)
% 68.08/29.24  															|
% 68.08/29.24  															| Equations (180) can reduce 97 to:
% 68.08/29.24  															| (182)  ~ (all_24_0_9 = all_12_0_3)
% 68.08/29.24  															|
% 68.08/29.24  															| Equations (180) can reduce 103 to:
% 68.08/29.24  															| (183)  ~ (all_22_0_8 = all_12_0_3)
% 68.08/29.24  															|
% 68.08/29.24  															| Equations (180) can reduce 104 to:
% 68.08/29.24  															| (105)  ~ (all_20_0_7 = all_12_0_3)
% 68.08/29.24  															|
% 68.08/29.24  															| Equations (180) can reduce 119 to:
% 68.08/29.24  															| (120)  ~ (all_18_0_6 = all_12_0_3)
% 68.08/29.24  															|
% 68.08/29.24  															| Equations (180) can reduce 114 to:
% 68.08/29.24  															| (115)  ~ (all_16_0_5 = all_12_0_3)
% 68.08/29.24  															|
% 68.08/29.24  															| Equations (180) can reduce 118 to:
% 68.08/29.24  															| (187)  ~ (all_12_0_3 = all_10_0_2)
% 68.08/29.24  															|
% 68.08/29.24  															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (73), into two cases.
% 68.08/29.24  															|-Branch one:
% 68.08/29.24  															| (121) all_26_0_10 = all_24_0_9
% 68.08/29.24  															|
% 68.08/29.24  																| Equations (121) can reduce 108 to:
% 68.08/29.24  																| (122) $false
% 68.08/29.24  																|
% 68.08/29.24  																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 68.08/29.24  															|-Branch two:
% 68.08/29.24  															| (108)  ~ (all_26_0_10 = all_24_0_9)
% 68.08/29.24  															| (191) all_26_0_10 = all_20_0_7 | all_26_0_10 = all_12_0_3 | all_26_0_10 = all_10_0_2 | all_24_0_9 = all_20_0_7 | all_24_0_9 = all_12_0_3 | all_24_0_9 = all_10_0_2 | all_20_0_7 = all_12_0_3 | all_20_0_7 = all_10_0_2 | all_12_0_3 = all_10_0_2
% 68.08/29.24  															|
% 68.08/29.24  																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (124), into two cases.
% 68.08/29.24  																|-Branch one:
% 68.08/29.24  																| (133) all_26_0_10 = all_20_0_7
% 68.08/29.24  																|
% 68.08/29.24  																	| Equations (133) can reduce 110 to:
% 68.08/29.24  																	| (122) $false
% 68.08/29.24  																	|
% 68.08/29.24  																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 68.08/29.24  																|-Branch two:
% 68.08/29.24  																| (110)  ~ (all_26_0_10 = all_20_0_7)
% 68.08/29.24  																| (195) all_26_0_10 = all_16_0_5 | all_26_0_10 = all_10_0_2 | all_24_0_9 = all_20_0_7 | all_24_0_9 = all_16_0_5 | all_24_0_9 = all_10_0_2 | all_20_0_7 = all_16_0_5 | all_20_0_7 = all_10_0_2 | all_16_0_5 = all_10_0_2
% 68.08/29.24  																|
% 68.08/29.24  																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (195), into two cases.
% 68.08/29.24  																	|-Branch one:
% 68.08/29.24  																	| (196) all_26_0_10 = all_16_0_5
% 68.08/29.24  																	|
% 68.08/29.24  																		| Equations (196) can reduce 110 to:
% 68.08/29.24  																		| (197)  ~ (all_20_0_7 = all_16_0_5)
% 68.08/29.24  																		|
% 68.08/29.24  																		| Simplifying 197 yields:
% 68.08/29.24  																		| (102)  ~ (all_20_0_7 = all_16_0_5)
% 68.08/29.24  																		|
% 68.08/29.24  																		| Equations (196) can reduce 181 to:
% 68.08/29.24  																		| (115)  ~ (all_16_0_5 = all_12_0_3)
% 68.08/29.24  																		|
% 68.08/29.24  																		| Equations (196) can reduce 116 to:
% 68.08/29.24  																		| (117)  ~ (all_16_0_5 = all_10_0_2)
% 68.08/29.24  																		|
% 68.08/29.24  																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (191), into two cases.
% 68.08/29.24  																		|-Branch one:
% 68.08/29.24  																		| (133) all_26_0_10 = all_20_0_7
% 68.08/29.24  																		|
% 68.08/29.25  																			| Combining equations (133,196) yields a new equation:
% 68.08/29.25  																			| (202) all_20_0_7 = all_16_0_5
% 68.08/29.25  																			|
% 68.08/29.25  																			| Simplifying 202 yields:
% 68.08/29.25  																			| (149) all_20_0_7 = all_16_0_5
% 68.08/29.25  																			|
% 68.08/29.25  																			| Equations (149) can reduce 102 to:
% 68.08/29.25  																			| (122) $false
% 68.08/29.25  																			|
% 68.08/29.25  																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 68.08/29.25  																		|-Branch two:
% 68.08/29.25  																		| (110)  ~ (all_26_0_10 = all_20_0_7)
% 68.08/29.25  																		| (206) all_26_0_10 = all_12_0_3 | all_26_0_10 = all_10_0_2 | all_24_0_9 = all_20_0_7 | all_24_0_9 = all_12_0_3 | all_24_0_9 = all_10_0_2 | all_20_0_7 = all_12_0_3 | all_20_0_7 = all_10_0_2 | all_12_0_3 = all_10_0_2
% 68.08/29.25  																		|
% 68.08/29.25  																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (206), into two cases.
