%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : CSE---1.7 % Problem : KRS096+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.1.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s % Computer : n018.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 300s % DateTime : Mon Jun 24 10:08:29 EDT 2024 % Result : Unsatisfiable 0.58s 0.68s % Output : CNFRefutation 0.58s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.03/0.14 % Problem : KRS096+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.1.0. % 0.03/0.14 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s % 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu % 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300 % 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Wed Jun 19 14:01:39 EDT 2024 % 0.14/0.36 % CPUTime : % 0.45/0.62 start to proof:theBenchmark % 0.58/0.67 %------------------------------------------- % 0.58/0.67 % File :CSE---1.7 % 0.58/0.67 % Problem :theBenchmark % 0.58/0.67 % Transform :cnf % 0.58/0.67 % Format :tptp:raw % 0.58/0.67 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s % 0.58/0.67 % 0.58/0.67 % Result :Theorem 0.010000s % 0.58/0.67 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.010000s % 0.58/0.67 %------------------------------------------- % 0.58/0.68 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % 0.58/0.68 % File : KRS096+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.1.0. % 0.58/0.68 % Domain : Knowledge Representation (Semantic Web) % 0.58/0.68 % Problem : DL Test: heinsohn2.2 % 0.58/0.68 % Version : Especial. % 0.58/0.68 % English : Tbox tests from [HK+94] % 0.58/0.68 % 0.58/0.68 % Refs : [HK+94] Heinsohn et al. (1994), An Empirical Analysis of Termi % 0.58/0.68 % : [Bec03] Bechhofer (2003), Email to G. Sutcliffe % 0.58/0.68 % : [TR+04] Tsarkov et al. (2004), Using Vampire to Reason with OW % 0.58/0.68 % Source : [Bec03] % 0.58/0.68 % Names : inconsistent_description-logic-Manifest106 [Bec03] % 0.58/0.68 % 0.58/0.68 % Status : Unsatisfiable % 0.58/0.68 % Rating : 0.00 v3.1.0 % 0.58/0.68 % Syntax : Number of formulae : 14 ( 1 unt; 0 def) % 0.58/0.68 % Number of atoms : 42 ( 10 equ) % 0.58/0.68 % Maximal formula atoms : 8 ( 3 avg) % 0.58/0.68 % Number of connectives : 31 ( 3 ~; 0 |; 15 &) % 0.58/0.68 % ( 2 <=>; 11 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>) % 0.58/0.68 % Maximal formula depth : 9 ( 5 avg) % 0.58/0.68 % Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg) % 0.58/0.68 % Number of predicates : 9 ( 8 usr; 0 prp; 1-2 aty) % 0.58/0.68 % Number of functors : 1 ( 1 usr; 1 con; 0-0 aty) % 0.58/0.68 % Number of variables : 28 ( 26 !; 2 ?) % 0.58/0.68 % SPC : FOF_UNS_RFO_SEQ % 0.58/0.68 % 0.58/0.68 % Comments : Sean Bechhofer says there are some errors in the encoding of % 0.58/0.68 % datatypes, so this problem may not be perfect. At least it's % 