%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : CSE---1.7 % Problem : KRS101+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.1.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s % Computer : n002.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 300s % DateTime : Mon Jun 24 10:08:30 EDT 2024 % Result : Unsatisfiable 0.55s 0.60s % Output : CNFRefutation 0.55s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.11/0.12 % Problem : KRS101+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.1.0. % 0.11/0.12 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s % 0.11/0.33 % Computer : n002.cluster.edu % 0.11/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.11/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.11/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.11/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.11/0.33 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.11/0.33 % WCLimit : 300 % 0.11/0.33 % DateTime : Wed Jun 19 14:35:09 EDT 2024 % 0.18/0.33 % CPUTime : % 0.19/0.52 start to proof:theBenchmark % 0.53/0.59 %------------------------------------------- % 0.53/0.59 % File :CSE---1.7 % 0.53/0.59 % Problem :theBenchmark % 0.53/0.59 % Transform :cnf % 0.53/0.59 % Format :tptp:raw % 0.53/0.59 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s % 0.53/0.59 % 0.53/0.59 % Result :Theorem 0.030000s % 0.53/0.59 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.030000s % 0.53/0.59 %------------------------------------------- % 0.53/0.59 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % 0.53/0.59 % File : KRS101+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.1.0. % 0.53/0.59 % Domain : Knowledge Representation (Semantic Web) % 0.53/0.59 % Problem : DL Test: heinsohn4.2 % 0.53/0.59 % Version : Especial. % 0.53/0.59 % English : Tbox tests from [HK+94] % 0.53/0.59 % 0.53/0.59 % Refs : [HK+94] Heinsohn et al. (1994), An Empirical Analysis of Termi % 0.53/0.59 % : [Bec03] Bechhofer (2003), Email to G. Sutcliffe % 0.53/0.59 % : [TR+04] Tsarkov et al. (2004), Using Vampire to Reason with OW % 0.53/0.59 % Source : [Bec03] % 0.53/0.59 % Names : inconsistent_description-logic-Manifest111 [Bec03] % 0.53/0.59 % 0.53/0.59 % Status : Unsatisfiable % 0.53/0.59 % Rating : 0.00 v3.1.0 % 0.53/0.59 % Syntax : Number of formulae : 16 ( 1 unt; 0 def) % 0.53/0.59 % Number of atoms : 52 ( 13 equ) % 0.53/0.59 % Maximal formula atoms : 12 ( 3 avg) % 0.53/0.59 % Number of connectives : 42 ( 6 ~; 1 |; 18 &) % 0.53/0.59 % ( 2 <=>; 15 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>) % 0.53/0.59 % Maximal formula depth : 14 ( 5 avg) % 0.53/0.59 % Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg) % 