↑ Up

SPASS---3.9.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : KRS100+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 03:30:33 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.21s 0.46s
% Output   : Refutation 0.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   10 (   4 unt;   0 nHn;  10 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   21 (   0 equ;  13 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   3 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    0 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(2,axiom,
    cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_20_32704),
    file('KRS100+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(7,axiom,
    ~ ce(skf3(u)),
    file('KRS100+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(10,axiom,
    ( ~ cUnsatisfiable(u)
    | rr(u,skf3(u)) ),
    file('KRS100+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(11,axiom,
    ( ~ cUnsatisfiable(u)
    | ~ rr(u,v)
    | cd(v) ),
    file('KRS100+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(12,axiom,
    ( ~ cd(u)
    | ~ cUnsatisfiable(v)
    | ~ rr(v,u)
    | ce(u) ),
    file('KRS100+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(15,plain,
    ( ~ cUnsatisfiable(u)
    | ~ rr(u,v)
    | ce(v) ),
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[12,11]),
    [iquote('0:MRR:12.0,11.2')] ).

cnf(29,plain,
    ( ~ cUnsatisfiable(u)
    | ~ cUnsatisfiable(u)
    | ce(skf3(u)) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[10,15]),
    [iquote('0:Res:10.1,15.1')] ).

cnf(30,plain,
    ( ~ cUnsatisfiable(u)
    | ce(skf3(u)) ),
    inference(obv,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[29]),
    [iquote('0:Obv:29.0')] ).

cnf(31,plain,
    ~ cUnsatisfiable(u),
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[30,7]),
    [iquote('0:MRR:30.1,7.0')] ).

cnf(32,plain,
    $false,
    inference(unc,[status(thm)],[31,2]),
    [iquote('0:UnC:31.0,2.0')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : KRS100+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.14/0.34  % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.34  % DateTime : Tue Jun  7 14:49:53 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.21/0.46  
% 0.21/0.46  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.21/0.46  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.21/0.46  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.21/0.46  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.21/0.46  SPASS derived 2 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 16 clauses.
% 0.21/0.46  SPASS allocated 97758 KBytes.
% 0.21/0.46  SPASS spent	0:00:00.10 on the problem.
% 0.21/0.46  		0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 0.21/0.46  		0:00:00.04 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.21/0.46  		0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.21/0.46  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.21/0.46  		0:00:00.00 for the reduction.
% 0.21/0.46  
% 0.21/0.46  
% 0.21/0.46  Here is a proof with depth 1, length 10 :
% 0.21/0.46  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.46  Formulae used in the proof : axiom_4 axiom_2
% 0.21/0.46  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------