0.58/0.68 % still representative of the type of reasoning required for OWL. % 0.58/0.68 % : Tests incoherency caused by number restrictions % 0.58/0.68 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % 0.58/0.68 fof(cUnsatisfiable_substitution_1,axiom, % 0.58/0.68 ! [A,B] : % 0.58/0.68 ( ( A = B % 0.58/0.68 & cUnsatisfiable(A) ) % 0.58/0.68 => cUnsatisfiable(B) ) ). % 0.58/0.68 % 0.58/0.68 fof(cc_substitution_1,axiom, % 0.58/0.68 ! [A,B] : % 0.58/0.68 ( ( A = B % 0.58/0.68 & cc(A) ) % 0.58/0.68 => cc(B) ) ). % 0.58/0.68 % 0.58/0.68 fof(cd_substitution_1,axiom, % 0.58/0.68 ! [A,B] : % 0.58/0.68 ( ( A = B % 0.58/0.68 & cd(A) ) % 0.58/0.68 => cd(B) ) ). % 0.58/0.68 % 0.58/0.68 fof(cowlNothing_substitution_1,axiom, % 0.58/0.68 ! [A,B] : % 0.58/0.68 ( ( A = B % 0.58/0.68 & cowlNothing(A) ) % 0.58/0.68 => cowlNothing(B) ) ). % 0.58/0.68 % 0.58/0.68 fof(cowlThing_substitution_1,axiom, % 0.58/0.68 ! [A,B] : % 0.58/0.68 ( ( A = B % 0.58/0.68 & cowlThing(A) ) % 0.58/0.68 => cowlThing(B) ) ). % 0.58/0.68 % 0.58/0.68 fof(rr_substitution_1,axiom, % 0.58/0.68 ! [A,B,C] : % 0.58/0.68 ( ( A = B % 0.58/0.68 & rr(A,C) ) % 0.58/0.68 => rr(B,C) ) ). % 0.58/0.68 % 0.58/0.68 fof(rr_substitution_2,axiom, % 0.58/0.68 ! [A,B,C] : % 0.58/0.68 ( ( A = B % 0.58/0.68 & rr(C,A) ) % 0.58/0.68 => rr(C,B) ) ). % 0.58/0.68 % 0.58/0.68 fof(xsd_integer_substitution_1,axiom, % 0.58/0.68 ! [A,B] : % 0.58/0.68 ( ( A = B % 0.58/0.68 & xsd_integer(A) ) % 0.58/0.68 => xsd_integer(B) ) ). % 0.58/0.68 % 0.58/0.68 fof(xsd_string_substitution_1,axiom, % 0.58/0.68 ! [A,B] : % 0.58/0.68 ( ( A = B % 0.58/0.68 & xsd_string(A) ) % 0.58/0.68 => xsd_string(B) ) ). % 0.58/0.68 % 0.58/0.68 %----Thing and Nothing % 0.58/0.68 fof(axiom_0,axiom, % 0.58/0.68 ! [X] : % 0.58/0.68 ( cowlThing(X) % 0.58/0.68 & ~ cowlNothing(X) ) ). % 0.58/0.68 % 0.58/0.68 %----String and Integer disjoint % 0.58/0.68 fof(axiom_1,axiom, % 0.58/0.68 ! [X] : % 0.58/0.68 ( xsd_string(X) % 0.58/0.68 <=> ~ xsd_integer(X) ) ). % 0.58/0.68 % 0.58/0.68 %----Equality cUnsatisfiable % 0.58/0.68 fof(axiom_2,axiom, % 0.58/0.68 ! [X] : % 0.58/0.68 ( cUnsatisfiable(X) % 0.58/0.68 <=> ( ? [Y] : % 0.58/0.68 ( rr(X,Y) % 0.58/0.68 & cc(Y) ) % 0.58/0.68 & ? [Y] : % 0.58/0.68 ( rr(X,Y) % 0.58/0.68 & cd(Y) ) % 0.58/0.68 & ! [Y0,Y1] : % 0.58/0.68 ( ( rr(X,Y0) % 0.58/0.68 & rr(X,Y1) ) % 0.58/0.68 => Y0 = Y1 ) ) ) ). % 0.58/0.68 % 0.58/0.68 %----Super cc % 0.58/0.68 fof(axiom_3,axiom, % 0.58/0.68 ! [X] : % 0.58/0.68 ( cc(X) % 0.58/0.68 => ~ cd(X) ) ). % 0.58/0.68 % 0.58/0.68 %----i2003_11_14_17_20_18265 % 0.58/0.68 fof(axiom_4,axiom, % 0.58/0.68 cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_20_18265) ). % 0.58/0.68 % 0.58/0.68 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % 0.58/0.68 %------------------------------------------- % 0.58/0.68 % Proof found % 0.58/0.68 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark % 0.58/0.68 % SZS output start Proof % 0.58/0.68 %ClaNum:28(EqnAxiom:15) % 0.58/0.68 %VarNum:51(SingletonVarNum:20) % 0.58/0.68 %MaxLitNum:6 % 0.58/0.68 %MaxfuncDepth:1 % 0.58/0.68 %SharedTerms:2 % 0.58/0.68 [16]P1(a1) % 0.58/0.68 [17]~P2(x171) % 0.58/0.68 [18]P7(x181)+P5(x181) % 0.58/0.68 [19]~P4(x191)+~P3(x191) % 0.58/0.68 [20]~P7(x201)+~P5(x201) % 0.58/0.68 [21]~P1(x211)+P3(f2(x211)) % 0.58/0.68 [22]~P1(x221)+P4(f3(x221)) % 0.58/0.68 [23]~P1(x231)+P6(x231,f2(x231)) % 0.58/0.68 [24]~P1(x241)+P6(x241,f3(x241)) % 0.58/0.68 [25]~P6(x253,x252)+~P6(x253,x251)+E(x251,x252)+~P1(x253) % 0.58/0.68 [26]~P6(x261,x263)+~P6(x261,x262)+P1(x261)+~P3(x262)+~P4(x263)+~E(f4(x261),f5(x261)) % 0.58/0.68 [27]~P6(x271,x273)+~P6(x271,x272)+P1(x271)+~P3(x272)+~P4(x273)+P6(x271,f5(x271)) % 0.58/0.68 [28]~P6(x281,x283)+~P6(x281,x282)+P1(x281)+~P3(x282)+~P4(x283)+P6(x281,f4(x281)) % 0.58/0.68 %EqnAxiom % 0.58/0.68 [1]E(x11,x11) % 0.58/0.68 [2]E(x22,x21)+~E(x21,x22) % 0.58/0.68 [3]E(x31,x33)+~E(x31,x32)+~E(x32,x33) % 0.58/0.68 [4]~E(x41,x42)+E(f2(x41),f2(x42)) % 0.58/0.68 [5]~E(x51,x52)+E(f3(x51),f3(x52)) % 0.58/0.68 [6]~E(x61,x62)+E(f4(x61),f4(x62)) % 0.58/0.68 [7]~E(x71,x72)+E(f5(x71),f5(x72)) % 0.58/0.68 [8]~P1(x81)+P1(x82)+~E(x81,x82) % 0.58/0.68 [9]~P2(x91)+P2(x92)+~E(x91,x92) % 0.58/0.68 [10]~P5(x101)+P5(x102)+~E(x101,x102) % 0.58/0.68 [11]~P7(x111)+P7(x112)+~E(x111,x112) % 0.58/0.68 [12]~P3(x121)+P3(x122)+~E(x121,x122) % 0.58/0.68 [13]~P4(x131)+P4(x132)+~E(x131,x132) % 0.58/0.68 [14]P6(x142,x143)+~E(x141,x142)+~P6(x141,x143) % 0.58/0.68 [15]P6(x153,x152)+~E(x151,x152)+~P6(x153,x151) % 0.58/0.68 % 0.58/0.68 %------------------------------------------- % 0.58/0.68 cnf(30,plain, % 0.58/0.68 (~P4(f2(a1))), % 0.58/0.68 inference(scs_inference,[],[16,19,21])). % 0.58/0.68 cnf(31,plain, % 0.58/0.68 (~E(a1,x311)+P4(f3(x311))), % 0.58/0.68 inference(scs_inference,[],[16,22,8])). % 0.58/0.68 cnf(32,plain, % 0.58/0.68 (P4(f3(a1))), % 0.58/0.68 inference(equality_inference,[],[31])). % 0.58/0.68 cnf(35,plain, % 0.58/0.68 (~E(a1,x351)+P6(x351,f2(x351))), % 0.58/0.68 inference(scs_inference,[],[16,23,8])). % 0.58/0.68 cnf(36,plain, % 0.58/0.68 (P6(a1,f2(a1))), % 0.58/0.68 inference(equality_inference,[],[35])). % 0.58/0.68 cnf(41,plain, % 0.58/0.68 (~E(a1,x411)+P6(x411,f3(x411))), % 0.58/0.68 inference(scs_inference,[],[16,24,8])). % 0.58/0.68 cnf(42,plain, % 0.58/0.68 (P6(a1,f3(a1))), % 0.58/0.68 inference(equality_inference,[],[41])). % 0.58/0.68 cnf(55,plain, % 0.58/0.68 (~E(f2(a1),f3(a1))), % 0.58/0.68 inference(scs_inference,[],[32,30,13,2])). % 0.58/0.68 cnf(56,plain, % 0.58/0.68 ($false), % 0.58/0.69 inference(scs_inference,[],[36,42,55,16,25]), % 0.58/0.69 ['proof']). % 0.58/0.69 % SZS output end Proof % 0.58/0.69 % Total time :0.010000s %------------------------------------------------------------------------------