0.53/0.59 % Number of predicates : 10 ( 9 usr; 0 prp; 1-2 aty) % 0.53/0.59 % Number of functors : 1 ( 1 usr; 1 con; 0-0 aty) % 0.53/0.59 % Number of variables : 37 ( 34 !; 3 ?) % 0.53/0.59 % SPC : FOF_UNS_RFO_SEQ % 0.53/0.59 % 0.53/0.59 % Comments : Sean Bechhofer says there are some errors in the encoding of % 0.53/0.59 % datatypes, so this problem may not be perfect. At least it's % 0.53/0.59 % still representative of the type of reasoning required for OWL. % 0.53/0.59 % : Tests role restrictions % 0.53/0.59 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % 0.53/0.59 fof(cUnsatisfiable_substitution_1,axiom, % 0.53/0.59 ! [A,B] : % 0.53/0.59 ( ( A = B % 0.53/0.59 & cUnsatisfiable(A) ) % 0.53/0.59 => cUnsatisfiable(B) ) ). % 0.53/0.59 % 0.53/0.59 fof(cc_substitution_1,axiom, % 0.53/0.59 ! [A,B] : % 0.53/0.59 ( ( A = B % 0.53/0.59 & cc(A) ) % 0.53/0.59 => cc(B) ) ). % 0.53/0.59 % 0.53/0.59 fof(cd_substitution_1,axiom, % 0.53/0.59 ! [A,B] : % 0.53/0.60 ( ( A = B % 0.53/0.60 & cd(A) ) % 0.53/0.60 => cd(B) ) ). % 0.53/0.60 % 0.53/0.60 fof(cowlNothing_substitution_1,axiom, % 0.53/0.60 ! [A,B] : % 0.53/0.60 ( ( A = B % 0.53/0.60 & cowlNothing(A) ) % 0.53/0.60 => cowlNothing(B) ) ). % 0.53/0.60 % 0.53/0.60 fof(cowlThing_substitution_1,axiom, % 0.53/0.60 ! [A,B] : % 0.53/0.60 ( ( A = B % 0.53/0.60 & cowlThing(A) ) % 0.53/0.60 => cowlThing(B) ) ). % 0.53/0.60 % 0.53/0.60 fof(rr_substitution_1,axiom, % 0.53/0.60 ! [A,B,C] : % 0.53/0.60 ( ( A = B % 0.53/0.60 & rr(A,C) ) % 0.53/0.60 => rr(B,C) ) ). % 0.53/0.60 % 0.53/0.60 fof(rr_substitution_2,axiom, % 0.53/0.60 ! [A,B,C] : % 0.53/0.60 ( ( A = B % 0.53/0.60 & rr(C,A) ) % 0.53/0.60 => rr(C,B) ) ). % 0.53/0.60 % 0.53/0.60 fof(rs_substitution_1,axiom, % 0.53/0.60 ! [A,B,C] : % 0.53/0.60 ( ( A = B % 0.53/0.60 & rs(A,C) ) % 0.53/0.60 => rs(B,C) ) ). % 0.53/0.60 % 0.53/0.60 fof(rs_substitution_2,axiom, % 0.53/0.60 ! [A,B,C] : % 0.53/0.60 ( ( A = B % 0.53/0.60 & rs(C,A) ) % 0.53/0.60 => rs(C,B) ) ). % 0.53/0.60 % 0.53/0.60 fof(xsd_integer_substitution_1,axiom, % 0.53/0.60 ! [A,B] : % 0.53/0.60 ( ( A = B % 0.53/0.60 & xsd_integer(A) ) % 0.53/0.60 => xsd_integer(B) ) ). % 0.53/0.60 % 0.53/0.60 fof(xsd_string_substitution_1,axiom, % 0.53/0.60 ! [A,B] : % 0.53/0.60 ( ( A = B % 0.53/0.60 & xsd_string(A) ) % 0.53/0.60 => xsd_string(B) ) ). % 0.53/0.60 % 0.53/0.60 %----Thing and Nothing % 0.53/0.60 fof(axiom_0,axiom, % 0.53/0.60 ! [X] : % 0.53/0.60 ( cowlThing(X) % 0.53/0.60 & ~ cowlNothing(X) ) ). % 0.53/0.60 % 0.53/0.60 %----String and Integer disjoint % 0.53/0.60 fof(axiom_1,axiom, % 0.53/0.60 ! [X] : % 0.53/0.60 ( xsd_string(X) % 0.53/0.60 <=> ~ xsd_integer(X) ) ). % 