%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : CSE---1.7 % Problem : KRS092+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.1.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s % Computer : n014.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 300s % DateTime : Mon Jun 24 10:08:28 EDT 2024 % Result : Unsatisfiable 0.53s 0.64s % Output : CNFRefutation 0.53s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.12/0.15 % Problem : KRS092+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.1.0. % 0.12/0.15 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s % 0.13/0.37 % Computer : n014.cluster.edu % 0.13/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.13/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.13/0.37 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.13/0.37 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.13/0.37 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.13/0.37 % WCLimit : 300 % 0.13/0.37 % DateTime : Wed Jun 19 13:30:24 EDT 2024 % 0.13/0.37 % CPUTime : % 0.47/0.60 start to proof:theBenchmark % 0.47/0.64 %------------------------------------------- % 0.47/0.64 % File :CSE---1.7 % 0.47/0.64 % Problem :theBenchmark % 0.47/0.64 % Transform :cnf % 0.47/0.64 % Format :tptp:raw % 0.47/0.64 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s % 0.47/0.64 % 0.47/0.64 % Result :Theorem 0.000000s % 0.47/0.64 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.000000s % 0.47/0.64 %------------------------------------------- % 0.53/0.64 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % 0.53/0.64 % File : KRS092+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.1.0. % 0.53/0.64 % Domain : Knowledge Representation (Semantic Web) % 0.53/0.64 % Problem : DL Test: heinsohn1.2 % 0.53/0.64 % Version : Especial. % 0.53/0.64 % English : Tbox tests from [HK+94] % 0.53/0.64 % 0.53/0.64 % Refs : [HK+94] Heinsohn et al. (1994), An Empirical Analysis of Termi % 0.53/0.64 % : [Bec03] Bechhofer (2003), Email to G. Sutcliffe % 0.53/0.64 % : [TR+04] Tsarkov et al. (2004), Using Vampire to Reason with OW % 0.53/0.64 % Source : [Bec03] % 0.53/0.64 % Names : inconsistent_description-logic-Manifest102 [Bec03] % 0.53/0.64 % 0.53/0.64 % Status : Unsatisfiable % 0.53/0.64 % Rating : 0.00 v6.4.0, 0.25 v6.3.0, 0.00 v3.1.0 % 0.53/0.64 % Syntax : Number of formulae : 9 ( 1 unt; 0 def) % 0.53/0.64 % Number of atoms : 21 ( 0 equ) % 0.53/0.64 % Maximal formula atoms : 6 ( 2 avg) % 0.53/0.64 % Number of connectives : 16 ( 4 ~; 0 |; 4 &) % 0.53/0.64 % ( 2 <=>; 6 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>) % 0.53/0.64 % Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 4 avg) % 0.53/0.64 % Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg) % 0.53/0.64 % Number of predicates : 12 ( 12 usr; 0 prp; 1-2 aty) % 0.53/0.64 % Number of functors : 1 ( 1 usr; 1 con; 0-0 aty) % 0.53/0.64 % Number of variables : 10 ( 9 !; 1 ?) % 0.53/0.64 % SPC : FOF_UNS_RFO_NEQ % 0.53/0.64 % 0.53/0.64 % Comments : Sean Bechhofer says there are some errors in the encoding of % 0.53/0.64 % datatypes, so this problem may not be perfect. At least it's % 0.53/0.64 % still representative of the type of reasoning