↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : KRS088+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n031.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 04:36:19 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.26s 1.72s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.26s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   22 (   4 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   76 (   6 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   19 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   93 (  39   ~;  35   |;  13   &)
%                                         (   3 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   16 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   44 (   1 sgn  19   !;   4   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(axiom_2,axiom,
    ! [X4] :
      ( cUnsatisfiable(X4)
    <=> ? [X5] :
          ( rf(X4,X5)
          & ! [X6] :
              ( rinvF(X5,X6)
             => ? [X7] :
                  ( rf(X6,X7)
                  & ~ cp1(X7) ) )
          & cp1(X5) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_2) ).

fof(axiom_4,axiom,
    ! [X4,X5] :
      ( rinvF(X4,X5)
    <=> rf(X5,X4) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_4) ).

fof(axiom_3,axiom,
    ! [X4,X5,X6] :
      ( ( rf(X4,X5)
        & rf(X4,X6) )
     => X5 = X6 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_3) ).

fof(axiom_7,axiom,
    cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_19_49673),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_7) ).

fof(c_0_4,plain,
    ! [X4] :
      ( cUnsatisfiable(X4)
    <=> ? [X5] :
          ( rf(X4,X5)
          & ! [X6] :
              ( rinvF(X5,X6)
             => ? [X7] :
                  ( rf(X6,X7)
                  & ~ cp1(X7) ) )
          & cp1(X5) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[axiom_2]) ).

fof(c_0_5,plain,
    ! [X98,X100,X102,X103,X105] :
      ( ( rf(X98,esk1_1(X98))
        | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X98) )
      & ( rf(X100,esk2_2(X98,X100))
        | ~ rinvF(esk1_1(X98),X100)
        | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X98) )
      & ( ~ cp1(esk2_2(X98,X100))
        | ~ rinvF(esk1_1(X98),X100)
        | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X98) )
      & ( cp1(esk1_1(X98))
        | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X98) )
      & ( rinvF(X103,esk3_2(X102,X103))
        | ~ rf(X102,X103)
        | ~ cp1(X103)
        | cUnsatisfiable(X102) )
      & ( ~ rf(esk3_2(X102,X103),X105)
        | cp1(X105)
        | ~ rf(X102,X103)
        | ~ cp1(X103)
        | cUnsatisfiable(X102) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_6,plain,
    ! [X109,X110] :
      ( ( ~ rinvF(X109,X110)
        | rf(X110,X109) )
      & ( ~ rf(X110,X109)
        | rinvF(X109,X110) ) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[axiom_4])]) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X106,X107,X108] :
      ( ~ rf(X106,X107)
      | ~ rf(X106,X108)
      | X107 = X108 ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[axiom_3])]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    ( rf(X1,esk2_2(X2,X1))
    | ~ rinvF(esk1_1(X2),X1)
    | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    ( rinvF(X2,X1)
    | ~ rf(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( X2 = X3
    | ~ rf(X1,X2)
    | ~ rf(X1,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( rf(X1,esk2_2(X2,X1))
    | ~ rf(X1,esk1_1(X2))
    | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( X1 = esk2_2(X2,X3)
    | ~ rf(X3,esk1_1(X2))
    | ~ rf(X3,X1)
    | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( rf(X1,esk1_1(X1))
    | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( X1 = esk2_2(X2,X2)
    | ~ rf(X2,X1)
    | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( ~ cp1(esk2_2(X1,X2))
    | ~ rinvF(esk1_1(X1),X2)
    | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( esk2_2(X1,X1) = esk1_1(X1)
    | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( cp1(esk1_1(X1))
    | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( ~ rinvF(esk1_1(X1),X1)
    | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_19_49673),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[axiom_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_9]),c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem    : KRS088+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.16/0.33  % Computer : n031.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.16/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.16/0.33  % DateTime   : Mon May  4 20:38:53 EDT 2026
% 0.16/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.16/0.34  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 1.26/1.72  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 1.26/1.72  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 1.26/1.72  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 1.26/1.72  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.26/1.72  % Total time : 1.369s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------