0.53/0.60 % 0.53/0.60 %----Equality cUnsatisfiable % 0.53/0.60 fof(axiom_2,axiom, % 0.53/0.60 ! [X] : % 0.53/0.60 ( cUnsatisfiable(X) % 0.53/0.60 <=> ( ! [Y] : % 0.53/0.60 ( rr(X,Y) % 0.53/0.60 => cd(Y) ) % 0.53/0.60 & ! [Y] : % 0.53/0.60 ( rr(X,Y) % 0.53/0.60 => ( ~ ? [Z0,Z1] : % 0.53/0.60 ( rs(Y,Z0) % 0.53/0.60 & rs(Y,Z1) % 0.53/0.60 & Z0 != Z1 ) % 0.53/0.60 | cc(Y) ) ) % 0.53/0.60 & ? [Y] : % 0.53/0.60 ( rr(X,Y) % 0.53/0.60 & ~ ! [Z0,Z1] : % 0.53/0.60 ( ( rs(Y,Z0) % 0.53/0.60 & rs(Y,Z1) ) % 0.53/0.60 => Z0 = Z1 ) ) ) ) ). % 0.53/0.60 % 0.55/0.60 %----Super cc % 0.55/0.60 fof(axiom_3,axiom, % 0.55/0.60 ! [X] : % 0.55/0.60 ( cc(X) % 0.55/0.60 => ~ cd(X) ) ). % 0.55/0.60 % 0.55/0.60 %----i2003_11_14_17_20_36582 % 0.55/0.60 fof(axiom_4,axiom, % 0.55/0.60 cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_20_36582) ). % 0.55/0.60 % 0.55/0.60 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % 0.55/0.60 %------------------------------------------- % 0.55/0.60 % Proof found % 0.55/0.60 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark % 0.55/0.60 % SZS output start Proof % 0.55/0.60 %ClaNum:41(EqnAxiom:20) % 0.55/0.60 %VarNum:156(SingletonVarNum:54) % 0.55/0.60 %MaxLitNum:7 % 0.55/0.60 %MaxfuncDepth:1 % 0.55/0.60 %SharedTerms:2 % 0.55/0.60 [21]P1(a1) % 0.55/0.60 [22]~P2(x221) % 0.55/0.60 [23]P8(x231)+P5(x231) % 0.55/0.60 [24]~P4(x241)+~P3(x241) % 0.55/0.60 [25]~P8(x251)+~P5(x251) % 0.55/0.60 [26]~P1(x261)+~E(f2(x261),f3(x261)) % 0.55/0.60 [27]~P1(x271)+P6(x271,f4(x271)) % 0.55/0.60 [28]~P1(x281)+P7(f4(x281),f3(x281)) % 0.55/0.60 [29]~P1(x291)+P7(f4(x291),f2(x291)) % 0.55/0.60 [30]~P6(x302,x301)+P4(x301)+~P1(x302) % 0.55/0.60 [31]~P6(x314,x313)+~P7(x313,x312)+~P7(x313,x311)+E(x311,x312)+P3(x313)+~P1(x314) % 0.55/0.60 [32]~P7(x324,x322)+~P7(x324,x321)+E(x321,x322)+~P6(x323,x324)+P1(x323)+~E(f5(x323),f6(x323))+~P4(f7(x323)) % 0.55/0.60 [33]~P7(x334,x332)+~P7(x334,x331)+E(x331,x332)+~P6(x333,x334)+P1(x333)+~P3(f8(x333))+~P4(f7(x333)) % 0.55/0.60 [34]~P7(x344,x342)+~P7(x344,x341)+E(x341,x342)+~P6(x343,x344)+P1(x343)+P6(x343,f7(x343))+~E(f5(x343),f6(x343)) % 0.55/0.60 [35]~P7(x354,x352)+~P7(x354,x351)+E(x351,x352)+~P6(x353,x354)+P1(x353)+P6(x353,f7(x353))+~P3(f8(x353)) % 0.55/0.60 [36]~P7(x364,x362)+~P7(x364,x361)+E(x361,x362)+~P6(x363,x364)+P1(x363)+P6(x363,f8(x363))+~P4(f7(x363)) % 0.55/0.60 [37]~P7(x374,x372)+~P7(x374,x371)+E(x371,x372)+~P6(x373,x374)+P1(x373)+P6(x373,f7(x373))+P6(x373,f8(x373)) % 0.55/0.60 [38]~P7(x384,x382)+~P7(x384,x381)+E(x381,x382)+~P6(x383,x384)+P1(x383)+P7(f8(x383),f6(x383))+~P4(f7(x383)) % 0.55/0.60 [39]~P7(x394,x392)+~P7(x394,x391)+E(x391,x392)+~P6(x393,x394)+P1(x393)+P7(f8(x393),f5(x393))+~P4(f7(x393)) % 