% 68.08/29.25  																			|-Branch one:
% 68.08/29.25  																			| (207) all_26_0_10 = all_12_0_3
% 68.08/29.25  																			|
% 68.08/29.25  																				| Combining equations (207,196) yields a new equation:
% 68.08/29.25  																				| (177) all_16_0_5 = all_12_0_3
% 68.08/29.25  																				|
% 68.08/29.25  																				| Equations (177) can reduce 115 to:
% 68.08/29.25  																				| (122) $false
% 68.08/29.25  																				|
% 68.08/29.25  																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 68.08/29.25  																			|-Branch two:
% 68.08/29.25  																			| (181)  ~ (all_26_0_10 = all_12_0_3)
% 68.08/29.25  																			| (211) all_26_0_10 = all_10_0_2 | all_24_0_9 = all_20_0_7 | all_24_0_9 = all_12_0_3 | all_24_0_9 = all_10_0_2 | all_20_0_7 = all_12_0_3 | all_20_0_7 = all_10_0_2 | all_12_0_3 = all_10_0_2
% 68.08/29.25  																			|
% 68.08/29.25  																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (211), into two cases.
% 68.08/29.25  																				|-Branch one:
% 68.08/29.25  																				| (212) all_26_0_10 = all_10_0_2
% 68.08/29.25  																				|
% 68.08/29.25  																					| Combining equations (212,196) yields a new equation:
% 68.08/29.25  																					| (213) all_16_0_5 = all_10_0_2
% 68.08/29.25  																					|
% 68.08/29.25  																					| Equations (213) can reduce 117 to:
% 68.08/29.25  																					| (122) $false
% 68.08/29.25  																					|
% 68.08/29.25  																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 68.08/29.25  																				|-Branch two:
% 68.08/29.25  																				| (116)  ~ (all_26_0_10 = all_10_0_2)
% 68.08/29.25  																				| (216) all_24_0_9 = all_20_0_7 | all_24_0_9 = all_12_0_3 | all_24_0_9 = all_10_0_2 | all_20_0_7 = all_12_0_3 | all_20_0_7 = all_10_0_2 | all_12_0_3 = all_10_0_2
% 68.08/29.25  																				|
% 68.08/29.25  																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (216), into two cases.
% 68.08/29.25  																					|-Branch one:
% 68.08/29.25  																					| (217) all_24_0_9 = all_20_0_7
% 68.08/29.25  																					|
% 68.08/29.25  																						| Equations (217) can reduce 96 to:
% 68.08/29.25  																						| (122) $false
% 68.08/29.25  																						|
% 68.08/29.25  																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 68.08/29.25  																					|-Branch two:
% 68.08/29.25  																					| (96)  ~ (all_24_0_9 = all_20_0_7)
% 68.08/29.25  																					| (220) all_24_0_9 = all_12_0_3 | all_24_0_9 = all_10_0_2 | all_20_0_7 = all_12_0_3 | all_20_0_7 = all_10_0_2 | all_12_0_3 = all_10_0_2
% 68.08/29.25  																					|
% 68.08/29.25  																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (220), into two cases.
% 68.08/29.25  																						|-Branch one:
% 68.08/29.25  																						| (221) all_24_0_9 = all_12_0_3
% 68.08/29.25  																						|
% 68.08/29.25  																							| Equations (221) can reduce 182 to:
% 68.08/29.25  																							| (122) $false
% 68.08/29.25  																							|
% 68.08/29.25  																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 68.08/29.25  																						|-Branch two:
% 68.08/29.25  																						| (182)  ~ (all_24_0_9 = all_12_0_3)
% 68.08/29.25  																						| (224) all_24_0_9 = all_10_0_2 | all_20_0_7 = all_12_0_3 | all_20_0_7 = all_10_0_2 | all_12_0_3 = all_10_0_2
% 68.57/29.25  																						|
% 68.57/29.25  																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (224), into two cases.
% 68.57/29.25  																							|-Branch one:
% 68.57/29.25  																							| (225) all_24_0_9 = all_10_0_2
% 68.57/29.25  																							|
% 68.57/29.25  																								| Equations (225) can reduce 98 to:
% 68.57/29.25  																								| (122) $false
% 68.57/29.25  																								|
% 68.57/29.25  																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 68.57/29.25  																							|-Branch two:
% 68.57/29.25  																							| (98)  ~ (all_24_0_9 = all_10_0_2)
% 68.57/29.25  																							| (228) all_20_0_7 = all_12_0_3 | all_20_0_7 = all_10_0_2 | all_12_0_3 = all_10_0_2
% 68.57/29.25  																							|
% 68.57/29.25  																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (228), into two cases.
