%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : CSE---1.7 % Problem : KRS100+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.1.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s % Computer : n032.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 300s % DateTime : Mon Jun 24 10:08:30 EDT 2024 % Result : Unsatisfiable 0.12s 0.50s % Output : CNFRefutation 0.12s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.00/0.09 % Problem : KRS100+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.1.0. % 0.00/0.09 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s % 0.08/0.29 % Computer : n032.cluster.edu % 0.08/0.29 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.08/0.29 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.08/0.29 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.08/0.29 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.08/0.29 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.08/0.29 % WCLimit : 300 % 0.08/0.29 % DateTime : Wed Jun 19 13:49:23 EDT 2024 % 0.08/0.29 % CPUTime : % 0.12/0.47 start to proof:theBenchmark % 0.12/0.49 %------------------------------------------- % 0.12/0.49 % File :CSE---1.7 % 0.12/0.49 % Problem :theBenchmark % 0.12/0.49 % Transform :cnf % 0.12/0.49 % Format :tptp:raw % 0.12/0.49 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s % 0.12/0.49 % 0.12/0.49 % Result :Theorem 0.000000s % 0.12/0.49 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.000000s % 0.12/0.49 %------------------------------------------- % 0.12/0.50 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % 0.12/0.50 % File : KRS100+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.1.0. % 0.12/0.50 % Domain : Knowledge Representation (Semantic Web) % 0.12/0.50 % Problem : DL Test: heinsohn4.1 % 0.12/0.50 % Version : Especial. % 0.12/0.50 % English : Tbox tests from [HK+94] % 0.12/0.50 % 0.12/0.50 % Refs : [HK+94] Heinsohn et al. (1994), An Empirical Analysis of Termi % 0.12/0.50 % : [Bec03] Bechhofer (2003), Email to G. Sutcliffe % 0.12/0.50 % : [TR+04] Tsarkov et al. (2004), Using Vampire to Reason with OW % 0.12/0.50 % Source : [Bec03] % 0.12/0.50 % Names : inconsistent_description-logic-Manifest110 [Bec03] % 0.12/0.50 % 0.12/0.50 % Status : Unsatisfiable % 0.12/0.50 % Rating : 0.00 v6.4.0, 0.25 v6.3.0, 0.00 v3.1.0 % 0.12/0.50 % Syntax : Number of formulae : 5 ( 1 unt; 0 def) % 0.12/0.50 % Number of atoms : 15 ( 0 equ) % 0.12/0.50 % Maximal formula atoms : 8 ( 3 avg) % 0.12/0.50 % Number of connectives : 15 ( 5 ~; 1 |; 4 &) % 0.12/0.50 % ( 2 <=>; 3 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>) % 0.12/0.50 % Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 4 avg) % 0.12/0.50 % Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg) % 0.12/0.50 % Number of predicates : 9 ( 9 usr; 0 prp; 1-2 aty) % 0.12/0.50 % Number of functors : 1 ( 1 usr; 1 con; 0-0 aty) % 0.12/0.50 % Number of variables : 7 ( 6 !; 1 ?) % 0.12/0.50 % SPC : FOF_UNS_RFO_NEQ % 0.12/0.50 % 0.12/0.50 % Comments : Sean Bechhofer says there are some errors in the encoding of % 0.12/0.50 % datatypes, so this problem