0.55/0.60 [40]~P7(x404,x402)+~P7(x404,x401)+E(x401,x402)+~P6(x403,x404)+P1(x403)+P6(x403,f7(x403))+P7(f8(x403),f6(x403)) % 0.55/0.60 [41]~P7(x414,x412)+~P7(x414,x411)+E(x411,x412)+~P6(x413,x414)+P1(x413)+P6(x413,f7(x413))+P7(f8(x413),f5(x413)) % 0.55/0.60 %EqnAxiom % 0.55/0.60 [1]E(x11,x11) % 0.55/0.60 [2]E(x22,x21)+~E(x21,x22) % 0.55/0.60 [3]E(x31,x33)+~E(x31,x32)+~E(x32,x33) % 0.55/0.60 [4]~E(x41,x42)+E(f2(x41),f2(x42)) % 0.55/0.60 [5]~E(x51,x52)+E(f3(x51),f3(x52)) % 0.55/0.60 [6]~E(x61,x62)+E(f4(x61),f4(x62)) % 0.55/0.60 [7]~E(x71,x72)+E(f7(x71),f7(x72)) % 0.55/0.60 [8]~E(x81,x82)+E(f8(x81),f8(x82)) % 0.55/0.60 [9]~E(x91,x92)+E(f6(x91),f6(x92)) % 0.55/0.60 [10]~E(x101,x102)+E(f5(x101),f5(x102)) % 0.55/0.60 [11]~P1(x111)+P1(x112)+~E(x111,x112) % 0.55/0.60 [12]~P2(x121)+P2(x122)+~E(x121,x122) % 0.55/0.60 [13]~P5(x131)+P5(x132)+~E(x131,x132) % 0.55/0.60 [14]~P8(x141)+P8(x142)+~E(x141,x142) % 0.55/0.60 [15]~P3(x151)+P3(x152)+~E(x151,x152) % 0.55/0.60 [16]~P4(x161)+P4(x162)+~E(x161,x162) % 0.55/0.60 [17]P7(x172,x173)+~E(x171,x172)+~P7(x171,x173) % 0.55/0.60 [18]P7(x183,x182)+~E(x181,x182)+~P7(x183,x181) % 0.55/0.60 [19]P6(x192,x193)+~E(x191,x192)+~P6(x191,x193) % 0.55/0.60 [20]P6(x203,x202)+~E(x201,x202)+~P6(x203,x201) % 0.55/0.60 % 0.55/0.60 %------------------------------------------- % 0.55/0.60 cnf(47,plain, % 0.55/0.60 (~E(a1,x471)+P6(x471,f4(x471))), % 0.55/0.60 inference(scs_inference,[],[21,27,11])). % 0.55/0.60 cnf(48,plain, % 0.55/0.60 (P6(a1,f4(a1))), % 0.55/0.60 inference(equality_inference,[],[47])). % 0.55/0.60 cnf(53,plain, % 0.55/0.60 (~E(a1,x531)+~E(f2(x531),f3(x531))), % 0.55/0.60 inference(scs_inference,[],[21,26,11])). % 0.55/0.60 cnf(54,plain, % 0.55/0.60 (~E(a1,x541)+P7(f4(x541),f3(x541))), % 0.55/0.60 inference(scs_inference,[],[21,28,11])). % 0.55/0.60 cnf(55,plain, % 0.55/0.60 (P7(f4(a1),f3(a1))), % 0.55/0.60 inference(equality_inference,[],[54])). % 0.55/0.60 cnf(60,plain, % 0.55/0.60 (~E(a1,x601)+P7(f4(x601),f2(x601))), % 0.55/0.60 inference(scs_inference,[],[21,29,11])). % 0.55/0.60 cnf(61,plain, % 0.55/0.60 (P7(f4(a1),f2(a1))), % 0.55/0.60 inference(equality_inference,[],[60])). % 0.55/0.60 cnf(72,plain, % 0.55/0.60 (~E(f3(x721),f2(x721))+~E(a1,x721)), % 0.55/0.60 inference(scs_inference,[],[53,2])). % 0.55/0.60 cnf(73,plain, % 0.55/0.60 (P3(f4(a1))), % 0.55/0.60 inference(scs_inference,[],[21,48,61,55,72,31])). % 0.55/0.60 cnf(76,plain, % 0.55/0.60 ($false), % 0.55/0.60 inference(scs_inference,[],[48,73,21,24,30]), % 0.55/0.60 ['proof']). % 0.55/0.60 % SZS output end Proof % 0.55/0.60 % Total time :0.030000s %------------------------------------------------------------------------------