% 68.57/29.25  																								|-Branch one:
% 68.57/29.25  																								| (157) all_20_0_7 = all_12_0_3
% 68.57/29.25  																								|
% 68.57/29.25  																									| Equations (157) can reduce 105 to:
% 68.57/29.25  																									| (122) $false
% 68.57/29.25  																									|
% 68.57/29.25  																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 68.57/29.25  																								|-Branch two:
% 68.57/29.25  																								| (105)  ~ (all_20_0_7 = all_12_0_3)
% 68.57/29.25  																								| (232) all_20_0_7 = all_10_0_2 | all_12_0_3 = all_10_0_2
% 68.57/29.25  																								|
% 68.57/29.25  																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (232), into two cases.
% 68.57/29.25  																									|-Branch one:
% 68.57/29.25  																									| (233) all_20_0_7 = all_10_0_2
% 68.57/29.25  																									|
% 68.57/29.25  																										| Equations (233) can reduce 107 to:
% 68.57/29.25  																										| (122) $false
% 68.57/29.25  																										|
% 68.57/29.25  																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 68.57/29.25  																									|-Branch two:
% 68.57/29.25  																									| (107)  ~ (all_20_0_7 = all_10_0_2)
% 68.57/29.25  																									| (236) all_12_0_3 = all_10_0_2
% 68.57/29.25  																									|
% 68.57/29.25  																										| Equations (236) can reduce 187 to:
% 68.57/29.25  																										| (122) $false
% 68.57/29.25  																										|
% 68.57/29.25  																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 68.57/29.25  																	|-Branch two:
% 68.57/29.25  																	| (238)  ~ (all_26_0_10 = all_16_0_5)
% 68.57/29.25  																	| (239) all_26_0_10 = all_10_0_2 | all_24_0_9 = all_20_0_7 | all_24_0_9 = all_16_0_5 | all_24_0_9 = all_10_0_2 | all_20_0_7 = all_16_0_5 | all_20_0_7 = all_10_0_2 | all_16_0_5 = all_10_0_2
% 68.57/29.25  																	|
% 68.57/29.25  																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (75), into two cases.
% 68.57/29.25  																		|-Branch one:
% 68.57/29.25  																		| (125) all_26_0_10 = all_22_0_8
% 68.57/29.25  																		|
% 68.57/29.25  																			| Equations (125) can reduce 109 to:
% 68.57/29.25  																			| (122) $false
% 68.57/29.25  																			|
% 68.57/29.25  																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 68.57/29.25  																		|-Branch two:
% 68.57/29.25  																		| (109)  ~ (all_26_0_10 = all_22_0_8)
% 68.57/29.25  																		| (243) all_26_0_10 = all_20_0_7 | all_26_0_10 = all_12_0_3 | all_26_0_10 = all_10_0_2 | all_22_0_8 = all_20_0_7 | all_22_0_8 = all_12_0_3 | all_22_0_8 = all_10_0_2 | all_20_0_7 = all_12_0_3 | all_20_0_7 = all_10_0_2 | all_12_0_3 = all_10_0_2
% 68.57/29.25  																		|
% 68.57/29.25  																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (76), into two cases.
% 68.57/29.25  																			|-Branch one:
% 68.57/29.25  																			| (125) all_26_0_10 = all_22_0_8
% 68.57/29.25  																			|
% 68.57/29.25  																				| Equations (125) can reduce 109 to:
% 68.57/29.25  																				| (122) $false
% 68.57/29.25  																				|
% 68.57/29.25  																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 68.57/29.25  																			|-Branch two:
% 68.57/29.25  																			| (109)  ~ (all_26_0_10 = all_22_0_8)
% 68.57/29.25  																			| (247) all_26_0_10 = all_18_0_6 | all_26_0_10 = all_16_0_5 | all_26_0_10 = all_10_0_2 | all_22_0_8 = all_18_0_6 | all_22_0_8 = all_16_0_5 | all_22_0_8 = all_10_0_2 | all_18_0_6 = all_16_0_5 | all_18_0_6 = all_10_0_2 | all_16_0_5 = all_10_0_2
% 68.57/29.25  																			|
% 68.57/29.25  																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (243), into two cases.
% 68.57/29.25  																				|-Branch one:
% 68.57/29.25  																				| (133) all_26_0_10 = all_20_0_7
% 68.57/29.25  																				|
% 68.57/29.25  																					| Equations (133) can reduce 110 to:
% 68.57/29.25  																					| (122) $false
% 68.57/29.25  																					|
% 68.57/29.25  																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 68.57/29.25  																				|-Branch two:
% 68.57/29.25  																				| (110)  ~ (all_26_0_10 = all_20_0_7)
% 68.57/29.25  																				| (251) all_26_0_10 = all_12_0_3 | all_26_0_10 = all_10_0_2 | all_22_0_8 = all_20_0_7 | all_22_0_8 = all_12_0_3 | all_22_0_8 = all_10_0_2 | all_20_0_7 = all_12_0_3 | all_20_0_7 = all_10_0_2 | all_12_0_3 = all_10_0_2
% 68.57/29.25  																				|
% 68.57/29.25  																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (247), into two cases.
