↑ Up

SuperZenon---0.0.1.UNS-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SuperZenon---0.0.1
% Problem  : KRS100+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_super_zenon -p0 -itptp -om -max-time %d %s

% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 03:31:54 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.39s
% Output   : Proof 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : KRS100+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command  : run_super_zenon -p0 -itptp -om -max-time %d %s
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.33  % DateTime : Tue Jun  7 14:23:21 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.39  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.19/0.39  (* PROOF-FOUND *)
% 0.19/0.39  (* BEGIN-PROOF *)
% 0.19/0.39  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.19/0.39  1. (rr (i2003_11_14_17_20_32704) T_0) (-. (rr (i2003_11_14_17_20_32704) T_0))   ### Axiom
% 0.19/0.39  2. (rr (i2003_11_14_17_20_32704) T_0) (-. (rr (i2003_11_14_17_20_32704) T_0))   ### Axiom
% 0.19/0.39  3. (-. (ce T_0)) (ce T_0)   ### Axiom
% 0.19/0.39  4. (cd T_0) (-. (cd T_0))   ### Axiom
% 0.19/0.39  5. ((rr (i2003_11_14_17_20_32704) T_0) => ((ce T_0) \/ (-. (cd T_0)))) (cd T_0) (-. (ce T_0)) (rr (i2003_11_14_17_20_32704) T_0)   ### DisjTree 2 3 4
% 0.19/0.39  6. (All Y, ((rr (i2003_11_14_17_20_32704) Y) => ((ce Y) \/ (-. (cd Y))))) (rr (i2003_11_14_17_20_32704) T_0) (-. (ce T_0)) (cd T_0)   ### All 5
% 0.19/0.39  7. ((rr (i2003_11_14_17_20_32704) T_0) => (cd T_0)) (-. (ce T_0)) (All Y, ((rr (i2003_11_14_17_20_32704) Y) => ((ce Y) \/ (-. (cd Y))))) (rr (i2003_11_14_17_20_32704) T_0)   ### Imply 1 6
% 0.19/0.39  8. (All Y, ((rr (i2003_11_14_17_20_32704) Y) => (cd Y))) (rr (i2003_11_14_17_20_32704) T_0) (All Y, ((rr (i2003_11_14_17_20_32704) Y) => ((ce Y) \/ (-. (cd Y))))) (-. (ce T_0))   ### All 7
% 0.19/0.39  9. ((rr (i2003_11_14_17_20_32704) T_0) /\ (-. (ce T_0))) (All Y, ((rr (i2003_11_14_17_20_32704) Y) => ((ce Y) \/ (-. (cd Y))))) (All Y, ((rr (i2003_11_14_17_20_32704) Y) => (cd Y)))   ### And 8
% 0.19/0.39  10. (Ex Y, ((rr (i2003_11_14_17_20_32704) Y) /\ (-. (ce Y)))) (All Y, ((rr (i2003_11_14_17_20_32704) Y) => (cd Y))) (All Y, ((rr (i2003_11_14_17_20_32704) Y) => ((ce Y) \/ (-. (cd Y)))))   ### Exists 9
% 0.19/0.39  11. ((All Y, ((rr (i2003_11_14_17_20_32704) Y) => ((ce Y) \/ (-. (cd Y))))) /\ ((All Y, ((rr (i2003_11_14_17_20_32704) Y) => (cd Y))) /\ (Ex Y, ((rr (i2003_11_14_17_20_32704) Y) /\ (-. (ce Y))))))   ### ConjTree 10
% 0.19/0.39  12. (cUnsatisfiable (i2003_11_14_17_20_32704))   ### Definition-Pseudo(cUnsatisfiable) 11
% 0.19/0.39  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.19/0.39  (* END-PROOF *)
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------