↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : KRS100+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 07:46:02 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.08s 0.38s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.08s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   18 (   7 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  106 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   41 (   5 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  139 (  51   ~;  59   |;  26   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   17 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   1 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   41 (   0 sgn  29   !;   4   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(axiom_2,axiom,
    ! [X] :
      ( cUnsatisfiable(X)
    <=> ( ? [Y] :
            ( ~ ce(Y)
            & rr(X,Y) )
        & ! [Y] :
            ( rr(X,Y)
           => cd(Y) )
        & ! [Y] :
            ( rr(X,Y)
           => ( ~ cd(Y)
              | ce(Y) ) ) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',axiom_2) ).

fof(nnf_3,plain,
    ! [X] :
      ( ( ! [Y] :
            ( ce(Y)
            | ~ rr(X,Y) )
        | ? [X4] :
            ( ~ cd(X4)
            & rr(X,X4) )
        | ? [X3] :
            ( cd(X3)
            & ~ ce(X3)
            & rr(X,X3) )
        | cUnsatisfiable(X) )
      & ( ( ? [X2] :
              ( ~ ce(X2)
              & rr(X,X2) )
          & ! [X1] :
              ( cd(X1)
              | ~ rr(X,X1) )
          & ! [X0] :
              ( ~ cd(X0)
              | ce(X0)
              | ~ rr(X,X0) ) )
        | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[axiom_2]) ).

fof(sk_axiom_2_sk,plain,
    ! [X] :
      ( ( ! [Y] :
            ( ce(Y)
            | ~ rr(X,Y) )
        | ( ~ cd(sK2(X))
          & rr(X,sK2(X)) )
        | ( cd(sK1(X))
          & ~ ce(sK1(X))
          & rr(X,sK1(X)) )
        | cUnsatisfiable(X) )
      & ( ( ~ ce(sK0(X))
          & rr(X,sK0(X))
          & ! [X1] :
              ( cd(X1)
              | ~ rr(X,X1) )
          & ! [X0] :
              ( ~ cd(X0)
              | ce(X0)
              | ~ rr(X,X0) ) )
        | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2]),skolemize(X2,sK0(X)),skolemize(X3,sK1(X)),skolemize(X4,sK2(X))],[nnf_3]) ).

fof(sk_axiom_2,plain,
    ( ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] :
        ( ce(VAR_1)
        | ~ rr(VAR_0,VAR_1)
        | ~ cd(sK2(VAR_0))
        | cd(sK1(VAR_0))
        | cUnsatisfiable(VAR_0) )
    & ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] :
        ( ce(VAR_1)
        | ~ rr(VAR_0,VAR_1)
        | rr(VAR_0,sK2(VAR_0))
        | cd(sK1(VAR_0))
        | cUnsatisfiable(VAR_0) )
    & ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] :
        ( ce(VAR_1)
        | ~ rr(VAR_0,VAR_1)
        | ~ cd(sK2(VAR_0))
        | ~ ce(sK1(VAR_0))
        | cUnsatisfiable(VAR_0) )
    & ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] :
        ( ce(VAR_1)
        | ~ rr(VAR_0,VAR_1)
        | rr(VAR_0,sK2(VAR_0))
        | ~ ce(sK1(VAR_0))
        | cUnsatisfiable(VAR_0) )
    & ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] :
        ( ce(VAR_1)
        | ~ rr(VAR_0,VAR_1)
        | ~ cd(sK2(VAR_0))
        | rr(VAR_0,sK1(VAR_0))
        | cUnsatisfiable(VAR_0) )
    & ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] :
        ( ce(VAR_1)
        | ~ rr(VAR_0,VAR_1)
        | rr(VAR_0,sK2(VAR_0))
        | rr(VAR_0,sK1(VAR_0))
        | cUnsatisfiable(VAR_0) )
    & ! [VAR_0] :
        ( ~ ce(sK0(VAR_0))
        | ~ cUnsatisfiable(VAR_0) )
    & ! [VAR_0] :
        ( rr(VAR_0,sK0(VAR_0))
        | ~ cUnsatisfiable(VAR_0) )
    & ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] :
        ( cd(VAR_1)
        | ~ rr(VAR_0,VAR_1)
        | ~ cUnsatisfiable(VAR_0) )
    & ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] :
        ( ~ cd(VAR_1)
        | ce(VAR_1)
        | ~ rr(VAR_0,VAR_1)
        | ~ cUnsatisfiable(VAR_0) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[sk_axiom_2_sk]) ).

cnf(c_7,plain,
    ( ~ ce(sK0(A))
    | ~ cUnsatisfiable(A) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_axiom_2]) ).

fof(axiom_4,axiom,
    cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_20_32704),
    file('theBenchmark.p',axiom_4) ).

cnf(c_14,plain,
    cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_20_32704),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[axiom_4]) ).

cnf(c_15,plain,
    ( rr(A,sK0(A))
    | ~ cUnsatisfiable(A) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_axiom_2]) ).

cnf(c_16,plain,
    ( cd(B)
    | ~ rr(A,B)
    | ~ cUnsatisfiable(A) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_axiom_2]) ).

cnf(c_17,plain,
    ( ~ cd(B)
    | ce(B)
    | ~ rr(A,B)
    | ~ cUnsatisfiable(A) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_axiom_2]) ).

cnf(c_24,plain,
    ~ ce(sK0(i2003_11_14_17_20_32704)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_7,c_14]) ).

cnf(c_31,plain,
    rr(i2003_11_14_17_20_32704,sK0(i2003_11_14_17_20_32704)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_15,c_14]) ).

cnf(c_38,plain,
    ( cd(A)
    | ~ rr(i2003_11_14_17_20_32704,A) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_16,c_14]) ).

cnf(c_45,plain,
    ( ~ cd(A)
    | ce(A)
    | ~ rr(i2003_11_14_17_20_32704,A) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_17,c_14]) ).

cnf(c_74,plain,
    cd(sK0(i2003_11_14_17_20_32704)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_38,c_31]) ).

cnf(c_76,plain,
    ( ~ cd(sK0(i2003_11_14_17_20_32704))
    | ce(sK0(i2003_11_14_17_20_32704)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_45,c_31]) ).

cnf(c_77,plain,
    ~ cd(sK0(i2003_11_14_17_20_32704)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_24,c_76]) ).

cnf(c_75,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_74,c_77]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : KRS100+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.08/0.36  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/0.36  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 19:40:18 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.08/0.36  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.08/0.36  % Process 3599464 was started by sandbox on n020,
% 0.08/0.36  % Fri Sep 25 19:40:18 2026
% 0.08/0.36  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.08/0.37  
% 0.08/0.37  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.08/0.38  
% 0.08/0.38  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.08/0.38  
% 0.08/0.38  % Proof 1 at 0.01 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.08/0.38  % Length of proof is 12.
% 0.08/0.38  % Level of proof is 4.
% 0.08/0.38  % Maximum clause weight is 7.000.
% 0.08/0.38  % Given clauses 22.
% 0.08/0.38  
% 0.08/0.38  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------