% 68.57/29.25  																					|-Branch one:
% 68.57/29.25  																					| (137) all_26_0_10 = all_18_0_6
% 68.57/29.25  																					|
% 68.57/29.25  																						| Equations (137) can reduce 111 to:
% 68.57/29.25  																						| (122) $false
% 68.57/29.25  																						|
% 68.57/29.25  																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 68.57/29.25  																					|-Branch two:
% 68.57/29.25  																					| (111)  ~ (all_26_0_10 = all_18_0_6)
% 68.57/29.25  																					| (255) all_26_0_10 = all_16_0_5 | all_26_0_10 = all_10_0_2 | all_22_0_8 = all_18_0_6 | all_22_0_8 = all_16_0_5 | all_22_0_8 = all_10_0_2 | all_18_0_6 = all_16_0_5 | all_18_0_6 = all_10_0_2 | all_16_0_5 = all_10_0_2
% 68.57/29.25  																					|
% 68.57/29.25  																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (255), into two cases.
% 68.57/29.25  																						|-Branch one:
% 68.57/29.25  																						| (196) all_26_0_10 = all_16_0_5
% 68.57/29.25  																						|
% 68.57/29.25  																							| Equations (196) can reduce 238 to:
% 68.57/29.25  																							| (122) $false
% 68.57/29.25  																							|
% 68.57/29.25  																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 68.57/29.25  																						|-Branch two:
% 68.57/29.25  																						| (238)  ~ (all_26_0_10 = all_16_0_5)
% 68.57/29.26  																						| (259) all_26_0_10 = all_10_0_2 | all_22_0_8 = all_18_0_6 | all_22_0_8 = all_16_0_5 | all_22_0_8 = all_10_0_2 | all_18_0_6 = all_16_0_5 | all_18_0_6 = all_10_0_2 | all_16_0_5 = all_10_0_2
% 68.57/29.26  																						|
% 68.57/29.26  																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (259), into two cases.
% 68.57/29.26  																							|-Branch one:
% 68.57/29.26  																							| (212) all_26_0_10 = all_10_0_2
% 68.57/29.26  																							|
% 68.57/29.26  																								| Equations (212) can reduce 116 to:
% 68.57/29.26  																								| (122) $false
% 68.57/29.26  																								|
% 68.57/29.26  																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 68.57/29.26  																							|-Branch two:
% 68.57/29.26  																							| (116)  ~ (all_26_0_10 = all_10_0_2)
% 68.57/29.26  																							| (263) all_22_0_8 = all_18_0_6 | all_22_0_8 = all_16_0_5 | all_22_0_8 = all_10_0_2 | all_18_0_6 = all_16_0_5 | all_18_0_6 = all_10_0_2 | all_16_0_5 = all_10_0_2
% 68.57/29.26  																							|
% 68.57/29.26  																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (263), into two cases.
% 68.57/29.26  																								|-Branch one:
% 68.57/29.26  																								| (264) all_22_0_8 = all_18_0_6
% 68.57/29.26  																								|
% 68.57/29.26  																									| Equations (264) can reduce 99 to:
% 68.57/29.26  																									| (122) $false
% 68.57/29.26  																									|
% 68.57/29.26  																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 68.57/29.26  																								|-Branch two:
% 68.57/29.26  																								| (99)  ~ (all_22_0_8 = all_18_0_6)
% 68.57/29.26  																								| (267) all_22_0_8 = all_16_0_5 | all_22_0_8 = all_10_0_2 | all_18_0_6 = all_16_0_5 | all_18_0_6 = all_10_0_2 | all_16_0_5 = all_10_0_2
% 68.57/29.26  																								|
% 68.57/29.26  																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (267), into two cases.
% 68.57/29.26  																									|-Branch one:
% 68.57/29.26  																									| (268) all_22_0_8 = all_16_0_5
% 68.57/29.26  																									|
% 68.57/29.26  																										| Equations (268) can reduce 101 to:
% 68.57/29.26  																										| (122) $false
% 68.57/29.26  																										|
% 68.57/29.26  																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 68.57/29.26  																									|-Branch two:
% 68.57/29.26  																									| (101)  ~ (all_22_0_8 = all_16_0_5)
% 68.57/29.26  																									| (271) all_22_0_8 = all_10_0_2 | all_18_0_6 = all_16_0_5 | all_18_0_6 = all_10_0_2 | all_16_0_5 = all_10_0_2
% 68.57/29.26  																									|
% 68.57/29.26  																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (271), into two cases.
% 68.57/29.26  																										|-Branch one:
% 68.57/29.26  																										| (272) all_22_0_8 = all_10_0_2
% 68.57/29.26  																										|
% 68.57/29.26  																											| Equations (272) can reduce 106 to:
% 68.57/29.26  																											| (122) $false
% 68.57/29.26  																											|
% 68.57/29.26  																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 68.57/29.26  																										|-Branch two:
% 68.57/29.26  																										| (106)  ~ (all_22_0_8 = all_10_0_2)
% 68.57/29.26  																										| (275) all_18_0_6 = all_16_0_5 | all_18_0_6 = all_10_0_2 | all_16_0_5 = all_10_0_2
% 68.57/29.26  																										|
% 68.57/29.26  																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (275), into two cases.
