%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : KRS095+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:00:45 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.15s 0.64s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.15s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 12 ( 4 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 56 ( 13 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 25 ( 4 avg)
% Number of connectives : 70 ( 26 ~; 26 |; 14 &)
% ( 2 <=>; 2 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 17 ( 5 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 1 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 25 ( 1 sgn 12 !; 4 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(axiom_2,axiom,
! [X4] :
( cUnsatisfiable(X4)
<=> ( ! [X5,X6] :
( ( rr(X4,X6)
& rr(X4,X5) )
=> X5 = X6 )
& ? [X5,X6] :
( X5 != X6
& rr(X4,X6)
& rr(X4,X5) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_2) ).
fof(axiom_4,axiom,
cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_20_14253),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_4) ).
fof(c_0_2,plain,
! [X4] :
( cUnsatisfiable(X4)
<=> ( ! [X5,X6] :
( ( rr(X4,X6)
& rr(X4,X5) )
=> X5 = X6 )
& ? [X5,X6] :
( X5 != X6
& rr(X4,X6)
& rr(X4,X5) ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[axiom_2]) ).
fof(c_0_3,plain,
! [X29,X32,X33,X34,X35,X36] :
( ( cUnsatisfiable(X34)
| X35 = X36
| ~ rr(X34,X36)
| ~ rr(X34,X35)
| esk3_1(X34) != esk4_1(X34) )
& ( cUnsatisfiable(X34)
| X35 = X36
| ~ rr(X34,X36)
| ~ rr(X34,X35)
| rr(X34,esk4_1(X34)) )
& ( cUnsatisfiable(X34)
| X35 = X36
| ~ rr(X34,X36)
| ~ rr(X34,X35)
| rr(X34,esk3_1(X34)) )
& ( ~ cUnsatisfiable(X29)
| X32 = X33
| ~ rr(X29,X33)
| ~ rr(X29,X32) )
& ( ~ cUnsatisfiable(X29)
| esk1_1(X29) != esk2_1(X29) )
& ( ~ cUnsatisfiable(X29)
| rr(X29,esk2_1(X29)) )
& ( ~ cUnsatisfiable(X29)
| rr(X29,esk1_1(X29)) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_4,plain,
( ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1)
| ~ rr(X1,X3)
| ~ rr(X1,X2)
| X2 = X3 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,plain,
( ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1)
| rr(X1,esk2_1(X1)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
( ~ cUnsatisfiable(X2)
| ~ rr(X2,X1)
| X1 = esk2_1(X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1)
| rr(X1,esk1_1(X1)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1)
| esk1_1(X1) != esk2_1(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_20_14253),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[axiom_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
~ cUnsatisfiable(X1),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]),c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : KRS095+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.58 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.58 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.58 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.58 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.58 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.58 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.58 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.58 % DateTime : Sun Sep 20 22:56:24 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.58 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/0.58 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.62 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.10/0.62 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.64 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.15/0.64 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.64 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.64 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.64 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.64 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.64 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.64 % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 774890 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.64 % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.15/0.64 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.64 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.64 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.64 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.15/0.64 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.15/0.64 % Search class: FGHSF-FFSF11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.64 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.15/0.64 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.64 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.64 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S4d with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.64 % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.64 % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.64 % SubtermCWHack with pid 774903 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.64 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.15/0.64 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.64 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.64 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.64 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.15/0.64 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.15/0.64 % Search class: FGHSF-FFSF11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.64 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.15/0.64 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.64 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.15/0.64
% 0.15/0.64 % Proof found!
% 0.15/0.64 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.15/0.64 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.15/0.64 % Parsed axioms : 14
% 0.15/0.64 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.15/0.64 % Initial clauses : 22
% 0.15/0.64 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 10
% 0.15/0.64 % Initial clauses in saturation : 12
% 0.15/0.64 % Processed clauses : 12
% 0.15/0.64 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.15/0.64 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.64 % ...remaining for further processing : 12
% 0.15/0.64 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.15/0.64 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.15/0.64 % Backward-subsumed : 5
% 0.15/0.64 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.15/0.64 % Generated clauses : 7
% 0.15/0.64 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 5
% 0.15/0.64 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.64 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 2
% 0.15/0.64 % Paramodulations : 6
% 0.15/0.64 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.15/0.64 % NegExts : 0
% 0.15/0.64 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.15/0.64 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.15/0.64 % Total rewrite steps : 0
% 0.15/0.64 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.15/0.64 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.15/0.64 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.15/0.64 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.15/0.64 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.15/0.64 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.15/0.64 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.15/0.64 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.64 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.64 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.64 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.64 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.64 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.64 % Current number of processed clauses : 6
% 0.15/0.64 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 0
% 0.15/0.64 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.15/0.64 % Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.15/0.64 % Non-unit-clauses : 4
% 0.15/0.64 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 5
% 0.15/0.64 % ...number of literals in the above : 21
% 0.15/0.64 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.15/0.64 % Current number of archived clauses : 7
% 0.15/0.64 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 26
% 0.15/0.64 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 13
% 0.15/0.64 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 2
% 0.15/0.64 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 5
% 0.15/0.64 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.15/0.64 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.15/0.64 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.15/0.64 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.15/0.64 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.15/0.64 % Termbank termtop insertions : 1438
% 0.15/0.64 % Search garbage collected termcells : 343
% 0.15/0.64
% 0.15/0.64 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.64 % User time : 0.006 s
% 0.15/0.64 % System time : 0.004 s
% 0.15/0.64 % Total time : 0.009 s
% 0.15/0.64 % Maximum resident set size: 3644 pages
% 0.15/0.64
% 0.15/0.64 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.64 % User time : 0.011 s
% 0.15/0.64 % System time : 0.012 s
% 0.15/0.64 % Total time : 0.023 s
% 0.15/0.64 % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.15/0.64 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------