%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : CSE---1.7 % Problem : KRS090+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.1.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s % Computer : n013.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 300s % DateTime : Mon Jun 24 10:08:27 EDT 2024 % Result : Unsatisfiable 0.59s 0.67s % Output : CNFRefutation 0.59s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.08/0.13 % Problem : KRS090+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.1.0. % 0.08/0.13 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s % 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n013.cluster.edu % 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300 % 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Wed Jun 19 12:22:39 EDT 2024 % 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime : % 0.43/0.61 start to proof:theBenchmark % 0.59/0.66 %------------------------------------------- % 0.59/0.66 % File :CSE---1.7 % 0.59/0.66 % Problem :theBenchmark % 0.59/0.66 % Transform :cnf % 0.59/0.66 % Format :tptp:raw % 0.59/0.66 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s % 0.59/0.66 % 0.59/0.66 % Result :Theorem 0.000000s % 0.59/0.66 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.000000s % 0.59/0.66 %------------------------------------------- % 0.59/0.66 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % 0.59/0.66 % File : KRS090+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.1.0. % 0.59/0.66 % Domain : Knowledge Representation (Semantic Web) % 0.59/0.66 % Problem : A pattern comes up a lot in more complex ontologies % 0.59/0.66 % Version : Especial. % 0.59/0.66 % English : This kind of pattern comes up a lot in more complex ontologies. % 0.59/0.66 % Failure to cope with this kind of pattern is one of the reasons % 0.59/0.66 % that many reasoners have been unable to cope with such ontologies. % 0.59/0.66 % 0.59/0.66 % Refs : [Bec03] Bechhofer (2003), Email to G. Sutcliffe % 0.59/0.66 % : [TR+04] Tsarkov et al. (2004), Using Vampire to Reason with OW % 0.59/0.66 % Source : [Bec03] % 0.59/0.66 % Names : inconsistent_description-logic-Manifest040 [Bec03] % 0.59/0.66 % 0.59/0.66 % Status : Unsatisfiable % 0.59/0.66 % Rating : 0.00 v6.4.0, 0.25 v6.3.0, 0.00 v3.1.0 % 0.59/0.66 % Syntax : Number of formulae : 9 ( 1 unt; 0 def) % 0.59/0.66 % Number of atoms : 90 ( 0 equ) % 0.59/0.66 % Maximal formula atoms : 65 ( 10 avg) % 0.59/0.66 % Number of connectives : 87 ( 6 ~; 36 |; 37 &) % 0.59/0.66 % ( 1 <=>; 7 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>) % 0.59/0.66 % Maximal formula depth : 35 ( 8 avg) % 0.59/0.66 % Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg) % 0.59/0.66 % Number of predicates : 77 ( 77 usr; 0 prp; 1-2 aty) % 0.59/0.66 % Number of functors : 1 ( 1 usr; 1 con; 0-0 aty) % 0.59/0.66 % Number of variables : 10 ( 9 !; 1 ?) % 0.59/0.66 % SPC : FOF_UNS_RFO_NEQ % 0.59/0.66 % 0.59/0.66 % Comments : Sean Bechhofer says there are some errors in the encoding of % 0.59/0.66 % datatypes, so this problem may not be perfect. At least it's % 0.59/0.66 % still representative of the type of reasoning required for OWL. % 0.59/0.66 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % 0.59/0.66 %----Thing and Nothing % 0.59/0.66 fof(axiom_0,axiom, % 0.59/0.66 ! [X] : % 0.59/0.66 ( cowlThing(X) % 0.59/0.66 & ~ cowlNothing(X) ) ). % 0.59/0.66 % 0.59/0.66 %----String and Integer disjoint % 0.59/0.66 fof(axiom_1,axiom, % 0.59/0.66 ! [X] : % 0.59/0.66 ( xsd_string(X) % 0.59/0.66 <=> ~ xsd_integer(X) ) ). % 0.59/0.66 % 0.59/0.66 %----Super cC1 % 0.59/0.66 fof(axiom_2,axiom, % 0.59/0.66 ! [X] : % 0.59/0.66 ( cC1(X) % 0.59/0.66 => ( ( cB5(X) % 0.59/0.66 | cA5(X) ) % 0.59/0.66 & ( cB13(X) % 0.59/0.66 | cA13(X) ) % 0.59/0.66 & ( cA1(X) % 0.59/0.66 | cB1(X) ) % 0.59/0.66 & ( cA27(X) % 0.59/0.66 | cB27(X) ) % 0.59/0.66 & ( cA4(X) % 0.59/0.66 | cB4(X) ) % 0.59/0.66 & ( cB12(X) % 0.59/0.66 | cA12(X) ) % 0.59/0.66 & ( cB30(X) % 0.59/0.66 | cA30(X) ) % 0.59/0.66 & ( cA20(X) % 0.59/0.66 | cB20(X) ) % 0.59/0.66 & ( cB14(X) % 0.59/0.66 | cA14(X) ) % 0.59/0.66 & ( cB28(X) % 0.59/0.66 | cA28(X) ) % 0.59/0.66 & ( cA3(X) % 0.59/0.66 | cB3(X) ) % 0.59/0.66 & ( cB7(X) % 0.59/0.66 | cA7(X) ) % 0.59/0.66 & ( cB21(X) % 0.59/0.66 | cA21(X) ) % 0.59/0.66 & ( cB22(X) % 0.59/0.66 | cA22(X) ) % 0.59/0.66 & ( cB17(X) % 0.59/0.66 | cA17(X) ) % 0.59/0.66 & ( cB11(X) % 0.59/0.66 | cA11(X) ) % 0.59/0.66 & ( cB19(X) % 0.59/0.66 | cA19(X) ) % 0.59/0.66 & ( cA8(X) % 0.59/0.66 | cB8(X) ) % 0.59/0.66 & ( cA26(X) % 0.59/0.66 | cB26(X) ) % 0.59/0.66 & ( cA25(X) % 0.59/0.66 | cB25(X) ) % 0.59/0.66 & ( cA29(X) % 0.59/0.66 | cB29(X) ) % 0.59/0.66 & ( cB23(X) % 0.59/0.66 | cA23(X) ) % 0.59/0.66 & ( cB18(X) % 0.59/0.66 | cA18(X) ) % 0.59/0.66 & ( cB10(X) % 0.59/0.66 | cA10(X) ) % 0.59/0.66 & ( cB2(X) % 0.59/0.66 | cA2(X) ) % 0.59/0.66 & ( cA16(X) % 0.59/0.66 | cB16(X) ) % 0.59/0.66 & ( cB0(X) % 0.59/0.66 | cA0(X) ) % 0.59/0.66 & ( cB31(X) % 0.59/0.66 | cA31(X) ) % 0.59/0.66 & ( cB9(X) % 0.59/0.66 | cA9(X) ) % 0.59/0.66 & ( cB6(X) % 0.59/0.66 | cA6(X) ) % 0.59/0.66 & ( cB24(X) % 0.59/0.66 | cA24(X) ) % 0.59/0.66 & ( cB15(X) % 0.59/0.66 | cA15(X) ) ) ) ). % 0.59/0.66 % 0.59/0.66 %----Super cC2 % 0.59/0.66 fof(axiom_3,axiom, % 0.59/0.66 ! [X] : % 0.59/0.66 ( cC2(X) % 0.59/0.66 => ( ( ~ cB(X) % 0.59/0.66 | cA(X) ) % 0.59/0.66 & ( cB(X) % 0.59/0.67 | cA(X) ) ) ) ). % 0.59/0.67 % 0.59/0.67 %----Super cC3 % 0.59/0.67 fof(axiom_4,axiom, % 0.59/0.67 ! [X] : % 0.59/0.67 ( cC3(X) % 0.59/0.67 => ( ( ~ cB(X) % 0.59/0.67 | ~ cA(X) ) % 0.59/0.67 & ( cB(X) % 0.59/0.67 | ~ cA(X) ) ) ) ). % 0.59/0.67 % 0.59/0.67 %----Super cC4 % 0.59/0.67 fof(axiom_5,axiom, % 0.59/0.67 ! [X] : % 0.59/0.67 ( cC4(X) % 0.59/0.67 => ? [Y] : % 0.59/0.67 ( rR(X,Y) % 0.59/0.67 & cC2(Y) ) ) ). % 0.59/0.67 % 0.59/0.67 %----Super cC5 % 0.59/0.67 fof(axiom_6,axiom, % 0.59/0.67 ! [X] : % 0.59/0.67 ( cC5(X) % 0.59/0.67 => ! [Y] : % 0.59/0.67 ( rR(X,Y) % 0.59/0.67 => cC3(Y) ) ) ). % 0.59/0.67 % 0.59/0.67 %----Super cTEST % 0.59/0.67 fof(axiom_7,axiom, % 0.59/0.67 ! [X] : % 0.59/0.67 ( cTEST(X) % 0.59/0.67 => ( cC4(X) % 0.59/0.67 & cC1(X) % 0.59/0.67 & cC5(X) ) ) ). % 0.59/0.67 % 0.59/0.67 %----i2003_11_14_17_19_57994 % 0.59/0.67 fof(axiom_8,axiom, % 0.59/0.67 cTEST(i2003_11_14_17_19_57994) ). % 0.59/0.67 % 0.59/0.67 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % 0.59/0.67 %------------------------------------------- % 0.59/0.67 % Proof found % 0.59/0.67 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark % 0.59/0.67 % SZS output start Proof % 0.59/0.67 %ClaNum:47(EqnAxiom:0) % 0.59/0.67 %VarNum:130(SingletonVarNum:47) % 0.59/0.67 %MaxLitNum:3 % 0.59/0.67 %MaxfuncDepth:1 % 0.59/0.67 %SharedTerms:2 % 0.59/0.67 [1]P1(a1) % 0.59/0.67 [2]~P73(x21) % 0.59/0.67 [3]P75(x31)+P74(x31) % 0.59/0.67 [4]~P1(x41)+P2(x41) % 0.59/0.67 [5]~P1(x51)+P69(x51) % 0.59/0.67 [6]~P1(x61)+P72(x61) % 0.59/0.67 [7]~P2(x71)+P76(x71) % 0.59/0.67 [8]~P75(x81)+~P74(x81) % 0.59/0.67 [42]~P69(x421)+P70(f2(x421)) % 0.59/0.67 [46]~P69(x461)+P77(x461,f2(x461)) % 0.59/0.67 [9]P4(x91)+~P76(x91)+P3(x91) % 0.59/0.67 [10]P5(x101)+~P76(x101)+P33(x101) % 0.59/0.67 [11]P34(x111)+~P76(x111)+P6(x111) % 0.59/0.67 [12]P44(x121)+~P76(x121)+P12(x121) % 0.59/0.67 [13]P59(x131)+~P76(x131)+P27(x131) % 0.59/0.67 [14]P9(x141)+~P76(x141)+P41(x141) % 0.59/0.67 [15]P28(x151)+~P76(x151)+P60(x151) % 0.59/0.67 [16]P45(x161)+~P76(x161)+P13(x161) % 0.59/0.67 [17]P14(x171)+~P76(x171)+P46(x171) % 0.59/0.67 [18]P29(x181)+~P76(x181)+P61(x181) % 0.59/0.67 [19]P62(x191)+~P76(x191)+P30(x191) % 0.59/0.67 [20]P35(x201)+~P76(x201)+P65(x201) % 0.59/0.67 [21]P21(x211)+~P76(x211)+P53(x211) % 0.59/0.67 [22]P22(x221)+~P76(x221)+P54(x221) % 0.59/0.67 [23]P15(x231)+~P76(x231)+P47(x231) % 0.59/0.67 [24]P10(x241)+~P76(x241)+P42(x241) % 0.59/0.67 [25]P18(x251)+~P76(x251)+P50(x251) % 0.59/0.67 [26]P67(x261)+~P76(x261)+P37(x261) % 0.59/0.67 [27]P55(x271)+~P76(x271)+P23(x271) % 0.59/0.67 [28]P56(x281)+~P76(x281)+P24(x281) % 0.59/0.67 [29]P63(x291)+~P76(x291)+P31(x291) % 0.59/0.67 [30]P25(x301)+~P76(x301)+P57(x301) % 0.59/0.67 [31]P19(x311)+~P76(x311)+P51(x311) % 0.59/0.67 [32]P11(x321)+~P76(x321)+P43(x321) % 0.59/0.67 [33]P20(x331)+~P76(x331)+P52(x331) % 0.59/0.67 [34]P48(x341)+~P76(x341)+P16(x341) % 0.59/0.67 [35]P7(x351)+~P76(x351)+P38(x351) % 0.59/0.67 [36]P32(x361)+~P76(x361)+P64(x361) % 0.59/0.67 [37]P39(x371)+~P76(x371)+P68(x371) % 0.59/0.67 [38]P36(x381)+~P76(x381)+P66(x381) % 0.59/0.67 [39]P26(x391)+~P76(x391)+P58(x391) % 0.59/0.67 [40]P17(x401)+~P76(x401)+P49(x401) % 0.59/0.67 [41]P8(x411)+~P70(x411)+P40(x411) % 0.59/0.67 [43]~P8(x431)+~P71(x431)+P40(x431) % 0.59/0.67 [44]~P70(x441)+~P40(x441)+P8(x441) % 0.59/0.67 [45]~P8(x451)+~P71(x451)+~P40(x451) % 0.59/0.67 [47]~P77(x472,x471)+P71(x471)+~P72(x472) % 0.59/0.67 %EqnAxiom % 0.59/0.67 % 0.59/0.67 %------------------------------------------- % 0.59/0.67 cnf(49,plain, % 0.59/0.67 (P70(f2(a1))), % 0.59/0.67 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,5,42])). % 0.59/0.67 cnf(52,plain, % 0.59/0.67 (P8(f2(a1))), % 0.59/0.67 inference(scs_inference,[],[49,41,44])). % 0.59/0.67 cnf(54,plain, % 0.59/0.67 (P71(x541)+~P77(a1,x541)), % 0.59/0.67 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,6,47])). % 0.59/0.67 cnf(56,plain, % 0.59/0.67 (P77(a1,f2(a1))), % 0.59/0.67 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,46,5])). % 0.59/0.67 cnf(62,plain, % 0.59/0.67 ($false), % 0.59/0.67 inference(scs_inference,[],[56,52,54,45,43]), % 0.59/0.67 ['proof']). % 0.59/0.67 % SZS output end Proof % 0.59/0.67 % Total time :0.000000s %------------------------------------------------------------------------------