% 68.57/29.26  																											|-Branch one:
% 68.57/29.26  																											| (161) all_18_0_6 = all_16_0_5
% 68.57/29.26  																											|
% 68.57/29.26  																												| Equations (161) can reduce 112 to:
% 68.57/29.26  																												| (122) $false
% 68.57/29.26  																												|
% 68.57/29.26  																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 68.57/29.26  																											|-Branch two:
% 68.57/29.26  																											| (112)  ~ (all_18_0_6 = all_16_0_5)
% 68.57/29.26  																											| (279) all_18_0_6 = all_10_0_2 | all_16_0_5 = all_10_0_2
% 68.57/29.26  																											|
% 68.57/29.26  																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (279), into two cases.
% 68.57/29.26  																												|-Branch one:
% 68.57/29.26  																												| (280) all_18_0_6 = all_10_0_2
% 68.57/29.26  																												|
% 68.57/29.26  																													| Equations (280) can reduce 111 to:
% 68.57/29.26  																													| (116)  ~ (all_26_0_10 = all_10_0_2)
% 68.57/29.26  																													|
% 68.57/29.26  																													| Equations (280) can reduce 99 to:
% 68.57/29.26  																													| (106)  ~ (all_22_0_8 = all_10_0_2)
% 68.57/29.26  																													|
% 68.57/29.26  																													| Equations (280) can reduce 100 to:
% 68.57/29.26  																													| (107)  ~ (all_20_0_7 = all_10_0_2)
% 68.57/29.26  																													|
% 68.57/29.26  																													| Equations (280) can reduce 112 to:
% 68.57/29.26  																													| (284)  ~ (all_16_0_5 = all_10_0_2)
% 68.57/29.26  																													|
% 68.57/29.26  																													| Simplifying 284 yields:
% 68.57/29.26  																													| (117)  ~ (all_16_0_5 = all_10_0_2)
% 68.57/29.26  																													|
% 68.57/29.26  																													| Equations (280) can reduce 120 to:
% 68.57/29.26  																													| (286)  ~ (all_12_0_3 = all_10_0_2)
% 68.57/29.26  																													|
% 68.57/29.26  																													| Simplifying 286 yields:
% 68.57/29.26  																													| (187)  ~ (all_12_0_3 = all_10_0_2)
% 68.57/29.26  																													|
% 68.57/29.26  																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (74), into two cases.
% 68.57/29.26  																													|-Branch one:
% 68.57/29.26  																													| (125) all_26_0_10 = all_22_0_8
% 68.57/29.26  																													|
% 68.57/29.26  																														| Equations (125) can reduce 109 to:
% 68.57/29.26  																														| (122) $false
% 68.57/29.26  																														|
% 68.57/29.26  																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 68.57/29.26  																													|-Branch two:
% 68.57/29.26  																													| (109)  ~ (all_26_0_10 = all_22_0_8)
% 68.57/29.26  																													| (291) all_26_0_10 = all_20_0_7 | all_26_0_10 = all_16_0_5 | all_26_0_10 = all_10_0_2 | all_22_0_8 = all_20_0_7 | all_22_0_8 = all_16_0_5 | all_22_0_8 = all_10_0_2 | all_20_0_7 = all_16_0_5 | all_20_0_7 = all_10_0_2 | all_16_0_5 = all_10_0_2
% 68.57/29.26  																													|
% 68.57/29.26  																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (251), into two cases.
% 68.57/29.26  																														|-Branch one:
% 68.57/29.26  																														| (207) all_26_0_10 = all_12_0_3
% 68.57/29.26  																														|
% 68.57/29.26  																															| Equations (207) can reduce 181 to:
% 68.57/29.26  																															| (122) $false
% 68.57/29.26  																															|
% 68.57/29.26  																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 68.57/29.26  																														|-Branch two:
% 68.57/29.26  																														| (181)  ~ (all_26_0_10 = all_12_0_3)
% 68.57/29.26  																														| (295) all_26_0_10 = all_10_0_2 | all_22_0_8 = all_20_0_7 | all_22_0_8 = all_12_0_3 | all_22_0_8 = all_10_0_2 | all_20_0_7 = all_12_0_3 | all_20_0_7 = all_10_0_2 | all_12_0_3 = all_10_0_2
% 68.57/29.26  																														|
% 68.57/29.26  																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (295), into two cases.
% 68.57/29.26  																															|-Branch one:
% 68.57/29.26  																															| (212) all_26_0_10 = all_10_0_2
% 68.57/29.26  																															|
% 68.57/29.26  																																| Equations (212) can reduce 116 to:
% 68.57/29.26  																																| (122) $false
% 68.57/29.26  																																|
% 68.57/29.26  																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 68.57/29.26  																															|-Branch two:
% 68.57/29.26  																															| (116)  ~ (all_26_0_10 = all_10_0_2)
% 68.57/29.26  																															| (299) all_22_0_8 = all_20_0_7 | all_22_0_8 = all_12_0_3 | all_22_0_8 = all_10_0_2 | all_20_0_7 = all_12_0_3 | all_20_0_7 = all_10_0_2 | all_12_0_3 = all_10_0_2
% 68.57/29.26  																															|
% 68.57/29.26  																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (299), into two cases.