required for OWL. % 0.53/0.64 % : Tests incoherency caused by disjoint concept % 0.53/0.64 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % 0.53/0.64 %----Thing and Nothing % 0.53/0.64 fof(axiom_0,axiom, % 0.53/0.64 ! [X] : % 0.53/0.64 ( cowlThing(X) % 0.53/0.64 & ~ cowlNothing(X) ) ). % 0.53/0.64 % 0.53/0.64 %----String and Integer disjoint % 0.53/0.64 fof(axiom_1,axiom, % 0.53/0.64 ! [X] : % 0.53/0.64 ( xsd_string(X) % 0.53/0.64 <=> ~ xsd_integer(X) ) ). % 0.53/0.64 % 0.53/0.64 %----Equality cUnsatisfiable % 0.53/0.64 fof(axiom_2,axiom, % 0.53/0.64 ! [X] : % 0.53/0.64 ( cUnsatisfiable(X) % 0.53/0.64 <=> ( ? [Y] : % 0.53/0.64 ( rr(X,Y) % 0.53/0.64 & cowlThing(Y) ) % 0.53/0.64 & ! [Y] : % 0.53/0.64 ( rr(X,Y) % 0.53/0.64 => ( cd(Y) % 0.53/0.64 & cc(Y) ) ) ) ) ). % 0.53/0.64 % 0.53/0.64 %----Super cc % 0.53/0.64 fof(axiom_3,axiom, % 0.53/0.64 ! [X] : % 0.53/0.64 ( cc(X) % 0.53/0.64 => ~ cd(X) ) ). % 0.53/0.64 % 0.53/0.64 %----Super cc1 % 0.53/0.64 fof(axiom_4,axiom, % 0.53/0.64 ! [X] : % 0.53/0.64 ( cc1(X) % 0.53/0.64 => cd1(X) ) ). % 0.53/0.64 % 0.53/0.64 %----Super cc1 % 0.53/0.64 fof(axiom_5,axiom, % 0.53/0.64 ! [X] : % 0.53/0.64 ( cc1(X) % 0.53/0.64 => ~ cd1(X) ) ). % 0.53/0.64 % 0.53/0.64 %----Super ce3 % 0.53/0.64 fof(axiom_6,axiom, % 0.53/0.64 ! [X] : % 0.53/0.64 ( ce3(X) % 0.53/0.64 => cc(X) ) ). % 0.53/0.64 % 0.53/0.64 %----Super cf % 0.53/0.64 fof(axiom_7,axiom, % 0.53/0.64 ! [X] : % 0.53/0.64 ( cf(X) % 0.53/0.64 => cd(X) ) ). % 0.53/0.64 % 0.53/0.64 %----i2003_11_14_17_20_04172 % 0.53/0.64 fof(axiom_8,axiom, % 0.53/0.64 cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_20_04172) ). % 0.53/0.64 % 0.53/0.64 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % 0.53/0.64 %------------------------------------------- % 0.53/0.64 % Proof found % 0.53/0.64 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark % 0.53/0.64 % SZS output start Proof % 0.53/0.65 %ClaNum:14(EqnAxiom:0) % 0.53/0.65 %VarNum:31(SingletonVarNum:15) % 0.53/0.65 %MaxLitNum:3 % 0.53/0.65 %MaxfuncDepth:1 % 0.53/0.65 %SharedTerms:2 % 0.53/0.65 [1]P1(a1) % 0.53/0.65 [2]~P2(x21) % 0.53/0.65 [3]P10(x31)+P9(x31) % 0.53/0.65 [4]~P6(x41)+P3(x41) % 0.53/0.65 [5]~P7(x51)+P4(x51) % 0.53/0.65 [6]~P5(x61)+P8(x61) % 0.53/0.65 [7]~P10(x71)+~P9(x71) % 0.53/0.65 [8]~P4(x81)+~P3(x81) % 0.53/0.65 [9]~P8(x91)+~P5(x91) % 0.53/0.65 [10]~P1(x101)+P11(x101,f2(x101)) % 0.53/0.65 [11]~P11(x112,x111)+P3(x111)+~P1(x112) % 0.53/0.65 [12]~P11(x122,x121)+P4(x121)+~P1(x122) % 0.53/0.65 [13]P1(x131)+~P11(x131,x132)+P11(x131,f3(x131)) % 0.53/0.65 %EqnAxiom % 0.53/0.65 % 0.53/0.65 %------------------------------------------- % 0.53/0.65 cnf(16,plain, % 0.53/0.65 (~P4(x161)+~P11(a1,x161)), % 0.53/0.65 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,8,11])). % 0.53/0.65 cnf(17,plain, % 0.53/0.65 (~P11(a1,x171)), % 0.53/0.65 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,16,12])). % 0.53/0.65 cnf(18,plain, % 0.53/0.65 ($false), % 0.53/0.65 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,17,10]), % 0.53/0.65 ['proof']). % 0.53/0.65 % SZS output end Proof % 0.53/0.65 % Total time :0.000000s %------------------------------------------------------------------------------