%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : SPASS---3.9 % Problem : KRS085+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp % Command : run_spass %d %s % Computer : n029.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 600s % DateTime : Sun Jul 17 03:30:30 EDT 2022 % Result : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.46s % Output : Refutation 0.20s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.03/0.12 % Problem : KRS085+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0. % 0.03/0.13 % Command : run_spass %d %s % 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n029.cluster.edu % 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600 % 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Tue Jun 7 08:40:50 EDT 2022 % 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime : % 0.20/0.46 % 0.20/0.46 SPASS V 3.9 % 0.20/0.46 SPASS beiseite: Proof found. % 0.20/0.46 % SZS status Theorem % 0.20/0.46 Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.20/0.46 SPASS derived 19 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 29 clauses. % 0.20/0.46 SPASS allocated 97828 KBytes. % 0.20/0.46 SPASS spent 0:00:00.10 on the problem. % 0.20/0.46 0:00:00.04 for the input. % 0.20/0.46 0:00:00.04 for the FLOTTER CNF translation. % 0.20/0.46 0:00:00.00 for inferences. % 0.20/0.46 0:00:00.00 for the backtracking. % 0.20/0.46 0:00:00.00 for the reduction. % 0.20/0.46 % 0.20/0.46 % 0.20/0.46 Here is a proof with depth 4, length 14 : % 0.20/0.46 % SZS output start Refutation % 0.20/0.46 2[0:Inp] || -> cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_19_39537)*. % 0.20/0.46 7[0:Inp] cUnsatisfiable(u) || -> cp1(u)*. % 0.20/0.46 9[0:Inp] cUnsatisfiable(u) || -> rr(u,skf4(u))*r. % 0.20/0.46 13[0:Inp] || rr(u,v) -> rinvR(v,u)*. % 0.20/0.46 14[0:Inp] cUnsatisfiable(u) || -> rr(skf4(v),skf5(v))*r. % 0.20/0.46 15[0:Inp] cUnsatisfiable(u) cp1(v) || rinvR(skf5(w),v)* -> . % 0.20/0.46 16[0:Inp] || rr(u,v)* rr(v,w)* -> rr(u,w)*. % 0.20/0.46 21[0:EmS:15.0,2.0] cp1(u) || rinvR(skf5(v),u)* -> . % 0.20/0.46 22[0:Res:13.1,21.1] cp1(u) || rr(u,skf5(v))* -> . % 0.20/0.46 24[0:EmS:14.0,2.0] || -> rr(skf4(u),skf5(u))*r. % 0.20/0.46 26[0:NCh:16.2,16.1,22.1,24.0] cp1(u) || rr(u,skf4(v))* -> . % 0.20/0.46 38[0:Res:9.1,26.1] cUnsatisfiable(u) cp1(u) || -> . % 0.20/0.46 41[0:SSi:38.1,7.1] cUnsatisfiable(u) || -> . % 0.20/0.46 42[0:UnC:41.0,2.0] || -> . % 0.20/0.46 % SZS output end Refutation % 0.20/0.46 Formulae used in the proof : axiom_7 axiom_2 axiom_5 axiom_6 % 0.20/0.46 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------