% 68.57/29.26  																																|-Branch one:
% 68.57/29.26  																																| (300) all_22_0_8 = all_20_0_7
% 68.57/29.26  																																|
% 68.57/29.26  																																	| Equations (300) can reduce 109 to:
% 68.57/29.26  																																	| (110)  ~ (all_26_0_10 = all_20_0_7)
% 68.57/29.26  																																	|
% 68.57/29.26  																																	| Equations (300) can reduce 101 to:
% 68.57/29.26  																																	| (102)  ~ (all_20_0_7 = all_16_0_5)
% 68.57/29.26  																																	|
% 68.57/29.26  																																	| Equations (300) can reduce 183 to:
% 68.57/29.26  																																	| (105)  ~ (all_20_0_7 = all_12_0_3)
% 68.57/29.26  																																	|
% 68.57/29.26  																																	| Equations (300) can reduce 106 to:
% 68.57/29.26  																																	| (107)  ~ (all_20_0_7 = all_10_0_2)
% 68.57/29.26  																																	|
% 68.57/29.26  																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (77), into two cases.
% 68.57/29.26  																																	|-Branch one:
% 68.57/29.26  																																	| (125) all_26_0_10 = all_22_0_8
% 68.57/29.26  																																	|
% 68.57/29.26  																																		| Combining equations (300,125) yields a new equation:
% 68.57/29.26  																																		| (133) all_26_0_10 = all_20_0_7
% 68.57/29.26  																																		|
% 68.57/29.26  																																		| Equations (133) can reduce 110 to:
% 68.57/29.26  																																		| (122) $false
% 68.57/29.26  																																		|
% 68.57/29.26  																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 68.57/29.26  																																	|-Branch two:
% 68.57/29.26  																																	| (109)  ~ (all_26_0_10 = all_22_0_8)
% 68.57/29.26  																																	| (309) all_26_0_10 = all_16_0_5 | all_26_0_10 = all_14_0_4 | all_26_0_10 = all_10_0_2 | all_22_0_8 = all_16_0_5 | all_22_0_8 = all_14_0_4 | all_22_0_8 = all_10_0_2 | all_16_0_5 = all_14_0_4 | all_16_0_5 = all_10_0_2 | all_14_0_4 = all_10_0_2
% 68.57/29.26  																																	|
% 68.57/29.26  																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (309), into two cases.
% 68.57/29.26  																																		|-Branch one:
% 68.57/29.26  																																		| (196) all_26_0_10 = all_16_0_5
% 68.57/29.26  																																		|
% 68.57/29.26  																																			| Equations (196) can reduce 238 to:
% 68.57/29.26  																																			| (122) $false
% 68.57/29.26  																																			|
% 68.57/29.26  																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 68.57/29.26  																																		|-Branch two:
% 68.57/29.26  																																		| (238)  ~ (all_26_0_10 = all_16_0_5)
% 68.57/29.26  																																		| (313) all_26_0_10 = all_14_0_4 | all_26_0_10 = all_10_0_2 | all_22_0_8 = all_16_0_5 | all_22_0_8 = all_14_0_4 | all_22_0_8 = all_10_0_2 | all_16_0_5 = all_14_0_4 | all_16_0_5 = all_10_0_2 | all_14_0_4 = all_10_0_2
% 68.57/29.26  																																		|
% 68.57/29.26  																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (313), into two cases.
% 68.57/29.26  																																			|-Branch one:
% 68.57/29.26  																																			| (314) all_26_0_10 = all_14_0_4
% 68.57/29.26  																																			|
% 68.57/29.26  																																				| Combining equations (180,314) yields a new equation:
% 68.57/29.26  																																				| (207) all_26_0_10 = all_12_0_3
% 68.57/29.26  																																				|
% 68.57/29.26  																																				| Equations (207) can reduce 181 to:
% 68.57/29.26  																																				| (122) $false
% 68.57/29.26  																																				|
% 68.57/29.26  																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 68.57/29.26  																																			|-Branch two:
% 68.57/29.26  																																			| (113)  ~ (all_26_0_10 = all_14_0_4)
% 68.57/29.26  																																			| (318) all_26_0_10 = all_10_0_2 | all_22_0_8 = all_16_0_5 | all_22_0_8 = all_14_0_4 | all_22_0_8 = all_10_0_2 | all_16_0_5 = all_14_0_4 | all_16_0_5 = all_10_0_2 | all_14_0_4 = all_10_0_2
% 68.57/29.26  																																			|
% 68.57/29.26  																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (318), into two cases.
