↑ Up

PyRes---1.5.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : PyRes---1.5
% Problem  : KRS094+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s

% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu May  9 17:28:41 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.53s
% Output   : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : KRS094+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command  : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Thu May  9 00:17:08 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.53  % Version:  1.5
% 0.19/0.53  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.19/0.53  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% 0.19/0.53  fof(axiom_8,axiom,cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_20_11330),file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', axiom_8)).
% 0.19/0.53  cnf(c0,plain,cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_20_11330),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[axiom_8])).
% 0.19/0.53  fof(axiom_2,axiom,(![X]:(cUnsatisfiable(X)<=>cc1(X))),file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', axiom_2)).
% 0.19/0.53  fof(c18,plain,(![X]:((~cUnsatisfiable(X)|cc1(X))&(~cc1(X)|cUnsatisfiable(X)))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[axiom_2])).
% 0.19/0.53  fof(c19,plain,((![X]:(~cUnsatisfiable(X)|cc1(X)))&(![X]:(~cc1(X)|cUnsatisfiable(X)))),inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[c18])).
% 0.19/0.53  fof(c21,plain,(![X7]:(![X8]:((~cUnsatisfiable(X7)|cc1(X7))&(~cc1(X8)|cUnsatisfiable(X8))))),inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[fof(c20,plain,((![X7]:(~cUnsatisfiable(X7)|cc1(X7)))&(![X8]:(~cc1(X8)|cUnsatisfiable(X8)))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c19])).])).
% 0.19/0.53  cnf(c22,plain,~cUnsatisfiable(X20)|cc1(X20),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c21])).
% 0.19/0.53  cnf(c37,plain,cc1(i2003_11_14_17_20_11330),inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c22, c0])).
% 0.19/0.53  fof(axiom_4,axiom,(![X]:(cc1(X)=>(~cd1(X)))),file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', axiom_4)).
% 0.19/0.53  fof(c10,plain,(![X]:(cc1(X)=>~cd1(X))),inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[axiom_4])).
% 0.19/0.53  fof(c11,plain,(![X]:(~cc1(X)|~cd1(X))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c10])).
% 0.19/0.53  fof(c12,plain,(![X5]:(~cc1(X5)|~cd1(X5))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c11])).
% 0.19/0.53  cnf(c13,plain,~cc1(X18)|~cd1(X18),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c12])).
% 0.19/0.53  fof(axiom_5,axiom,(![X]:(cc1(X)=>cd1(X))),file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', axiom_5)).
% 0.19/0.53  fof(c7,plain,(![X]:(~cc1(X)|cd1(X))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[axiom_5])).
% 0.19/0.53  fof(c8,plain,(![X4]:(~cc1(X4)|cd1(X4))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c7])).
% 0.19/0.53  cnf(c9,plain,~cc1(X17)|cd1(X17),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c8])).
% 0.19/0.53  cnf(c38,plain,cd1(i2003_11_14_17_20_11330),inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c37, c9])).
% 0.19/0.53  cnf(c39,plain,~cc1(i2003_11_14_17_20_11330),inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c38, c13])).
% 0.19/0.53  cnf(c41,plain,$false,inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c39, c37])).
% 0.19/0.53  % SZS output end CNFRefutation
% 0.19/0.53  
% 0.19/0.53  % Initial clauses    : 12
% 0.19/0.53  % Processed clauses  : 13
% 0.19/0.53  % Factors computed   : 0
% 0.19/0.53  % Resolvents computed: 5
% 0.19/0.53  % Tautologies deleted: 0
% 0.19/0.53  % Forward subsumed   : 0
% 0.19/0.53  % Backward subsumed  : 0
% 0.19/0.53  % -------- CPU Time ---------
% 0.19/0.53  % User time          : 0.172 s
% 0.19/0.53  % System time        : 0.015 s
% 0.19/0.53  % Total time         : 0.187 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------