may not be perfect. At least it's % 0.12/0.50 % still representative of the type of reasoning required for OWL. % 0.12/0.50 % : Tests role restrictions % 0.12/0.50 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % 0.12/0.50 %----Thing and Nothing % 0.12/0.50 fof(axiom_0,axiom, % 0.12/0.50 ! [X] : % 0.12/0.50 ( cowlThing(X) % 0.12/0.50 & ~ cowlNothing(X) ) ). % 0.12/0.50 % 0.12/0.50 %----String and Integer disjoint % 0.12/0.50 fof(axiom_1,axiom, % 0.12/0.50 ! [X] : % 0.12/0.50 ( xsd_string(X) % 0.12/0.50 <=> ~ xsd_integer(X) ) ). % 0.12/0.50 % 0.12/0.50 %----Equality cUnsatisfiable % 0.12/0.50 fof(axiom_2,axiom, % 0.12/0.50 ! [X] : % 0.12/0.50 ( cUnsatisfiable(X) % 0.12/0.50 <=> ( ! [Y] : % 0.12/0.50 ( rr(X,Y) % 0.12/0.50 => ( ce(Y) % 0.12/0.50 | ~ cd(Y) ) ) % 0.12/0.50 & ! [Y] : % 0.12/0.50 ( rr(X,Y) % 0.12/0.50 => cd(Y) ) % 0.12/0.50 & ? [Y] : % 0.12/0.50 ( rr(X,Y) % 0.12/0.50 & ~ ce(Y) ) ) ) ). % 0.12/0.50 % 0.12/0.50 %----Super cc % 0.12/0.50 fof(axiom_3,axiom, % 0.12/0.50 ! [X] : % 0.12/0.50 ( cc(X) % 0.12/0.50 => ~ cd(X) ) ). % 0.12/0.50 % 0.12/0.50 %----i2003_11_14_17_20_32704 % 0.12/0.50 fof(axiom_4,axiom, % 0.12/0.50 cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_20_32704) ). % 0.12/0.50 % 0.12/0.50 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % 0.12/0.50 %------------------------------------------- % 0.12/0.50 % Proof found % 0.12/0.50 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark % 0.12/0.50 % SZS output start Proof % 0.12/0.50 %ClaNum:15(EqnAxiom:0) % 0.12/0.50 %VarNum:62(SingletonVarNum:22) % 0.12/0.50 %MaxLitNum:5 % 0.12/0.50 %MaxfuncDepth:1 % 0.12/0.50 %SharedTerms:2 % 0.12/0.50 [1]P1(a1) % 0.12/0.50 [2]~P2(x21) % 0.12/0.50 [3]P7(x31)+P6(x31) % 0.12/0.50 [4]~P7(x41)+~P6(x41) % 0.12/0.50 [5]~P4(x51)+~P3(x51) % 0.12/0.50 [6]~P1(x61)+~P5(f2(x61)) % 0.12/0.50 [7]~P1(x71)+P8(x71,f2(x71)) % 0.12/0.50 [8]~P8(x82,x81)+P3(x81)+~P1(x82) % 0.12/0.50 [9]~P3(x91)+~P8(x92,x91)+P5(x91)+~P1(x92) % 0.12/0.50 [10]~P8(x101,x102)+P1(x101)+P5(x102)+P3(f3(x101))+~P3(f4(x101)) % 0.12/0.50 [11]~P8(x111,x112)+P1(x111)+P5(x112)+P8(x111,f4(x111))+P3(f3(x111)) % 0.12/0.50 [12]~P8(x121,x122)+P1(x121)+P5(x122)+~P5(f3(x121))+~P3(f4(x121)) % 0.12/0.50 [13]~P8(x131,x132)+P1(x131)+P5(x132)+P8(x131,f3(x131))+~P3(f4(x131)) % 0.12/0.50 [14]~P8(x141,x142)+P1(x141)+P5(x142)+P8(x141,f4(x141))+~P5(f3(x141)) % 0.12/0.50 [15]~P8(x151,x152)+P1(x151)+P5(x152)+P8(x151,f3(x151))+P8(x151,f4(x151)) % 0.12/0.50 %EqnAxiom % 0.12/0.50 % 0.12/0.50 %------------------------------------------- % 0.12/0.50 cnf(17,plain, % 0.12/0.50 (~P3(f2(a1))+~P8(a1,f2(a1))), % 0.12/0.50 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,6,9])). % 0.12/0.50 cnf(18,plain, % 0.12/0.50 (~P3(f2(a1))), % 0.12/0.50 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,7,17])). % 0.12/0.50 cnf(21,plain, % 0.12/0.50 ($false), % 0.12/0.50 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,18,8,7]), % 0.12/0.50 ['proof']). % 0.12/0.50 % SZS output end Proof % 0.12/0.50 % Total time :0.000000s %------------------------------------------------------------------------------