% 68.57/29.26  																																				|-Branch one:
% 68.57/29.26  																																				| (212) all_26_0_10 = all_10_0_2
% 68.57/29.27  																																				|
% 68.57/29.27  																																					| Equations (212) can reduce 116 to:
% 68.57/29.27  																																					| (122) $false
% 68.57/29.27  																																					|
% 68.57/29.27  																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 68.57/29.27  																																				|-Branch two:
% 68.57/29.27  																																				| (116)  ~ (all_26_0_10 = all_10_0_2)
% 68.57/29.27  																																				| (322) all_22_0_8 = all_16_0_5 | all_22_0_8 = all_14_0_4 | all_22_0_8 = all_10_0_2 | all_16_0_5 = all_14_0_4 | all_16_0_5 = all_10_0_2 | all_14_0_4 = all_10_0_2
% 68.57/29.27  																																				|
% 68.57/29.27  																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (322), into two cases.
% 68.57/29.27  																																					|-Branch one:
% 68.57/29.27  																																					| (268) all_22_0_8 = all_16_0_5
% 68.57/29.27  																																					|
% 68.57/29.27  																																						| Combining equations (268,300) yields a new equation:
% 68.57/29.27  																																						| (149) all_20_0_7 = all_16_0_5
% 68.57/29.27  																																						|
% 68.57/29.27  																																						| Equations (149) can reduce 102 to:
% 68.57/29.27  																																						| (122) $false
% 68.57/29.27  																																						|
% 68.57/29.27  																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 68.57/29.27  																																					|-Branch two:
% 68.57/29.27  																																					| (101)  ~ (all_22_0_8 = all_16_0_5)
% 68.57/29.27  																																					| (327) all_22_0_8 = all_14_0_4 | all_22_0_8 = all_10_0_2 | all_16_0_5 = all_14_0_4 | all_16_0_5 = all_10_0_2 | all_14_0_4 = all_10_0_2
% 68.57/29.27  																																					|
% 68.57/29.27  																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (327), into two cases.
% 68.57/29.27  																																						|-Branch one:
% 68.57/29.27  																																						| (328) all_22_0_8 = all_14_0_4
% 68.57/29.27  																																						|
% 68.57/29.27  																																							| Combining equations (328,300) yields a new equation:
% 68.57/29.27  																																							| (153) all_20_0_7 = all_14_0_4
% 68.57/29.27  																																							|
% 68.57/29.27  																																							| Combining equations (180,153) yields a new equation:
% 68.57/29.27  																																							| (157) all_20_0_7 = all_12_0_3
% 68.57/29.27  																																							|
% 68.57/29.27  																																							| Equations (157) can reduce 105 to:
% 68.57/29.27  																																							| (122) $false
% 68.57/29.27  																																							|
% 68.57/29.27  																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 68.57/29.27  																																						|-Branch two:
% 68.57/29.27  																																						| (103)  ~ (all_22_0_8 = all_14_0_4)
% 68.57/29.27  																																						| (333) all_22_0_8 = all_10_0_2 | all_16_0_5 = all_14_0_4 | all_16_0_5 = all_10_0_2 | all_14_0_4 = all_10_0_2
% 68.57/29.27  																																						|
% 68.57/29.27  																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (333), into two cases.
% 68.57/29.27  																																							|-Branch one:
% 68.57/29.27  																																							| (272) all_22_0_8 = all_10_0_2
% 68.57/29.27  																																							|
% 68.57/29.27  																																								| Combining equations (272,300) yields a new equation:
% 68.57/29.27  																																								| (233) all_20_0_7 = all_10_0_2
% 68.57/29.27  																																								|
% 68.57/29.27  																																								| Equations (233) can reduce 107 to:
% 68.57/29.27  																																								| (122) $false
% 68.57/29.27  																																								|
% 68.57/29.27  																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 68.57/29.27  																																							|-Branch two:
% 68.57/29.27  																																							| (106)  ~ (all_22_0_8 = all_10_0_2)
% 68.57/29.27  																																							| (338) all_16_0_5 = all_14_0_4 | all_16_0_5 = all_10_0_2 | all_14_0_4 = all_10_0_2
% 68.57/29.27  																																							|
% 68.57/29.27  																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (338), into two cases.
% 68.57/29.27  																																								|-Branch one:
% 68.57/29.27  																																								| (173) all_16_0_5 = all_14_0_4
% 68.57/29.27  																																								|
% 68.57/29.27  																																									| Combining equations (180,173) yields a new equation:
% 68.57/29.27  																																									| (177) all_16_0_5 = all_12_0_3
% 68.57/29.27  																																									|
% 68.57/29.27  																																									| Equations (177) can reduce 115 to:
% 68.57/29.27  																																									| (122) $false
% 68.57/29.27  																																									|
% 68.57/29.27  																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 68.57/29.27  																																								|-Branch two:
% 68.57/29.27  																																								| (114)  ~ (all_16_0_5 = all_14_0_4)
% 68.57/29.27  																																								| (343) all_16_0_5 = all_10_0_2 | all_14_0_4 = all_10_0_2
% 68.57/29.27  																																								|
% 68.57/29.27  																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (343), into two cases.
% 68.57/29.27  																																									|-Branch one:
% 68.57/29.27  																																									| (213) all_16_0_5 = all_10_0_2
% 68.57/29.27  																																									|
% 68.57/29.27  																																										| Equations (213) can reduce 117 to:
% 68.57/29.27  																																										| (122) $false
% 68.57/29.27  																																										|
% 68.57/29.27  																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 68.57/29.27  																																									|-Branch two:
% 68.57/29.27  																																									| (117)  ~ (all_16_0_5 = all_10_0_2)
% 68.57/29.27  																																									| (347) all_14_0_4 = all_10_0_2
% 68.57/29.27  																																									|
% 68.57/29.27  																																										| Combining equations (347,180) yields a new equation:
% 68.57/29.27  																																										| (236) all_12_0_3 = all_10_0_2
% 68.57/29.27  																																										|
% 68.57/29.27  																																										| Equations (236) can reduce 187 to:
% 68.57/29.27  																																										| (122) $false
% 68.57/29.27  																																										|
% 68.57/29.27  																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 68.57/29.27  																																|-Branch two:
% 68.57/29.27  																																| (350)  ~ (all_22_0_8 = all_20_0_7)
% 68.57/29.27  																																| (351) all_22_0_8 = all_12_0_3 | all_22_0_8 = all_10_0_2 | all_20_0_7 = all_12_0_3 | all_20_0_7 = all_10_0_2 | all_12_0_3 = all_10_0_2
% 68.57/29.27  																																|
% 68.57/29.27  																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (351), into two cases.
% 68.57/29.27  																																	|-Branch one:
% 68.57/29.27  																																	| (352) all_22_0_8 = all_12_0_3
% 68.57/29.27  																																	|
% 68.57/29.27  																																		| Equations (352) can reduce 183 to:
% 68.57/29.27  																																		| (122) $false
% 68.57/29.27  																																		|
% 68.57/29.27  																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 68.57/29.27  																																	|-Branch two:
% 68.57/29.27  																																	| (183)  ~ (all_22_0_8 = all_12_0_3)
% 68.57/29.27  																																	| (355) all_22_0_8 = all_10_0_2 | all_20_0_7 = all_12_0_3 | all_20_0_7 = all_10_0_2 | all_12_0_3 = all_10_0_2
% 68.57/29.27  																																	|
% 68.57/29.27  																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (355), into two cases.
% 68.57/29.27  																																		|-Branch one:
% 68.57/29.27  																																		| (272) all_22_0_8 = all_10_0_2
% 68.57/29.27  																																		|
% 68.57/29.27  																																			| Equations (272) can reduce 106 to:
% 68.57/29.27  																																			| (122) $false
% 68.57/29.27  																																			|
% 68.57/29.27  																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 68.57/29.27  																																		|-Branch two:
% 68.57/29.27  																																		| (106)  ~ (all_22_0_8 = all_10_0_2)
% 68.57/29.27  																																		| (228) all_20_0_7 = all_12_0_3 | all_20_0_7 = all_10_0_2 | all_12_0_3 = all_10_0_2
% 68.57/29.27  																																		|
% 68.57/29.27  																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (228), into two cases.
% 68.57/29.27  																																			|-Branch one:
% 68.57/29.27  																																			| (157) all_20_0_7 = all_12_0_3
% 68.57/29.27  																																			|
% 68.57/29.27  																																				| Equations (157) can reduce 105 to:
% 68.57/29.27  																																				| (122) $false
% 68.57/29.27  																																				|
% 68.57/29.27  																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 68.57/29.27  																																			|-Branch two:
% 68.57/29.27  																																			| (105)  ~ (all_20_0_7 = all_12_0_3)
% 68.57/29.27  																																			| (232) all_20_0_7 = all_10_0_2 | all_12_0_3 = all_10_0_2
% 68.57/29.27  																																			|
% 68.57/29.27  																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (232), into two cases.
% 68.57/29.27  																																				|-Branch one:
% 68.57/29.27  																																				| (233) all_20_0_7 = all_10_0_2
% 68.57/29.27  																																				|
% 68.57/29.27  																																					| Equations (233) can reduce 107 to:
% 68.57/29.27  																																					| (122) $false
% 68.57/29.27  																																					|
% 68.57/29.27  																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 68.57/29.27  																																				|-Branch two:
% 68.57/29.27  																																				| (107)  ~ (all_20_0_7 = all_10_0_2)
% 68.57/29.27  																																				| (236) all_12_0_3 = all_10_0_2
% 68.57/29.27  																																				|
% 68.57/29.27  																																					| Equations (236) can reduce 187 to:
% 68.57/29.27  																																					| (122) $false
% 68.57/29.27  																																					|
% 68.57/29.27  																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 68.57/29.27  																												|-Branch two:
% 68.57/29.27  																												| (369)  ~ (all_18_0_6 = all_10_0_2)
% 68.57/29.27  																												| (213) all_16_0_5 = all_10_0_2
% 68.57/29.27  																												|
% 68.57/29.27  																													| Equations (213) can reduce 117 to:
% 68.57/29.27  																													| (122) $false
% 68.57/29.27  																													|
% 68.57/29.27  																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 68.57/29.27  % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 68.57/29.27  
% 68.57/29.27  28601ms
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------